A repressor sequence in the juxtamembrane domain of Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) constitutively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase activation and endothelial cell migration
2000; Springer Nature; Volume: 19; Issue: 15 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/emboj/19.15.4064
ISSN1460-2075
AutoresHendrik Gille, Joe Kowalski, Lanlan Yu, Helen Chen, M. Teresa Pisabarro, Terri Davis-Smyth, Napoleone Ferrara,
Tópico(s)Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
ResumoArticle1 August 2000free access A repressor sequence in the juxtamembrane domain of Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) constitutively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase activation and endothelial cell migration Hendrik Gille Hendrik Gille Present address: Xantos Biomedicine, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany Search for more papers by this author Joe Kowalski Joe Kowalski Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Lanlan Yu Lanlan Yu Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Helen Chen Helen Chen Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author M.Teresa Pisabarro M.Teresa Pisabarro Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Terri Davis-Smyth Terri Davis-Smyth Present address: Raven Biotechnologies, Inc., San Carlos, CA, 94070 USA Search for more papers by this author Napoleone Ferrara Corresponding Author Napoleone Ferrara Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Hendrik Gille Hendrik Gille Present address: Xantos Biomedicine, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany Search for more papers by this author Joe Kowalski Joe Kowalski Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Lanlan Yu Lanlan Yu Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Helen Chen Helen Chen Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author M.Teresa Pisabarro M.Teresa Pisabarro Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Terri Davis-Smyth Terri Davis-Smyth Present address: Raven Biotechnologies, Inc., San Carlos, CA, 94070 USA Search for more papers by this author Napoleone Ferrara Corresponding Author Napoleone Ferrara Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Hendrik Gille2, Joe Kowalski1, Lanlan Yu1, Helen Chen1, M.Teresa Pisabarro3, Terri Davis-Smyth4 and Napoleone Ferrara 1 1Departments of Molecular Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA 2Present address: Xantos Biomedicine, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany 3Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080 USA 4Present address: Raven Biotechnologies, Inc., San Carlos, CA, 94070 USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2000)19:4064-4073https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.15.4064 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has two highly homologous tyrosine kinase receptors: Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) and KDR (VEGFR-2). KDR is strongly phosphorylated on tyrosines and can transmit mitogenic and motogenic signals following VEGF binding, while Flt-1 is markedly less effective in mediating such functions. To dissect the regions that account for the differences between the two receptors, we generated a series of chimeric Flt-1–KDR molecules. We found that the juxtamembrane region of Flt-1 prevents key signaling functions. When the juxtamembrane region of Flt-1 is replaced by that of KDR, Flt-1 becomes competent to mediate endothelial cell migration and phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase activation in response to VEGF. Further mutational analysis shows that a short divergent sequence is responsible for such repressor function. However, mutant Flt-1 receptors lacking this sequence do not transmit effective proliferative signals, suggesting that this receptor function is regulated separately. These results define a novel functional domain that serves to repress Flt-1 activity in endothelial cells. Introduction Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major regulator of physiological and pathological angiogenesis (Leung et al., 1989), exerts its cellular functions on the vascular endothelium by binding to two different tyrosine kinase receptors: Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) and KDR (VEGFR-2) (Ferrara, 1999). Both receptors consist of seven immunoglobulin-like domains in their extracellular regions, followed by a transmembrane sequence and a short intracellular juxtamembrane region. The kinase domain is interrupted by a kinase-insert region and followed by a C-terminal sequence (Shibuya et al., 1990; Terman et al., 1991; de Vries et al., 1992). The structurally related tyrosine kinase Flt-4 (VEGFR-3) is not a receptor for VEGF, but instead binds VEGF-C and VEGF-D (Enholm et al., 1998). More recently, neuropilin-1 has been identified as an isoform-specific VEGF receptor that is thought to facilitate KDR-dependent signal transduction (Soker et al., 1998). Binding of the VEGF dimer to the second and third immunoglobin-like domains of Flt-1 or KDR is believed to result in receptor dimerization and initiates signal transduction (Davis-Smyth et al., 1996; Fuh et al., 1998). VEGF binding causes autophosphorylation of tyrosines in the cytoplasmic region of the KDR receptor, residues that may be recognized by various Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-binding proteins (Waltenberger et al., 1994; Guo et al., 1995). Several different SH2 domain-containing proteins have been reported to interact with phosphotyrosines in the intracellular regions of KDR and Flt-1. Phosphopeptides based on the Flt-1 intracellular domain bind to phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ), Grb2 and the phosphatase SHP-2 in vitro (Ito et al., 1998). In vitro binding of PLCγ to full-length baculovirus-produced Flt-1 has also been reported. This interaction also occurs upon overexpression in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (Sawano et al., 1997). In directed yeast two-hybrid assays, Flt-1 can interact with the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI 3′-kinase) regulatory subunit, p85α, and with SHP-2 and Nck (Cunningham et al., 1995; Igarashi et al., 1998a). It is unclear whether any of these proteins can bind to Flt-1 in endothelial cells. In a non-directed yeast screen, Sck was identified as a binding partner for KDR (Igarashi et al., 1998b). In 293 cells expressing KDR, PLCγ becomes phosphorylated after VEGF treatment (Dougher and Terman, 1999). PLCγ also interacts with Flk in VEGF-treated mouse mesentery (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1998). While the biological functions of KDR activation are reasonably well understood, the function of Flt-1 in the adult endothelium is considerably less clear (Ferrara, 1999). We recently conducted a study using novel KDR- and Flt-selective VEGF mutants to elucidate the functions of the two receptors in primary endothelial cells. Intracellular signaling and cell migration in primary cells and in vivo angiogenesis could be obtained with the KDR-selective mutant alone, but not with the Flt- selective mutant (H.Gille, J.Kowalski, B.Li, B.Moffat, T.F.Zioncheck, N.Pelletier and N.Ferrara, submitted). Similar results have been obtained when comparing the effects of placenta-derived growth factor (PlGF), which binds to Flt-1 but not to KDR, with those of another VEGF-like molecule, VEGFOrf. The VEGFOrf gene was isolated from the Orf parapoxyvirus; the protein binds to KDR but not Flt-1 (Meyer et al., 1999; Wise et al., 1999). Flt-1 contains a functional kinase domain, as autophosphorylation sites can be detected upon overexpression in heterologous systems (Sawano et al., 1997). The receptor can also be activated oncogenically by fusion to a dimerization motif followed by random mutagenesis (Maru et al., 1998). Flt-1-null mice die at embryonic day 9. They show an increase in endothelial progenitor cells leading to vascular disorganization (Fong et al., 1995, 1999). However, mice homozygous for a deletion of the Flt-1 cytoplasmic domain develop normally and are fertile. Their only defect is a loss of VEGF-induced macrophage migration in vitro (Hiratsuka et al., 1998). These observations have led to the hypothesis that Flt-1 may act as a decoy receptor in the vasculature (Park et al., 1994; Hiratsuka et al., 1998). In order to understand the structural basis for the strikingly different properties of KDR and Flt-1, we constructed chimeric receptors by domain swapping. We found that the intracellular juxtamembrane (jx) region in Flt-1 suppresses activation of this receptor, as defined by VEGF-dependent chemotaxis. However, a chimeric Flt-1 receptor containing the KDR jx sequence can direct the phosphorylation of PI 3′-kinase and stimulate cell migration. PI 3′-kinase activity is required for endothelial migration. These results define a novel inhibitory domain in the VEGF receptor Flt-1. Results Generation of cell lines expressing chimeric receptors We generated porcine aortic endothelial (PAE) cell lines stably expressing each VEGF receptor. PAE cells do not express endogenous KDR, Flt-1 or platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) proteins (Miyazono et al., 1987; Waltenberger et al., 1994). One of the central aspects of VEGF action on endothelial cells is its ability to act as a chemoattractant and stimulate the migration of endothelial cells. Figure 1 shows the results of a migration assay performed in a modified Boyden chamber with PAE cells expressing the various receptors. VEGF addition stimulates the migration of PAE cells expressing KDR, but not that of Flt-1-expressing cells, in agreement with a previous report (Waltenberger et al., 1994). Such KDR-dependent stimulation of migration is of the same order of magnitude as that observed in a well characterized PAE cell line expressing the PDGFβ receptor (Mori et al., 1993). Figure 