The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix
2012; Wiley; Volume: 101; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
ISSN2168-9830
Autores Tópico(s)Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
ResumoJournal of Engineering EducationVolume 101, Issue 4 p. 738-797 The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix DAVID P. CRISMOND, DAVID P. CRISMOND City College, City University of New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorROBIN S. ADAMS, ROBIN S. ADAMS Purdue UniversitySearch for more papers by this author DAVID P. CRISMOND, DAVID P. CRISMOND City College, City University of New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorROBIN S. ADAMS, ROBIN S. ADAMS Purdue UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 January 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.xCitations: 256AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Adams, J. L. (1986). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas. Reading, MA: Perseus Books. Adams, R. S. (2001). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Adams, R. S. (2002). “Understanding design iteration: Representations from an empirical study.” In D. Durling & J. Shackleton (Eds.), Common ground: Proceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference at Brunel University (pp. 1151–1161). Staffordshire University Press: UK. Adams, R. S., & Atman, C. J. (2000). Characterizing engineering student design processes: An illustration of iteration. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Session 2330. St. Louis, MO. Adams, R. S., Beltz, N., Mann, L., & Wilson, D. (2010). Exploring student differences in formulating cross-disciplinary sustainability problems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 324–338. Adams, R. S., & Fralick, B. (2010). Work in progress: A conceptions of design instrument as an assessment tool. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C.J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294. Akin, Ö. (1994). Creativity in design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 9–21. Akin, Ö., & Akin, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: Analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Design Studies, 17(4), 341–361. Akin, Ö., & Lin, C. (1996). Design protocol data and novel design decisions. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity (pp. 35–63). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Alexander, C. (1979). A timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 3(4), 2–16. Anning, A. (1997). Drawing Out Ideas: Graphicacy and young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(3), 219–239. Arbaugh, F., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Ramirez, N., Knuth, E., Kranendonk, H., & Quander, J. R. (2010). Linking research & practice: The NCTM research agenda conference report. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Archer, L. B. (1965). Systematic method for designers. London: Council of Industrial Design. Archer, L. B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies 1(1), 17–20. Association for the Promotion and Advancement of Science Education [APASE]. (1991). Engineering for children: Structures. Vancouver, Canada: APASE. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Mosborg, S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education 96(4), 359–379. Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1996). Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? Research in Engineering Design 8(4), 240–250. Atman, C. J., Chimka, K. M., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies 20(2), 131–152. Atman, C. J., Deibel, K. & Borgford-Parnell, J. (2009). The Process of Engineering Design: A Comparison of Three Representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Stanford, CA, August. Axton, T. R., Doverspike, D., Park, S. R., & Barrett, G. V. (1997). A model of the information-processing and cognitive ability requirements for mechanical troubleshooting. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 1(3), 245–266. Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: Two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies 30(2), 169–186. Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (1995). Structured and opportunistic processing in design: A critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43(1), 131–151. Bamberger, J. (2003). The development of intuitive musical understanding: A natural experiment. Psychology of Music 31(1), 7–36. Bamberger, J. & Schön, D. (1983). Learning as reflective conversation with materials: Notes from work in progress. Art Education 36(2), 68–73. Barlex, D. (1995). Nuffield design and technology student's book. Harlow: Longman. Barlex, D. (2000). Young foresight: Handbook for teachers and mentors. London: Software Production Enterprises. Barlex, D. (2004). PIES. Design and Technology News & Views 9, 8–9. Retrieved November 21, 2006, from http:www.tep.org.uk. Barlex, D., & Givens, N. P. (1995). The Nuffield approach to the teaching of mechanisms at key stage 3. IDATER 1995, 48–51. Barlex, D., & Wright, R. (1998). Using the internet as an information gathering tool for the design and technology curriculum. IDATER 1998, 160–168. Bartunek, J. M. (2007). Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1323–1333. Baya, V., & Leifer, L. J. (1994). A study of the information handling behavior of designers during conceptual design. Design theory and methodology-DTM1994 (pp. 153–160). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Benenson, G., & Neujahr, J. (2002). Stuff that works! Mechanisms and other systems. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. LaSalle, IL: Open Court. