Voltar
Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares
BIBTEX RIS

Distinct Regulation of Internal Ribosome Entry Site-mediated Translation following Cellular Stress Is Mediated by Apoptotic Fragments of eIF4G Translation Initiation Factor Family Members eIF4GI and p97/DAP5/NAT1

2003; Elsevier BV; Volume: 278; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.m206781200

ISSN

1083-351X

Autores

Tara A. Nevins, Zdena Harder, Robert G. Korneluk, Martin Holčı́k,

Tópico(s)

RNA regulation and disease

Resumo

Many cellular stresses lead to the inhibition of protein synthesis. Despite this, some cellular mRNAs are selectively translated under these conditions. It was suggested that the presence of internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequences in the 5′-untranslated regions allow these mRNAs to be actively translated despite the overall cessation of protein synthesis. Here we tested the hypothesis that the IRES elements of genes that are involved in the control of cell survival are distinctly regulated by cellular stresses. We show that the transient conditions of cellular stress favor the translation of pro-survival IRES, while the severe apoptotic conditions support translation of pro-death IRES elements. Furthermore, activation of pro-death IRES during the etoposide-induced apoptosis is caspase-dependent and correlates with the expression of apoptotic fragments of two members of the eIF4G translation initiation factor family, p97/DAP5/NAT1 and eIF4GI. Our results suggest that the regulation of IRES translation during stress contributes to the fine-tuning of cell fate. Many cellular stresses lead to the inhibition of protein synthesis. Despite this, some cellular mRNAs are selectively translated under these conditions. It was suggested that the presence of internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequences in the 5′-untranslated regions allow these mRNAs to be actively translated despite the overall cessation of protein synthesis. Here we tested the hypothesis that the IRES elements of genes that are involved in the control of cell survival are distinctly regulated by cellular stresses. We show that the transient conditions of cellular stress favor the translation of pro-survival IRES, while the severe apoptotic conditions support translation of pro-death IRES elements. Furthermore, activation of pro-death IRES during the etoposide-induced apoptosis is caspase-dependent and correlates with the expression of apoptotic fragments of two members of the eIF4G translation initiation factor family, p97/DAP5/NAT1 and eIF4GI. Our results suggest that the regulation of IRES translation during stress contributes to the fine-tuning of cell fate. internal ribosome entry site untranslated region X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein Chinese hamster ovary z-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketon encephalomyocarditis virus galactosidase chloramphenicol acetyltransferase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay green fluorescent protein analysis of variance Many chemotherapeutic agents and irradiation induce apoptosis in human cancers. Induction of apoptosis leads to the selective cleavage of translation initiation factors that results in an inhibition of cap-dependent protein synthesis (1Clemens M.J. Bushell M. Jeffrey I.W. Pain V.M. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 603-615Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar). Despite this, resistant tumor cells arise that up-regulate proteins promoting their survival. Therefore, it is critical to identify the proteins and the mechanism promoting their preferential translation. Translational control is a final regulatory step in gene expression. Cellular mRNAs are translated by the so-called ribosome scanning mechanism (2Jackson R.J. Sonenberg N. Hershey J.W.B. Mathews M.B. Translational Control of Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY2000: 127-183Google Scholar). This mechanism involves the specific recognition of the 5′-end m7G structure by the cap-binding protein eIF4E. The eIF4E is a part of the larger cap-binding protein complex eIF4F that consists of eIF4A, eIF4G, and eIF4E. The binding of eIF4F to mRNA further recruits other initiation factors as well as the 40 S ribosomal subunit. This complex is then thought to proceed in the 3′ direction until an AUG initiation codon in a favorable context is encountered, and protein synthesis is initiated. A broad range of cellular stresses lead to the inhibition of translation. This is accomplished by (i) the phosphorylation of some initiation factors and/or their regulators (3Brostrom C.O. Brostrom M.A. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 1998; 58: 79-125Crossref PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar) or (ii) by the proteolytic cleavage of several initiation factors (1Clemens M.J. Bushell M. Jeffrey I.W. Pain V.M. