Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Aortic Root Replacement Using a Biovalsalva Prosthesis in Comparison to a “Handsewn” Composite Bioprosthesis

2010; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01015.x

1540-8191

Narain Moorjani, Amit Modi, Kavita Mattam, Clifford W. Barlow, Geoffrey Tsang, Marcus P. Haw, Steven Livesey, Sunil K. Ohri,

Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

Abstract Background: The Biovalsalva aortic root prosthesis incorporates an Elan porcine stentless biological aortic valve suspended within a triple-layered vascular conduit with preformed aortic sinuses of Valsalva. This study compared implantation of the Biovalsalva prosthesis with a “handsewn” composite bioprosthetic graft (CE Perimount bovine bioprosthesis anastomosed to a gelatin-impregnated gelweave Dacron graft). Methods: Between December 2004 and January 2009, 39 patients underwent elective or urgent aortic root replacement (modified Bentall procedure with coronary button reimplantation) using a Biovalsalva (n = 21) or a handsewn bioprosthesis (n = 18) for aortic root dilatation. Results: There was no significant difference in the preoperative variables between the two study groups including age (70.7 ± 1.7 vs. 67.6 ± 2.9 years, p > 0.05). There was no in-hospital mortality. Three patients in each group underwent concomitant aortic hemi-arch replacement. Patients who underwent Biovalsalva implantation had a reduced need for transfusion of blood (1.25 ± 0.32 vs. 3.17 ± 0.71 units, p < 0.05) and fresh frozen plasma (2.78 ± 0.39 vs. 1.85 ± 0.31, p < 0.05), and reduced mediastinal blood loss (416 ± 52 vs. 583 ± 74 mL, p < 0.05) compared to those with a handsewn bioprosthesis. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (141 ± 6 vs. 170 ± 17 minutes, p = NS) and aortic cross-clamp time (113 ± 6 vs. 115 ± 7 minutes, p = NS) were similar. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated excellent hemodynamic function of the Biovalsalva prosthesis (mean size 25.1 ± 0.4 mm valved conduit) with a peak pressure gradient of 26.2 ± 1.9 mmHg and no or trivial valvular regurgitation. Conclusions: The Biovalsalva prosthesis should be considered for patients requiring a biological aortic root replacement. It offers an “off-the-shelf” preassembled composite biological valve conduit with excellent hemostatic and hemodynamic properties. (J Card Surg 2010;25:321-326)