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology ( 2nd ed.; pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research, (3rd.; Series: (CGWEP) Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Braha, D., & Maimon, O. (1997). The design process: Properties, paradigms, and structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 27(2), 146–166. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. New York: Viking. Brereton, M. F., Cannon, D. M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity (pp. 319–341). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Broadbent, G. (1984). The development of design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 337–346). Chichester, UK: Wiley. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins. Bryson, M., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., & Joram, E. (1991). Going beyond the problem as given: Problem solving in expert and novice writers. In R. J. S. P. A. Frensch (Ed.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools of thought: How the politics of literacy shape thinking in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bucciarelli, L. (1984). Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies 5(3), 185–190. Bucciarelli, L. (2002). Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies 23(3), 219–231. Bucciarelli, L. (2003). Engineering Philosophy, 1-75. Delft, The Netherlands: DUP Satellite Press. Buchanan, R. (1995). Wicked problems in design thinking. In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design: A Design Issues reader (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Burghardt, D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as a core process in technology. The Technology Teacher 63(1), 6–8. Bursic, K. M., & Atman, C. J. (1997). Information gathering: A critical step for quality in the design process. Quality Management Journal 4(4), 60–75. Bybee, R. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum. In R. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 25–35). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125(3), 367–383. Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., & Adams, R. S. (2006). Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies 27(1), 5–24. Chandresekaran, B. (1992). Design problem solving: A task analysis. In M. Green (Ed.), Knowledge aided design (pp. 25–46). London: Academic Press. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices, Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152. Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1992). Cognitive models in industrial design engineering. Design Theory and Methodology 42, 131–140. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science 14(4), 141–142. Clement, D. H., & Gullo, D. F. (1984). Effects of computer programming on young children's cognition. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6), 1051–1058. Cline, H. F., & Mandinach, E. B. (2000). The corruption of a research design: A case study of a curriculum innovation project. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook for research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 169–189). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Committee on Engineering Design. (1961). Report on engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education 51(8), 645–660. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. (2009). In L. Katehi, G. Pearson, & M. Feder (Eds.), Engineering in K-12 education. Washington DC: National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. Constable, H. (1994). A study of aspects of design and technology capability at key stage 1 and 2. IDATER 1994, 9–14. Coyle, H. P. (2001). Electromagnets teachers guide: A supplemental curriculum for middle school physical science. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt. Craig, D. L. (2001). Stalking homo faber: A comparison of research strategies for studying design behavior. In C. Eastman, M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 13–36). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Crismond, D. (1997). Investigate-and-redesign tasks as a context for learning and doing science and technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science and technology ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7), 791–820. Crismond, D. (2005). Contrasting Behaviors of Beginner Versus Informed Designers: Presentation of Evidence for a Framework of ‘Informed Designing’. Paper for Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Orlando, FL, October 20. Crismond, D. (2008). Case Studies of Diagnostic Reasoning's Role in Engineering Design. Paper for ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22–25. Crismond, D. (2011). Scaffolding strategies that integrate engineering design and scientific inquiry in project-based learning environments. In M. Barak & M. Hacker (Eds.), Fostering human development through engineering and technology education. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Crismond, D. & Adams, R. (2012). Developing Design Pedagogical Content Knowledge in K-8 Teachers: Report on an Extended Professional Development Experience. Paper presented at the 2nd P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit. Washington, DC. Crismond, D., Camp, P. J., Ryan, M., & Kolodner, J. L. (2001). Design rules of thumb—Connecting science and design. Special session 27.50. Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA. Crismond, D. P., Howland, J., & Jonassen, D. (2011). Designing with technology. In J. Howland, D. H. Jonassen, & R. M. Marra (Eds.), Meaningful learning with technology ( 4th ed.; pp. 72–90). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Crismond, D., Hynes, M., & Donahy, E. (2010). The Design Compass: A computer tool for scaffolding students' metacognition and discussions about their engineering design process. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on Using Electronic Tangibles to Promote Learning: Design and Evaluation, Palo Alto, CA, March 22–24. Crismond, D., Kolodner, J. L., Fasse, B., Gray, J., & Holbrook, J. (1999). Learning by Design's professional development and research agenda. Invited NSF Pre-Session Paper presented at the International Technology Education Association's 61th Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN. Crismond, D. & Peterie, M. (2011). Tools and materials for developing design-based reflective thinking in high school engineering students and enhancing discussions between teacher and student team. Workshop presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Vancouver, BC: June 25. Cross, N. (1992). A history of design methodology. In M. J. Vries, N. Cross, & D. P. Grant (Eds.) Design methodology and relationships with science (pp. 15–27). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Cross, N. (1999). Design research: A disciplined conversation. Design Issues 15(2), 5–10. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design ( 3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Cross, N. (2001a). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In C. Eastman, M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.) Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Cross, N. (2001b). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues 17(3), 49–55. Cross, N. & Cross, A. C. (1998). Expertise in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 10, 141–149. Dalrymple, O., Sears, D., & Evangelou, D. (2010). Evaluating the motivational and learning potential of an instructional practice for use with first year engineering students. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville. Daly, S. R., Adams, R.S., & Bodner, G. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals' experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2). Daly, S. R., Christian, J.L., Yilmaz, S., Seifer, C.M. & Gonzalez, R. (2011). Teaching Design Ideation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference, June. Daly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Cognitive heuristic use in engineering design ideation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference, June. Dauphinée D., & Martin, J. B. (2000). Breaking down the walls: Thoughts on the scholarship of integration. Academic Medicine 75(9), 881–886. Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Thompson, P., McCormack, J., Harrison, O., Trevisan, M., Gerlick, R., & Howe, S. (2011). IDEALS: A Model for Integrating Engineering Design Professional Skills Assessment and Learning Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Vancouver, CA. De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row. De Lisi, R. & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implication of Piagetian Theory for Peer Learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Derringer, P. (1996). Knowledge gets distilled in the Invention Machine. Mass High Tech 14(23), July 22. Diaz, J., & Carter, D. A. (1999). The Elements of Pop-Up: A pop-up book for aspiring paper engineers. New York: Little Simon. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies 26(5), 779–792. Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. San Francisco: Dubberly Design Office. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Hardiman, P. T. & Mestre, J. P. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertiselike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3), 307–331. Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2009). Editorial: Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46(6), 606–609. Dunsmore, K., Turns, J. & Yellin, J. M. (2011). Looking toward the real world: Student conceptions of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 100(2): 329–348. Dym, C. & Little, P. (2004). Engineering design: A project-based introduction ( 2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Eastman, C., W. Newstetter, & M. McCracken (Eds). (2001). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Educational Development Center [EDC]. (1999). Model windmill: A video case study of an extended investigation in technology and science. Watertown, MA: Educational Development Center, Inc. Egan, B. (1999). Children talking about designing: how do young children perceive the functions/uses of drawing as part of the design process? IDATER1999, 79–83. Elio, R. & Scharf, P. B. (1990). Modeling novice-to-expert shifts in problem solving strategy and knowledge organization. Cognitive Science 14(4), 579–639. Elmer, R. (2002). Meta-cognition and design and technology education. The Journal of Design and Technology Education 7(1), 19–25. Ennis, C. W. & Gyeszly, S. W. (1991). Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design approach. Research in Engineering Design 3(1), 15–22. Erickson, J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). The evolution of critical standards as students design hypermedia documents. Journal of the Learning Sciences 7(3–4), 351–386. Figueiredo, A. D. (2008). Toward an Epistemology of Engineering. In D. Goldberg & N. McCarthy (Eds.), Proceedings Workshop on Philosophy & Engineering [WPE 2008] (pp. 94–95). London: Royal Engineering Academy. Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review 87(6), 477–531. Fischer, K. W. (2006). Dynamic Cycles of Cognitive and Brain Development: Measuring Growth in Mind, Brain, and Education. In A. M. Battro & K. W. Fischer (Eds.) , The educated brain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Fischer, K. W. & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1. Theoretical models of human development ( 5th ed.) pp. 467–561. New York: Wiley. Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. A. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: Sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23(1), 117–126. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906–911. Fleer, M. (2000). An early childhood research agenda: Voices from the field. DETYA, Canberra. Flowers, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37(1), 16–55. Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. Foshay, W. R., Silber, K. H., & Steinicki, M. (2003). Writing training materials that work: How to train anyone to do anything. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Frye, E. (1997). Engineering problem solving for mathematics, science and technology education. Hanover, NJ: Trustees of Dartmouth College. Garcia, J., Sinfield, J., Yadav, A., & Adams, R. (2012). Learning through entrepreneurially oriented case-based instruction. International Journal of Engineering Education 28(2), 448–457. Garner, S. (1989). Drawing and designing: Exploration and manipulation through two-dimensional modeling. IDATER1989, 43–50. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2004a). Design in the classroom: Supporting creativity in kids. Downloaded on March 12, 2012 and viewed from 2:43–4:19 at http:designintheclassroom.comdesignProcessteachStratcreativityKids.html. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2004b). Design in the classroom: Day 2 — Identify Key Variables, MOVIE 2, 3:25–3:36. Downloaded on March 12, 2012 and viewed at http:www.designintheclassroom.comdesignTasksparachuteparTimelinetechEd2.html. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2004c). Design in the classroom: Authentic assessment. Downloaded on March 12, 2012 and viewed at http:designintheclassroom.comdesignProcessassessmentauthenticAssess.html. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2004d). Design in the classroom: Gender and design. Downloaded on March 12, 2012 and viewed at http:designintheclassroom.comdesignProcessdesignControversiesgender.html. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2004e). Design in the classroom: Developing the “seeing” of designer roles in students. Downloaded on March 12, 2012 and viewed at http:designintheclassroom.comdesignProcessdesignControversiesgender.html. Georgia Tech Research Corporation [GTRC]. (2010). Project-Based Inquiry Science: Diving into science. Armonk, NY: It's About Time, Herff Jones Educational Division. Gero, J. S. (1999). Preface. In J. S. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design. Sydney: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition. Gero, J. S. (2011). Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 108–115. Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function-behavior-structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373–391. Gil, N., Tommelein, I. D. & Beckman, S. (2004). Postponing design processes in unpredictable environments. Research in Engineering Design 15(3), 139–154. Goals Committee. (1968). Goals of engineering education: Final report of the goals committee. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Goldman, E. (2002). Chair design. TIES Magazine, 27–31. Retrieved August 17, 2006 from http:www.tiesmagazine.orgarchivessep_2002index.html. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4(2), 123–143. Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Judgment and decision research: Some history context. In W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies (pp. 3–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Goel, V. (1989). Design within information-processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, 10(1), 19–35. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design spaces. Cognitive Science 16(3), 395–429. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96(3), 606–633. Grant, D. P. (1992). Housing location for low income residents: An architectural case study of simulating conflicts of interest and generating compromise proposals. In M. J. Vries, N. Cross, & D. P. Grant (Eds.) Design methodology and relationships with science (pp. 63–101). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gregory, S. (1966). The design method. London: Butterworth. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record 111(9), 2055–2100. Gustafson, B., MacDonald, D., & Gentilini, S. (2007). Using talking and drawing to design: Elementary children collaborating with university industrial design students. Journal of Technology Education 19(1), 19–34. Hacker, M., & Burghardt, D. (2004). Technology education: Learning by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall. Harlen, W. (2001). Primary science: Taking the plunge. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Harris, J.G. (Moderator and Organizer), E.M. DeLoatch, W.R. Grogan, I.C. Peden, & J.R. Whinnery (1994). Journal of Engineering Education Roundtable: Reflections on the Grinter Report. Journal of Engineering Education 83(1), 69–94. Harrison, S., & Minneman, S. (1996). A bike in hand: A study of 3-D objects in design. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity (pp. 417–436). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hauser, J., & D. Clausing (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review 66(3), 63–73. Hawkins, D. (2002). The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature. New York: Agathon Press. Hawkins, J. (1990). Gender differences and problem-solving with novel technological objects. Invited talk, Educational Tes
Referência(s)