Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Natural Fertility and Family Limitation in Roman Marriage

1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 89; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/367430

1546-072X

Bruce W. Frier,

Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment

Previous articleNext article No AccessNatural Fertility and Family Limitation in Roman MarriageBruce W. FrierBruce W. FrierPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Classical Philology Volume 89, Number 4Oct., 1994 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/367430 Views: 19Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Paul V. Kelly Risks for Farming Families in the Roman World, (Nov 2021): 485–503.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81103-7_16John M. Riddle , ( 2020): 1.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah21002.pub2Marine Tesson Le choix de la non-maternité dans l'Antiquité tardive, Sextant , no.3636 (Dec 2019): 115–134.https://doi.org/10.4000/sextant.391Isabelle Séguy , ( 2019): 23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04576-0_2Walter Scheidel Demography of the Ancient World, (Feb 2018): 2744–2747.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2450G. Geltner Public Health and the Pre-Modern City: A Research Agenda, History Compass 10, no.33 (Mar 2012): 231–245.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00826.xWalter Scheidel Demography of the Ancient World, (Dec 2016): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2450-1Walter Scheidel Demography, (Nov 2007): 38–86.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521780537.004Saskia Hin Family Matters: Economy, Culture and Biology: Fertility and Its Constraints in Roman Italy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1426945John C. Caldwell Fertility control in the classical world: Was there an ancient fertility transition?, Journal of Population Research 21, no.11 (Mar 2004): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032208Alan K. Bowman, Peter Garnsey, Dominic Rathbone The Cambridge Ancient History, (Mar 2008).https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351Peter Garnsey The land, (Oct 2000): 679–709.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.024W. V. Harris Trade, (Oct 2000): 710–740.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.025Kevin Greene Industry and technology, (Oct 2000): 741–768.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.026J. Andreau Commerce and finance, (Oct 2000): 769–786.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.027Bruce W. Frier Demography, (Oct 2000): 787–816.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.028Richard Saller Status and patronage, (Oct 2000): 817–854.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.029Richard Saller Family and household, (Oct 2000): 855–874.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521263351.030 John Neu Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 1995, Isis 86 (Oct 2015): 1–331.https://doi.org/10.1086/357399John C. Caldwell Fertility Control in The Classical World: was There an Ancient Fertility Transition?, (): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4498-4_6