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 603-615Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar). The rapid inhibition of protein synthesis is believed to function as a protective homeostatic mechanism. In this context, it is noteworthy that mRNAs encoding several oncogenes, survival factors, and proteins critically involved in apoptosis are preferentially translated by a poorly understood cap-independent mechanism under conditions of compromised translation initiation (4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar). These mRNAs contain IRES1 (internal ribosome entry sequence) elements in their respective 5′-UTR and were shown to be translated during apoptosis (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar, 6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar), cell cycle (7Pyronnet S. Pradayrol L. Sonenberg N. Mol. Cell. 2000; 5: 607-616Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (279) Google Scholar, 8Cornelis S. Bruynooghe Y. Denecker G. Van Huffel S. Tinton S. Beyaert R. Mol. Cell. 2000; 5: 597-605Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar), development (9Creancier L. Mercier P. Prats A.C. Morello D. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; 21: 1833-1840Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar), amino acid availability (10Fernandez J. Yaman I. Mishra R. Merrick W.C. Snider M.D. Lamers W.H. Hatzoglou M. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 12285-12291Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar), and endoplasmic reticulum stress (11Fernandez J. Bode B. Koromilas A. Diehl J.A. Krukovets I. Snider M.D. Hatzoglou M. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 11780-11787Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar). Cellular IRES elements are found in a limited but growing number of mRNAs (12Hellen C.U. Sarnow P. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 1593-1612Crossref PubMed Scopus (806) Google Scholar). Interestingly, they are found preferentially in the mRNAs of genes involved in the control of cellular proliferation, survival, and death (e.g. FGF2 (13Vagner S. Gensac M.C. Maret A. Bayard F. Amalric F. Prats H. Prats A.C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 35-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (289) Google Scholar), PDGF (14Bernstein J. Sella O., Le, S.Y. Elroy-Stein O. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 9356-9362Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar), VEGF (15Stein I. Itin A. Einat P. Skaliter R. Grossman Z. Keshet E. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998; 18: 3112-3119Crossref PubMed Scopus (425) Google Scholar), IGFII (16Teerink H. Voorma H.O. Thomas A.A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1995; 1264: 403-408Crossref PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar), c-Myc (17Nanbru C. Lafon I. Audigier S. Gensac M.C. Vagner S. Huez G. Prats A.C. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 32061-32066Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (210) Google Scholar), c-Jun (18Sehgal A. Briggs J. Rinehart-Kim J. Basso J. Bos T.J. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 2836-2845Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar), PITSLRE (8Cornelis S. Bruynooghe Y. Denecker G. Van Huffel S. Tinton S. Beyaert R. Mol. Cell. 2000; 5: 597-605Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar)) XIAP (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar), DAP5 (6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar), Apaf-1 (19Coldwell M.J. Mitchell S.A. Stoneley M. MacFarlane M. Willis A.E. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 899-905Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar), and bag-1 (20Coldwell M.J. deSchoolmeester M.L. Fraser G.A. Pickering B.M. Packham G. Willis A.E. Oncogene. 2001; 20: 4095-4100Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar). It was therefore suggested that IRES-mediated translation plays a critical role in the regulation of cell fate (4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar). It is not clear, however, how cellular IRES facilitate translation or how this translation mechanism is regulated. We have described previously that the IRES element of a key intrinsic inhibitor of apoptosis, XIAP, is actively translated during serum starvation and low dose γ-irradiation (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar, 21Holcik M. Yeh C. Korneluk R.G. Chow T. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 4174-4177Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar). Importantly, the IRES-mediated translation of XIAP is critical for enhanced survival of cells under acute, but transient conditions of cellular stress, thus supporting the notion that IRES-mediated translation regulates cell fate (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar). In this study we wished to investigate the XIAP IRES translation under different cellular stresses. Furthermore, we wished to test the hypothesis that the IRES elements of other cellular mRNAs that are involved in the cell survival are regulated by physiological stress. We demonstrate that XIAP IRES is active in the conditions of transient stress. In addition, we