1.Migration of PAE cells expressing VEGF and PDGFβ receptors. The ability of cell lines expressing the indicated receptors to mount a migratory response to 20 ng/ml growth factor was tested. Results are expressed relative to basal, factor-independent, migration. The bars represent the mean ± SEM. Experiments were performed in triplicate and significance was calculated to a 95% confidence level. Download figure Download PowerPoint We wished to determine which domain(s) of Flt-1 is/are responsible for its failure to cause cell migration in endothelial cells. To this end, Flt–KDR chimeras were constructed and multiple clones were generated in PAE cells. In the initial chimeras, the kinase domain and the C-terminal sequences were exchanged. Surprisingly, PAE clones expressing chimeras of the Flt-1 kinase domain fused to the KDR intracellular jx and extracellular regions were able to migrate in response to VEGF stimulation to an extent similar to that of cells expressing wild-type KDR. Fusion of the Flt-1 jx and extracellular regions to the KDR kinase domain resulted in reduced migration of PAE cells in response to VEGF (data not shown). Therefore, we generated the chimeric receptors Flt(KDRjx) and KDR(Fltjx), outlined in Figure 2A, in which only the intracellular jx regions were exchanged. Several PAE cell lines expressing these chimeras were obtained and tested for their ability to migrate after VEGF treatment (Figure 2B). Comparison of the Flt(KDRjx) and KDR(Fltjx) cells demonstrates that the KDR jx region is sufficient to confer upon Flt-1 the ability to cause migration. On the other hand, when the Flt jx region is introduced into KDR, the mutant receptor appears unable to mediate chemotactic signaling in response to VEGF. Figure 2.Domain structure (A) and migration (B) of the KDR–Flt-1 chimeras. Schematic representations of the receptor chimeras are shown above. Flt-1 domains are in black. Migration results are presented as in Figure 1. At least five independent clones for each construct were analyzed and data shown reflect representative clones. Download figure Download PowerPoint Mutational analysis of Flt-1 receptor juxtamembrane region In order to characterize further the differences between the intracellular KDR and Flt jx regions, a sequence alignment was performed. Figure 3A shows that this region is highly conserved between the two receptors. One sequence feature of the jx regions is a potential SH2-binding site that is strongly conserved between the two receptors. At the +1 and +3 positions, which are major determinants of SH2 specificity, the sequence is identical in KDR and Flt-1, making it unlikely that this motif differs functionally in these two proteins. The major non-conservative divergence is a stretch of three serines in Flt-1. This sequence is replaced by the sequence ANGG in KDR. Therefore, the three serines in Flt-1 were replaced by the sequence ANGG by site-directed mutagenesis, generating Flt(ANGG). We also generated an Flt-1 deletion mutant, Flt(ΔS), lacking the three serines. Figure 3.Mutational analysis of the VEGF receptor jx regions and bioactivity. (A) Alignment of the KDR and Flt-1 jx regions. The potential SH2 domain-binding site (underlined) and the most divergent region are highlighted. Motility assay on VEGF receptor mutants. (B) Flt(ANGG) and (C) Flt(ΔS). Migration data are presented as in Figure 1B. Download figure Download PowerPoint PAE cells expressing the receptor mutants were tested for their ability to migrate in response to VEGF. The migratory response of Flt(ANGG)-expressing cells to VEGF is indistinguishable from that of wild-type KDR-expressing cells (Figure 3B). Flt(ΔS) cells behaved in a similar fashion, migration being significantly stimulated by VEGF (Figure 3C). These results indicate that the inhibitory function that resides in the Flt-1 jx region is exerted by the divergent stretch of three serines in Flt. Some mutations in tyrosine kinase receptors shift the migration dose–response curve (Kundra et al., 1994), so we investigated whether any of our mutant receptors could do this. In addition to the mutants already described, we also analyzed a variant of Flt(KDR) in which the jx tyrosine had been mutated to phenylalanine, Flt(KDR)Y802F. Figure 4 shows that when motility was assessed at a VEGF concentration between 1 and 500 ng/ml, the maximal stimulation in cells expressing the receptors able to mediate migration was at 10–50 ng/ml. Small variations are likely to reflect the variability of the assay rather than any functional differences. No VEGF-dependent motility was detected in PAE cells expressing Flt(KDR)Y802F. Figure 4.Migration dose–response curves. The indicated cell lines were tested for migration towards a concentration range from 1 to 500 ng/ml VEGF. Download figure Download PowerPoint Analysis of downstream signaling events PLCγ can become tyrosine phosphorylated in response to VEGF treatment of endothelial cells (Guo et al., 1995). Phosphorylation