Relation of gravity to elevation and rejuvenation of blocks in India
1971; American Geophysical Union; Volume: 76; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1029/jb076i002p00545
ISSN2156-2202
Autores Tópico(s)Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
ResumoJournal of Geophysical Research (1896-1977)Volume 76, Issue 2 p. 545-557 Relation of gravity to elevation and rejuvenation of blocks in India M. N. Qureshy, M. N. QureshySearch for more papers by this author M. N. Qureshy, M. N. QureshySearch for more papers by this author First published: 10 January 1971 https://doi.org/10.1029/JB076i002p00545Citations: 42AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract An analysis of free-air, Bouguer, Pratt-Hayford (D = 113.7 km), and Airy-Heiskanen (T = 30 km) anomalies visa vis elevation in India indicates that on an over-all basis isostatic equilibrium prevails in India. Regression study of Bouguer anomalies versus elevation made by grouping the data according to tectonic and geologic units shows that the Bouguer anomaly decreases rather slowly with the increase in elevation over the Himalayas, Aravallis, Nilgiris, Eastern Ghats and the Assam plateau, all of which are post-Mesozoic rejuvenated blocks of the Archaean shield. Small, and sometimes even positive regression coefficients characterize these blocks; the isostatic anomalies are found to be near zero or positive. It is concluded that the uplifting of these shield blocks has probably taken place through movement and incorporation of material from the upper mantle into the crust. References Ahmad, F., The origin and significance of the Vindhyan scarp, Proceedings of the Second Symposium of Earth Engineering, 513–525University of Roorkee, U.P., India, 1962. Andreyev, A. P., V. V. Brodovoy, V. I. Goldschmidt, Yu. V. Kuz'min, Deep tectonic subdivision of Kazakhstan from geophysical data, Int. Geol. Rev., 101, 97–107, 1968. Beloussov, V. V., Study of earth's deep interior project 'Upper mantle and its effects on development of the earth's crust,', Trans. AGU, 424, 426–428, 1961. Beloussov, V. V., Basic Problems in Geotectonics, 809, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962. Beloussov, V. V., Interrelations between the earth's crust and upper mantle, The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Geophys. Monogr., 13 Pembroke J. Hart, 698–712, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1969. Closs, H., Explosion seismic studies in western Europe, The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Geophys. Monogr., 13 Pembroke J. Hart, 178–185, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1969. Demenitskaya, R. M., N. A. Belyaevsky, The relation between the earth's crust, surface relief, and gravity field in the USSR, The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Geophys. Monogr., 13 Pembroke J. Hart, 312–319, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1969. Fermor, L. L., On the age of the Aravallis, Rec. Geol. Surv. India, 62, 391–409, 1930. Fermor, L. L., An attempt at correlation of the ancient schistose rocks of peninsular India, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 70, 324, 1936. Frolov, A. I., The gravitational field and some features of crustal structure in Antarctica, Engl. Transl., Bull. (Izv.) Acad. Sci. USSR, Geophys. Ser.10, 878–885, 1964. Gulatee, B. L., Gravity data in India, Surv. India Tech. Pap., 10, 1–95, 1956. Hales, A. L., D. I. Gough, The Gravity Survey of the Republic of South Africa Handbook, 3, Isostatic Anomalies and Crustal Structure, 355–486, Geological Survey of the Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, 1962. Heiskanen, W. A., F. A. Vening Meinesz, The Earth and Its Gravity Field, 470, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958. Heron, A. M., Geology of Central Rajputana, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 79, 37–42, 1953. Holmer, R. C., A regional gravity survey of Colorado, D. Sc. thesis, No. T-801,Colo. School Mines,1954. Jackson, W. H., L. C. Pakiser, Seismic study of crustal structure in the southern Rocky Mountains, U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 525-D, D85–D92, 1965. Kosminskaya, I. P., Y. V. Riznichenko, Seismic studies of the earth's crust in Eurasia, Research in Geophysics, 2 Hugh Odishaw, 81–122, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964. Lubimova, E. A., B. G. Polyak, Heat flow map of Eurasia, The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Geophys. Monogr., 13 Pembroke J. Hart, 82–87, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1969. Mabey, D. R., Relation between Bouguer gravity anomalies and regional topography in Nevada and