Hsp70-RAP46 interaction in downregulation of DNA binding by glucocorticoid receptor
2000; Springer Nature; Volume: 19; Issue: 23 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/emboj/19.23.6508
ISSN1460-2075
Autores Tópico(s)Computational Drug Discovery Methods
ResumoArticle1 December 2000free access Hsp70–RAP46 interaction in downregulation of DNA binding by glucocorticoid receptor Jean Schneikert Jean Schneikert Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Susanne Hübner Susanne Hübner Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Gernot Langer Gernot Langer Schering AG, Enabling Technologies, D-13342 Berlin, Germany Search for more papers by this author Thomas Petri Thomas Petri Schering AG, Enabling Technologies, D-13342 Berlin, Germany Search for more papers by this author Marja Jäättelä Marja Jäättelä Apoptosis Laboratory, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Search for more papers by this author Jennifer Reed Jennifer Reed Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Department of Pathochemistry, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Andrew C.B. Cato Corresponding Author Andrew C.B. Cato Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Jean Schneikert Jean Schneikert Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Susanne Hübner Susanne Hübner Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Gernot Langer Gernot Langer Schering AG, Enabling Technologies, D-13342 Berlin, Germany Search for more papers by this author Thomas Petri Thomas Petri Schering AG, Enabling Technologies, D-13342 Berlin, Germany Search for more papers by this author Marja Jäättelä Marja Jäättelä Apoptosis Laboratory, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Search for more papers by this author Jennifer Reed Jennifer Reed Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Department of Pathochemistry, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Andrew C.B. Cato Corresponding Author Andrew C.B. Cato Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Search for more papers by this author Author Information Jean Schneikert1, Susanne Hübner1, Gernot Langer2, Thomas Petri2, Marja Jäättelä3, Jennifer Reed4 and Andrew C.B. Cato 1 1Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, PO Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany 2Schering AG, Enabling Technologies, D-13342 Berlin, Germany 3Apoptosis Laboratory, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Department of Pathochemistry, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2000)19:6508-6516https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.23.6508 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info Receptor-associating protein 46 (RAP46) is a cochaperone that regulates the transactivation function of several steroid receptors. It is transported into the nucleus by a liganded glucocorticoid receptor where it downregulates DNA binding and transactivation by this receptor. The N- and C-termini of RAP46 are both implicated in its negative regulatory function. In metabolic labelling experiments, we have shown that the N-terminus of RAP46 is modified by phosphorylation, but this does not contribute to the downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor activity. However, deletion of a sequence that binds 70 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70) and the constitutive isoform of Hsp70 (Hsc70) at the C-terminus of RAP46 abrogated its negative regulatory action. Surface plasmon resonance studies showed that RAP46 binds the glucocorticoid receptor only when it has interacted with Hsp70/Hsc70, and confocal immunofluorescence analyses revealed a nuclear transport of Hsp70/Hsc70 by the liganded receptor. Together these findings demonstrate an important contribution of Hsp70/Hsc70 in the binding of RAP46 to the glucocorticoid receptor and suggest a role for this molecular chaperone in the RAP46-mediated downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor activity. Introduction Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and other members of the nuclear receptor family reside in the cytoplasm of target cells in an inactive complex with the molecular chaperones and cochaperones 90 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90), Hsp70, p48 (Hip), p60/Hop, p23, FKBP52, FKBP54 and cyclophilin 40 (for review see Pratt and Toft, 1997). Molecular chaperones and cochaperones are defined as a group of unrelated proteins that mediate the correct assembly of other proteins but are not themselves components of the final functional structure (Anfinsen, 1973). These proteins are therefore thought to generate the correct folding for hormone binding through their association with steroid receptors (Bresnick et al., 1989; Smith and Toft, 1993; Bohen et al., 1995). Molecular chaperones interact with the GR in an ordered fashion, involving