MEASURING SOCIAL–ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS BEHIND THE GENERATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
2007; Wiley; Volume: 17; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1890/06-1116.1
ISSN1939-5582
AutoresErik Andersson, Stephan Barthel, Karin Ahrné,
Tópico(s)Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
ResumoEcological ApplicationsVolume 17, Issue 5 p. 1267-1278 Article MEASURING SOCIAL–ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS BEHIND THE GENERATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES E. Andersson, E. Andersson Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 21 A, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3 E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorS. Barthel, S. Barthel Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 21 A, 106 91 Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorK. Ahrné, K. Ahrné Department of Entomology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 16, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author E. Andersson, E. Andersson Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 21 A, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3 E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorS. Barthel, S. Barthel Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 21 A, 106 91 Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorK. Ahrné, K. Ahrné Department of Entomology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 16, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 July 2007 https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1116.1Citations: 206 Corresponding Editor: J. A. Powell. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract The generation of ecosystem services depends on both social and ecological features. Here we focus on management, its ecological consequences, and social drivers. Our approach combined (1) quantitative surveys of local species diversity and abundance of three functional groups of ecosystem service providers (pollinators, seed dispersers, and insectivores) with (2) qualitative studies of local management practices connected to these services and their underlying social mechanisms, i.e., institutions, local ecological knowledge, and a sense of place. It focused on the ecology of three types of green areas (allotment gardens, cemeteries, and city parks) in the city of Stockholm, Sweden. These are superficially similar but differ considerably in their management. Effects of the different practices could be seen in the three functional groups, primarily as a higher abundance of pollinators in the informally managed allotment gardens and as differences in the composition of seed dispersers and insectivores. Thus, informal management, which is normally disregarded by planning authorities, is important for ecosystem services in the urban landscape. Furthermore, we suggest that informal management has an important secondary function: It may be crucial during periods of instability and change as it is argued to promote qualities with potential for adaptation. Allotment gardeners seem to be the most motivated managers, something that is reflected in their deeper knowledge and can be explained by a sense of place and management institutions. We propose that co-management would be one possible way to infuse the same positive qualities into all management and that improved information exchange between managers would be one further step toward ecologically functional urban landscapes. Supporting Information Filename Description https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3293744 Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Literature Cited Alberti, M., J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, G. Bradley, C. Ryan, and C. Zumbrunnen . 2003. Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53: 1169–1179. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621–630. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke . 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke . , editors. 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Berkes, F., and C. Folke . , editors. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Björkman, L. 2000. Vad betyder koloniträdgårdar för den urbana människan i Stockholm? Länkar mellan fritidsodling i staden, ekologisk kunskap och uthållig samhällsbyggnad. Ph.D. Thesis. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. Bodin, Ö., M. Tengö, A. Norman, J. Lundberg, and T. Elmqvist . 2006. The value of small size: loss of forest patches and ecological thresholds in southern Madagascar. Ecological Applications 16: 440–451. Buchmann, S. L., and G. P. Nabhan . 1996. The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Cannon, A. R., D. E. Chameberlain, M. P. Toms, B. J. Hatchwell, and K. J. Gaston . 2005. Trends in the use of private gardens by wild birds in Great Britain 1995–2002. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 659–671. Cantrill, J. G., and S. L. Senacha . 2001. Using the “sense of self in place” construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environmental Science and Policy 4: 185–203. Cash, D. W., and S. C. Moser . 2000. Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change 10: 109–120. Chapin, F. S. III . et al. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity: experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. Bioscience 48: 45–52. Chapin, F. S. III, B. H. Walker, R. J. Hobbs, D. U. Hooper, J. H. Lawton, O. E. Sala, and D. Tilman . 1997. Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277: 500–504. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129–138. Clarke, K. R. 1988. Detecting change in benthic community structure. Pages 131–142 in Proceedings, XIVth International Biometric Conference, Namur. Invited papers. Société Adophe Quélét, Gemblous, Belgium. Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of change in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143. Colding, J., and C. Folke . 2001. Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications 11: 584–600. Collins, J. P., A. Kinzig, N. B. Grimm, W. F. Fagan, D. Hope, J. Wu, and E. T. Borer . 2000. A new urban ecology—modeling human communities as integral parts of ecosystems poses special problems for the development and testing of ecological theory. American Scientist 88: 416–425. Corbet, S. A., I. H. Williams, and J. L. Osborne . 1991. Bees and the pollination of crops and wild flowers in the European Community. Bee World 72: 47–59. Cramp, S. , editors. 1977–1994. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa: the birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Daily, G. 1997. Nature's services. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Davis, A., and J. R. Wagner . 2003. Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 31: 463–489. Ellis, J. A., A. D. Walter, J. F. Tooker, M. D. Ginzel, P. F. Reagel, E. S. Lacey, A. B. Bennett, E. M. Grossman, and L. M. Hanks . 