Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Reliability of the Grading of High-School Work in English

1912; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 20; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/435971

1940-1213

Daniel Starch, Edward C. Elliott,

Educational Innovations and Challenges

Previous articleNext article FreeReliability of the Grading of High-School Work in EnglishDaniel Starch and Edward C. ElliottDaniel Starch Search for more articles by this author and Edward C. Elliott Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 20, Number 7Sep., 1912 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/435971 Views: 955Total views on this site Citations: 67Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Marcia Rapchak, Africa S. Hands, Merinda Kaye Hensley Moving Toward Equity: Experiences With Ungrading, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 86 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2021-0062Anders Jönsson, Andreia Balan, Eva Hartell Analytic or holistic? A study about how to increase the agreement in teachers’ grading, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 16 (Feb 2021): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884041Michelle Herridge, Vicente Talanquer Dimensions of Variation in Chemistry Instructors’ Approaches to the Evaluation and Grading of Student Responses, Journal of Chemical Education 98, no.22 (Dec 2020): 270–280.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00944Bruno Ferman, Luiz Felipe Fontes Discriminating Behavior: Evidence of Teachers' Grading Bias, SSRN Electronic Journal 134 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3797725Anders Jönsson, Alli Klapp Svenska lärares syn på avvikelser mellan resultat på nationella prov och ämnesbetyg, Educare , no.44 (Oct 2020): 88–108.https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.4.4Christopher L. Quarles, Ceren Budak, Paul Resnick The shape of educational inequality, Science Advances 6, no.2929 (Jul 2020): eaaz5954.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5954Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney The Reliability of Public Examinations, (Dec 2019): 163–172.https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1_ch8Clémentine Beauvais Teacher, Tester, Soldier, Spy: Psychologists Talk about Teachers in the Intelligence-Testing Movement, 1910s-1930s, History of Education Quarterly 57, no.33 (Jul 2017): 371–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2017.16Sherri Melrose Pass/Fail and Discretionary Grading: A Snapshot of Their Influences on Learning, Open Journal of Nursing 07, no.0202 (Jan 2017): 185–192.https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2017.72016Herbert Kalthoff, Tristan Dittrich Unterscheidung und Härtung. Bewertungs- und Notenkommunikation in Lehrerzimmer und Zeugniskonferenz, Berliner Journal für Soziologie 26, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2017): 459–483.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-017-0324-8Susan M. Brookhart, Thomas R. Guskey, Alex J. Bowers, James H. McMillan, Jeffrey K. Smith, Lisa F. Smith, Michael T. Stevens, Megan E. Welsh A Century of Grading Research, Review of Educational Research 86, no.44 (Oct 2016): 803–848.https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069Herbert Kalthoff Observing – Treating – Classifying: On the Educational Practice of Human Differentiation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 228 (Jul 2016): 648–655.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.099 김진웅, 주민재 An Analysis of Tendency and Tasks in Writing Assessments, The Review of Korean Cultural Studies 54, no.5454 (Jun 2016): 297–326.https://doi.org/10.17329/kcbook.2016.54.54.010Susan M. Brookhart Graded Achievement, Tested Achievement, and Validity, Educational Assessment 20, no.44 (Nov 2015): 268–296.https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1093928Kelly R. Schutz, Brent M. Drake, Janet Lessner, Gail F. Hughes A Comparison of Community College Full-Time and Adjunct Faculties' Perceptions of Factors Associated With Grade Inflation, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 63, no.33 (Nov 2015): 180–192.https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2015.1085951Matthew Bamber The impact on stakeholder confidence of increased transparency in the examination assessment process, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40, no.44 (May 2014): 471–487.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.921662Zoë Kuehn, Pedro Landeras The Effect of Family Background on Student Effort, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 14, no.44 (Oct 2014): 1337–1403.https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0150Jeffrey Schinske, Kimberly Tanner Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently), CBE—Life Sciences Education 13, no.22 (Jun 2014): 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054Lennart Jølle Pair assessment of pupil writing: A dialogic approach for studying the development of rater competence, Assessing Writing 20 (Apr 2014): 37–52.