Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Assessing the prevalence of compromised bone health among overweight and obese African-American breast cancer survivors: a case–control study

2015; Springer Science+Business Media; Volume: 10; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1007/s11764-015-0448-9

ISSN

1932-2267

Autores

Patricia Sheean, Huifang Liang, Linda Schiffer, Claudia Balderas, Karen L. Troy, Melinda Stolley,

Tópico(s)

Bone health and osteoporosis research

Resumo

Osteoporosis increases the risk of fracture and is often considered a late effect of breast cancer treatment. We examined the prevalence of compromised bone health in a sample of exclusively African-American (AA) breast cancer survivors since bone mineral density (BMD) varies by race/ethnicity in healthy populations. Using a case–control design, AA women in a weight loss intervention previously diagnosed and treated for stages I–IIIa breast cancer were matched 1:1 on age, race, sex, and BMI with non-cancer population controls (n = 101 pairs) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Questionnaires and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning were completed, and participants were categorized as having normal bone density, low bone mass, or osteoporosis using the World Health Organization (WHO) definition for femoral neck T-scores. The majority of these overweight/obese survivors were 6.6 (±4.7) years post-diagnosis, had stage II (n = 46) or stage III (n = 16) disease, and treated with chemotherapy (76 %), radiation (72 %), and/or adjuvant hormone therapies (45 %). Mean femoral neck BMD was significantly lower in cases vs. matched non-cancer population controls (0.85 ± 0.15 vs. 0.91 ± 0.14 g/cm2, respectively; p = 0.007). However, the prevalence of low bone mass and osteoporosis was low and did not significantly differ between groups (n = 101 pairs; p = 0.26), even when restricted to those on adjuvant hormone therapies (n = 45 pairs; p = 0.75). Using conditional logistic regression, controlling for dietary factors and education, the odds of developing compromised bone health in AA breast cancer survivors was insignificant (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.52, 5.56). These null case–control findings challenge the clinical assumption that osteoporosis is highly prevalent among all breast cancer survivors, providing foundational evidence to support differences by race/ethnicity and body weight. Routine bone density testing and regular patient–provider dialogue is critical in overweight/obese AA breast cancer survivors to ensure that healthy lifestyle factors (e.g., ideal weight, regular weight-bearing exercises, dietary adequacy of calcium and vitamin D) support optimal skeletal health.

Referência(s)