Artigo Revisado por pares

Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters

1991; Wiley; Volume: 108; Issue: 1-6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1439-0388.1991.tb00183.x

ISSN

1439-0388

Autores

Ming Wei, Hanno Steen, J. H. J. van der Werf, E.W. Brascamp,

Tópico(s)

Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Resumo

Journal of Animal Breeding and GeneticsVolume 108, Issue 1-6 p. 253-261 Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters I Variances and covariances under the one-locus model M. Wei, Corresponding Author M. Wei Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorH. A. M. Van der Steen, Corresponding Author H. A. M. Van der Steen Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorJ.H.J. Van der Werf, Corresponding Author J.H.J. Van der Werf Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorE. W. Brascamp, Corresponding Author E. W. Brascamp Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author M. Wei, Corresponding Author M. Wei Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorH. A. M. Van der Steen, Corresponding Author H. A. M. Van der Steen Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorJ.H.J. Van der Werf, Corresponding Author J.H.J. Van der Werf Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorE. W. Brascamp, Corresponding Author E. W. Brascamp Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Pig Improvement Company Ltd., Fyfield Wick, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5NA, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author First published: January‐December 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.1991.tb00183.xCitations: 21AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Bassett, J. W.; Shelton, M., 1966: Crossbreeding influence on heritability estimates. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 877. Bell, A. E., 1982: Selection for heterosis-results with laboratory and domestic animal. Proc. 2nd World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 6, 206–227. Biswas, D. K.; Chapman, A. B.; First, N. L.; Self, H.L., 1971: Intrapopulation versus reciprocal recurrent selection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 840–848. Brown, W. P.; Bell, A.E., 1980: An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response. Genetics 94, 477–496. Griffing, B., 1960: Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on the individual phenotype. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 307–343. Griffing, B., 1962: Prediction formulae for general combining ability selection methods utilizing one or two random-mating populations. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15, 650–665. Grossman, M.; Fernando, R. L., 1989: Covariance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci in a population in disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77, 311–319. Hale, R. W.; Clayton, G. A., 1965: A diallel crossing experiment with two breeds of laying fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 6, 153–174. Koger, M.; Jilek, A. F.; Burns, W. C.; Crockett, J. R., 1975: Sire effects for specific combining ability in purebred and crossbred cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 230–234. Krause, E.; Yamada, Y.; Bell, A. E., 1965: Genetic parameters in two populations of chickens under reciprocal recurrent selection. Br. Poult. Sci. 6, 197–206. Louca, A.; Robison, O. W., 1967: Components of variance and covariance in purebred and crossbred swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 267–273. McLaren, D. G.; Buchanan, D. S.; Hintz, R. L., 1985. Sire ranking based upon purebred versus crossbred progeny performance in Swine. J. Anim. Sci. 60, 902–912. McNew, R. W.; Bell, A. E., 1971: The nature of the purebred-crossbred genetic covariance. Genet. Res. camb. 18, 1–7. Miquel, C.; Cartwright, T. C., 1963: Comparison of heritabilities in crossbred and purebred cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 821. Orozco, F.; Bell, A. E., 1974: Reciprocal recurrent selection compared to within-strain selection for increasing rate of egg lay of Tribolium under optimal and stress conditions. Genetics 77, 143–161. Orozco, F.; Campo, J. L., 1975: A comparison of purebred and crossbred genetic parameters in layers. World's Poult. Sci. J. 31, 149–153. Pirchner, F., 1974: Genetic correlations between pure-line and cross-line performance in poultry. Proc. 23rd Nat. Poultry Breeders' Roundtable. May 2–3, 1974. Kansas City, Missouri. pp. 202–230. Pirchner, F.; Von Krosigk, C. M., 1973: Genetic parameters of cross- and pure-bred poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 14, 193–202. Pirchner, F.; Mergl, R., 1977: Overdominance as cause for heterosis in poultry. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 94, 151–158. Salah, E.; Galal, E.; Hazel, L. N.; Sidwell, G. M.; Terrill, C. E., 1969: Correlation between purebred and crossbred half-sibs in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 30, 475–480. Sellier, P., 1982: Selection populations for use in crossbreeding. Proc. 2nd World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. in Madrid. 6, 15–49. Standal, N., 1968: Studies on breeding and selection schemes in pigs. I. Selection on performance of purebred versus crossbred progeny. Acta Agric. Scand. 18, 222–232. Stanislaw, C. M.; Omtvedt, I. T.; Willham, R. L.; Whatley, Jr, J. A., 1967: A study of some genetic parameters in purebred and crossbred populations of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 16–20. Stuber, C. W.; Cockerham, C. C., 1966: Gene effects and variances in hybrid populations. Genetics 54, 1279–1286. Taran, M.; Gabriel, E.; Moses, E.; Soller, M., 1971: Performance of purebred and crossbred progeny of White Leghorn and New Hampshire sires. Br. Poult. Sci. 13, 331–339. Van der Werf, J. H. J., 1990: Models to estimate genetic parameters in crossbred dairy cattle populations under selection. Doctoral Thesis, Wageningen Agr. Univer., Wageningen, The Netherlands. Vinson, W. E.; Eisen, E. J.; Robison, O. W., 1969: Predicted response to selection for crossbred performance in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 725–733. Wei, M.; Van der Steen, H. A. M., 1991: Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 59, 281–298. Wong, W. C.; Boylan, W. J., 1970: Intrapopulation selection and correlated response in crossbreds of Tribolium Castaneum. Genetics 64, 69–78. Wong, W. C.; Boylan, W. J.; Rempel, W. E., 1971: Purebred versus crossbred performance as a basis of selection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 605–610. Citing Literature Volume108, Issue1-6January‐December 1991Pages 253-261 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)