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.002Darren Grant, William B. Green Grades as incentives, Empirical Economics 44, no.33 (Apr 2012): 1563–1592.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0578-0Herbert Kalthoff Practices of grading: an ethnographic study of educational assessment, Ethnography and Education 8, no.11 (Mar 2013): 89–104.https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.766436Susan M. Brookhart The use of teacher judgement for summative assessment in the USA, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20, no.11 (Jul 2012): 69–90.https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.703170D. Royce Sadler Assuring academic achievement standards: from moderation to calibration, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20, no.11 (Aug 2012): 5–19.https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742Theodore Carey, James Carifio The Minimum Grading Controversy, Educational Researcher 41, no.66 (Aug 2012): 201–208.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12453309Sharon L. Nichols, Heather S. Dawson Assessment as a Context for Student Engagement, (Jan 2012): 457–477.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_22Charles Tocci An Immanent Machine: Reconsidering grades, historical and present, Educational Philosophy and Theory 42, no.77 (Jan 2013): 762–778.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00440.xTove I. Dahl When precedence sets a bad example for reform: conceptions and reliability of a questionable high stakes assessment practice in Norwegian universities, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 13, no.11 (Jan 2007): 5–27.https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940600563579James D. Allen Grades as Valid Measures of Academic Achievement of Classroom Learning, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 78, no.55 (Aug 2010): 218–223.https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.5.218-223Donald R. Bacon Assessing Learning Outcomes: A Comparison of Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Questions in a Marketing Context, Journal of Marketing Education 25, no.11 (Jul 2016): 31–36.https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302250570Thomas Kellaghan, George Madaus External (Public) Examinations, (Jan 2003): 577–600.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_34Gregory J. Cizek More Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 20, no.44 (Oct 2005): 19–27.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00072.xChristopher Mazzeo Frameworks of State: Assessment Policy in Historical Perspective, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 103, no.33 (Feb 2022): 367–397.https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810110300304Christopher Mazzeo Frameworks of State: Assessment Policy in Historical Perspective, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 103, no.33 (Apr 2022): 367–397.https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00119Warren W. Willingham, Judith M. Pollack, Charles Lewis GRADES AND TEST SCORES: ACCOUNTING FOR OBSERVED DIFFERENCES, ETS Research Report Series 2000, no.22 (Aug 2014): i–177.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2000.tb01838.xRobert L. Brennan Performance Assessments from the Perspective of Generalizability Theory, Applied Psychological Measurement 24, no.44 (Jul 2016): 339–353.https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210022031796 Faculty Forum, Teaching of Psychology 27, no.33 (Aug 2016): 204–219.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2703_09Gregory J. Cizek Pockets of Resistance in the Assessment Revolution, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 19, no.22 (Oct 2005): 16–23.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2000.tb00026.xGregory J. Cizek The Assessment Revolution's Unfinished Business, Kappa Delta Pi Record 34, no.44 (Jul 1998): 144–149.https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.1998.10518753Randy Reedy Formative and Summative Assessment: A Possible Alternative to The Grading-Reporting Dilemma, NASSP Bulletin 79, no.573573 (Jul 2016): 47–51.https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659507957308Robert L. Linn High-Stakes Uses of Performance-Based Assessments, (Jan 1995): 49–73.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0639-9_3Ruth B. Ekstrom GENDER DIFFERENCES IN HIGH SCHOOL GRADES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY, ETS Research Report Series 1994, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–30.