The Dual of Duopoly Is Complementary Monopoly: or, Two of Cournot's Theories Are One
1968; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 76; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/259404
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Taxation and Legal Issues
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Dual of Duopoly Is Complementary Monopoly: or, Two of Cournot's Theories Are OneHugo SonnenscheinHugo SonnenscheinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 76, Number 2Mar. - Apr., 1968 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259404 Views: 30Total views on this site Citations: 80Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1968 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Paolo Bertoletti The dual of Bertrand with homogenous products is Cournot with perfect complements, Economic Theory Bulletin 10, no.22 (May 2022): 183–189.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00225-3Laurent Linnemer Doubling Back on Double Marginalization, Review of Industrial Organization 61, no.11 (May 2022): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-022-09872-zLaurent Linnemer Doubling Back on Double Marginalization, SSRN Electronic Journal 36 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4014929Ibrahim Abdelfadeel Shaban, F.T.S. Chan, S.H. Chung A novel model to manage air cargo disruptions caused by global catastrophes such as Covid-19, Journal of Air Transport Management 95 (Aug 2021): 102086.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102086Rim Lahmandi‐Ayed, Hejer Lasram, Didier Laussel Is partial privatization of universities a solution for higher education?, Journal of Public Economic Theory 46 (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12531Claude d'Aspremont, Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira Modelling the Intensity of Competition, (Jan 2021): 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63602-9_1Matteo Alvisi, Emanuela Carbonara Cocktails done right: price competition and welfare when substitutes become complements, Journal of Economics 131, no.11 (Jan 2020): 1–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-020-00690-zPaul W. Dobson, Ratula Chakraborty Strategic incentives for complementary producers to innovate for efficiency and support sustainability, International Journal of Production Economics 219 (Jan 2020): 431–439.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.001Zachary Grossman, Jonathan Pincus, Perry Shapiro, Duygu Yengin Second-best mechanisms for land assembly and hold-out problems, Journal of Public Economics 175 (Jul 2019): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.03.002Alexei Alexandrov, Russell Pittman, Olga Ukhaneva Pricing of Complements in the U.S. Freight Railroads: Cournot Versus Coase, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3165072Chia-Hung Sun, Chorng-Jian Liu The combination of two tragedies: commons and anticommons tragedies, Journal of Economics 122, no.11 (Mar 2017): 29–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0534-8Michael Kopel, Clemens Löffler, Thomas Pfeiffer Complementary monopolies and multi-product firms, Economics Letters 157 (Aug 2017): 28–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.021Syngjoo Choi, Andrea Galeotti, Sanjeev Goyal Trading in Networks: Theory and Experiments, Journal of the European Economic Association 15, no.44 (Feb 2017): 784–817.https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvw016Richard T. B. Ma Pay or Perish: The Economics of Premium Peering, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 35, no.22 (Feb 2017): 353–366.https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2017.2659038Michael Kopel, Clemens LLffler, Thomas Pfeiffer Complementary Monopolies and Multi-Product Firms, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975325Sophie Bienenstock Consumer education: why the market doesn't work, European Journal of Law and Economics 42, no.22 (Jun 2014): 237–262.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9446-zRein Haagsma Cournot, a Non-strategic Economist, (Apr 2016): 15–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29254-0_3Ralph M. Braid Efficiency-enhancing horizontal mergers in spatial competition, Papers in Regional Science (Apr 2016).https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12228Harald Hecking, Timo Panke The global markets for coking coal and iron ore — Complementary goods, integrated mining companies and strategic behavior, Energy Economics 52 (Dec 2015): 26–38.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.09.005Luca Lambertini, Manuela Mosca The Bertrand Paradox, the Useless Auctioneer and the Launhardt Model, Australian Economic Papers 53, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2015): 170–183.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12028Noriaki Matsushima, Fumitoshi Mizutani How Does Market Size Affect Vertical Structure When Considering Vertical Coordination? Application to the Railway Industry, Pacific Economic Review 19, no.55 (Dec 2014): 657–676.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12088Gastón Llanes, Joaquín Poblete Ex Ante Agreements in Standard Setting and Patent-Pool Formation*, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 23, no.11 (Jan 2014): 50–67.https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12045Matt Van Essen Regulating the Anticommons: Insights from Public-Expenditure Theory, Southern Economic Journal 80, no.22 (Oct 2013): 523–539.https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2012.147Matteo Alvisi, Emanuela Carbonara IMPERFECT SUBSTITUTES FOR PERFECT COMPLEMENTS: SOLVING THE ANTICOMMONS PROBLEM, Bulletin of Economic Research 65, no.33 (Oct 2011): 256–279.