find that while transient cellular stress favors the translation of pro-survival IRES, severe apoptotic conditions support translation of pro-death IRES. Importantly, the activation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements during etoposide-induced apoptosis is caspase-dependent and correlates with the expression of apoptotic fragments of eIF4G initiation factor family members eIF4GI and p97/DAP5/NAT1. Human embryonic kidney (293T), human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), human bladder carcinoma (T24), human glioblastoma (SF539), Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), and mouse fibroblast (NIH3T3) cell lines were cultured in standard conditions in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (293T, HeLa, NIH3T3, SF539), F-12 (CHO), or McCoy's 5A (T24) medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, glutamate, and antibiotics. Transient DNA transfections were done using LipofectAMINE Plus (NIH3T3 and T24 cells) or LipofectAMINE 2000 (293T, HeLa, CHO, and SF539 cells) and the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells/ml in six-well plates and were transfected 24 h later in serum-free Opti-MEM medium (Invitrogen) with 2 μg of DNA. The transfection mixture was replaced 3 h later with fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (LipofectAMINE Plus) or left on the cells overnight (LipofectAMINE 2000). Cells were collected for analysis 24 h post-transfection. For the cellular stress experiments 293T cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells/ml in six-well plates coated with poly-d-lysine (5 μg/ml) along with transfection mixture (12 μl of LipofectAMINE 2000 + 2 μg DNA in 500 μl of Opti-MEM per well). 24 h after seeding and transfection the cells were exposed to either anoxia (90% N2, 5% H2, 5% CO2 in a MACS-VA500 microaerophilic work station), heat stress (42 °C), etoposide (200 μm), or zVAD.fmk (100 μm) for indicated time and then collected for analysis. Co-transfections of 293T cells were done as described above except that 1 μg of bicistronic plasmid was combined with 1 μg of indicated expression plasmid. When monocistronic plasmids were used, 0.5 μg of pCI-lacZ reporter plasmid was included in each transfection to normalize for transfection efficiency. The bicistronic vectors pβgal/hUTR/CAT (containing the human XIAP IRES), pβgal/EMCV/CAT (containing the IRES of EMCV), and pβgal/Apaf-1/CAT were described previously (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar, 22Holcik M. Gordon B.W. Korneluk R.G. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003; 23: 280-288Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar). The other IRES elements were reverse transcriptase-PCR amplified from total RNA isolated from BJAB cells using the following primers tagged with XhoI restriction site: DAP5 (6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar) (forward: 5′-cagcagtgagtcggagctctatgg; reverse: 5′-ttggcgcttgacaacgaagaatcttc), BiP (23Pelletier J. Sonenberg N. Nature. 1988; 334: 320-325Crossref PubMed Scopus (1403) Google Scholar) (forward: 5′-caagcgtgggctgtacc; reverse: 5′-cgcggaggcttggggca), c-Myc (24Stoneley M. Paulin F.E., Le Quesne J.P. Chappell S.A. Willis A.E. Oncogene. 1998; 16: 423-428Crossref PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar) (forward: 5′-aattccagcgagaggcaga; reverse: 5′-gctcgcgggaggctgctgga). The reverse transcriptase-PCR fragments were TOPO TA cloned (Invitrogen) and then inserted into the linker region of the bicistronic vector pβgal/CAT (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar). The correct sequence and the orientation of all constructs were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. Monocistronic plasmids were constructed from bicistronic construct by removing the β-gal reporter cassette. Plasmids pCI-p97 and pCI-p86 were constructed by inserting the FLAG-tagged p97/DAP5 and p86/DAP5 cDNAs (a generous gift from Adi Kimchi) into the expression vector pCI (Invitrogen). Expression plasmids pCI-N-FAG (containing the N-terminal fragment of eIF4GI, amino acids 1–495 (25Bushell M. Poncet D. Marissen W.E. Flotow H. Lloyd R.E. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 628-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar)), and pCI-M-FAG (containing the middle fragment of eIF4GI, amino acids 494–1139 (25Bushell M. Poncet D. Marissen W.E. Flotow H. Lloyd R.E. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 628-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar)) were constructed by PCR amplification from Jurkat cells cDNA (Invitrogen) of the respective fragments of eIF4GI into the expression vector pCI (Invitrogen). The primers for PCR amplification were as follows: N-FAG forward, 5′-ctcgagaaatgaacacgccttctcag; reverse, 5′-tctagatcaatccagaaggtctccaacag; M-FAG forward, 5′-gtcgactggatgccttcaaggaggcgaac; reverse, 5′-tctagatcaatcaagccggtccccacggt. Both constructs also contained the FLAG tag at their N terminus for Western blot analysis. Transiently transfected cells were washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested in the CAT ELISA kit lysis buffer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and cell extracts were prepared using the protocol provided by the manufacturer. β-Galactosidase enzymatic activity in cell extracts was determined by the spectrophotometric assay usingo-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (26MacGregor G.R. Nolan G.P. Fiering S. Roederer M. Herzenberg L.A. Murray E.J. Walker J.M. