Enhanced mental performance at higher body temperature?
2002; American Physiological Society; Volume: 283; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1152/ajpregu.00524.2002
ISSN1522-1490
AutoresRachel Leproult, Pontus B. Persson,
Tópico(s)Sleep and Wakefulness Research
ResumoCOMPLEX FUNCTIONS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, SLEEP AND LOCOMOTIONEnhanced mental performance at higher body temperature?R. Leproult, and P. B. PerssonR. Leproult Endocrinology, Department of Medicine (MC1027), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; and, and P. B. Persson Johannes-Müller-Institut für Physiologie, Humboldt-Universität (Charité), D-10117 Berlin, GermanyPublished Online:01 Dec 2002https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00524.2002MoreSectionsPDF (44 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat most of us have had the remarkable experience of performing several mental tasks very well during slight fever or while body temperature rises unexpectedly during jet lag. This may not simply be a misperception related to the fever process or desynchrony, as pointed out by Wright and colleagues (13) in this issue of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.Most neurobehavioral measures depend essentially on two processes: a circadian process depending on the time of day and a homeostatic process relating sleep duration and intensity to the amount of prior wakefulness (2, 7). Body temperature levels also demonstrate a circadian pattern (4, 6, 11), with high levels during the day and low levels during the night. Sleep exerts an influence on body temperature levels because under conditions of total sleep deprivation, the circadian rhythm of body temperature is preserved, but its amplitude is reduced to 0.5°C, compared with an amplitude of ∼1°C when sleep occurs at a normal time (12).The relationship between the circadian rhythms of body temperature and performance in simple repetitive tasks was already shown by Kleitman in 1963 (9) and by Colquhoun in 1971 (3). Performance for this type of task parallels the circadian rhythm of body temperature. More recent studies have shown a similar relationship when data were collected during extended wakefulness. Minimum performance coincides with low levels of body temperature (1, 5,8, 10). In these studies, the pressure of the homeostatic process, because of sleep deprivation, continues to increase. Therefore, to distinguish the effects of the homeostatic process from those of the circadian process, some groups have used the forced desynchrony protocol. Under conditions in which the volunteers, for instance, live on 28-h days (with 9 h and 20 min allocated for sleep), the internal clock is not able to synchronize to the environment, allowing for the examination of variables at different circadian phases without sleep depriving the subjects. The parallelism between the circadian rhythms of body temperature and performance on various tasks persists and alertness deteriorates with time spent awake (5, 8). Similar findings have been found when subjects lived on a 20-h day (14).In this issue, Wright et al. (13) report a study in which the subjects performed various tasks during the forced desynchrony protocol, allowing a few observations of the relationship between body temperature and performance at the same circadian phases and after the same amount of hours spent awake. They then split the performance results between the corresponding lowest or highest body temperature for each subject at various circadian phases and at various hours being awake. Globally, better performance is associated with higher body temperature levels, independently of circadian phase and time spent awake. The authors conclude that body temperature is a modulator of the neurobehavioral function.Kleitman and Jackson hypothesized in 1950 that changes in alertness could be derived from variations in body temperature avoiding “time consuming performance tests which, in themselves, interfere with, or disrupt, the scheduled activities of the persons studied” (see Ref. 2). The complex analysis by Wright et al. verifies this assumption.FOOTNOTES10.1152/ajpregu.00524.2002REFERENCES1 Babkoff H, Mikulincer M, Caspy T, Kempinski D, Sing H.The topology of performance curves during 72 hours of sleep loss: a memory and search task.Q J Exp Psychol B401988737756Crossref | Google Scholar2 Carrier J, Monk T.Circadian rhythms of performance: new trends.Chronobiol Int172000719732Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar3 Colquhoun WP.Biological Rhythms and Human Performance.1971AcademicLondonGoogle Scholar4 Danel T, Libersa C, Touitou Y.The effect of alcohol consumption on the circadian control of human core body temperature is time dependent.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2812001R52R55Link | ISI | Google Scholar5 Dijk DJ, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA.Circadian and sleep/wake dependent aspects of subjective alertness and cognitive performance.J Sleep Res11992112117Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar6 Dijk DJ, Neri DF, Wyatt JK, Ronda JM, Riel E, Ritz-De Cecco A, Hughes RJ, Elliott AR, Prisk GK, West JB, Czeisler CA.Sleep, performance, circadian rhythms, and light-dark cycles during two space shuttle flights.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2812001R1647R1664Link | ISI | Google Scholar7 Folkard S, Akerstedt T.A three-process model of the regulation of alertness-sleepiness.Sleep, Arousal and Performance: A Tribute to Bob Wilkinson, Broughton RJ, Ogilvie RD.19921126BirkhauserBostonGoogle Scholar8 Johnson MP, Duffy JF, Dijk DJ, Ronda JM, Dyal CM, Czeisler CA.Short-term memory, alertness and performance: a reappraisal of their relationship to body temperature.J Sleep Res119922429Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar9 Kleitman N.Sleep and Wakefulness.1963University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar10 Monk TH, Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Berga SL, Jarret DB, Begley AE, Kupfer DJ.Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions.J Sleep Res61997918Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar11 Sharkey KM, Eastman CI.Melatonin phase shifts human circadian rhythms in a placebo-controlled simulated night-work study.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2822002R454R463Link | ISI | Google Scholar12 Van Cauter E, Sturis J, Byrne MM, Blackman JD, Leproult R, Ofek G, L'Hermite-Balériaux M, Refetoff S, Turek F, Van Reeth O.Demonstration of rapid light-induced advances and delays of the human circadian clock using hormonal phase markers.Am J Physiol2661994E953E963Link | ISI | Google Scholar13 Wright KP, Hull JT, Czeisler CA.Relationship between alertness, performance and body temperature in humans.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2832002R1370R1377Link | ISI | Google Scholar14 Wyatt JK, Ritz-De Cecco A, Czeisler CA, Dijk DJ.Circadian temperature and melatonin rhythms, sleep, and neurobehavioral function in humans living on a 20-h day.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2771999R1152R1163Link | ISI | Google Scholar Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation Cited ByNeuroprotection, Photoperiod, and Sleep11 September 2019 More from this issue > Volume 283Issue 6December 2002Pages R1368-R1369 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00524.2002PubMed12429560History Published online 1 December 2002 Published in print 1 December 2002 Metrics
Referência(s)