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1994.tb01598.xBERNARD SPOLSKY Policy Issues in Testing and Evaluation, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 532, no.11 (Sep 2016): 226–237.https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716294532001016Robert L. Linn Educational Assessment: Expanded Expectations and Challenges, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15, no.11 (Nov 2016): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015001001Anne E. Cunningham EENY, MEENY, MINY, MOE: Testing Policy and Practice in Early Childhood, (Jan 1993): 229–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2226-9_5George F. Madaus A National Testing System: Manna From Above? An Historical/Technological Perspective, Educational Assessment 1, no.11 (Jan 1993): 9–26.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0101_2D. Royce Sadler Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards, Oxford Review of Education 13, no.22 (Jan 1987): 191–209.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498870130207Walt Haney Testing Reasoning and Reasoning About Testing, Review of Educational Research 54, no.44 (Jun 2016): 597–654.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054004597Anders Lysne Grading of Student's Attainment: Purposes and Functions, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 28, no.33 (Jul 2006): 149–165.https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383840280303J. D. Duke Disparities in Grading Practice, Some Resulting Inequities, and a Proposed New Index of Academic Achievement, Psychological Reports 53, no.3_suppl3_suppl (Aug 2016): 1023–1080.https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3f.1023Randolph A. Ellsworth, Don D. Willson Another Visit to the World of Grading, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 51, no.44 (Jul 2010): 188–189.https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1977.9957038Kyle R. Carter Student Criterion Grading: An Attempt to Reduce Some Common Grading Problems, Teaching of Psychology 4, no.22 (Aug 2016): 59–62.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top0402_2Barbara Moretti Pinchak REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN GRADING PRACTICES, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1974, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–16.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1974.tb00466.xRobert L. Ebel Marks and Marking Systems, IEEE Transactions on Education 17, no.22 (May 1974): 76–92.https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.1974.4320885ROBERT L. EBEL EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, Journal of Educational Measurement 10, no.44 (Dec 1973): 273–279.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1973.tb00804.xNazma Yeasmeen, Donald G. Barker A Half Century of Research on Essay Testing, Improving College and University Teaching 21, no.11 (Feb 1973): 24–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1973.10533348Schuyler W. Huck, William G. Bounds Essay Grades: An Interaction Between Graders' Handwriting Clarity and the Neatness of Examination Papers, American Educational Research Journal 9, no.22 (Jun 2016): 279–283.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312009002279Marjorie C. Kirkland The Effects of Tests on Students and Schools, Review of Educational Research 41, no.44 (Jun 2016): 303–350.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543041004303JON C. MARSHALL, JERRY M. POWERS WRITING NEATNESS, COMPOSITION ERRORS, AND ESSAY GRADES, Journal of Educational Measurement 6, no.22 (Jun 1969): 97–101.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00665.xRobert I. Watson A brief history of educational psychology, The Psychological Record 11, no.33 (May 2017): 209–242.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393406Edith M. Huddleston Measurement of Writing Ability at the College-Entrance Level, The Journal of Experimental Education 22, no.33 (Jan 2015): 165–213.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1954.11010477Edith M. Huddleston MEASUREMENT OF WRITING ABILITY AT THE COLLEGE-ENTRANCE LEVEL: OBJECTIVE VS. SUBJECTIVE TESTING TECHNIQUES, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1952, no.22 (Aug 2014): i–104.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1952.tb00925.xHarold Gulliksen A course in the theory of mental tests, Psychometrika 8, no.44 (Dec 1943): 223–245.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288706 With the Technicians, The Journal of Higher Education 12, no.11 (Nov 2016): 41–45.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1941.11773754A. Duryee Crooks Marks and Marking Systems: A Digest, The Journal of Educational Research 27, no.44 (Dec 2014): 259–272.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1933.10880402 Chapter Three: School Marks, Review of Educational Research 3, no.33 (Jun 2016): 201–204.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543003003201 A SCIENTIFIC MARKING SYSTEM, School Science and Mathematics 22, no.44 (Apr 1922): 377–382.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1922.tb02307.xJ. L. Zerbe PERSONAL JUDGMENTS AS A FACTOR IN GRADING, School Science and Mathematics 18, no.55 (May 1918): 405–417.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1918.tb03813.x