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc., Clifton, NJ1991: 217-235Google Scholar), and the CAT levels were determined using the CAT ELISA kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The relative IRES activity was determined as a ratio of CAT/β-gal in three independent experiments performed in triplicates. Cells were harvested in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, lysed in RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.15 m NaCl, 0.01m sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 2 mm EDTA, 0.1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 30 min at 4 °C followed by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min. Protein concentration was assayed by protein assay kit (Bradford Assay; Bio-Rad), and equal amounts of protein samples were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Samples were analyzed by Western blotting using mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 (Stratagene), mouse monoclonal HIF-1α (BD Transduction Laboratories), mouse monoclonal anti-Hsp70 (Stressgen), or rabbit cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies at the manufacturer's suggested dilutions followed by secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG; Amersham Biosciences). Antibody complexes were detected using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences). Total RNA was isolated from transiently transfected cells with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with 1 unit of DNase I. The32P-labeled antisense RNA probes were synthesized using the MaxiScript T7 transcription kit (Ambion) and gel-purified. The RNA probes span the entire Apaf-1 or DAP5 5′-UTRs and overlap with additional 47 nucleotides of the CAT gene and 30 nucleotides of the β-gal gene. Ribonuclease protection assay analysis was performed using the ribonuclease protection assay III kit (Ambion) and the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, 10 μg of total RNA was hybridized overnight at 42 °C with 5 × 104 cpm of high specific activity RNA probe and then digested with RNase A/RNase T1 mix. The digested samples were ethanol-precipitated and separated on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The protected fragments were visualized by detection to x-ray film. To allow direct comparison of translation mediated by various IRES elements we used the previously described bicistronic plasmid pβgal/CAT that uses β-galactosidase and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase as first and second cistrons, respectively (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar). The IRES elements of XIAP, DAP5, Apaf-1, c-Myc, BiP, and EMCV were PCR-amplified and inserted into this construct (Fig. 1). Bicistronic plasmids were transfected into 293T cells, and the activity of IRES-directed translation was determined. Surprisingly, the activity of Apaf-1, DAP5, BiP, and c-Myc IRES elements was only 3–4-fold above that of the control plasmid (each IRES element in the antisense orientation). In contrast, the IRES elements of XIAP and EMCV directed translation at ∼40- and 80-fold, respectively, above background (Fig. 2). The activity of all IRES elements in the antisense orientation was indistinguishable and was the same as that of the empty bicistronic vector (data not shown). It has been suggested that cellular IRES elements may require specific protein factors for their function (27Martinez-Salas E. Ramos R. Lafuente E. Lopez De Quinto S. J. Gen. Virol. 2001; 82: 973-984Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar). One reason why we observed very low levels of activity for Apaf-1, DAP5, BiP, and c-Myc IRES could have been that these auxiliary factors vary among various cell lines and are not present or are present at low concentration in 293T cells. We therefore transfected the IRES-containing plasmids into five different cell lines (Fig. 2). In all cell lines tested the translation directed by IRES of DAP5, Apaf-1, BiP, and c-Myc was very low when compared with EMCV and XIAP IRES elements. The exception was the T24 bladder carcinoma cell line where the translation of XIAP IRES was very low. In contrast, translation of EMCV IRES was stronger in this cell line than in any other cell line tested. These results suggest that the activity of cellular IRES elements vary dramatically. In all cases the cellular IRES elements were not as efficient in directing the translation of the downstream cistron as the viral (EMCV) IRES. IRES-directed translation is cell line-dependent, which likely reflects the availability or status of trans-acting protein factors that are involved in the facilitation of IRES translation. It is