of PLCγ occurs in PAE cells expressing KDR but not in Flt-1-expressing PAE cells, and its activation has been correlated with cell migration (Landgren et al., 1998). We therefore tested whether the Flt(KDRjx), KDR(Fltjx), Flt(ANGG) and FltΔS cells can cause PLCγ phosphorylation. Figure 5A shows that, as expected, PLCγ was phosphorylated after exposure to VEGF in cells expressing KDR, but not in those expressing Flt-1. PLCγ phosphorylation appeared to be weaker than in cells expressing PDGFβ receptors. Stimulation of KDR(Fltjx)-expressing cells causes PLCγ to become phosphorylated, but neither Flt(ANGG) nor Flt(ΔS) can trigger its phosphorylation. Since these cells can mount a migratory response after VEGF stimulation, PLCγ phosphorylation does not appear to be required for PAE cell migration. Figure 5.Analysis of downstream signaling. (A) PLCγ phosphorylation in response to VEGF stimulation. The migration of the faint bands at the top of the blot is consistent with the co-precipitated tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors. (B) PI 3′-kinase phosphorylation. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the endogenous p85 PI 3′-kinase regulatory subunit was assessed after immunoprecipitation. Download figure Download PowerPoint PI 3′-kinase activity is required for the cytoskeletal changes involved in the migration of fibroblasts and epithelial cells (Toker and Cantley, 1997). It is also required to transmit signals that lead to membrane ruffling in PAE cells expressing PDGFβ receptors (Wennstrom et al., 1994). Therefore, the capacity of the mutant receptors to cause phosphorylation of the p85 subunit of the PI 3′-kinase was analyzed. Figure 5B shows that, as expected, p85 was not phosphorylated in Flt-1-expressing PAE cells. In contrast, p85 was strongly phosphorylated in PAE cells expressing KDR upon stimulation with VEGF. When the KDR jx region was introduced into Flt, the receptor gained the ability to induce p85 phosphorylation. Therefore, sequences in the Flt-1 jx region can repress this receptor function. In cells expressing Flt(ANGG) or Flt(ΔS), VEGF stimulation also results in p85 phosphorylation. We then tested whether VEGF treatment of PAE cells expressing the mutant receptors resulted in an increase in PI 3′-kinase enzymatic activity. Initially, we attempted to use receptor antibodies to co-precipitate the lipid kinase. In agreement with Waltenberger et al. (1994), we did not detect KDR-associated PI 3′-kinase activity (data not shown). PI 3′-kinase activity was therefore measured in phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates. VEGF stimulation resulted in an ∼4-fold increase in PI 3′-kinase activity in KDR-expressing PAE cells (Figure 6). The mutant receptors Flt(KDRjx), Flt(ΔS) and Flt(ANGG) mediated similar PI 3′-kinase activation. Also, cells expressing Flt(KDRjx)Y802F, in which p85 is not phosphorylated, showed only a marginal increase in PI 3′-kinase activity. Hence, the ability of the receptor mutants to trigger phosphorylation of the PI 3′-kinase regulatory subunit correlates tightly with their capacity to induce cell migration. The fact that activation of PI 3′-kinase was not detectable in receptor immunoprecipitates may indicate that activation proceeds through a transient interaction via an adaptor protein. Figure 6.Phosphotyrosine-associated PI 3′-kinase activity was measured before and after ligand stimulation of the indicated cell lines. Lower panel: phosphoimager analysis was performed and the activity in each clone was standardized against that observed in the absence of VEGF. Download figure Download PowerPoint In order to determine whether PI 3′-kinase activity is required for endothelial cell migration in response to VEGF, we tested the effects of a specific PI 3′-kinase inhibitor, LY294002, on Flt(KDRjx) cells. PAE cell viability was not affected by exposure to LY294002 under our assay conditions. At 30 μM, LY294002 reduced migration to background levels (Figure 7), showing that PI 3′-kinase activity is required for endothelial cell migration. Figure 7.Migration of Flt(KDRjx) cells in the presence of the PI 3′-kinase activity inhibitor LY294002. Data were normalized against ligand-independent migration. Inhibition of migration was statistically significant at 30 and 100 μM LY294002. Download figure Download PowerPoint PlGF is a VEGF-related protein (Maglione et al., 1991) that binds to Flt-1 but not to KDR (Park et al., 1994). Treatment of primary endothelial cells with PlGF (Cao et al., 1996) or an Flt-1 selective VEGF mutant (data not shown) does not trigger cell migration. Therefore, we were interested in determining whether the Flt(KDRjx) chimera containing the Flt-1 extracellular domain could promote migration in response to PlGF. Figure 7 demonstrates that exposure of Flt(KDRjx) cells to PlGF stimulates cell migration to an extent comparable to that observed in the presence of VEGF. The results presented above suggest