INHIBITING BLIND GUESSING: THE EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONS
1976; Wiley; Volume: 13; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00020.x
ISSN1745-3984
Autores Tópico(s)School Choice and Performance
ResumoJournal of Educational MeasurementVolume 13, Issue 4 p. 297-307 INHIBITING BLIND GUESSING: THE EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONS ROBERT WOOD, Corresponding Author ROBERT WOOD University of London School Examinations Department I am grateful to the Editor and to an anonymous reviewer for helping me to improve this paper.WOOD, ROBERT Address: University of London, School Examinations Department, 66 72 Gower Street, London WC1 6EE, England. Title: Senior Research Officer. Degrees: B.S. University of Nottingham, Ph.D. University of Chicago. Specialization: Measurement; Judgment; Sex Differences.Search for more papers by this author ROBERT WOOD, Corresponding Author ROBERT WOOD University of London School Examinations Department I am grateful to the Editor and to an anonymous reviewer for helping me to improve this paper.WOOD, ROBERT Address: University of London, School Examinations Department, 66 72 Gower Street, London WC1 6EE, England. Title: Senior Research Officer. Degrees: B.S. University of Nottingham, Ph.D. University of Chicago. Specialization: Measurement; Judgment; Sex Differences.Search for more papers by this author First published: December 1976 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00020.xCitations: 7 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES CHOPPIN, B. Guessing the answer on objective tests. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1975, 45, 206–213. EBEL, R. L. Blind guessing on objective achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 321–325. GRITTEN, F., & JOHNSON, D. M. Individual differences in judging multiple-choice questions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1941, 30, 423–430. HAMILTON, C. H. Bias and error in multiple-choice tests. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 151–168. LORD, F. M. Formula scoring and number-right scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975, 12, 7–11. MEAD, A. R., & SMITH, B. M. Does the true-false formula scoring work. Some data on an old subject. Journal of Educational Research, 1957, 51, 47–53. MOSTELLER, F., & TUKEY, J. W. Data analysis including statistics. In G. LINDZEY & E. ARONSON (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Reading , Massachusetts : Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1968. SCHOFIELD, R. Guessing on objective type test items. School Science Review, 1973, 55, 170–172. SLAKTER, M. J. The penalty for not guessing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 141–144. TAYLOR, P. H. A study of the effects of instructions in a multiple-choice mathematics test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966, 36, 1–6. TRAUB, R. E., & HAMBLETON, R. K The effect of scoring instructions and degree of speededness on the validity and reliability of multiple-choice tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972, 32, 737–758. WATERS, C. W., & WATERS, L. K. Validity and likeability ratings for three scoring instructions for a multiple-choice vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971, 31, 935–938. WOOD, R. Guessing on objective type test items: A reply to Schofield. School Science Review, 1974, 56, 179–180. Citing Literature Volume13, Issue4December 1976Pages 297-307 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)