an initial binding by Hsp70 and its cochaperones, followed by two molecules of Hsp90 (for reviews see Dittmar and Pratt, 1997; Frydman and Höhfeld, 1997; Buchner, 1999). An intermediate complex is formed, with the scaffold protein Hsp70 and Hsp90 organizing protein (Hop) holding Hsp70 and Hsp90 onto the receptor. Later, Hsp70 is reported to dissociate from the complex, allowing p23 and immunophilins to interact in order to generate a competent receptor for hormone binding and further translocation into the nucleus. While these processes are generally accepted as essential steps in the maturation of the GR, it is important to note that they were mainly deduced from in vitro assembly assays. Recently, the individual roles or requirements of the chaperone molecules in the maturation of steroid receptors have been questioned and the overall function of the molecular chaperones in the action of steroid receptors is being re-evaluated (Ylikomi et al., 1998; Morishima et al., 2000; Rajapandi et al., 2000). Biochemical and genetic studies have clearly shown that Hsp90, p23 and cyclophilin 40 are required for hormone-dependent activation of the GR (Picard et al., 1990; Duina et al., 1996; Freeman et al., 2000). Further experiments have even revealed that in addition to their role in the maturation of steroid receptors in the cytoplasm, they may also regulate the action of these receptors distal to hormone binding (Diehl and Schmidt, 1993; Srinivasan et al., 1994; Kang et al., 1999). We have recently reported that the cochaperone RAP46 (also known as the M isoform of Bcl-2-associated athanogene 1, BAG-1M) is transported into the nucleus by the liganded GR, where it downregulates DNA binding by this receptor (Schneikert et al., 1999). RAP46 was originally identified as a protein that associates with the GR and other steroid receptors (Zeiner and Gehring, 1995). It was found to be closely related to BAG-1, an interaction partner of the anti-apoptotic factor Bcl2 (Takayama et al., 1995). At present, this protein exists as a family of at least three members (BAG-1L, BAG-1M/RAP46 and BAG-1S) with divergent N-terminal but conserved C-terminal regions (Packham et al., 1997; Takayama et al., 1998; Yang et al., 1998). The BAG-1 proteins bind to the ATPase domain of Hsp70 and the constitutive isoform of Hsp70 (Hsc70) through their conserved C-terminal sequences (Zeiner et al., 1997; Bimston et al., 1998; Takayama et al., 1998) and modulate the chaperone activity of these proteins (Höhfeld and Jentsch, 1997; Takayama et al., 1997; Bimston et al., 1998; Nollen et al., 2000). It was therefore suggested that they would interfere with the hormone binding properties of steroid receptors; indeed effects of BAG-1 on hormone binding by the GR have been reported. BAG-1S at stoichiometric, but not at substoichiometric levels to Hsp70/Hsc70 inhibits hormone binding to the GR (Kanelakis et al., 1999). Other reported effects of BAG-1 proteins on nuclear receptors range from BAG-1S-mediated inhibition of transactivation and DNA binding by retinoic acid (RAR/RXR) heterodimeric receptors (Liu et al., 1998) to BAG-1L-mediated enhancement of the transactivation function of the androgen receptor (Froesch et al., 1998). The mechanisms involved in these regulatory pathways of BAG-1 have not yet been elucidated, but studies on the inhibition of GR action by RAP46 have identified both the N- and C-terminal sequences as essential regulatory domains (Schneikert et al., 1999). Here we show that the N-terminus of RAP46 is a site for phosphorylation. Exchanging the N-terminal serine residues for non-phosphorylatable amino acids inhibited phosphorylation but did not affect the ability of RAP46 to downregulate DNA binding or transactivation by the GR. Deletion of the last C-47 amino acids with which RAP46 binds to Hsp70/Hsc70 had no effect on phosphorylation but abolished RAP46-mediated repression of the action of the GR. In surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies, we showed that Hsp70 binds the GR in the absence as well as in the presence of hormone and that RAP46 interacts with the GR after the receptor had bound Hsp70/Hsc70. Together these results demonstrate a crucial role of the molecular chaperone Hsp70/Hsc70 in the negative regulation of GR activity by RAP46. Results The N-terminus of RAP46 is phosphorylated The N-terminus of RAP46 has been shown to be important for downregulating DNA binding and subsequent transactivation functions of the GR (Schneikert et al., 1999). This region contains several serine and threonine residues as well as a putative consensus sequence for creatine kinase 2 (Takayama et al., 1998), implicating phosphorylation in the action of RAP46. In a metabolic labelling experiment with [32P]orthophosphate, we determined that RAP46 was mainly phosphorylated at its N-terminal sequence but phosphorylation was not