Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Role of Receptor Phosphorylation in Desensitization and Internalization of the Secretin Receptor

1996; Elsevier BV; Volume: 271; Issue: 38 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.271.38.23566

ISSN

1083-351X

Autores

Martin Holtmann, Belinda F. Roettger, Delia I. Pinon, Laurence J. Miller,

Tópico(s)

Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

Resumo

The secretin receptor is prototypic of a recently described family of G protein-coupled receptors. We recently demonstrated its phosphorylation in response to agonist stimulation and elimination of this covalent modification by C-terminal truncation (F. Ozcelebi et al. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 818-824). Here, we explore the functional impact of receptor phosphorylation and structural determinants for desensitization by comparing receptor behavior after agonist exposure in cell lines expressing wild-type and truncated receptor. To characterize receptor internalization, a novel fluorescent full agonist, [rat secretin-27]-Gly-rhodamine, was developed, which bound specifically and with high affinity. Both receptor constructs bound secretin normally, leading to normal G protein coupling and cAMP accumulation and prompt receptor internalization. Exposure to 10 n secretin for 5 min or 12 h prior to washing and restimulation with a full range of concentrations demonstrated absent cAMP responses in wild-type receptor-bearing cells and responses 25 to 30% of control and shifted 1 order of magnitude to the right in the truncated receptor-bearing cells. Thus, the major mechanism of desensitization was phosphorylation-independent receptor internalization. Phosphorylation was associated with a distinct process that likely represents interference with G protein coupling, manifest as a reduced rate of cAMP stimulation. Thus, dual distinct mechanisms of desensitization exist in the secretin receptor family that should help protect receptor-bearing cells from overstimulation. The secretin receptor is prototypic of a recently described family of G protein-coupled receptors. We recently demonstrated its phosphorylation in response to agonist stimulation and elimination of this covalent modification by C-terminal truncation (F. Ozcelebi et al. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 818-824). Here, we explore the functional impact of receptor phosphorylation and structural determinants for desensitization by comparing receptor behavior after agonist exposure in cell lines expressing wild-type and truncated receptor. To characterize receptor internalization, a novel fluorescent full agonist, [rat secretin-27]-Gly-rhodamine, was developed, which bound specifically and with high affinity. Both receptor constructs bound secretin normally, leading to normal G protein coupling and cAMP accumulation and prompt receptor internalization. Exposure to 10 n secretin for 5 min or 12 h prior to washing and restimulation with a full range of concentrations demonstrated absent cAMP responses in wild-type receptor-bearing cells and responses 25 to 30% of control and shifted 1 order of magnitude to the right in the truncated receptor-bearing cells. Thus, the major mechanism of desensitization was phosphorylation-independent receptor internalization. Phosphorylation was associated with a distinct process that likely represents interference with G protein coupling, manifest as a reduced rate of cAMP stimulation. Thus, dual distinct mechanisms of desensitization exist in the secretin receptor family that should help protect receptor-bearing cells from overstimulation.

Referência(s)