The Evolutionary Response to Frequency- and Density-Dependent Interactions
1979; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 114; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283487
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Animal Behavior and Reproduction
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Evolutionary Response to Frequency- and Density-Dependent InteractionsMontgomery SlatkinMontgomery SlatkinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 114, Number 3Sep., 1979 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283487 PermissionsRequest permissions Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 46Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1979 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nicholas A. Levis, David W. Pfennig Plasticity‐led evolution: A survey of developmental mechanisms and empirical tests, Evolution & Development 22, no.1-21-2 (Aug 2019): 71–87.https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12309Stephen M. Shuster, Regina M. Willen, Brian Keane, Nancy G. Solomon Alternative Mating Tactics in Socially Monogamous Prairie Voles, Microtus ochrogaster, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (Feb 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00007Rupert Mazzucco, Michael Doebeli, Ulf Dieckmann The influence of habitat boundaries on evolutionary branching along environmental gradients, Evolutionary Ecology 32, no.66 (Sep 2018): 563–585.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-018-9956-1Oscar Rios-Cardenas, Lisa Bono, Molly R. Morris Frequency-dependent selection and fluctuations around an equilibrium for alternative reproductive tactics in a swordtail, Animal Behaviour 140 (Jun 2018): 19–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.018Bjarni K. Kristjánsson, Camille A. Leblanc Variation in the magnitude of morphological and dietary differences between individuals among populations of small benthic Arctic charr in relation to ecological factors, Ecology and Evolution 8, no.33 (Jan 2018): 1573–1581.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3761Mark A. McPeek The Ecological Dynamics of Natural Selection: Traits and the Coevolution of Community Structure, The American Naturalist 189, no.55 (Mar 2017): E91–E117.https://doi.org/10.1086/691101Gustavo S Betini, Andrew G McAdam, Cortland K Griswold, D Ryan Norris A fitness trade-off between seasons causes multigenerational cycles in phenotype and population size, eLife 6 (Feb 2017).https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18770Renée A. Duckworth, Stepfanie M. Aguillon Eco-evolutionary dynamics: investigating multiple causal pathways linking changes in behavior, population density and natural selection, Journal of Ornithology 156, no.S1S1 (Jun 2015): 115–124.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1239-9Michael T. Kinnison, Nelson G. Hairston, Andrew P. Hendry Cryptic eco‐evolutionary dynamics, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1360, no.11 (Nov 2015): 120–144.https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12974Yosef Cohen, Gonzalo Galiano Evolutionary Distributions and Competition by Way of Reaction-Diffusion and by Way of Convolution, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 75, no.1212 (Oct 2013): 2305–2323.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9890-xLuis-Miguel Chevin and Russell Lande Evolution of Discrete Phenotypes from Continuous Norms of Reaction., The American Naturalist 182, no.11 (Jul 2015): 13–27.https://doi.org/10.1086/670613Lee Altenberg The evolution of dispersal in random environments and the principle of partial control, Ecological Monographs 82, no.33 (Aug 2012): 297–333.https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1136.1Ned A. Dochtermann, Stephen H. Jenkins, Maryke J. Swartz, Allison C. Hargett The roles of competition and environmental heterogeneity in the maintenance of behavioral variation and covariation, Ecology 93, no.66 (Jun 2012): 1330–1339.https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1025.1Michael Taborsky, Rui F. Oliveira, H. Jane Brockmann The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions, (Mar 2008): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.002D. WAXMAN, S. GAVRILETS 20 Questions on Adaptive Dynamics, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, no.55 (Aug 2005): 1139–1154.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00948.xJosé M Álvarez-Castro, Gonzalo Alvarez Models of General Frequency-Dependent Selection and Mating-Interaction Effects and the Analysis of Selection Patterns in Drosophila Inversion Polymorphisms, Genetics 170, no.33 (Jul 2005): 1167–1179.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.037754CHRISTIAN DAMGAARD Evolution of advantageous alleles affecting population ecological characteristics in partially inbreeding populations, Hereditas 138, no.22 (Jun 2003): 122–128.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01642.xF. John Odling-Smee, Kevin N. Laland, Marcus W. Feldman Niche Construction and Gene-Culture Coevolution: An Evolutionary Basis for the Human Sciences, (Jan 2000): 89–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1221-9_4Stephen M. Shuster, Clay Sassaman Genetic interaction between male mating strategy and sex ratio in a marine isopod, Nature 388, no.66406640 (Jul 1997): 373–377.https://doi.org/10.1038/41089F.J. Odling-Smee Niche construction, genetic evolution and cultural change, Behavioural Processes 35, no.1-31-3 (Dec 1995): 195–205.