required for the negative regulation of GR action. Inhibition of phosphorylation by olomoucine, a cyclin-dependent protein kinase inhibitor (Vesely et al., 1994), had no effect on RAP46-mediated inhibition of DNA binding by the GR (results not shown). In a more direct experiment, all nine phosphorylatable serine residues in the first 70 amino acids of RAP46 were mutated into amino acids that can not be modified (e.g. alanine, leucine, lysine and asparagine) (Figure 1A). These non-phosphorylatable amino acids were chosen arbitrarily to avoid cross-hybridization of the oligonucleotides used in the mutagenesis with the highly repetitive N-terminal region of the RAP46 gene. This massive mutation drastically altered the structure of the protein as determined by circular dichroism measurements in which bacterially purified glutathione S-transferase (GST)– RAP46mtSer and GST–RAP46 (Figure 1B) were compared. Application of the standard Chou–Fasman or Robson folding algorithms to critical areas of the proteins showed that the mutations increased α-helical tendency and disrupted favourable turn configurations within the wild-type protein. The results of the secondary structure are consistent with this prediction (Table I). Note that α-helices seemed to be produced in the mutant protein at the expense of turns and β-sheets. The extent of helix increase is therefore greater than would be expected from the folding algorithm and would thus have far-reaching effects on the protein. Figure 1.Mutation of the serine residues at the N-terminus of RAP46 does not abolish the inhibitory effect of RAP46 on DNA binding by the GR. (A) The sequences of the first 70 amino acids of the wild-type and the N-terminal serine mutant of RAP46 are illustrated. The amino acids exchanged are indicated by boxes. (B) Mutation of the serine residues at the N-terminus of RAP46 alters the secondary structure of the protein. Purified, bacterially produced fusion proteins GST–RAP46 and GST–RAP46mtSer were subjected to circular dichroism measurements. (C) Mutation of the N-terminal serine residues does not alter the negative effect of RAP46 on DNA binding by the GR. A hundred thousand COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with 0.9 μg of either an empty expression vector (vector) or an expression vector encoding glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and 0.9 μg of expression vectors encoding HA-tagged RAP46 or the mutant RAP46mtSer. One half of the transfected cells was used for EMSA and the other half was metabolically labelled with [32P]orthophosphate for 4 h and immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody. The immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE and exposed to autoradiography (RAP46 phosphorylation) or immunoblotted using antibodies recognizing either the GR (GR immunoblot) or RAP46 as well as RAP46mtSer (RAP46 immunoblot). (D) Surfaces with an average of 2000 resonance units (RU) immobilized GST–RAP46 fusion proteins were obtained by covalent immobilization of an anti-GST antibody with the help of a standard amine coupling protocol, followed by capture of the different fusion proteins through antibody–antigen interaction. Injection of Hsp70 over the surface resulted in a strong interaction signal by 100 ng GST–RAP46 (1), whereas a decrease in the interaction signal was obtained when 100 ng GST–RAP46mtSer (2) were used for capture. No interaction was detected with 100 ng GST–RAP46dC47 (3). Download figure Download PowerPoint Table 1. Average secondary structure content (%) of wild-type RAP46 and the multiple serine-substituted mutant (RAP46mutSer) as calculated from the far-UV CD spectra (see Materials and methods) Secondary structure estimation Wild-type RAP46 RAP46mtSer α-helix 21 34 β-sheet 27 9 Turn 9 32 Polyproline helix 15 15 Other structures 8 19 The mutations were, however, effective in destroying the site(s) of phosphorylation, as demonstrated in an in vivo phosphorylation assay (Figure 1C, compare lanes 3 and 4 in RAP46 phosphorylation panel), but they did not destroy the ability of RAP46mtSer to inhibit DNA binding by the GR, although this effect was slightly reduced [Figure 1C, compare lanes 3 and 4 in the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) panel]. The mutations also did not destroy the binding of RAP46 to Hsp70. In SPR studies in which GST–RAP46, GST–RAP46mtSer and GST–RAP46dC47 were captured onto a carboxymethyl (CM) sensor chip by an anti-GST antibody and Hsp70 was passed over the chip, Hsp70 bound RAP46 and RAP46mtSer, although its affinity to RAP46Ser was slightly reduced. As a control, RAP46dC47 lacking the Hsp70/Hsc70 binding site did not interact with Hsp70 (Figure 1D). Together, these findings demonstrate that inhibition of N-terminal phosphorylation of RAP46 does not abolish the ability of this protein to downregulate DNA binding by the GR or to