noteworthy that although the cellular IRES elements used in this study originate from human mRNAs they were able to direct translation in human as well as rodent cell lines (CHO, NIH3T3), confirming that the mechanism of IRES-dependent translation is evolutionary conserved.Figure 2The relative translational efficiency of distinct IRES elements is cell line-specific. Human embryonic kidney (293T), human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), human bladder carcinoma (T24), human glioblastoma (SF539), CHO, and mouse fibroblast (NIH3T3) cell lines were transfected with indicated bicistronic plasmids as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the cells were collected for analysis 24 h post-transfection by washing in cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysing in the CAT ELISA kit lysis buffer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and cell extracts were prepared using the protocol provided by the manufacturer. β-Galactosidase enzymatic activity in cell extracts was determined by the spectrophotometric assay usingo-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (26MacGregor G.R. Nolan G.P. Fiering S. Roederer M. Herzenberg L.A. Murray E.J. Walker J.M. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc., Clifton, NJ1991: 217-235Google Scholar), and the CAT levels were determined using the CAT ELISA kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The relative IRES activity was determined as a ratio of CAT/β-gal. The activity of each IRES construct in an antisense orientation was set as 1 in each experiment. The bars represent the average ± S.D. of three independent experiments performed in triplicates.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) It has been proposed that IRES-mediated translation is preferentially utilized during cellular stress (4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar), because it employs different regulatory mechanisms than cap-dependent translation. In addition, IRES-mediated translation may enable selective regulation of IRES-driven genes in response to divergent cellular stress. Indeed, we have shown that translation of XIAP IRES is enhanced during serum starvation or low dose γ-irradiation (5Holcik M. Lefebvre C.A. Yeh C. Chow T. Korneluk R.G. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 190-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar, 21Holcik M. Yeh C. Korneluk R.G. Chow T. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 4174-4177Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar). Similarly, the IRES of c-Myc was shown to be maintained following genotoxic stress despite overall reduction of protein synthesis (28Subkhankulova T. Mitchell S.A. Willis A.E. Biochem. J. 2001; 359: 183-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar). To further test this hypothesis, transiently transfected 293T cell were subjected to three different types of cellular stress (heat stress, anoxia, and etoposide), and the efficiency of cap-dependentversus IRES-dependent translation was determined for each IRES element. While both heat stress and anoxia could be considered as transient conditions, the treatment of cells with etoposide will induce apoptosis and represents severe conditions of cellular stress. As summarized in Fig. 3, diverse treatments evoked distinct changes in the translation mediated by different IRES elements. Heat stress resulted in significant reduction of IRES translation. In particular, the translation mediated by the IRES of Apaf-1 and DAP5 was completely abolished. The anoxic conditions resulted in an initial reduction of IRES translation that was followed by partial (DAP5) or almost full (BiP, c-Myc) restoration of IRES activity. Significantly, translation mediated by XIAP and EMCV elements was enhanced following prolonged anoxic treatment. In contrast, translation mediated by the IRES element of Apaf-1 was completely repressed. The treatment of cells with etoposide resulted in the induction of cell death with only 15–20% of surviving cells at 48 h (data not shown). Interestingly, the translation mediated by XIAP, BiP, and c-Myc IRES elements was reduced, while the translation of EMCV IRES remained largely unaffected. Significantly, however, the activity of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES was substantially enhanced 48 h following the addition of etoposide. This increase in IRES activity was due to both the reduction of cap-dependent as well as enhancement of cap-independent translation (TableI). These results suggest that during transient stress there exists a mechanism that blocks translation of pro-apoptotic molecules such as Apaf-1 while allowing translation of anti-apoptotic XIAP. Conversely, severe apoptotic conditions support translation of pro-death molecules such as Apaf-1 and DAP5, while the translation of anti-apoptotic XIAP remained reduced.Table IEtoposide-induced apoptosis enhances Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES-dependent but not cap-dependent translationConstruct1-aCells were transfected with the indicated plasmid and treated with etoposide (200 μm) or Me2SO (control) for 48 h as described under "Experimental Procedures."