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00407.xNoriaki Matsushima, Tomomichi Mizuno Vertical separation as a defense against strong suppliers, European Journal of Operational Research 228, no.11 (Jul 2013): 208–216.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.037MING CHUNG CHANG, YUN-CHIEH LIN, CHIU FEN LIN COMPARING COURNOT DUOPOLY AND MONOPOLY WITH ASYMMETRIC COMPLEMENTARY GOODS, The Singapore Economic Review 58, no.0202 (Jun 2013): 1350011.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590813500112Maria-Augusta Miceli Fusioni orizzontali (Horizontal Mergers), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261153MING CHUNG CHANG, HSIAO-PING PENG COURNOT AND BERTRAND EQUILIBRIA COMPARED: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND AN EXTENSION FROM THE OUTPUT-STRUCTURE VIEWPOINT*, Japanese Economic Review 63, no.44 (Jan 2012): 467–496.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2011.00551.xTOSHIHIRO MATSUMURA, NORIAKI MATSUSHIMA AIRPORT PRIVATIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION, Japanese Economic Review 63, no.44 (Aug 2012): 431–450.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2012.00584.xDidier Laussel, Ngo Van Long Vertical Disintegration: A Dynamic Markovian Approach, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 21, no.33 (Jul 2012): 745–771.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00345.xGastón Llanes, Stefano Trento Patent policy, patent pools, and the accumulation of claims in sequential innovation, Economic Theory 50, no.33 (Dec 2010): 703–725.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0591-5Nicolas Boccard Duality of welfare and profit maximization, Economics Letters 113, no.33 (Dec 2011): 215–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.07.010Evangelia N. Kaselimi, Theo E. Notteboom, Bruno De Borger A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: the impact of dedicated terminals, Maritime Policy & Management 38, no.44 (Jul 2011): 395–414.https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.588260Masayoshi Maruyama, Kazumitsu Minamikawa, Yusuke Zennyo A Note on the Desirability of Merger among Complements, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 11, no.11 (Dec 2009): 57–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0062-5Didier Laussel, Ngo Van Long Strategic Separation from Suppliers of Vital Complementary Inputs: A Dynamic Markovian Approach, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1919015Noriaki Matsushima, Fumitoshi Mizutani Market Size and Vertical Structure in the Railway Industry, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1943251Adam A. Wadecki, David J. Brophy Determinants of Private Equity Fundraising: An Analysis of Competition, Uncertainty, and Barriers to Entry, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1946968Jenny Rae Hawkins Mitigating Hold-Up Through Complementarities and Refundability, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992052Byung-Cheol Kim, Jay Pil Choi Customer Information Sharing: Strategic Incentives and New Implications, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 19, no.22 (Jun 2010): 403–433.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00256.xNoriaki Matsushima, Tomomichi Mizuno How Do Market Structures Affect Decisions on Vertical Integration/Separation?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1547543Matteo Alvisi, Emanuela Carbonara Bundling and Compatibility: Selling the Whole Package May Be Pro-Competitive, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1625844Toshihiro Matsumura, Noriaki Matsushima Airport Privatization and International Competition, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1677720Emanuela Carbonara, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Francesco Parisi, Matteo Alvisi Complementing Substitutes: Bundling, Compatibility, and Entry, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1415925Gaston Llanes, Stefano Trento Anticommons and Optimal Patent Policy in a Model of Sequential Innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1424498Gaston Llanes, Stefano Trento Patent Policy, Patent Pools, and the Accumulation of Claims in Sequential Innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1439752Noriaki Matsushima, Tomomichi Mizuno Vertical Separation as a Defense against Strong Suppliers, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1472905Didier Laussel Buying Back Subcontractors: The Strategic Limits of Backward Integration, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 17, no.44 (Dec 2008): 895–911.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2008.00199.xJan Kraemer Service Bundling and Quality Competition on Converging Communications Markets, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265047Claude d'Aspremont, Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira, Louis-André Gérard-Varet COMPETITION FOR MARKET SHARE OR FOR MARKET SIZE: OLIGOPOLISTIC EQUILIBRIA WITH VARYING COMPETITIVE TOUGHNESS, International Economic Review 48, no.33 (Aug 2007): 761–784.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00444.xAntoine Soubeyran, Hubert Stahn Do Investments in Specialized Knowledge Lead to Composite Good Industries?, Small Business Economics 29, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2007): 119–135.