Mathematical Models: Questions of Trustworthiness
1993; Oxford University Press; Volume: 44; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/bjps/44.4.659
ISSN1464-3537
Autores Tópico(s)Game Theory and Applications
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessArticlesMathematical Models: Questions of TrustworthinessADAM MORTONADAM MORTONDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bristol Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Volume 44, Number 4December 1993 Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 35Total views on this site Citations: 123Citations are reported from Crossref Views: 35Total views on this site Citations: 123Citations are reported from Crossref Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/44.4.659 Views: 35Total views on this site Citations: 123Citations are reported from Crossref © 1993 by The Author. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Keith Beven, Stuart Lane, Trevor Page, Ann Kretzschmar, Barry Hankin, Paul Smith, Nick Chappell On (in)validating environmental models. 2. Implementation of a Turing‐like test to modelling hydrological processes, Hydrological Processes 36, no.1010 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14703Keith Beven, Stuart Lane On (in)validating environmental models. 1. Principles for formulating a Turing‐like Test for determining when a model is fit‐for purpose, Hydrological Processes 36, no.1010 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14704Peter Müller Interpretations of Probability, (Nov 2021): 319–334.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88486-4_14Alirio Rosales, Adam Morton Scientific Explanation and Trade-Offs Between Explanatory Virtues, Foundations of Science 26, no.44 (Dec 2019): 1075–1087.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09645-0Yang Yang, Ting Fong May Chui Reliability Assessment of Machine Learning Models in Hydrological Predictions Through Metamorphic Testing, Water Resources Research 57, no.99 (Aug 2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029471Michael Rush Samuel Alexander on Motion, (Jun 2021): 129–148.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65121-3_8Yang Yang, Ting Fong May Chui Modeling and interpreting hydrological responses of sustainable urban drainage systems with explainable machine learning methods, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 25, no.1111 (Nov 2021): 5839–5858.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021Claudia von Brömssen, Elin Röös Why statistical testing and confidence intervals should not be used in comparative life cycle assessments based on Monte Carlo simulations, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 25, no.1111 (Oct 2020): 2101–2105.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01827-4Eric Desjardins, Marco Van De Wiel, Yannick Rousseau Predicting, explaining and exploring with computer simulations in fluvial geomorphology, Earth-Science Reviews 209 (Oct 2020): 102654.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.015Harsh Vardhan Singh, Nitin Joshi, Deen Dayal Application of a Macro-Scale Hydrological Model over Netravati River Basin, India, (May 2020): 142–151.https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482964.015Casper Bruun Jensen A flood of models: Mekong ecologies of comparison, Social Studies of Science 50, no.11 (Sep 2019): 76–93.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719871616Keith Beven Towards a methodology for testing models as hypotheses in the inexact sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 475, no.22242224 (Apr 2019): 20180862.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0862Keith Beven, Stuart Lane Invalidation of Models and Fitness-for-Purpose: A Rejectionist Approach, (Apr 2019): 145–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_6Sebastian Koehler Modeling Interest Group Communication Strategies, (Aug 2018): 57–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97055-4_4Antoine Marmy, Jan Rajczak, Reynald Delaloye, Christin Hilbich, Martin Hoelzle, Sven Kotlarski, Christophe Lambiel, Jeannette Noetzli, Marcia Phillips, Nadine Salzmann, Benno Staub, Christian Hauck Semi-automated calibration method for modelling of mountain permafrost evolution in Switzerland, The Cryosphere 10, no.66 (Nov 2016): 2693–2719.https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2693-2016Olga Semenova, Keith Beven Barriers to progress in distributed hydrological modelling, Hydrological Processes 29, no.88 (Feb 2015): 2074–2078.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10434Keith Beven What we see now: Event-persistence and the predictability of hydro-eco-geomorphological systems, Ecological Modelling 298 (Feb 2015): 4–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.019Vikenti Gorokhovski Introduction, (Jan 2014): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03569-7_1Vikenti Gorokhovski Advective Solute Transport Through Porous Media, (Jan 2014): 143–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03569-7_10Vikenti Gorokhovski Engineering Approach, (Jan 2014): 11–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03569-7_2Vikenti Gorokhovski Geostatistical Approach, (Jan 2014): 17–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03569-7_3Vikenti Gorokhovski Model Identification, (Jan 2014): 39–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03569-7_4 References, (Apr 2012): 179–190.https://doi.org/10.1201/b11914-12Keith Beven Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes, Comptes Rendus Geoscience 344, no.22 (Feb 2012): 77–88.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005Vikenti Gorokhovski Introduction, (Jan 2012): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23722-5_1Vikenti Gorokhovski Engineering Approach, (Jan 2012): 11–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23722-5_2Vikenti Gorokhovski Geostatistical Approach, (Jan 2012): 17–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23722-5_3Vikenti Gorokhovski Model Identification, (Jan 2012): 39–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23722-5_4Steffen Ducheyne Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases, Erkenntnis 76, no.11 (Jul 2011): 73–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9309-8Caterina Marchionni Geographical Economics and its Neighbours — Forces Towards and Against Unification, (Jan 2012): 425–458.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50015-4Axel Gelfert Mathematical formalisms in scientific practice: From denotation to model-based representation, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no.22 (Jun 2011): 272–286.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.035A. Pistocchi, D.A. Sarigiannis, P. Vizcaino Spatially explicit multimedia fate models for pollutants in Europe: State of the art and perspectives, Science of The Total Environment 408, no.1818 (Aug 2010): 3817–3830.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.046Peter Müller Constructing climate knowledge with computer models, WIREs Climate Change 1, no.44 (Jun 2010): 565–580.https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.60Robert W. P. Luk Understanding Scientific Study via Process Modeling, Foundations of Science 15, no.11 (Jan 2010): 49–78.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-009-9168-9Robert J Smith, Richard Gordon The OptAIDS project: towards global halting of HIV/AIDS, BMC Public Health 9, no.S1S1 (Nov 2009).https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-S1-S1Yanni Gunnell Bibliographie, (Sep 2009): 371–392.https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.gunne.2009.01.0371Roman Frigg, Julian Reiss The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew?, Synthese 169, no.33 (Dec 2008): 593–613.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9438-zMatthew W. Parker Computing the uncomputable; or, The discrete charm of second-order simulacra, Synthese 169, no.33 (Nov 2008): 447–463.