2005. Conservation biological control in urban landscapes: Manipulating parasitoids of bagworm (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) with flowering forbs. Biological Control 34: 99–107. Elmqvist, T., C. Folke, M. Nyström, G. Peterson, J. Bengtsson, B. Walker, and J. Norberg . 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 488–494. Folke, C., C. S. Holling, and C. Perrings . 1996. Biological diversity, ecosystems, and the human scale. Ecological Applications 6: 1018–1024. Folke, C., A. Jansson, J. Larsson, and R. Costanza . 1997. Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26: 167–172. Franz, J. M. 1961. Biological control of pest insects in Europe. Annual Review of Entomology 6: 183–200. Gotelli, N. J., and G. L. Entsminger . 2006. EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7. Acquired Intelligence and Kesey-Bear. Jericho, Vermont, USA. 〈http://garyentsminger.com/ecosim.htm〉. Gregory, R. D., D. W. Gibbons, and P. F. Donald . 2004. Bird census and survey techniques. Pages 17–55 in W. J. Sutherland, I. Newton, R. E. Green, editors. Bird ecology and conservation. A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Grimm, N. B., J. M. Grove, S. T. A. Pickett, and C. L. Redman . 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50: 571–584. Hostetler, M. 1999. Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 15–19. Jules, E. S., and P. Shahani . 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: Why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 459–464. Kaltenborn, B. P. 1998. Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts: A study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian high Arctic. Applied Geography 18: 169–189. Kearns, C. A., D. W. Inouye, and N. M. Waser . 1998. Endangered mutualism: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 83–112. Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8: 468–479. Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, R. L. Bugg, J. P. Fay, and R. W. Thorp . 2004. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecology Letters 7: 1109–1119. Kvale, S. 1997. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden. Lindhagen, A. 1916. Koloniträdgårdar och planterade gårdar. Rekolid, Stockholm, Sweden. Løken, A. 1973. Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Norsk entomologisk tidsskrift 20: 1–218. Loreau, M., N. Mouquet, and A. Gonzalea . 2003. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 12765–12770. MacArthur, R. H., and J. W. MacArthur . 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. McDaniel, J., and K. D. Alley . 2005. Connecting local environmental knowledge and land use practices: a human ecosystem approach to urbanization in West Georgia. Urban Ecosystems 8: 23–38. Melles, S., S. Glenn, and K. Martin . 2003. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conservation Ecology 7 1 5. 〈http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art5〉. Miller, J. R. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 430–434. Moberg, M. 2003. Odlarna på berget-om södra tantolunden. Pages 40–81 in Nordiska museets och Skansens årsbok. 2003. Stadens odlare. Nordiska museets förlag, Värnamo, Sweden. Mols, C. M. M., and M. E. Visser . 2002. Great tits can reduce caterpillar damage in apple orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 888–899. Moss, T., and M. Wissen . 2005. Making sense of diversity: a synergy report on an inventory of 113 intermediary organizations of water management in Europe. Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Leibniz, Germany. Nolin, C. 2003. Koloniträdgårdsrörelsen i Stockholm—dess förutsättingar och uppkomst vid 1900-talets början. Pages 9–40 in C. Westergren, editor. Stadens odlare. Nordiska museets och Skansens årsbok. Nordiska museets förlag, Värnamo, Sweden. Norberg, J. 1999. Linking nature's services to ecosystems: some general ecological concepts. Ecological Economics 29: 183–202. Norton, B. G., and B. Hannon . 1997. Environmental values: a place based theory. Environmental Ethics 19: 227–245. Oreszcyn, S., and A. Lane . 2000. The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 101–118. Osborne, J. L., S. J. Clark, R. J. Morris, I. H. Williams, J. R. Riley, and A. D. Smith . 1999. A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 519–533. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Ostrom, E. 2003. Doing institutional analysis: digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. Pages 819–848 in M. Claude, M. Shirley, editors. Handbook of new institutional economics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Ostrom, E., and E. Schlager . 1996. The formation of property rights. Pages 127–156 in S. Hanna, C. Folke, K.-G. Mäler, editors. Rights to nature. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluations methods. Third edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA. Pretty, J. N. 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23: 1247–1263. Pyle, R. M. 1978. The extinction of experience. Horticulture 56: 64–67. Pyle, R. M. 1993. The thunder tree: lessons from an urban wildland. Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Robinson, G. R., and S. N. Handel . 1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7: 271–278. Rogan, R., M. O'Connor, and P. Horwitz . 2005. Nowhere to hide: awareness and perceptions of environmental change, and their influence on relationships with place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25: 147–158. Rosenfeld, J. S. 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98: 156–162. Saure, C. 1996. Urban habitats for bees: the example of the city of Berlin. Pages 47–54 in A. Matheson, S. L. Buchmann, C. O'Toole, P. Westrich, I. Williams, editors. The conservation of bees. Academic Press, London, UK. SCB [Statistiska Centralbyrån]. 2005. Statistical yearbook of Sweden. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm and Örebro, Sweden. Schaffer, W. M., D. W. Zeh, S. L. Buchmann, S. Kleinhans, V. M. Schaffer, and J. Antrim . 1983. Competition for nectar between introduced honey bees and native North American bees and ants. Ecology 64: 564–577. Sekercioglu, C. H., G. C. Daily, and P. R. Ehrlich . 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101: 18042–18047. Theodori, G. L., A. E. Luloff, and F. K. Willits . 1998. The association of outdoor recreation and environmental concern: Reexamining the Dunlap-Heffernan thesis. Rural Sociology 63: 94–108. Thompson, K., J. G. Hodgson, R. M. Smith, P. H. Warren, and K. J. Gaston . 2004. Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 373–378. Tommasi, D., A. Miro, H. A. Higo, and M. L. Winston . 2004. Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Canadian Entomologist 136: 851–869. United Nations. 2005. World population prospects: the 2005 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, New York, USA. Walther-Hellwig, K., and R. Frankl . 2000. Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hym., apidae), in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Applied Entomology-Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Entomologie 124: 299–306. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue5July 2007Pages 1267-1278 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)