Voltar
Artigo Acesso aberto
BIBTEX RIS

A REVISION OF GYPSOPHILA, BOLANTHUS, ANKYROPETALUM AND PHRYNA 1

1962; Koninklijke Nederlandse Botanische Vereniging; Volume: 9; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1438-8677.1962.tb00012.x

ISSN

0511-4780

Autores

Y. I. Barkoudah,

Tópico(s)

Plant Diversity and Evolution

Resumo

WentiaVolume 9, Issue S3 p. 1-203 Article A REVISION OF GYPSOPHILA, BOLANTHUS, ANKYROPETALUM AND PHRYNA† Y. I. Barkoudah, Y. I. Barkoudah Botanical Museum and Herbarium, UtrechtSearch for more papers by this author Y. I. Barkoudah, Y. I. Barkoudah Botanical Museum and Herbarium, UtrechtSearch for more papers by this author First published: September 1962 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1962.tb00012.xCitations: 41 †The author was enabled to carry out this work by a scholarship received from Damascus University and by a special grant covering part of the publishing costs. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Publications cited only in the taxonomic part with the synonymy are not listed here in extenso. The full titles can be found in A. Pritzel, Thesaurus Literaturae Botanicae. Google Scholar Arber, A., 1918. The Phyllode theory of the monocotyledonous leaf. Annal Bot. London 32: 465–501. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089687 Web of Science®Google Scholar Arber, A., 1930. Root and shoot in the angiosperms. New Phytologist 29: 297–315. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1930.tb07397.x Google Scholar Arber, A., 1933. Floral anatomy and its morphological interpretation. New Phytologist 32: 231. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1933.tb07008.x Google Scholar Arber, A., 1936. The interpretation of the flower. Boil. Rev. 12: 157–184. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1937.tb01227.x Google Scholar Arber, A., 1939. On the interpretation of the petal and corona in Lychnis. Annals of Botany N.S. 38: 337. Google Scholar Arber, A., 1940. Studies in the flower structure VI. Annals of Bot. London. N.S. 4: 617–627. 10.1093/aob/4.3.617 Google Scholar Arber, A., 1941. The interpretation of the leaf. Biol. Rev. 16: 81–105. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1941.tb01096.x Google Scholar Baillon, H. E., 1888. Histoire des Plantes 9: 110. Google Scholar Benoist, R., 1933. La Phyllotaxie chez quelques espèces de Caryophyllacées et Valerianacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. Franc. 80: 367–371. 10.1080/00378941.1933.10833851 Google Scholar Bentham, G., 1862. Notes on Caryophyllaceae, Portulacaceae, and some allied orders. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 6: 55–77. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1862.tb01217.x Google Scholar Bentham, G. & Hooker, W. J., 1862. Genera Plantarum 1. Google Scholar Bessey, C. E., 1915. Phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard. 2: 109–164. 10.2307/2990030 Google Scholar Bitzek, E., 1928. Der Centrospermenast der Dikotylen. Bot. Arch. 22: 257–384. Google Scholar Blakelock, R. A., 1948. The Rustam Herbarium, Iraq. Kew Bull. 1. Google Scholar Blakelock, R. A., 1957. Notes on the Flora of Iraq. Kew Bull. 2: 177–224. 10.2307/4114408 Google Scholar Blatter, E. 1915. Flora of Aden. Rec. Bot. Sur. of India 7, 2: 119. Google Scholar Blatter, E. 1919. Flora Arabica. Rec. Bot. Sur. of India 8, 1: 59. Google Scholar Boissier, E., 1867. Flora Orientalis 1: 533–557. Google Scholar Boquet, G., 1960. The structure of the placental column in the genus Melandrium. Phytomorph. 9, 3: 217–221. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1911. Iter Persico-turcicum. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 38: 136–138. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1914. Zur Flora des Libanon und Antilibanon. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 31, 2: 190–191. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1914. b. Reliquiae Straussianae, Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora des westlichen Persiens. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 32: 349–419. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1915. Plantae Brusianae. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 33, 2: 278. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1917. Zur Flora des nördlichen Syriens. Notizbl. der Köngl. Bot. Gart. und Mus. zu Berlin-Dahlem 7, no. 63: 11. Google Scholar Bornmüller, J. 1940. Symbolae ad floram Anatolicam. Rep. Sp. Nov. Regi Veget. Beih. Band. 89, 1: 285. Google Scholar Boulos, L., 1960. Flora of Gebel El-Maghara, North Sinai. Google Scholar Braun, Al., 1843. Beiträge zur Feststellung natürlicher Gattungen unter den Silenen. Flora 26: 349. Google Scholar Braun, Al., 1875. Über Placentenbildung. Sitz. d. bot. Ver. f. d. Prov. Brandenburg. Google Scholar Brongiart, A., 1844. Examen de quelque cas de monstriosités végétales. Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, 2: 20–32. Google Scholar Burtt, B. L. & P. Lewis, 1952. On the flora of Kuweit. Kew Bull.: 333. Google Scholar Cain, S. A., 1944. Foundations of Plant Geography. Harper & Brothers, New York and London. Google Scholar de Candolle, A. P., 1819. Théorie élémentaire de la botanique. Google Scholar Čelakovsky, L., 1875. Über den "eingeschalteten" epipetalen Staubgefässkreis. Flora 58: 481–489, 497–504, 513–524. Google Scholar Čelakovsky, L., 1894. Das Reductions-Gesetz der Blüten, das Dédoublement und die Obdiplostemonie. Sitzber. d. kgl. böhm. Ges. d. Wiss. 3. Google Scholar Čelakovsky, L., 1900. Die phylogenetische Entwicklung der Blüthe, und über den Ursprung der Blumenkrone. Prag. Google Scholar Dangeard, P. A., 1889. Monographie anatomique des Acanthophyllum. Le Botanist 1: 194. Google Scholar Decaisne, J., 1835. Florula Sinaica II. Am. Sci. Nat. 2 ser. Bot. 3: 276. Google Scholar Dickson, J., 1936. Studies in floral anatomy III. Amer. Jour. Bot. 23: 385–393. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1936.tb09000.x Google Scholar Dickson, V., 1955. The wild flowers of Kuwait and Bahrain. Google Scholar Dobrovljansky, B., 1897. A description of Gypsophila aretioides Boiss. Trav. Soc. Nat. Pétrsb. 27: 281. Google Scholar Douglas, G. E., 1936. Studies in the vascular anatomy of the Primulaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot. 23: 199–212. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1936.tb08976.x Google Scholar Duchartré, M. P., 1844. Observation sur l'organogenie de la fleur chez les plantes à placenta central libre. Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, 2: 279–297. Google Scholar Eames, A. J., 1931. The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the carpel polymorphism. Amer. Jour. Bot. 18: 147–188. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1931.tb09580.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Eichler, A. W., 1875. Blüthendiagramme. Google Scholar Eig, A., 1926. A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Flora of Palestine. Agr. and Nat. Hist. Bull. 4. Google Scholar Eig, A., 1931. Les éléments et les groupes phytogéographiques auxiliaires dans la flore palestinienne. I, II. Fed. Rep. spec. nov. r. veg. Beih. 63: 1–201. Google Scholar Favarger, C., 1946. Recherches caryologiques sur la sous-famille des Silenoidées. Ber. Sch. Bot. Ges. 56: 364–466. Google Scholar Golenkin, M., 1893. Revision of the genus Acanthophyllum. Act. Hort. Petrop. 13: 77. Google Scholar Grisebach, A., 1884. Die Vegetation der Erde. Bd. 1, u. 2. Google Scholar de Halácsy, E., 1900. Consp. Flora Graecae. Google Scholar Henslow, G., 1889. On the vascular system of floral organs and their importance in the interpretation of the morphology of flowers. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 28: 151–197. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1890.tb01453.x Google Scholar Hegi, G., 1935. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. 3. Google Scholar Hohenacker, R. Fr., 1837. Enumeratio plantarum quas in itinere per Provinciam Talysh collegit. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. de Moscou 4: 159. Google Scholar Hunt, K. W., 1937. A study of the style and stigma, with reference to the carpel. Amer. Jour. of Bot. 24: 288–293. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1937.tb09102.x Google Scholar Kitamura, S., 1960. Flora of Afghanistan. Kyoto University. Google Scholar Kraft, E., 1917. Experimentelle und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Caryophyllaceen-Blüthen. Flora 109: 283–356. Google Scholar Kruckererg, A. R., 1960. Chromosome numbers in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) II. Madrona 15, 7: 205–215. Google Scholar Kuc, M., 1928. Gypsophila trichotoma Wend., in Frag. Fl. et Geo. of Bot. Akad. Polon. Ann. 3, 2: 29–33. Google Scholar Levitsky, G. A., 1931. The caryotype in systematics. Bull. Genet. and Plant breed. 27: 220–240. Google Scholar Lister, G., 1884. On the origin of the placenta in the tribe Alsineae of the order Caryophyllae. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 20: 423–428. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1884.tb00643.x Google Scholar Lüders, H., 1907. Systematische Untersuchungen über die Caryophyllaceen mit einfachem Diagramm. Bot. Jahrb. 40, Beibl. 91: 1–38. Google Scholar Mattfeld, J., 1921. Zur Kenntnis der Phyllogenie unterständiger Fruchtknoten bei den Caryophyllaceen. Ber. d. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 39: 275–280. Google Scholar Mattfeld, J., 1938. Das morphologische Wesen und der phylogenetische Bedeutung der Blumenblätter. Ber. d. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 56: 87–116. Google Scholar Matzke, B., 1931. Flower Variation and Symmetry in Stellaria media and their underlying significance. Amer. Jour. Bot. 19: 477–507. 10.2307/2436072 Google Scholar Metcalfe, C. R. & Chalk, L., 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons 1: p. 147. Google Scholar Moeliono, B. M., 1959. A preliminary note on the placenta of Stellaria media (L.) Vill. and Stellaria graminea L. A possible axial origin of ovules? Acta Bot. Neerl. 8: 292–303. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1959.tb00541.x Google Scholar Müller, N. J., 1866. Das Wachsthum des Vegetationspunktes von Pflanzen mit decussirter Blattstellung. Jahr. f. wiss. Bot. 5: p. 247. Web of Science®Google Scholar Nábaleck, Fr., 1926. Iter Turcico-Persicum III. Publ. Science Univ. Masaryk Brno. fasc. 70. Google Scholar Neumayer, H., 1921. Die Frage der Gattungsabgrenzung innerhalb der Silenoideen. Verh. d. Zoo.-bot. Gesellschaft 72: 53–59. Google Scholar Oliver, D. J., 1859. Observations on the structure of certain species of the natural order Caryophylleae. Trans. Linn. Soc. 22: 289. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1856.tb00099.x Google Scholar Oppenheimer, H. R. & M. Eevenari, 1940. Florula Cisjordanica "Reliques Aaronsonsianae". Soc. Bot. de Genève 31. Google Scholar Pax, F., 1889. Caryophyllaceae, in Engler und Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 1st ed. Google Scholar Pax, F. & K. Hoffmann, 1934. Caryophyllaceae, in Engler und Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 2nd ed. 16C. Gypsophila: 351–354. Google Scholar Payer, J. B., 1857. Traité d'organogenie comparée de la fleur. Paris. Google Scholar Pobeguin, T., 1943. Les oxalates de calcium chez quelques angiospermes. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 11 Sér. 4: 1–95. Google Scholar Rechinger, K. H., 1949. Grundzüge der Pflanzenverbreitung in der Aegäis. Vegetatio 2: I. 55–119, II. 239–308, III. 365–386. Google Scholar Rechinger, K. H., 1952. Zur Flora von Palestina und Transjordanien. Reliquiae Samuelssonianae V. Arkiv för Botanik, 2 series, 2. No. 5: 271–455. Google Scholar Rechinger, K. H., 1960. Zur Flora von Syrien, Libanon und angrenzenden türkischen Gebieten. Reliquiae Samuelssonianae VI. Arkiv för Botanik B. 5. No. 1: 118–119. Google Scholar Regel, C., 1937. Über die Grenze zwischen Mittelmeergebiet und Mitteleuropa in Griechenland. Ber. d. Deut. Bot. Gesel. 55. 1: 82–91. Google Scholar Rohrbach, P., 1867. Über Pycnophyllum Remy nebst Bemerkungen über die Blattstellung der Caryophyllaceen. Bot. Zeitung 25: 297. Google Scholar Rohrbach, P., 1868. Monographie der Gattung Silene. Leipzig. Google Scholar Rohweder, H., 1934. Beiträge zur Systematik und Phylogenie der Gattung Dianthus unter Berücksichtigung der karyologischen Verhältnisse. Engler's Bot. Jahrb. 66: 247–368. Google Scholar Rohweder, H., 1934b. Über die Bedeutung der Karyologie der Caryophyllaceen. Lilloa 9: 203. Google Scholar Rohweder, H., 1939. Weitere Beiträge zur Systematik und Phylogenie der Caryophyllaceen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. B. 59: 1–58. Google Scholar Rosoll, S., 1884. Über den direkten Nachweis von Saponin. Sitzungsb. d. kais. Akad. d. Wissensch. in Wien. Abt. I (Botanik) 7 Sitzung: 143–147. Google Scholar Saunders, E. R., 1932. On Carpel Polymorphism V. Ann. Bot. 46: 239–88. Web of Science®Google Scholar Saunders, E. R., 1936. On rhythmic development and radial organization in the flower. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 50: 291–322. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1936.tb02001.x Google Scholar Schleiden, M. J., 1849. Principles of scientific botany (translated), London. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1931. On Phytonism. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 28: 82–96. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1931b. On contort corolla. Proc. Kon. Akad. van Wetensch. te Amsterdam 34, 8: 1077–1084. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1932. On pleiomery and meiomery in the flower. Rec. Trav. Néerl. 19: 164. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1932b. Über die Caryophyllaceen-Dekussation. Ber. d. bot. Ges. 50: 229. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1935. On corolla aestivation and phyllotaxis of phyllomes. Ver. d. Kon. Akad. v. Wetensch. te Amsterdam, afd. Natuur, 2 sect. deel 34, n. 4. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1935b. Notes on some properties of decussate foliage leaves which are connected with space-filling in the bud. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 32: 317–323. Google Scholar Schoute, J. C., 1935c. On the perianth aestivation in the Portulacaceae and Basellaceae. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 32: 396. Google Scholar Šiškin, B., 1936. Gypsophila. Komar., Fl. U.S.S.R. 6: 731–777 and Add. 5: 891. Google Scholar Schwartz, O., 1939. Flora des tropischen Arabiens. Mitteil. Inst. allg. Bot. Hamburg 10. Google Scholar Schweinfurth, G., 1896. About a collection of plants from Arabia and Ethiopia. Bull. Herb. Boiss. 1 série t. IV. App. 2: 174. Google Scholar Simmler, G., 1910. Monographie der Gattung Saponaria. Denkschr. der mathem.-natur. Klasse d. Kais. Akad. der wissensch. 85. Google Scholar Sinnott, E. W. & Bailley, I. W., 1914. Investigation on the phyllogeny of the Angiosperms. 3. Nodal anatomy and the morphology of stipules. Amer. J. Bot. 1: 441–453. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1914.tb09378.x Web of Science®Google Scholar de St. Hilaire, A., 1816. Memoire sur les plantes auxquelles on attribue un placenta central libre. Paris. Google Scholar Ströbel, F., 1925. Die Obdiplostemonie in den Blüten. Bot. Archiv. 9: 210–224. Google Scholar Stroh, G., 1937. Die Gattung Gypsophila, Vorläufiger Katalog. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 59: 455–477. Google Scholar Takhtadzhian, A. L., 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen, p. 195. Google Scholar Tiébaut, J., 1936. Flore Libano-Syrienne. Google Scholar Thomas, H. H., 1933. The old morphology and the new. Proc. Linn. Soc. London. Session 145, part 1. Google Scholar Thomas, H. H., 1934. The nature and origin of the stigma. New Phytol. 33: 173–198. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1934.tb06807.x Google Scholar Thomson, B. F., 1942. The floral morphology of the Caryophyllaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot. 29: 333–349. 10.2307/2437569 Google Scholar Troll, W., 1928. Zur Frage nach der Herkunft der Blumenblätter. Flora 122: 56–75. Google Scholar Vandas, C., 1909. Reliquiae Formánekianae. enum. crit. pl. vas. itin. in Haemmo peninsula et Asia Minor. Dr. Formánek. Google Scholar Van Tieghem, P., 1868. Recherches sur la structure du pistil. Ann. Sci. Nat. 5, 12: 127–226. Google Scholar Van Tieghem, P., 1869. Structure de pistil de Primulaceae et des Theophrastes. Ann. Sci. Nat. 5, 12: 329–339. Google Scholar Uittien, H., 1928. Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Blattnervatur und Sprossverzweigung. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 25: 390–483. Google Scholar van Steenis, C. G. G. J., 1957. Specific and Infraspecific Delimitation. Flora Malesiana ser. I. vol. 5. Google Scholar Vautier, S., 1949. La vascularisation florale chez les Polygonacées. Candollea. 12: 219–343. Google Scholar Warburg, E. F., 1961. Some taxonomic problems in weedy species. Univ. of Oxford. Department of Botany. Google Scholar Warming, M. E., 1878. De l'ovule. Ann. Sci. Nat. 6, 5: 177–257. Google Scholar Warner, R., 1945. Relation of the vegetation cover to the growth conditions of eroded soils. Iowa St. Coll. Jour. of Science 20: 101–153. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Williams, F. N., 1886. A revision of the genus Arenaria L. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 33: 332. Google Scholar Williams, F. N., 1889. A revision of the genus Gypsophila. Jour. of Bot. 27: 321–329. Google Scholar Williams, F. N., 1893. A monograph of the genus Dianthus. Jour. of Linn. Soc. 29: 346–378. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1893.tb02037.x Google Scholar Williams, F. N., 1896. A revision of the genus Silene. Jour. of Linn. Soc. 32: 1–196. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1896.tb00695.x Google Scholar Wilson, C. L., 1937. The phylogeny of the stamen. Amer. Jour. Bot. 24: 686. 10.2307/2436442 Web of Science®Google Scholar Wydler, H., 1851. Die Knospenlage der Blätter in übersichtlicher Zusammenstellung. Flora 34: 113. Google Scholar Zohary, M., 1933. Neue Beiträge zur Flora Syriens. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 51: 273–298. Google Scholar Zohary, M., 1939. To the knowledge of the flora of the Syrian desert. Palest. Jour. Bot. J. ser. 1: 241–254. Google Scholar Zohary, M. & N. Feinbrun, 1951. Outline of vegetation of northern Negev. Palest. Journ. Bot. J. ser. 5. 2: 96–114. Google Scholar Zohary, M., 1957. A contribution to the flora of Saudi Arabia. Jour. Linn. Soc. Lond. Bot. 55: 632–643. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1957.tb00026.x Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume9, IssueS3September 1962Pages 1-203 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)