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(95)00055-0David B. Lank, Constance M. Smith, Olivier Hanotte, Terry Burke, Fred Cooke Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax, Nature 378, no.65526552 (Nov 1995): 59–62.https://doi.org/10.1038/378059a0Steven Hecht Orzack Sex Ratio Evolution in Parasitic Wasps, (Jan 1993): 477–511.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1402-8_15Stephen M. Shuster, Michael J. Wade Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod, Nature 350, no.63196319 (Apr 1991): 608–610.https://doi.org/10.1038/350608a0Joseph Travis, Bruce D. Woodward Social context and courtship flexibility in male sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poecillidae), Animal Behaviour 38, no.66 (Dec 1989): 1001–1011.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80139-3Stephen M. Shuster MALE ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN A MARINE ISOPOD CRUSTACEAN ( PARACERCEIS SCULPTA ): THE USE OF GENETIC MARKERS TO MEASURE DIFFERENCES IN FERTILIZATION SUCCESS AMONG α‐, β‐ , AND γ ‐MALES, Evolution 43, no.88 (May 2017): 1683–1698.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02618.xGebhard Geiger Sociobiology and the structural stability of behavior patterns, Mathematical Biosciences 93, no.11 (Mar 1989): 117–145.https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(89)90016-3 Laurence D. Mueller Density-Dependent Population Growth and Natural Selection in Food-Limited Environments: The Drosophila Model, The American Naturalist 132, no.66 (Oct 2015): 786–809.https://doi.org/10.1086/284890R. Cressman Frequency-dependent viability selection (A single-locus, multi-phenotype model), Journal of Theoretical Biology 130, no.22 (Jan 1988): 147–165.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80090-0Daniel A. Vasco, Apolinario D. Nazarea, R.H. Richardson Dynamics and stability in coevolutionary ecological systems I. Community stability and coevolutionarily stable states, Theoretical Population Biology 31, no.22 (Apr 1987): 273–305.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(87)90030-X Curtis M. Lively Canalization Versus Developmental Conversion in a Spatially Variable Environment, The American Naturalist 128, no.44 (Oct 2015): 561–572.https://doi.org/10.1086/284588Ruth G. Shaw RESPONSE TO DENSITY IN A WILD POPULATION OF THE PERENNIAL HERB SALVIA LYRATA : VARIATION AMONG FAMILIES, Evolution 40, no.33 (May 2017): 492–505.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00502.xSabin Lessard Evolutionary principles for general frequency-dependent two-phenotype models in sexual populations, Journal of Theoretical Biology 119, no.33 (Apr 1986): 329–344.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80145-XPeter A. Abrams Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition, Theoretical Population Biology 29, no.11 (Feb 1986): 107–160.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(86)90007-9Bernhard Thomas Genetical ESS-models. I. Concepts and basic model, Theoretical Population Biology 28, no.11 (Aug 1985): 18–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(85)90020-6Bernhard Thomas Genetical ESS-models. II. Multi-strategy models and multiple alleles, Theoretical Population Biology 28, no.11 (Aug 1985): 33–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(85)90021-8Stephen Ellner ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. Logistic-type models, Theoretical Population Biology 28, no.11 (Aug 1985): 50–79.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(85)90022-XMart R. Gross Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon, Nature 313, no.59975997 (Jan 1985): 47–48.https://doi.org/10.1038/313047a0Sabin Lessard Evolutionary dynamics in frequency-dependent two-phenotype models, Theoretical Population Biology 25, no.22 (Apr 1984): 210–234.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(84)90019-4John K. Raper General analysis of frequency-dependent sexual selection at a multi-allelic locus, Theoretical Population Biology 24, no.22 (Oct 1983): 192–211.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(83)90041-2Marjorie A. Asmussen Evolution of dispersal in density regulated populations: A haploid model, Theoretical Population Biology 23, no.33 (Jun 1983): 281–299.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(83)90019-9Marjorie A. Asmussen Density dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition 1. A haploid model, Journal of Theoretical Biology 101, no.11 (Mar 1983): 113–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(83)90275-8 Catherine A. Toft , David L. Trauger , and Horatio W. Murdy Tests for Species Interactions: Breeding Phenology and Habitat Use in Subarctic Ducks, The American Naturalist 120, no.55 (Oct 2015): 586–613.https://doi.org/10.1086/284015Simon A. Levin, Lee A. Segel Models of the influence of predation on aspect diversity in prey populations, Journal of Mathematical Biology 14, no.33 (Jul 1982): 253–284.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275393 J. Maynard Smith Will a Sexual Population Evolve to an Ess?, The American Naturalist 117, no.66 (Oct 2015): 1015–1018.https://doi.org/10.1086/283788John R G Turner Oscillations of frequency in batesian mimics, hawks and doves, and other simple frequency dependent polymorphisms, Heredity 45, no.11 (Aug 1980): 113–126.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.55Montgomery Slatkin A note on the symmetry constraints imposed by dominance in multiple locus genetic models, Genetical Research 33, no.11 (Apr 2009): 81–88.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300018188
Referência(s)