β-Gal1-bβ-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.CAT1-bβ-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.Relative IRES activity1-cRelative IRES activity was determined as CAT/β-gal.Apaf-1 (control)0.205 (±0.029)0.980 (±0.031)4.780Apaf-1 (etoposide)0.129 (±0.016)1.418 (±0.082)10.993DAP5 (control)0.198 (±0.019)1.023 (±0.107)5.167DAP5 (etoposide)0.114 (±0.012)1.520 (±0.103)13.3341-a Cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid and treated with etoposide (200 μm) or Me2SO (control) for 48 h as described under "Experimental Procedures."1-b β-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.1-c Relative IRES activity was determined as CAT/β-gal. Open table in a new tab We and others have suggested previously that caspase-mediated proteolytic fragments of the eIF4G family of initiation factors could specifically modulate IRES translation of selected IRES elements following the induction of apoptosis (1Clemens M.J. Bushell M. Jeffrey I.W. Pain V.M. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 603-615Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar, 4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar, 29Li S. Sonenberg N. Gingras A.C. Peterson M. Avdulov S. Polunovsky V.A. Bitterman P.B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002; 22: 2853-2861Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar). We wished to test whether the observed activation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements during etoposide-induced apoptosis could be mediated by such mechanism. To test this hypothesis the 293T cells transfected with either Apaf-1 or DAP5 IRES containing bicistronic plasmid were pretreated with broad-range caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk and then treated with etoposide for 48 h. The pretreatment of cells with caspase inhibitor blocked etoposide-induced cell death (data not shown). More importantly it also prevented the induction of translation of both Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements, suggesting that the activation of caspases is required for the stimulation of IRES activity (Fig. 4 A). Since the naturally occurring cellular mRNAs exist as monocistronic mRNAs, we next wished to test whether the enhanced translation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES is also true in the monocistronic context. Treatment of transiently transfected cells with etoposide and/or caspase inhibitor zVAD resulted in the enhancement of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES-containing monocistronic reporter constructs to levels similar to those observed with the bicistronic constructs (Fig. 4 A). Since induction of apoptosis leads to many intracellular changes, including activation of nucleases, we wished to determine whether the changes in Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES activity could be due to activation of nucleases with subsequent production of functionally monocistronic reporter mRNAs. However, no differences in the integrity or the amount of the bicistronic RNA were observed between etoposide-treated and control cells excluding this possibility (Fig. 4 B). Induction of apoptosis leads to the caspase-mediated cleavage eIF4G family members (eIF4GI, eIF4GII, and p97/DAP5/NAT1), which in turn inhibits translation (6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar, 25Bushell M. Poncet D. Marissen W.E. Flotow H. Lloyd R.E. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 628-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). It was suggested that the apoptotic fragments of the eIF4G proteins would allow preferential translation of IRES-containing mRNAs (1Clemens M.J. Bushell M. Jeffrey I.W. Pain V.M. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 603-615Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar, 4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar, 29Li S. Sonenberg N. Gingras A.C. Peterson M. Avdulov S. Polunovsky V.A. Bitterman P.B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002; 22: 2853-2861Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar). Indeed, the initiation factor p97/DAP5/NAT1 is processed by caspases to produce a truncated form DAP5/p86, which can stimulate the translation of its own IRES thus establishing a positive feedback loop (6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar). Similarly, both eIF4GI and eIF4GII are cleaved by caspases to produce distinct fragments, although their ability to support IRES translation has not been determined (25Bushell M. Poncet D. Marissen W.E. Flotow H. Lloyd R.E. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 628-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar,30Marissen W.E. Lloyd R.E. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998; 18: 7565-7574Crossref PubMed Scopus (170) Google Scholar, 31Bushell M. Wood W. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000; 267: 1083-1091Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). While the caspase cleavage of eIF4GII produces several fragments that do not persist in the apoptotic cell (32Marissen W.E. Gradi A. Sonenberg N. Lloyd R.E. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 1234-1243Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar), the middle part of the caspase-cleaved eIF4GI, termed M-FAG/p76, retains the core region capable of binding eIF3 and eIF4A that supports translation initiation (33De Gregorio E. Preiss T. Hentze M.W. RNA (N. Y.). 1998; 4: 828-836Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar) and is associated with ribosomes in apoptotic cells (25Bushell M. Poncet D. Marissen W.E. Flotow H. Lloyd R.E. Clemens M.J. Morley S.J. Cell Death Differ. 2000; 7: 628-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). Therefore, we wished to test whether apoptotic fragments of the eIF4G family could be responsible for the induction of cellular IRES elements, particularly Apaf-1 and DAP5, in our experimental system. 293T cells were co-transfected with IRES bicistronic plasmids and either GFP (pGFP), p97/DAP5/NAT1 (p97), DAP5/p86 (p86), N-FAG/p76, or M-FAG expression plasmids, and the relative activity of IRES translation was determined (Fig. 4, C and D, and Table II). We observed that the overexpression of p86/DAP5 resulted in a significant increase in the activity of Apaf-1 and DAP5, but not the other IRES elements. The overexpression of p97/DAP5/NAT1 had no effect on the translation of either IRES element tested. Similarly, the expression of M-FAG/p76 stimulated translation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements, while the expression of the N-terminal fragment of eIF4GI, N-FAG, had no effect on IRES translation. It should be noted, however, that the p86/DAP5 fragment had a stronger effect on the IRES translation than M-FAG/p76.Table IIApoptotic fragments of eIF4G and p97/DAP5/NAT1 enhance Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES-dependent but not cap-dependent translationConstruct2-a2 μg of total plasmid DNA per transfection.β-Gal2-bβ-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.CAT2-bβ-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.Relative IRES activity2-cRelative IRES activity was determined as CAT/β-gal.Apaf-1 + pGFP0.215 (±0.024)0.980 (±0.033)4.558Apaf-1 + pCI-p970.189 (±0.021)0.873 (±0.071)4.619Apaf-1 + pCI-p860.149 (±0.018)7.024 (±0.284)47.142Apaf-1 + pCI-N-FAG0.309 (±0.036)1.387 (±0.122)4.490Apaf-1 + pCI-M-FAG0.289 (±0.021)5.928 (±0.315)20.511DAP5 + pGFP0.218 (±0.017)1.103 (±0.103)5.060DAP5 + pCI-p970.178 (±0.019)0.888 (±0.091)4.989DAP5 + pCI-p860.152 (±0.021)16.457 (±0.327)108.27DAP5 + pCI-N-FAG0.251 (±0.031)1.287 (±0.099)5.126DAP5 + pCI-M-FAG0.244 (±0.028)12.506 (±0.198)51.2532-a 2 μg of total plasmid DNA per transfection.2-b β-Gal (cap-dependent) and CAT (IRES-dependent) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and are shown per 1 μg of total protein.2-c Relative IRES activity was determined as CAT/β-gal. Open table in a new tab In this study we have shown that distinct cellular IRES elements are regulated by different cellular mechanisms. We tested the hypothesis that IRES elements of cellular mRNAs involved in the control of cell survival are differentially regulated by physiological stress. It was anticipated that physiological conditions favoring translation of pro-death mRNAs such as DAP5, Apaf-1, or c-Myc would suppress translation of pro-survival molecules such as XIAP and vice versa. Indeed, we observed that different conditions favored distinct IRES elements. Although heat stress reduced activity of all IRES elements studied, XIAP, c-Myc, and BiP were affected to a lesser extent than Apaf-1 or DAP5. Conversely, following 48 h of anoxia the activity of XIAP IRES was enhanced, while the activity of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES were reduced. The most dramatic difference was seen following the treatment of cells with the apoptosis-inducing agent etoposide. This resulted in the significant increase in Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES activity, while XIAP, BiP, and c-Myc IRES were repressed. Importantly, these results suggest that the cellular IRES elements may belong to separate and distinct classes that will likely share either common regulatory mechanisms or trans-acting factors. For example, both Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES were severely inhibited by heat stress and induced by the etoposide treatment, while other IRES were not. Similarly, XIAP and EMCV elements were the only two IRES induced by anoxia. The identification of the shared elements among various IRES elements awaits further experiments. To further understand the mechanisms of regulation of IRES translation during cellular stress, we investigated the etoposide-induced enhancement of IRES translation in more detail. We found that the activation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements is caspase-dependent, since the pretreatment of cells with caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk prevented IRES translation enhancement. Significantly, we found that this specific activation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements correlated with the expression of apoptotic fragments of the eIF4G family of initiation factors p97/DAP5/NAT1 and eIF4GI. This observation is perhaps not surprising considering that DAP5/p86 and M-FAG/p76 share 32% sequence homology. Furthermore, both fragments retain the portion of the full-length proteins that interacts with eIF3 and eIF4A and are therefore considered sufficient to maintain translation initiation (33De Gregorio E. Preiss T. Hentze M.W. RNA (N. Y.). 