bind Hsp70. As deletion of the Hsp70/Hsc70 binding site inhibited the interaction of RAP46 with Hsp70, we investigated how this would affect the action of the GR. The C-terminus of RAP46 is required for downregulating GR action In cotransfection experiments, RAP46 inhibited DNA binding by the GR, as we have previously reported (Schneikert et al., 1999), but not the mutant lacking the last 47 C-terminal amino acids (Figure 2, EMSA panel, compare lanes 3 and 4). DNA binding by this mutant receptor even seemed enhanced, most probably due to the high level of receptor in the cellular extract used for the assay. The inability of the C-terminal mutant of RAP46 to inhibit DNA binding by the receptor was also reflected in its inability to repress transactivation (Figure 2, transactivation panel, compare lanes 3 and 4). However both the wild-type and mutant RAP46 were phosphorylated to an identical extent, which provides further support to the notion that events at the C-terminus and not phosphorylation at the N-terminus contribute to the downregulation of GR activity by RAP46. Figure 2.The Hsp70 binding domain is essential for RAP46-mediated downregulation of DNA binding by the GR. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with 0.2 μg of GR-responsive MMTV-luciferase (pGL3MMTV) indicator gene and 10 ng of an internal control encoding the renilla luciferase under the control of the ubiquitin promoter. In addition, 0.9 μg of either an empty expression vector (vector) or an expression vector encoding glucocorticoid receptor (GR), or the mutant RAP46dC47 were cotransfected. Both RAP46 proteins were tagged with HA. The transfected cells were either left untreated or were metabolically labelled with [32P]orthophosphate for 4 h. Whole-cell extracts were prepared for luciferase activity measurements (transactivation) or for EMSA and SDS–PAGE. In the latter case, the gels were immunoblotted using antibodies recognizing either the GR (GR immunoblot) or the HA tag on RAP46 or RAP46dC47 (RAP46 immunoblot). Immunoprecipitation with an anti-HA antibody was carried out on the cellular extracts from the metabolically labelled cells, followed by SDS–PAGE and autoradiography. The relative level of activation of the luciferase indicator plasmid in the transactivation assay was derived from the ratios of firefly over renilla luciferase activities obtained in three different experiments. For transactivation assays, dexamethasone (100 nM) was added to the cells immediately after transfection. For EMSA, the hormone was added to the reaction mixture before incubation of the cellular extracts with the radioactive DNA probe. Download figure Download PowerPoint Since the last 47 C-terminal amino acids of RAP46 have already been described as necessary for interaction with Hsp70/Hsc70 (Takayama et al., 1997; also our results in Figure 1D), our finding that its deletion prevented RAP46 from inhibiting DNA binding by the GR suggests an additional function for this region of RAP46. Hsp70: an adaptor protein for the interaction of RAP46 with the GR To determine a possible link between Hsp70/Hsc70 binding and inhibition of GR activity by RAP46, we investigated whether Hsp70/Hsc70 is required for RAP46 to bind to the GR. With the use of SPR measurements, we evaluated the interaction between recombinant purified Hsp70 and bacterially purified GST–RAP46 with human GR prepared from crude baculovirus extracts. We immobilized GR tagged with His6 residues at its N-terminus onto the surface of a nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) sensor chip in the absence and presence of hormone, and passed Hsp70 or GST–RAP46 over it. A typical sensogram with increasing concentrations of Hsp70 and the chip-coupled GR unambiguously demonstrated a dose-dependent hGR–Hsp70 interaction (Figure 3A), but no binding was detected with extracts from mock-transfected crude baculovirus extracts (data not shown). We could also show that the interaction kinetic is not drastically affected by hormone, although our receptor preparation bound hormone with Kd = 11.4 ± 5.5 nM and possessed an active receptor content of 0.30 ± 0.15 pmol/mg protein (Figure 3B). Interestingly, GST alone or the bacterially purified GST–RAP46 did not bind the GR (results not shown). Binding of RAP46 to the GR only occurred when Hsp70 was first allowed to interact with the receptor, followed by the addition of RAP46 in a sequential order (Figure 3C). When RAP46 was first added to the immobilized GR followed by Hsp70, only the binding of Hsp70 to the GR was observed (results not shown). This indicates that Hsp70 serves as an adaptor for the interaction of RAP46 with the GR. Figure 3.Hsp70 binds to the GR in the absence or presence of hormone and its binding is required for the interaction of RAP46 with GR in SPR. (A) Sensograms showing injections of Hsp70 at 100 (1), 50 (2), 25 (3), 12.5 (4) and 5 ng/μl (5) with 1500 RU His-tagged GR produced in baculovirus coupled to the surface of a NTA chip. A dose-dependent increase in resonance units (Response, RU) can be seen. (B) SPR signals obtained when 100 ng of Hsp70 were injected in the absence (1) or presence (2) of 10−7 M dexamethasone and 1500 RU His-tagged GR coupled to the NTA chip. A minor decrease in the interaction is observed in the presence of dexamethasone. (C) The consecutive addition of 100 ng RAP46 to a preformed GR–Hsp70 complex in the absence (1) or presence (2) of 10−7 M dexamethasone resulted in an additional increase in RU, indicative of RAP46 binding. The values of the apparent rate constants for the Hsp70–GR interaction deduced from the experiments described in (A) were Ka = 5.4 × 102 M/s and Kd = 8.23 × 10−4/s. From these data the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant was calculated to be Kd = 1.5 × 10−6 M. All calculations were based on the assumption of monomolecular 1:1 binding characteristics, where A + B = AB. However, the apparent rate and dissociation equilibrium constants have to be seen as first approximations since a steady drift in the baseline (i.e. a time-dependent decline in GR binding; not shown) was observed. This is a well known phenomenon when working with non-covalent capturing of His-tagged proteins to the surface of a NTA sensor chip. Download figure Download PowerPoint To determine further how Hsp70 contributes to the action of RAP46, we developed a cell-free assay that allowed us to examine the effect of Hsp70 on RAP46-mediated inhibition of DNA binding by the GR. The assay used consisted of an EMSA with extracts from COS-7 cells transfected with the GR. Addition of GST–RAP46 inhibited DNA binding by the receptor, possibly by making use of endogenous Hsc70 in the extract (Figure 4A, lane 4). This inhibitory effect of RAP46 was specific as it was not observed with GST alone (lane 3) or with the C-terminal deletion mutant of RAP46 lacking the Hsp70/Hsc70 binding site (Figure 4A, lane 5). Figure 4.In vitro cell-free system for studying the effect of RAP46 on DNA binding by the GR. One hundred thousand COS-7 cells in 3.4 cm culture dishes were transiently transfected by the Fugene transfection procedure with 0.9 μg empty expression vector or with an expression vector encoding the GR. Whole-cell extracts were prepared and subjected to an EMSA using radioactively labelled GR-response element as a probe. Where indicated, different amounts of bacterially purified GST or GST fusion proteins were added to the cell extracts. The fusion proteins consisted of GST alone or GST fused to either the wild-type RAP46 sequence (GST–RAP46) or RAP46 lacking the last 47 C-terminal amino acids (GST–RAP46dC47). (A) Inhibition of DNA binding by the GR is mediated by RAP46 and not RAP46C47. EMSA was carried out with cell extracts containing the GR and 1 μg GST, GST–RAP46 or GST–RAP46dC47. (B) Hsc70 relieves RAP46-mediated inhibition of DNA binding by the GR. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with an empty expression vector (vector, lane 1), or an expression vector encoding either the GR (lanes 2–10) or an HA-tagged RAP46 (lanes 3–10). Whole-cell extracts were prepared and subjected to an EMSA using radioactively labelled GR response element as a probe. Where indicated, different amounts of purified Hsc70 were added to the whole-cell extracts. (C) Increased concentration of RAP46 downregulated DNA binding by the GR. Concentrations of GST–RAP46 ranging from 0.1 to 1000 ng was added to the cellular extract before the DNA binding reaction were carried out. (D) A RAP46–Hsc70 complex does not affect DNA binding by the GR. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with either an empty expression vector (vector, lane 1) or an expression vector encoding the GR (lanes 2–5). Whole-cell extracts were prepared and subjected to EMSA. One microgram of bacterially produced GST (lanes 2 and 3) or GST–RAP46 fusion protein (lanes 4 and 5) were added to the cell extracts before providing the hormone and the probe. Where indicated, GST and GST–RAP46 were premixed with 2 μg of purified Hsc70 before addition to the cell extracts (lanes 3 and 5). In (A–D), dexamethasone (100 nM) was added to the EMSA reaction mixture prior to incubation with the radioactive probe. Download figure Download PowerPoint The effective concentration of Hsp70/Hsc70 for the action of RAP46 was quite crucial. We estimated by western blot analyses the ratio of Hsc70 to RAP46 in the extract to be ∼10:1 (results not shown). If this ratio was drastically altered by further addition of exogenous Hsc70, repression of DNA binding by the GR was abrogated (Figure 4B, compare lanes 8–10 with lane 3). At the highest concentration, Hsc70 alone did not have any significant effect on DNA binding by the GR (results not shown). The vast excess of Hsc70 