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9441-4Keith Beven On doing better hydrological science, Hydrological Processes 22, no.1717 (Jul 2008): 3549–3553.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7108M. Sànchez-Marrè, K. Gibert, R.S. Sojda, J.P. Steyer, P. Struss, I. Rodríguez-Roda, J. Comas, V. Brilhante, E.A. Roehl Chapter Eight Intelligent Environmental Decision Support Systems, (Jan 2008): 119–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00608-XKevin A. Clarke, David M. Primo Modernizing Political Science: A Model-Based Approach, Perspectives on Politics 5, no.0404 (Nov 2007).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707072192Caterina Marchionni Contrastive explanation and unrealistic models: The case of the new economic geography, Journal of Economic Methodology 13, no.44 (Dec 2006): 425–446.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780601048758Keith Beven Reply to ‘The emergence of a new kind of relativism in environmental modelling: a commentary’ by Philippe Baveye, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 460, no.20472047 (Jul 2004): 2147–2151.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1257Jim Freer, Keith Beven, Norman Peters Multivariate seasonal period model rejection within the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation procedure, (Jan 2003): 69–87.https://doi.org/10.1029/WS006p0069Keith Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 458, no.20262026 (Oct 2002): 2465–2484.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.0986M.B. Beck Chapter 6 Epilogue, (Jan 2002): 95–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8892(02)80007-0K.J. Beven Chapter 12 Uncertainty and the detection of structural change in models of environmental systems, (Jan 2002): 227–250.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8892(02)80013-6Keith Beven On explanatory depth and predictive power, Hydrological Processes 15, no.1515 (Oct 2001): 3069–3072.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.500Keith Beven On modelling as collective intelligence, Hydrological Processes 15, no.1111 (Jul 2001): 2205–2207.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.459Keith Beven, Jim Freer Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, Journal of Hydrology 249, no.1-41-4 (Aug 2001): 11–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8J. R. French, N. J. Clifford Hydrodynamic modelling as a basis for explaining estuarine environmental dynamics: some computational and methodological issues, Hydrological Processes 14, no.11-1211-12 (Jan 2000): 2089–2108.https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2089::AID-HYP56>3.0.CO;2-LKEITH BEVEN TOPMODEL: A critique, Hydrological Processes 11, no.99 (Jul 1997): 1069–1085.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1069::AID-HYP545>3.0.CO;2-OGiovanni Boniolo On a unified theory of models and thought experiments in natural sciences, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11, no.22 (Jul 1997): 121–142.https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599708573558M. B. Beck, J. R. Ravetz, L. A. Mulkey, T. O. Barnwell On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments, Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 11, no.33 (Jun 1997): 229–254.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427917Alexander Rueger and W. David Sharp Simple Theories of a Messy World: Truth and Explanatory Power in Nonlinear Dynamics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, no.11 (Dec 2020): 93–112.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/47.1.93Adam Morton GAME THEORY AND KNOWLEDGE BY SIMULATION, Ratio 7, no.11 (Oct 2006): 14–25.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1994.tb00150.x BBS volume 16 issue 1 Cover and Back matter, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): b1–b9.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028624Alison Gopnik How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028636Alvin I. Goldman The psychology of folk psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 15–28.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028648D. M. Armstrong Causes are perceived and introspected, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 29–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002865XSimon Baron-Cohen The concept of intentionality: Invented or innate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 29–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028661Karen Bartsch, David Estes Are false beliefs representative mental states?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 30–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028673George Butterworth Towards an ecology of mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 31–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028685Robert L. Campbell, Mark H. Bickhard Knowing levels and the child's understanding of mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 33–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028697Kimberly Wright Cassidy There's more to mental states than meets the inner “l”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 34–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028703David J. Chalmers Self-ascription without qualia: A case study, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 35–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028715Michael Chandler, Jeremy Carpendale The naked truth about first-person knowledge, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 36–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028727Nick Chater Categorization, theories and folk psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 37–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028739Maria Czyzewska, Pawel Lewicki How directly do we know our minds?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 37–38.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028740Steven Daniel The anthropology of folk psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 38–39.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028752Winand H. Dittrich, Stephen E. G. Lea Intentionality, mind and folk psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 39–41.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028764K. Anders Ericsson Recall or regeneration of past mental states: Toward an account in terms of cognitive processes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 41–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028776James H. Fetzer Goldman has not defeated folk functionalism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 42–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028788Alvin I. Goldman Competing accounts of belief-task performance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 43–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002879XAlison Gopnik Theories and qualities, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 44–45.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028806Robert M. Gordon Self-ascription of belief and desire, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 45–46.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028818Keith Gunderson On behalf of phenomenological parity for the attitudes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 46–47.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002882XJennifer M. Gurd, John C. Marshall Know my own mind? I should be so lucky!, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 47–48.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028831Paul L. Harris First-person current, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 48–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028843John Heil Unraveling introspection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 49–50.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028855Christopher S. Hill Qualitative characteristics, type materialism and the circularity of analytic functionalism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 50–51.