1998; 4: 828-836Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). Interestingly, however, while both DAP5/p86 and M-FAG/p76 induced translation of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements, the effect was much stronger with DAP5/p86, although the relative levels of both proteins were comparable. This suggests that these two apoptotic fragments may be involved in the regulation of IRES translation under different cellular circumstances. It should be noted, however, that in our experimental system the apoptotic fragments of p97/DAP5/NAT1 and eIF4GI were expressed transiently in cells that were not undergoing apoptosis and therefore contained endogenous full-length p97/DAP5/NAT1 and eIF4GI. The presence of the endogeneous proteins may have therefore attenuated the stimulatory effect of the apoptotic fragments on IRES translation. It was suggested previously that the DAP5/p86 fragment could function as a molecular switch that would enable IRES-mediated translation during the conditions of cellular stress (4Holcik M. Sonenberg N. Korneluk R.G. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 469-473Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar, 6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar). The data presented here suggest that both DAP5/p86 and M-FAG/p76 can fulfill this function. Significantly, however, both fragments support translation of "pro-death" IRES elements, suggesting that they participate in the acceleration of the cell death. Recently, an independent study showed that the DAP5/p86 fragment can enhance translation of XIAP, Apaf-1, c-Myc, and DAP5 IRES elements (34Henis-Korenblit S. Shani G. Sines T. Marash L. Shohat G. Kimchi A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 5400-5405Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar). However, in contrast we did not observe any effect of overexpression of DAP5/p86 on the translation of XIAP and c-Myc IRES elements. Furthermore, in our experiments we observed 6-fold and 21-fold induction of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES, respectively, while Henis-Korenblit et al. (34Henis-Korenblit S. Shani G. Sines T. Marash L. Shohat G. Kimchi A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 5400-5405Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar) reported modest 2- and 3-fold increases in the activity of the same IRES elements. In addition, our results oppose the finding of Henis-Korenblit et al. (34Henis-Korenblit S. Shani G. Sines T. Marash L. Shohat G. Kimchi A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 5400-5405Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar) that the overexpression of M-FAG/p76 has no effect on IRES translation. While it is difficult to determine the reason for these discrepancies, it is possible that the use of different reporter systems and/or the levels of overexpressed proteins could contribute to these differences. However, in our study the in vivocaspase-dependent induction of Apaf-1 and DAP5 IRES elements by etoposide parallels the induction seen by overexpression of either DAP5/p86 or N-FAG/p76. This suggests that only these two IRES elements are physiologically inducible by the apoptotic fragments of eIF4G family of proteins. Furthermore, the p97/DAP5/NAT1 is a promoter of apoptosis (6Henis-Korenblit S. Strumpf N.L. Goldstaub D. Kimchi A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 496-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar), and therefore it would be expected to enhance translation of pro-death (Apaf-1 and DAP5) but not the pro-survival (XIAP) IRES elements. Our data support the hypothesis that IRES-mediated translation escapes the control mechanisms that regulate cap-dependent translation during the conditions of cellular stress. In addition, conditions of transient cellular stress, such as anoxia, favor translation of pro-survival IRES, such as XIAP, while the severe apoptotic conditions result in the activation of pro-death IRES of Apaf-1 and DAP5. While the exact molecular pathways that regulate IRES translation in transient cellular stress need to be further investigated, our results indicate that the apoptotic fragments of eIF4G translation initiation factor family mediate up-regulation of pro-death IRES elements during apoptotic stress and may contribute to the acceleration of cell death. We thank the members of our laboratory for stimulating discussions. We are grateful to Adi Kimchi for the gift of FLAG epitope tagged p97/DAP5/NAT1 and DAP5/p86 cDNAs.

Referência(s)