that the Flt-1 intracellular jx region suppresses the ability of the receptor to mediate cell migration. Since VEGF also transmits proliferative signals, we examined the ability of VEGF to cause tyrosine phosphorylation of the various receptor constructs. Figure 8A shows that while VEGF strongly stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of KDR, phosphorylation of other receptor constructs was marginal or absent. Therefore, the overall tyrosine phosphorylation of the mutant receptors does not change appreciably upon VEGF treatment. However, these results do not rule out changes in phosphorylation at individual sites in the receptor. Figure 8.VEGF receptor and ERK phosphorylation. PAE cells were stimulated with VEGF for 5 min and receptors were precipitated with wheatgerm agglutinin and analyzed for tyrosine phosphorylation (A). In parallel, phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 was assessed in total lysates with a phospho-specific antiserum (B). Download figure Download PowerPoint We also examined the ability of VEGF to cause ERK phosphorylation. As shown in Figure 8B, induction of ERK phosphorylation is seen only in KDR-expressing cells. In several of the experiments performed, we occasionally detected minimal receptor phosphorylation or ERK activation in cells expressing the chimeric receptor constructs. However, this activation was always well below that seen in KDR-expressing cells. These results indicate that while replacement or mutational inactivation of the inhibitory Flt-1 jx region confers the ability to transmit signals that lead to cell migration, these mutant receptors do not transmit effective proliferative signals. Discussion The expression of at least two VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases on endothelial cells has made it difficult to elucidate the individual contributions of each receptor to VEGF signaling. While PlGF binds selectively to Flt-1 (Park et al., 1994), its use has sometimes led to conflicting results, especially when heterologous cell types such as NIH 3T3 fibroblasts have been used (Seetharam et al., 1995; Landgren et al., 1998). Recently, we investigated the signaling properties of novel VEGF mutants that bind to either Flt-1 or KDR with high selectivity. KDR activation is sufficient to activate multiple signaling pathways and to stimulate migration and in vivo angiogenesis (H.Gille, J.Kowalski, B.Li, B.Moffat, T.F.Zioncheck, N.Pelletier and N.Ferrara, submitted). The properties of KDR-selective VEGF family members present in Orf parapoxyviruses (VEGFOrf) have also been analyzed. VEGFOrf mediates migration of KDR-expressing PAE cells and corneal angiogenesis to an extent comparable to VEGF (Ogawa et al., 1998; Meyer et al., 1999). The role of Flt-1 in the adult endothelium thus remains unclear. However, the Flt receptor contains a kinase domain that can be activated artificially (Sawano et al., 1997; Maru et al., 1998). Despite their different signaling properties, the VEGF receptors KDR and Flt-1 are highly homologous. We generated receptor chimeras to investigate the structural basis for these differences. When the intracellular jx regions were exchanged between the two receptors, Flt-1 became able to activate PI 3′-kinase and trigger VEGF-dependent cell migration. In this chimera, mutation of the putative SH2 recognition site Y802 prevented PI 3′-kinase activation and cell migration. We also mutated Y802 in KDR to phenylalanine. However, in the context of KDR, this mutation did not have an appreciable effect on the ability of the receptor to mediate cell migration, indicating that phosphorylation of this site in KDR is not an essential step for chemotaxis (data not shown). These observations emphasize that the regulation of KDR may have a further level of complexity and differs in several respects from that of Flt-1, with or without the jx repressor. The motility response in PAE cells is completely dependent on PI 3′-kinase activity, since LY294002 was able to abrogate migration at 30 μM. PI 3′-kinase activation has been associated with another important function of VEGF: the ability to act as a survival factor and inhibit endothelial cell apoptosis (Gerber et al., 1998). Therefore, a potential pro-survival function of Flt-1 may also be under constitutive repression. KDR-selective VEGF mutants have previously been shown to be capable of promoting mitogenesis, without involvement of Flt-1 (Keyt et al., 1996). However, the Flt-1 constructs described in this study, in which the intracellular jx region was mutated to allow PI 3′-kinase activation and cell migration, did not mediate ERK phosphorylation. In fact, KDR(Fltjx)-expressing cells still exhibited receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphorylation of MAP kinase when exposed to VEGF, suggesting that the mitogenic pathway is regulated by a different region of the receptor (data not shown). Thus, elements outside the jx region of Flt-1, responsible for inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation and mitogenesis, remain to be identified. These results define a novel inhibitory domain in Flt-1 that serves to repress constitutively the ability of Flt-1 to mediate endothelial cell migration. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that Flt-1 serves its function in angiogenesis primarily as a ligand-binding molecule rather than as a signaling receptor (Park et al., 1994; Hiratsuka et al., 1998). However, Flt-1 activation causes migration of macrophages (Barleon et al., 1996; Clauss et al., 1996). The only apparent defect observed in mice carrying a homozygous deletion of the Flt-1 kinase domain is a loss of VEGF-induced macrophage migration (Hiratsuka et al., 1998). These findings suggest that Flt-1-dependent migration in macrophages involves a pathway different from that repressed in endothelial cells. Alternatively, a repressor potentially present in endothelial cells may not be functional in macrophages. Several lines of evidence suggest that a negative regulatory function may reside in the intracellular jx domain of other kinase-insert domain-containing receptors. Missense mutations in the c-Kit jx region are found in canine mastocytomas and human gastrointestinal tumors and have been suggested to be markers for poor prognosis (Ma et al., 1999; Taniguchi et al., 1999). When the c-Met jx sequence is reintroduced into TPR–Met, the oncogenic activity of the fusion is lost despite the presence of the constitutive dimerization motif in TPR (Vigna et al., 1999). Also, in-frame duplications in the Flt-3 jx region correlate with poor prognosis in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (Iwai et al., 1999). However, to our knowledge, this is the first example of a receptor in which some key signaling functions are constantly repressed and short amino acid substitutions are able to restore ligand-dependent activation. Mutational analysis suggests that a divergent stretch of three serines in Flt-1 mediates repression. So far, we have not been able to detect serine phosphorylation of Flt-1, so the precise mechanism by which this region regulates receptor activity will require further study. A single amino acid substitution in the PDGFR jx domain causes ligand-independent activation (Irusta and DiMaio, 1998). The authors of the study suggested that the PDGFR jx region may fold as a WW domain. In order to understand the role of these activating mutations, a three-dimensional model of the Flt-1 jx region was generated based on its homology with the PDGFR and the yap and Pin WW domains (Koepf et al., 1999). The alignment in Figure 9A shows that the residues forming the core of the WW domain are present in both KDR and Flt-1. Although the first tryptophan residue of the WW domain is replaced by a tyrosine in KDR and Flt-1, this residue could play a similar role in forming the core of the protein. In fact, this sequence replacement can be found in other reported WW domains. This tyrosine is part of a potential SH2 recognition sequence and would not be available for protein binding as it forms the hydrophobic core in our model. The second tryptophan of the WW domain, which is involved in ligand recognition (Macias et al., 1996), is conserved in both KDR and Flt-1. Figure 9.(A) Sequence alignment of pin and yap WW domains with the jx regions of PDGFR, Flt-1 and KDR. Residues forming the protein core are boxed in green. The tryptophan residues defining the WW motif are indicated by an asterisk at the top of the alignment. The residues responsible for the different signaling properties of KDR and Flt-1 are shown in red. The constitutively activating mutation in the PDGFR (Irusta and DiMaio, 1998) is shown in blue. Residues included in the IR-TK (PDB:1rk) and KDR-TK (PDB: 1vrz) structures, which were used for superimposition on our model, are indicated at the bottom of the alignment as a dashed and solid black line, respectively. (B) Proposed model for the regulation of receptor activation by the Flt-1 jx region. The Flt-1 jx region modeled by homology as a WW domain is shown as a yellow ribbon. The three serines responsible of Flt-1 repressor function are indicated in red, the position corresponding to the activating mutation in PDGFR (Irusta and DiMaio, 1998) is shown in blue and the side chain of the tryptophan important for ligand binding to the WW domain is displayed in yellow. The C-terminus of the modeled WW is superimposed on the N-terminus of the receptor kinase domain shown in green. The side chain of the tryptophan corresponding to the one responsible for activity regulation in Src-TK is displayed in green (see text for details). The white ribbon indicates where peptide ligands have been shown to bind WW domains (Macias et al., 1996) and the dashed white line illustrates the possibility of an inhibitor or regulator binding to the same region of Flt-1 and/or KDR and controlling receptor activity. (Top inse
Referência(s)