Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Ideology as a Factor in Senate Consideration of Supreme Court Nominations

1980; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 42; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/2130474

1468-2508

Wayne Sulfridge,

Law, Rights, and Freedoms

Previous articleNext article No AccessResearch NotesIdeology as a Factor in Senate Consideration of Supreme Court NominationsWayne SulfridgeWayne Sulfridge Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 42, Number 2May, 1980 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130474 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Christopher R. Darr Civility and Social Responsibility: “Civil Rationality” in the Confirmation Hearings of Justices Roberts and Alito, Argumentation and Advocacy 44, no.22 (Feb 2017): 57–74.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821678Stephen R Routh The contingency of Senate consent: a study of the determinants of roll call confirmation voting on executive branch appointments, 1945–1996, The Social Science Journal 41, no.11 (Dec 2019): 67–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2003.10.006Karen J. Maschke, Susan J. Siggelakis TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: SENATORS‘ OPENING STATEMENTS AT SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATON HEARINGS, Southeastern Political Review 24, no.11 (Nov 2008): 77–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1996.tb00433.xScott H. Ainsworth, John Anthony Maltese National Grange Influence on the Supreme Court Confirmation of Stanley Matthews, Social Science History 20, no.11 (Jan 2016): 41–62.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200021532James G. Gimpel, Lewis S. Ringel Understanding court nominee evaluation and approval: Mass opinion in the Bork and Thomas cases, Political Behavior 17, no.22 (Jun 1995): 135–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498811L. Marvin Overby, Beth M. Henschen, Julie Strauss, Michael H. Walsh African-American Constituents and Supreme Court Nominees: An Examination of the Senate Confirmation of Thurgood Marshall, Political Research Quarterly 47, no.44 (Dec 1994): 839–855.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700403 P. S. Ruckman, Jr. The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process, The Journal of Politics 55, no.33 (Oct 2015): 793–805.https://doi.org/10.2307/2132002L. Marvin Overby, Beth M. Henschen, Michael H. Walsh, Julie Strauss Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas, American Political Science Review 86, no.44 (Sep 2013): 997–1003.https://doi.org/10.2307/1964351André Bzdera L'Accord du lac Meech et le nouveau mode de sélection des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada: une réforme chimérique?., Canadian journal of law and society 4 (Jul 2014): 1–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100001526DAVID ADAMANY, JOEL B. GROSSMAN SUPPORT FOR THE SUPREME COURT AS A NATIONAL POLICYMAKER, Law & Policy 5, no.44 (Oct 1983): 405–437.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1983.tb00307.xDavid A. Yalof Confirmation obfuscation: Supreme Court confirmation politics in a conservative era, (): 141–171.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(08)00805-3