Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Attribution, dissonance, and the illusion of uniqueness

1972; Elsevier BV; Volume: 8; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/0022-1031(72)90060-1

1096-0465

Joel Cooper, EDWARD E. JONES, S.Mark Tuller,

Social and Intergroup Psychology

Kelley (1967) has suggested that the tendency toward greater attitude change with lower incentives in a “forced compliance” paradigm may be explained without reference to the motivational process of dissonance arousal and reduction. According to his “attributional” formulation, subjects who comply for low incentives assume (incorrectly) that they are unique in complying and infer, therefore, that the compliant behavior is actually consonant with their true attitude. This plausible interpretation was tested in a design that independently varied (a) levels of incentive for preparing a counterattitudinal essay and (b) information about compliance rates of previous subjects. The main result was that incentive level had the usual inverse effect on attitude change, but alleged differential compliance rates had no effect on attitude. The “illusion of uniqueness” hypothesis was clearly not supported whereas the inverse incentive effect was once again demonstrated.