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0008-9Patrick J. G. Van Cayseele, Jo Reynaerts Complementary Platforms, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1021705Ronald D. Fischer, Nicolas Figueroa, Sebastian Infante Competition with Asymmetric Switching Costs, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1924376Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Francesco Parisi SUBSTITUTING COMPLEMENTS, Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2, no.33 (Nov 2006): 333–347.https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhl018JOLIAN MCHARDY COMPLEMENTARY MONOPOLY AND WELFARE: IS SPLITTING UP SO BAD?*, The Manchester School 74, no.33 (Jun 2006): 334–349.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00496.xM. Keith Chen, Barry J. Nalebuff One-Way Essential Complements, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.937384Claude d'Aspremont, Rodolphe dos Santos Ferreira Oligopolistic Competition as a Common Agency Game, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.880396Denis Claude, Jean Hindriks Strategic Privatization and Regulation Policy in Mixed Markets, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.880401George Norman, Lynne Pepall Knowledge Spillovers, Mergers and Public Policy in Economic Clusters, Review of Industrial Organization 25, no.22 (Sep 2004): 155–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-004-1928-7 Johannes Hörner and Morton I. Kamien Coase and Hotelling: A Meeting of the Minds Hörner and Kamien, Journal of Political Economy 112, no.33 (Jul 2015): 718–723.https://doi.org/10.1086/383103Clarence C. Morrison Augustin cournot and neoclassical economics, Atlantic Economic Journal 31, no.22 (Jun 2003): 123–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319865Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira En quête d'un indice de l'intensité de la concurrence, Revue économique 54, no.33 (Jan 2003): 441.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.543.0441Antoine Soubeyran, Hubert Stahn Do Investments in Specialized Knowledge Lead to Composite Good Industries?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314000Yossi Feinberg, Morton I. Kamien Highway robbery: complementary monopoly and the hold-up problem, International Journal of Industrial Organization 19, no.1010 (Dec 2001): 1603–1621.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00069-2Barry J. Nalebuff Competing Against Bundles, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239684Nicholas Economides Quality choice and vertical integration, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, no.66 (Aug 1999): 903–914.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00063-5Barry J. Nalebuff Bundling, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1999).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.185193Andreas Irmen Mark-up pricing and bilateral monopoly, Economics Letters 54, no.22 (Feb 1997): 179–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00001-3P.K. Else, T.J. James Privatisation and the quality of rail services, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 29, no.66 (Nov 1995): 387–400.https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(95)00007-BSherrill Shaffer Structure, conduct, performance, and welfare, Review of Industrial Organization 9, no.44 (Aug 1994): 435–450.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01029516P.K. Else, T.J. James Will the fare be fair? An examination of the pricing effects of the privatization of rail services, International Review of Applied Economics 8, no.33 (Jan 1994): 291–302.https://doi.org/10.1080/758525162PETER ELSE Allocative Efficiency and the Proposed Restructuring of British Rail, Fiscal Studies 14, no.22 (May 1993): 65–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1993.tb00480.xXavier Vives Edgeworth and modern oligopoly theory, European Economic Review 37, no.2-32-3 (Apr 1993): 463–476.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(93)90035-9Paul W. Dobson Mutually related firms and the rationality of producing nothing, Managerial and Decision Economics 13, no.66 (Nov 1992): 485–491.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090130604Gérard Gaudet, Stephen W. Salant Mergers of producers of perfect complements competing in price, Economics Letters 39, no.33 (Jul 1992): 359–364.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(92)90274-3Jean-Pierre Amigues, Michel Moreaux, Gérard Gaudet Bertrand and Cournot Equilibrium Price Paths in a Nonrenewable Resource Differentiated Product Duopoly, (Jan 1988): 343–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46629-8_24Gérard Gaudet, Michel Moreaux A comparison of Bertrand and Cournot equilibrium outcomes in a differentiated nonrenewable resources duopoly, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 11 (Jan 1988): 903–906.https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(88)90624-3Jonathan B. Baker, Timothy F. Bresnahan Estimating the residual demand curve facing a single firm, International Journal of Industrial Organization 6, no.33 (Jan 1988): 283–300.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(88)80012-2Yasuhiro Sakai Cournot and bertrand equilibria under imperfect information, Journal of Economics Zeitschrift f�ur National�konomie 46, no.33 (Sep 1986): 213–232.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01229301Leonard Cheng Inverting systems of demand functions, Journal of Economic Theory 37, no.11 (Oct 1985): 202–210.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90037-7John Roberts, Hugo Sonnenschein On the existence of Cournot equilbrium without concave profit functions, Journal of Economic Theory 13, no.11 (Aug 1976): 112–117.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90069-7
Referência(s)