Carta Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Limitations of Minimally Acceptable Interpretive Performance Criteria for Screening Mammography

2011; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 258; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1148/radiol.101735

ISSN

1527-1315

Autores

Gregory P. Doyle, Jay Onysko, Lisa Pogany, Diane Major, Judy Caines, Rene Shumak, Nancy Wadden,

Tópico(s)

AI in cancer detection

Resumo

HomeRadiologyVol. 258, No. 3 PreviousNext CommunicationsLetters to the EditorLimitations of Minimally Acceptable Interpretive Performance Criteria for Screening MammographyGregory P. Doyle* , Jay Onysko†, Lisa Pogany†, Diane Major‡, Judy Caines§, Rene Shumak‖, Nancy Wadden#Gregory P. Doyle* , Jay Onysko†, Lisa Pogany†, Diane Major‡, Judy Caines§, Rene Shumak‖, Nancy Wadden#Author AffiliationsBreast Screening Program for Newfoundland and Labrador, 35 Major’s Path, Suite 102, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1A 4Z9* e-mail: [email protected]Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada†National Institute of Public Health of Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada‡Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada§Ontario Breast Screening Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada‖Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Clare’s Mercy Hospital, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada#Gregory P. Doyle* Jay Onysko†Lisa Pogany†Diane Major‡Judy Caines§Rene Shumak‖Nancy Wadden#Published Online:Mar 1 2011https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.101735MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References1 Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, et al.. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 2010;255(2):354–361. Link, Google Scholar2 Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, et al.. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(10):748–754. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Blanks RG, Moss SM, Wallis MG. Monitoring and evaluating the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: evaluating the variation in radiological performance between individual programmes using PPV-referral diagrams. J Med Screen 2001;8(1):24–28. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished online: Mar 2011Published in print: Mar 2011 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByHarmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and AccountabilityCindy S.Lee, LindaMoy, Sarah M.Friedewald, Edward A.Sickles, Debra L.Monticciolo2018Feb1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 210, No. 2Criteria for Identifying Radiologists With Acceptable Screening Mammography Interpretive Performance on Basis of Multiple Performance MeasuresDiana L.Miglioretti, LauraIchikawa, Robert A.Smith, Lawrence W.Bassett, Stephen A.Feig, BarbaraMonsees, Jay R.Parikh, Robert D.Rosenberg, Edward A.Sickles, Patricia A.Carney2015Apr1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 204, No. 4Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based studyE. G.Klompenhouwer, L. E. M.Duijm, A. C.Voogd, G. J.den Heeten, J.Nederend, F. HJansen, M. J. M.Broeders6 February 2014 | European Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 5Recommended Articles Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity AnalysisRadiology2020Volume: 297Issue: 1pp. 40-48Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) StudyRadiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 3pp. 518-528Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening PopulationRadiology2017Volume: 283Issue: 1pp. 70-76Equalizing the Performance of Radiologists and Physician Extenders in Screening MammographyRadiology2022Volume: 306Issue: 1pp. 110-111Digital Mammography Is Similar to Screen-Film Mammography for Women with Personal History of Breast CancerRadiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 2pp. 301-302See More RSNA Education Exhibits Imaging Biomarkers Relevant For Prostate Cancer Management: Clinical DevelopmentDigital Posters2021A Cased-Based Health Equity Primer for Radiologists: Real Cases, Real Problems, Real SolutionsDigital Posters2020An Approach to Re-Opening Breast Imaging Centers at an Academic Facility in California during the COVID-19 PandemicDigital Posters2020 RSNA Case Collection Invasive Lobular CarcinomaRSNA Case Collection2021Invasive ductal carcinoma as developing asymmetryRSNA Case Collection2021Tattoo pigment deposition in axillary lymph nodeRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 258, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download

Referência(s)