Artigo Revisado por pares

Effect of the Anchoring Group in Ru−Bipyridyl Sensitizers on the Photoelectrochemical Behavior of Dye-Sensitized TiO 2 Electrodes: Carboxylate versus Phosphonate Linkages

2006; American Chemical Society; Volume: 110; Issue: 17 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1021/jp060397e

ISSN

1520-6106

Autores

Hyunwoong Park, Eunyoung Bae, Jae‐Joon Lee, Jaiwook Park, Wonyong Choi,

Tópico(s)

Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

Resumo

The effects of the number of anchoring groups (carboxylate vs phosphonate) in Ru-bipyridyl complexes on their binding to TiO(2) surface and the photoelectrochemical performance of the sensitized TiO(2) electrodes were systematically investigated. Six derivatives of Ru-bipyridyl complexes having di-, tetra-, or hexacarboxylate (C2, C4, and C6) and di-, tetra-, or hexaphosphonate (P2, P4, and P6) as the anchoring group were synthesized. The properties and efficiencies of C- and P-complexes as a sensitizer depended on the number of anchoring groups in very different ways. Although C4 exhibited the lowest visible light absorption, C4-TiO(2) electrode showed the best cell performance and stability among C-TiO(2) electrodes. However, P6, which has the highest visible light absorption, was more efficient than P2 and P4 as a sensitizer of TiO(2). The surface binding (strength and stability) of C-complexes on TiO(2) is highly influenced by the number of carboxylate groups and is the most decisive factor in controlling the sensitization efficiency. A phosphonate anchor, however, can provide a stronger chemical linkage to TiO(2) surface, and the overall sensitization performance was less influenced by the adsorption capability of P-complexes. The apparent effect of the anchoring group number on the P-complex sensitization seems to be mainly related with the visible light absorption efficiency of each P-complex.

Referência(s)