Separation of dipeptide and tripeptide enantiomers in capillary electrophoresis by the cationic cyclodextrin derivative 2-hydroxypropyltrimethyl-ammonium-β-cyclodextrin and by neutral β-cyclodextrin derivatives at alkaline pH
2002; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 15-17 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/1615-9314(20021101)25
ISSN1615-9314
AutoresFalko Süß, Wolfgang Poppitz, Gerhard K. E. Scriba,
Tópico(s)Protein purification and stability
ResumoJournal of Separation ScienceVolume 25, Issue 15-17 p. 1147-1154 Research Article Separation of dipeptide and tripeptide enantiomers in capillary electrophoresis by the cationic cyclodextrin derivative 2-hydroxypropyltrimethyl-ammonium-β-cyclodextrin and by neutral β-cyclodextrin derivatives at alkaline pH Falko Süß, Falko Süß University of Jena, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Philosophenweg 14, 07743 Jena, Germany; Fax: +49 3641 949802Search for more papers by this authorWolfgang Poppitz, Wolfgang Poppitz University of Jena, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, August-Bebel-Strasse 2, 07743 Jena, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorGerhard K. E. Scriba, Gerhard K. E. Scriba [email protected] Search for more papers by this author Falko Süß, Falko Süß University of Jena, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Philosophenweg 14, 07743 Jena, Germany; Fax: +49 3641 949802Search for more papers by this authorWolfgang Poppitz, Wolfgang Poppitz University of Jena, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, August-Bebel-Strasse 2, 07743 Jena, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorGerhard K. E. Scriba, Gerhard K. E. Scriba [email protected] Search for more papers by this author First published: 27 November 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9314(20021101)25:15/17 3.0.CO;2-CCitations: 27AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract The enantioseparation of dipeptides and tripeptides by the cationic CD derivative 2-Hydroxy-3-trimethylammoniumpropyl-β-cyclodextrin (TMA-β-CD) was studied under acidic and alkaline conditions. Enantioresolutions could be achieved at pH 3.5 when the peptides were partially positively charged, at pH 5.3 close to the isoelectric point of the peptides when the compounds are uncharged, and at pH 9.5 where the peptides exist as anions. Although not as effective as under acidic run conditions, native β-CD and neutral CD derivatives were able to resolve the enantiomers of several peptides at pH 9.5. Analysis of the complexation constants and the mobilities of the analyte-CD complexes at pH 9.5 in the presence of TMA-β-CD and β-CD revealed identical chiral recognition of both CDs towards Ala-Phe, Ala-Tyr, and Asp-PheOMe. Despite identical enantiomer migration order compared to the other peptides, TMA-β-CD displayed opposite chiral recognition towards the enantiomers of Ala-Trp. In contrast to the other investigated peptides, the enantiomer migration order of Ala-Trp was determined by the mobility of the CD-peptide complex which was higher in the case of the stronger complexed enantiomer. References 1 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 875, 43–88. 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01209-1 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 R. Kuhn, D. Riester, B. Fleckenstein, K.-H. Wiesmüller, J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 716, 371–379. 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00371-S CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 M. G. Schmid, G. Gübitz, J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 709, 81–88. 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00106-W CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 D. Riester, K.-H. Wiesmüller, D. Stoll, R. Kuhn, Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2361–2365. 10.1021/ac9511511 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 K. Verleysen, S. Sabah, G. Scriba, P. Sandra, Chromatographia 1999, 49, 215–218. 10.1007/BF02575289 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, J. Microcol. Sep. 1996, 8, 339–344. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(1996)8:5 3.0.CO;2-2 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, Electrophoresis 1996, 17, 1938–1944. 10.1002/elps.1150171222 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 943–949. 10.1002/elps.1150180615 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 K. Desilva, Q. Jiang, T. Kuwana, Biomed. Chromatogr. 1995, 9, 295–301. 10.1002/bmc.1130090624 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 758, 303–311. 10.1016/S0021-9673(96)00726-1 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 H. Wan, L. G. Blomberg, J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 792, 393–400. 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00976-X CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 J. Li, K. C. Waldron, Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 171–179. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:1 3.0.CO;2-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 C. E. Sänger-Van De Griend, Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3417–3423. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991101)20:17 3.0.CO;2-J CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 14 C. E. Sänger-Van De Griend, Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 2397–2404. 10.1002/1522-2683(20000701)21:12 3.0.CO;2-F CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 S. Sabbah, G. K. E. Scriba, J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 894, 267–272. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00527-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 S. Sabbah, F. Süß, G. K. E. Scriba, Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 3163–3170. 10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:15 3.0.CO;2-A CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 N. Sidamonidze, F. Süß, W. Poppitz, G. K. E. Scriba, J. Sep. Sci. 2001, 24, 777–783. 10.1002/1615-9314(20010901)24:9 3.0.CO;2-V CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18 F. Süß, C. Kahle, U. Holzgrabe, G. K. E. Scriba, Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 1301–1307. 10.1002/1522-2683(200205)23:9 3.0.CO;2-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19 C. E. Sänger-Van De Griend, K. Gröningen, T. Arvidson, J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 782, 271–279. 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00517-7 Web of Science®Google Scholar 20 S. Sabah, G. K. E. Scriba, J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 822, 137–145. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00602-5 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 S. Sabah, G. K. E. Scriba, J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 833, 261–266. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)01061-9 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 S. Sabbah, G. K. E. Scriba, Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 1385–1393. 10.1002/1522-2683(200105)22:7 3.0.CO;2-A CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 G. M. Janini, G. M. Muschik, H. Issaq, Electrophoresis 1996, 17, 1575–1583. 10.1002/elps.1150171014 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 D. J. Skanchy, R. Wilson, T. Poh, G. H. Xie, C. W. Demarest, J. F. Stobaugh, Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 985–995. 10.1002/elps.1150180621 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 K. Verleysen, S. Sabah, G. K. E. Scriba, A. Chen, P. Sandra, J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 824, 91–97. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00667-0 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26 N. Dan, R. Ganesan, K. G. Flood, D. Tsai, V. D. Reif, J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 891, 115–127. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00621-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 27 F. Süß, W. Poppitz, C. E. Sänger-Van De Griend, G. K. E. Scriba, Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 2416–2423. 10.1002/1522-2683(200107)22:12 3.0.CO;2-S CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 G. Schulte, B. Chankvetadze, G. Blaschke, J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 771, 259–266. 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00096-4 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29 A. Bunke, T. Jira, J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 798, 275–280. 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)01197-7 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30 A. Bunke, T. Jira, Pharmazie 1996, 51, 672–673. CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 M. Bodanszky, A. Bodanszky, The Practice of Peptide Synthesis, 2nd edition, Springer, Berlin 1994, p. 110. 10.1007/978-3-642-85055-4 Google Scholar 32 S. Hjerten, J. Chromatogr. 1985, 347, 191–198. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)95485-8 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33 B. Chankvetadze, G. Endresz, G. Blaschke, M. Juza, H. Jakubetz, V. Schurig, Carbohydrate Res. 1996, 287, 139–155. 10.1016/0008-6215(96)00067-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Y. Tanaka, S. Terabe, J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 781, 151–160. 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00489-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 H. Yamamura, A. Akasaki, Y. Yamada, K. Kano, T. Katsuhara, S. Araki, M. Kawai, T. Tsuda, Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 478–483. 10.1002/1522-2683(200102)22:3 3.0.CO;2-L CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 A. M. Rizzi, L. Kremser, Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 2715–2722. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990901)20:13 3.0.CO;2-E CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume25, Issue15-17November 2002Pages 1147-1154 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)