Effort Indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II)
2009; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 24; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/13854040903107791
ISSN1744-4144
AutoresPenny Wolfe, Scott R. Millis, Robin A. Hanks, Norman L. Fichtenberg, Glenn J. Larrabee, Jerry J. Sweet,
Tópico(s)Memory Processes and Influences
ResumoAbstract This study determined whether performance patterns on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) could differentiate participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) showing adequate effort from those with mild TBI exhibiting poor effort using a case-control design. The TBI group consisted of 124 persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The poor effort group consisted of 77 persons with mild head injury who were involved in litigation (LG) and failed at least one stand-alone symptom validity measure (SVT) and also either a second SVT or an effort indicator embedded within a standard clinical test. A total of 18 CVLT-II variables were investigated using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) for logistic regression to determine which variables best differentiated the groups. The CVLT-II variables having the most support were Long-Delay Free Recall, Total Recognition Discriminability (d′), and Total Recall Discriminability. Keywords: Effort indicatorsCVLT-IIMalingering Notes Penny L. Wolfe, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Scott R. Millis, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Robin Hanks, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Norman Fichtenberg, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Glenn J. Larrabee, Independent Practice, Sarasota, Florida; Jerry J. Sweet, Northshore University Health System and University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. Penny L. Wolfe is now at the National Rehabilitation Hospital in the Department of Psychology. The authors thank Cherisse McKay, M.A., Tara McHugh, M.A., Bridgette Rees, B.S., and Robert Kotasek, M.A. for their assistance with data management. Additional informationNotes on contributorsPenny L. Wolfe Penny L. Wolfe, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Scott R. Millis, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Robin Hanks, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Norman Fichtenberg, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine; Glenn J. Larrabee, Independent Practice, Sarasota, Florida; Jerry J. Sweet, Northshore University Health System and University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. Penny L. Wolfe is now at the National Rehabilitation Hospital in the Department of Psychology. The authors thank Cherisse McKay, M.A., Tara McHugh, M.A., Bridgette Rees, B.S., and Robert Kotasek, M.A. for their assistance with data management.
Referência(s)