Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Treatment of Discourse Deficits Following TBI

2002; Volume: 12; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1044/nnsld12.3.14

1940-7777

Michael S. Cannizzaro, Carl Coelho, Kathleen M. Youse,

Language Development and Disorders

No AccessPerspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language DisordersArticle1 Oct 2002Treatment of Discourse Deficits Following TBI Michael S. Cannizzaro, Carl A. Coelho, and Kathleen Youse Michael S. Cannizzaro Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs Google Scholar More articles by this author , Carl A. Coelho Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs Google Scholar More articles by this author and Kathleen Youse Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld12.3.14 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar Blank, M., & Franklin, E. (1980). Dialogue with pre-schoolers: A cognitively-based system of assessment.Applied Psycholin-guistics, 1, 127–150. Google Scholar Bond, F., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact.Brain Injury, 11, 319–329. Google Scholar Brookshire, B. L., Chapman, S. B., Song, J., & Levin, H. S. (2000). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children’s discourse after closed head injury: A three year follow-up.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 741–751. Google Scholar Brinton, B., & Fujiki, M. (1989). Conversational management with language-impaired children. Gaithersberg, MD: Aspen Pub. Google Scholar Cannizzaro, M. S., & Coelho, C. A. (in press). Treatment of story grammar following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study.Brain Injury. Google Scholar Caspari, I., & Parkinson, S. R. (2000). Effects of memory impairment on discourse.Journal of Neuro-linguistics, 13, 15–36. Google Scholar Chapman, S. B., Culhane, K. A., Levin, H. S., Harward, H., Mendelsohn, D., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J. M., & Bruce, D. (1992). Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents.Brain and Language, 43, 42–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Cherney, L. R. (1998). Pragmatics and discourse: An introduction.In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden, C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 1–7). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers. Google Scholar Coelho, C. A. (in press). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning.Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research. Google Scholar Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991). Discourse analyses with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 465–468. Google Scholar Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults.Brain Injury, 9, 471–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Coelho, C. A., Youse, K., & Le, K. N. (2002). Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults.Aphasiology, 26, 659–672. Google Scholar Ehrlich, J., & Sipes, A. (1985). Group treatment of communication skills for head trauma patients.Cognitive Rehabilitation, 3, 32–37. Google Scholar Faylor, M., & Lemaire, P. (1993). Levels of approach to discourse.In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normally aging adults (pp. 3–21). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group. Google Scholar Glosser, G. (1993). Discourse production patterns in neurologically impaired and aged populations.In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normally aging adults (pp. 191–211). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing. Google Scholar Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1992). A comparison of changes in macrolin-guistic and microlinguistic aspects of discourse production in normal aging.Journal of Gerontology, 47, 266–272. Google Scholar Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1990). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders.Brain and Language, 40, 67–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Godfrey, H. P. D., & Shum, D. (2000). Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury.Aphasiology, 14, 433–444. Google Scholar Hartley, L. L. (1995). Cognitive-communicative abilities following brain injury: Afunctional approach. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group. Google Scholar Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury.Brain Injury, 5, 267–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Hinchliffe, F. J., Murdoch, B. E., & Theodoros, D. G. (2001). Discourse production in traumatic brain-injury associated speech, language and swallowing disorders.In B. E. Murdoch (Ed.), Traumatic brain-injury associated speech, language and swallowing disorders (pp. 223–246). San Diego, CA: Singular/Thomson Learning. Google Scholar Liles, B. Z., Coelho, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults.Journal of and Hearing Speech Disorders, 54, 356–366. Google Scholar McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener.Brain and Language, 44, 28–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Mentis, M., & Pruning, C. A. (1991). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 583–595. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Penn, C., & Cleary, J. (1988). Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients.Brain Injury, 2, 3–17. Google Scholar Penn, C., Jones, D., & Joffe, V. (1997). Hierarchical discourse therapy: a method for the mild patient.Aphasiology, 11, 601–632. Google Scholar Shadden, B. B. (1998a). Information analyses.In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden, & C.A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 85–114). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers. Google Scholar Shadden, B. B. (1998b). Sentential/surface-level analyses.In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden, & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 35–63). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers. Google Scholar Snow, P. C. & Douglas, J. M. (2000). Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding.Brain Injury, 14, 397–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1995). Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues.Aphasiology, 9, 365–380. Google Scholar Stout, C. E., Yorkston, K. M., & Pimentel, J. I. (2000). Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 15–25. Google Scholar Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1999). Exchanges of information in the talk of people with traumatic brain injury.In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychological Press. Google Scholar Tucker, F. M., & Hanlon, R. E. (1998). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production.Brain Injury, 12, 783–792. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Turkstra, L., McDonald, S., & Kaufman, P. (1996). Assessment of pragmatic communication skills after adolescent traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury, 10, 329–345. Google Scholar Ulatowska, H. K., North, A. J., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1981). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia.Brain and Language, 13, 345–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury.Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 327–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ylvisaker, M., Szekeres, S. F., & Feeney, T. (2001). Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury.In R. Chapey (Ed.) Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders, (pp. 745–800), Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27–35. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 12Issue 3October 2002Pages: 14-19 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2002 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2002 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...