Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality?

2004; Wiley; Volume: 106; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13516.x

1600-0706

Tim G. Shreeve, Roger L. H. Dennis, Hans Van Dyck, Hans Van Dyck,

Plant Parasitism and Resistance

OikosVolume 106, Issue 2 p. 404-408 Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality? Tim G. Shreeve, Tim G. Shreeve School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorRoger L. H. Dennis, Roger L. H. Dennis School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Dyck, Hans Van Dyck School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Dyck, Hans Van Dyck Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Dept of Biology, Univ. of Antwerp, Belgium.Search for more papers by this author Tim G. Shreeve, Tim G. Shreeve School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorRoger L. H. Dennis, Roger L. H. Dennis School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Dyck, Hans Van Dyck School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes Univ., Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 0BP ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Dyck, Hans Van Dyck Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Dept of Biology, Univ. of Antwerp, Belgium.Search for more papers by this author First published: 05 July 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13516.xCitations: 48Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Baguette, M. and Mennechez, G.. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. Oikos 106: 399–403. Baguette, M., Convie, I. and Néve, G.. 1996. Male density affects female spatial behaviour in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol. 17: 225–232. Dennis, R. L. H.. 1982a. Observations on habitats and dispersal made from oviposition markers in north Cheshire Anthocharis cardamines (L.) (Lep., Pieridae). Entomol. Gaz. 33: 151–159. Dennis, R. L. H.. 1982b. Patrolling behaviour in orange tip butterflies within the Bollin valley in north Cheshire, and a comparison with other pierids. Vasculum 67: 17–25. Dennis, R. L. H.. In press. Just how important are non-consumable resources as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. J. Insect Conserv. Dennis, R. L. H. and Bardell, P.. 1996. The impact of extreme weather on Great Orme populations of Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) and Plebejus argus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Papilionoidea: Satyrinae and Lycaenidae): hindsight, inference and lost opportunities. Entomol. Gaz. 47: 211–225. Dennis, R. L. H. and Eales, H. T.. 1997. Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J. Insect Conserv. 1: 167–176. Dennis, R. L. H. and Eales, H. T.. 1999. Probability of patch site occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller) (Lepidoptera: Satryinae) determined from geographical and ecological data. Biol. Conserv. 87: 295–301. Dennis, R. L. H., Shreeve, T. G. and Van Dyck, H.. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102: 417–426. Dennis, R. L. H., Hodgson, J. G., Grenyer, R. et al. 2004. Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host–plant strategies drive butterfly status?. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 1–16. Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjogren-Gulve, P. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16: 706–716. Gutiérrez, D., Thomas, C. D. and Léon-Cortes, J. L.. 1999. Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Oecologia 121: 506–517. Gutiérrez, D., Léon-Cortes, J. L., Menéndez, R. et al. 2001. Metapopulations of four Lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatus. Ecology 82: 1371–1386. Hanski, I. and Thomas, C. D.. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics. A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 68: 167–180. Hanski, I. and Simberloff, . 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, concetual domain, and application to conservation. – In: I. Hanski and M. Gilpin (eds), Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 5–26. Hanski, I. and Singer, M. C.. 2001. Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. Am. Nat. 158: 341–353. Hanski, I., Alho, J. and Moilanen, A.. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239–251. Hochberg, M. E., Elmes, G. W. and Thomas, J. A.. 1992. Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 375–391. Hochberg, M. E., Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A. et al. 1994. Mechanisms of local persistence in coupled host–parasitoid associations: the case model of Maculinea rebeli and Ichneumon eumerus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351: 1713–1724. Ims, R. A.. 1995. Movement patterns related to spatial structures. – In: L. Hansson, L. Fahrig and G. Merriam (eds), Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman & Hall, pp. 85–109. Léon-Cortes, J. L., Lennon, J. J. and Thomas, C. D.. 2003. Ecogical dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics. Oikos 102: 465–477. McKay, H. V.. 1991. Egg-laying requirements of woodland butterflies–brimstones (Gorepteryx rhamni) and alderbuckthorn (Frangula alnus). J. Appl. Ecol. 28: 731–743. Mendel, H. and Parsons, E.. 1987. Observations on the life-history of the silver-studded blue, Plebejus argus L. Trans. Suffolk Nat. Soc. 23: 2–8. Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 106: 243–252. Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. et al. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movement between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491–500. Pollard, E. and Yates, T. J.. 1993. Population fluctuations of the holly blue butterfly, Celastrina argiolus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Entomol. Gaz. 44: 3–9. Pollard, E. and Moss, D.. 1995. Historical records of the occurrence of butterflies in Britain: examples showing associations between annual number of records and weather. Global Change Biol. 1: 107–113. Schtickzelle, N., LeBoulengé., E. and Baguette, M.. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97: 349–360. Shreeve, T. G.. 1984. Habitat selection, mate location, and mocroclimatic constraints on the activity of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Oikos 42: 371–377. Shreeve, T. G., Dennis, R. L. H. and Pullin, A. S.. 1996. How marginal is the British butterfly fauna and what are the implications for research opportunities and conservation?. Biodiv. Conserv. 5: 1131–1141. Shreeve, T. G., Dennis, R. L. H., Roy, D. B. et al. 2001. An ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancy. J. Insect Conserv. 5: 145–161. Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T.. 2000. Butterfly community sructure in fragmented habitats. Ecol. Lett. 3: 449–456. Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T.. 2002. Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands – a mini review. Biol. Conserv. 104: 275–284. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Münzenberg, U., Bürger, C. et al. 2000. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83: 1421–1432. Summerville, K. S. and Crist, T. O.. 2001. Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation of patch use by butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera). Ecology 82: 1360–1370. Sutcliffe, O. L., Bakkestuen, V., Fry, G. et al. 2003. Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 15–31. Thomas, C. D. and Harrison, S.. 1992. Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 437–446. Thomas, C. D., Warren, M. S. and Thomas, J. A.. 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92: 563–567. Thomas, C. D., Wilson, R. J. and Lewis, O. T.. 2002. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 563–569. Thomas, J. A.. 1991. Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. – In: I. Spellerberg, B. Goldsmith and M. G. Morris (eds), The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 149–197. Thomas, J. A.. 1995. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly. – In: A. S. Pullin (ed.), Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, pp. 180–197. Thomas, J. A., Bourn, N. A. D., Clarke, R. T. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 1791–1796. Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T. and Hanski, I.. 2002. Dynamic populationns in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25: 224–232. Wilson, R. J.. 1999. That spatiotemporal dynamics of three Lepidopteran herbivores of Helianthemum chamaecistus Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Leeds, U.K. Citing Literature Volume106, Issue2August 2004Pages 404-408 ReferencesRelatedInformation