the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho, U. S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Pap., 550-B, 108–111, 1966. Mahalof, A., Ralph Moberly Jr., Effects of structure on the gravity field of Wyoming, Geophysics, 335, 781–804, 1968. Marshall, C. E., Hari Narain, Regional gravity investigations in the eastern and central Commonwealth, Univ. Sydney, Dep. of Geol. Geophys., Mem., 1954/2, 101, 1954. , National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India, Annual Report, 58, 1969. Pakiser, L. C., The basalt-eclogite transformation and crustal structure in the western United States, U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 525-B, B1–B8, 1965. Qureshy, M. N., Gravimetric-isostatic studies in Colorado, J. Geophys. Res., 676, 2459–2465, 1962. Qureshy, M. N., Gravity, elevation, and isostasy in India, Nat. Geophys. Res. Inst. Bull., 12, 99–106, 1963. Qureshy, M. N., A geologic analysis of Bouguer anomaly map of peninsular India, Proc. Nat. Inst. of Sci. India, 30A5, 675–688, 1964. Qureshy, M. N., Thickening of a basalt layer as a possible cause for the uplift of the Himalayas—A suggestion based on gravity data, Tectonophysics, 72, 137–157, 1969. Radhakrishna, B. P., Mysore Plateau, its structural and physiographic evolution, Bull. Mysore Geol. Ass.3, 56, 1952. Radhakrishna, B. P., Geomorphological evolution of the Mysore Plateau, Bull. Indian Geophys. Union.3, 95–106, 1966. Smirnov, Ya. B., The relationship between the thermal field and the structure and development of the earth's crust and upper mantle, Geotectonics6, 343–352, 1968. Sollugub, V. B., N. I. Pavlenkova, D. Y. Diachkova, Physical peculiarities of the Ukranian crustal blocks, The Ninth Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Copenhagen Henry Jensen, 29–38Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen, 1967. Sollugub, V. B., Seismic crustal studies in southeastern Europe, The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Geophys. Monogr., 13 Pembroke J. Hart, 189–195, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1969. Subbotin, S. I., V. B. Sollugub, A. V. Chekunov, L. P. Livanova, Crustal investigations of the East Carpathians and adjoining regions by means of deep seismic sounding, Ninth Assembly of the Europea Seismological Commission, Copenhagen Henry Jensen, 17–27Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen, 1967. Timofeev, A. N., Crustal structure from gravimetric and seismic data, Engl. Transl., Bull. (Izv.) Acad. Sci. USSR, Geophys. Ser.10, 873–877, 1964. Vaidyanadhan, R., An outline of the geomorphic history of India south of N. latitude 18, Seminar on Geomorphological Studies in India, 1965, 121–130University of Sangar, Sangar, 1967. Vol'vaski, I. S., V. A. Rayaboi, V. I. Schreibmann, On the nature of the regional gravitational anomalies of the Bukhara-Khira Province and adjacent regions, Engl. Transl., Bull. (Izv.) Acad. Sci. USSR, Geophys. Ser.No. 5, 418–421, 1967. Vyskocil, V., I. Jakubcova, Studium der Korrelation zwischen den Schwereanomalien und Seehohen auf dem Gebiete der CSSR, Travaux de L'institut Geophysique de L'academie Tchecoslovaque des sciences, Geofysikalni Sbornik219, 87–98, 1965. Vyskocil, V., M. Koziskova, Korrelation zwischen den Schwereanomalien und Seehohen in Mittleuropa, Travaux de L'institut Geophysique de L'academie Tcescoslovaque des sciences, Geofysikalni Sbornik242, 75–80, 1966. Wadia, D. N., The Making of India, Indian Science Congress, 29th, Calcutta, 2, 3–23, 1942. Woollard, G. P., Crustal structure from gravity and seismic measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 6410, 1521–1544, 1959. Woollard, G. P., The relation of gravity anomalies to surface elevation, crustal structure, and geologyRep. 62-9, 292Univ. Wisc. Geophys. Polar Res. Center, 1962. Woollard, G. P., Gravity anomalies and the study of the crust and upper mantle, Int. Counc. Sci. Union Rev., 6, 102–111, 1964. Woollard, G. P., Regional isostatic relations in the United States, The Earth beneath the Continents, Geophys. Monogr., 10 J. S. Steinhart, T. J. Smith, 557–594, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1966. Woollard, G. P., The interrelationship of the crust, the upper mantle, and isostatic gravity anomalies in the United States, The Crust and Upper Mantle of the Pacific Area, Geophys. Monogr., 12 L. Knopoff, C. L. Drake, P. J. Hart, 312–341, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1968. Woollard, G. P., Relation of gravity to regional changes in surface elevation, Tectonophysics, 75–6, 403, 1969. Citing Literature Volume76, Issue210 January 1971Pages 545-557 This article also appears in:Mariners 6 and 7 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)