to RAP46 possibly sequestered all the available RAP46 needed for interaction with the GR–Hsc70 complex in the inhibition of DNA binding by the GR. Note the slightly higher affinity of Hsc70 for RAP46 (Kd = 500 nM; Stuart et al., 1998) compared with that of Hsp70 for the GR (Kd = 1.5 μM; see the results of our SPR studies in Figure 3A). If the concentration of GST–RAP46 was drastically increased and Hsc70 was kept constant, RAP46 still inhibited DNA binding by the GR (Figure 4C, compare lanes 5–7 with lane 2) due to the disproportionately high level of Hsc70 in the extract. If, on the other hand, RAP46 was first allowed to complex with Hsc70 before addition to the cellular extract containing the GR, no inhibition of DNA binding by the GR was observed (Figure 4D). All these findings suggest that Hsp70/Hsc70 needs to bind to the GR before RAP46 can exert its inhibitory function. As RAP46 is transported into the nucleus by the liganded GR (Schneikert et al., 1999), we would also expect Hsp70/Hsc70 to be transported into the nucleus by the liganded receptor if Hsp70/Hsc70 is necessary for RAP46 to bind the GR. In laser confocal immunofluorescence studies, the cellular localization of Hsp70 protein containing an immunotag was determined after coexpression with a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged GR in COS-7 cells. In the absence of hormone, both proteins were detected in the cytoplasm (Figure 5, panel A2). In the presence of hormone, the GR was not only translocated into the nucleus, as we have previously reported (Schneikert et al., 1999), but Hsp70 was also cotransported into the nucleus (Figure 5, panel B2). In cells transfected only with Hsp70, this protein remained in the cytoplasm in the presence as well as in the absence of dexamethasone (results not shown). Note that the entire cytoplasmic Hsp70 was not recruited into the nucleus. This is possibly due to the high amount of this protein in the transfected COS-7 cells made up of endogenous Hsc70 and Hsp70, as well as the exogenously added Hsp70. Figure 5.Confocal immunofluorescence analysis of the intracellular localization of GR and Hsp70. Five hundred thousand COS-7 cells in 10 cm culture dishes were transiently transfected by the Fugene procedure with 4 μg of expression vectors encoding GR–GFP or GR(Δ491–515)–GFP and Hsp70. The Hsp70 was tagged with a decapeptide from human testis lactate dehydrogenase. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, the cells were treated for 16 h with vehicle alone (0.1% ethanol) (–Dex) or vehicle containing 0.1 μM dexamethasone (+ Dex) before harvesting, processing and visualization with laser confocal microscopy. The green fluorescence arises from the GFP-tagged receptors, whereas the red fluorescence comes from staining of Hsp70 with a rat antibody against the lactate dehydrogenase tag followed by an anti-rat antibody labelled with rhodamine. The yellow to orange colour indicates colocalization of the receptor and Hsp70. Download figure Download PowerPoint The translocation of Hsp70 into the nucleus by the GR was, however, specific since a mutant GR lacking the hinge region was unable to perform this function. In cotransfection experiments with this mutant GR and the tagged Hsp70, the two proteins were detected in the cytoplasm in the absence of hormone (Figure 5, panel C2). In the presence of hormone, while the mutant GR was transported into the nucleus, Hsp70 remained in the cytoplasm (Figure 5, panel D2). As the hinge region of the GR is also needed for the nuclear localization of RAP46 (Schneikert et al., 1999), these results together demonstrate that Hsp70 interacts with the liganded GR and that this interaction may be necessary for the nuclear localization and the negative regulatory action of the cochaperone RAP46. Discussion In this work, we have analyzed features of RAP46 necessary for the negative regulation of DNA binding and, as a result, the transactivation function of the GR. We have shown that the N-terminus, which contributes to the regulatory action of this protein on GR action, is a target for phosphorylation. This N-terminal phosphorylation is, however, not required for the regulation of GR activity. It is sensitive to olomoucine, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent protein kinase (Vesely et al., 1994), suggesting that phosphorylation of RAP46 may occur during cell-cycle progression and may contribute to the reported cell-cycle effects of this protein (Kullmann et al., 1998). We also found out that N-terminal amino acid residues reported as necessary for RAP46 to bind directly to DNA (Zeiner et al., 1999) are not involved in the inhibition of DNA binding by the GR (J.Schneikert and A.C.B.Cato, unpublished data). Instead, deletion of the Hsp70/Hsc70 binding site at the C-terminal end of RAP46 abrogated the negative regulatory function of t
Referência(s)