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028867Terence Horgan Analytic functionalism without representational functionalism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 51–51.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028879Frank Jackson Qualia for propositional attitudes?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 52–52.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028880Carl N. Johnson Gopnik's invention of intentionality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 52–53.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028892Brian D. Josephson “Good developmental sequence” and the paradoxes of children's skills, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 53–54.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028909Boaz Keysar Common sense and adult theory of communication, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 54–54.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028910Bernard W. Kobes Self-attributions help constitute mental types, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 54–56.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028922Alan M. Leslie, Tim P. German, Francesca G. Happé Even a theory-theory needs information processing: ToMM, an alternative theory-theory of the child's theory of mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 56–57.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028934Alexander Levine, Georg Schwarz Three inferential temptations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 57–58.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028946Brian Loar Functionalism can explain self-ascription, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 58–60.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028958Peter Ludlow, Norah Martin The fallibility of first-person knowledge of intentionality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 60–60.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002896XAlfred Mele Reporting on past psychological states: Beliefs, desires and intentions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 61–61.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028971Chris Moore, John Barresi Knowledge of the psychological states of self and others is not only theory-laden but also data-driven, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 61–62.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028983William Edward Morris, Robert C. Richardson Mismatching categories?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 62–63.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028995Adam Morton Heuristics and counterfactual self-knowledge, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 63–64.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029009Shaun Nichols Developmental evidence and introspection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 64–65.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029010David R. Olson, Janet Wilde Astington The role of concepts in perception and inference, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 65–66.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029022Josef Perner A plea for the second functionalist model and the insufficiency of simulation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 66–67.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029034Paul M. Pietroski First-person authority and beliefs as representations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 67–69.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029046Bradford H. Pillow Limitations on first-person experience: Implications of the “extent”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 69–69.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029058David C. Plaut, Annette Karmiloff-Smith Representational development and theory-of-mind computations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 70–71.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002906XIan Pratt Matching and mental-state ascription, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 71–72.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029071Howard Rachlin Theory-theory theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 72–73.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029083Sam S. Rakover Theories of mind: Some methodological/conceptual problems and an alternative approach, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 73–74.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029095Georges Rey Why presume analyses are on-line?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 74–75.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029101Lance J. Rips Qualities and relations in folk theories of mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 75–76.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029113James Russell On leaving your children wrapped in thought, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 76–77.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029125Barbara A. C. Saunders Disenshrining the Cartesian self, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 77–78.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029137Sydney Shoemaker Special access lies down with theory-theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 78–79.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029149Michael Siegal Knowing children's minds, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 79–80.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029150Keith E. Stanovich The developmental history of an illusion, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 80–81.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029162Kim Sterelny Categories, categorisation and development: Introspective knowledge is no threat to functionalism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 81–83.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029174Nicholas S. Thompson Why Alison Gopnik should be a behaviorist, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 83–84.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029186Michael Tomasello Where's the person?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 84–85.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029198Max Velmans Common sense, functional theories and knowledge of the mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 85–86.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029204Andrew Woodfield Three questions for Goldman, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 86–87.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029216Deborah Zaitchik, Jerry Samet Intentionality, theoreticity and innateness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 87–89.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029228Philip David Zelazo, Douglas Frye The psychologist's fallacy (and the philosopher's omission), Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 89–90.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002923X Editorial Commentary, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 90–90.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029241Alison Gopnik Theories and illusions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 90–100.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029253Alvin I. Goldman Functionalism, the theory-theory and phenomenology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 101–113.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029265Keith J. Beven A Discussion of Distributed Hydrological Modelling, (Jan 1990): 255–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0257-2_13Keith J. Beven Response to comments on ‘a discussion of distributed hydrological modelling’ by j c refsgaard et al, (Jan 1990): 289–295.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0257-2_15
Referência(s)