Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Emergent vs urgent appendectomy in children: a study of outcomes

2005; Elsevier BV; Volume: 40; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.005

1531-5037

Michael Taylor, Sherif Emil, Nam Nguyen, Fombe Ndiforchu,

Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders

Emergent appendectomy (EA) in children is still considered surgical dogma and continues to be recommended as a standard of care. This study examined whether emergent operation has any outcome advantages over urgent operation.The charts of children treated for appendicitis during a recent 28-month period at 2 children's hospitals, where appendectomies are not performed between midnight and 7 am, were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent EA (within 8 hours of presentation) vs those who underwent urgent appendectomy (UA, after 8 hours).Three hundred sixty-five children met the criteria for the study. One hundred sixty-one (44%) were in the EA group (5.3 +/- 2.1 hours), and 204 (56%) were in the UA group (16.8 +/- 9.7 hours). The incidence of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis was significantly higher in the EA group (47% vs 36%, P = .04). There were no significant differences between EA and UA in postoperative outcomes, including readmissions (3.7% vs 1.0%, P = .08), wound infections (0.6% vs 2.4%, P = .17), or postoperative abscesses (1.9% vs 1.5%, P = .77). There were no significant differences in average hospital stay or average hospital charges between EA and UA (3.2 days for both, 14,775 dollars vs 14,850 dollars), respectively.Emergent appendectomy in children has no advantages over UA with respect to gangrene and perforation rates, readmissions, postoperative complications, hospital stay, or hospital charges. Performance of a UA at a time convenient to the surgeon should be considered within the standard of care.