Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Early Dissemination of CTX-M-Derived Enzymes in South America

2002; American Society for Microbiology; Volume: 46; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1128/aac.46.2.602-604.2002

1098-6596

Marcela Rádice, P.P. Power, José Di Conza, Gabriel Gutkind,

Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections

In a recent publication by Bonnet et al. regarding a new CTX-M-derived enzyme, a short history of this group of enzymes is provided, stating that “initially found in Europe, microorganisms producing these enzymes have now been observed over a wide geographic area…” (3). We want to point out that although the description of the first members of enzymes was achieved in Europe, they had been widely distributed in South America at least since 1989. Three different groups of investigators reported, in a national meeting, the explosive dissemination of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant salmonella, initially in neonatology units in La Plata and Buenos Aires city hospitals (A. Picandet, S. Giugno, M. I. Caffer, and G. Schembri, Abstr. II Congreso Internacional de SADEBAC, Antimicrobianos '90, abstr. A-16, 1990; H. Lopardo, M. I. Caffer, N. Fernandez, et al., Abstr. II Congreso Internacional de SADEBAC, Antimicrobianos '90, abstr. A-15, 1990; E. Maiorini, A. Procopio, S. Furmanski, et al., Abstr. II Congreso Internacional de SADEBAC, Antimicrobianos '90, abstr. A-17, 1990). An outbreak in a single hospital was presented at the 17th Congress of Chemotherapy, Berlin, 1991 (H. Lopardo, N. Fernandez, M. Fernandez Cobo, et al., abstr. 2088, 1991). The presence of a new enzyme in the implicated microorganisms was pointed out in a communication to the 1992 ASM General Meeting (A. Rossi, M. Woloj, G. Gutkind, et al., Abstr. 92nd Gen. Meet., abstr. A-135, 1992), and a brief historic perspective of their dissemination was reported in a paper that finally appeared in 1995 (7). In that paper, information relevant to the initial isolates, dissemination of this resistance marker within different salmonella serovars, and some biochemical characteristics of the enzymes present was displayed. In brief, they made their appearance in a really explosive way, initially in a single hospital in La Plata, from there to neonatology units in pediatric hospitals in Buenos Aires, and from them it was disseminated to Paraguay, Misiones (in northern Argentina), and Uruguay. However, formal sequencing of the structural gene of the enzyme responsible for this outbreak (and naming of the enzyme) was achieved by a more efficient collaboration of Bauernfeind and his group with Casellas and his group (1-2). Since then, its presence has been suggested or demonstrated in different microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli (M. Radice, A. Rossi, M. Venuta, H. Lopardo, and G. Gutkind, XVI Congreso Chileno de Microbiologia, p. 31, 1994; (5a), Shigella sonnei (5), and Proteus mirabilis (M. Quinteros, M. Mollerach, M. Radice, et al., Abstr. 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 893, 1999; M. Radice, M. Quinteros, M. Matteo, et al., Abstr. 9th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., abstr. 16028, 2000) (as typical non-AmpC producers), Morganella morganii (reference 44 and P. Power, M. Radice, C. Barberis, et al., Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1998, abstr. V-125, 1998), Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, and Enterobacter aerogenes, among other “AmpC-inducible” enterobacteria (M. Quinteros, M. Radice, P. Power, et al., Abstr. II Int. Congr. β-Lactamases, abstr. A-27, 1999), Vibrio cholerae (reference 6 and M. Galas, A. Petroni, R. Melano, et al., Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-174, 1998), and Aeromonas hydrophyla (M. Quinteros, M. Radice, P. Power, et al., Abstr. 9th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., abstr. 15884, 2000). A discussion on the ability of different susceptibility testing systems has been presented also (M. Quinteros, M. Matteo, P. Power, et al., Abstr. VIII Congreso Argentino de Microbiologia, abstr. A-44, 1998; M. Quinteros, M. Mollerach, M. Radice, et al., Abstr. 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 893, 1999; S. Kauffman, M. Quinteros, M. Radice, et al., Abstr. 9th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., abstr. 15883, 16028, and 16031, 2000). A more straightforward recommendation was presented almost a decade ago by the Subcomision de Antimicrobianos, Sociedad Argentina de Bacteriologia Clinica, Asociacion Argentina de Microbiologia, for changing on a national scale the interpretation of NCCLS breakpoints (while keeping all the other NCCLS method recommendations), stating that any enterobacteria (except for those in which AmpC is typically inducible) with inhibition zones lower than 26 mm around 30-μg cefotaxime disks or with a MIC higher than 1 mg/liter should be considered as potentially resistant to all extended-spectrum cephalosporins. It would be interesting to learn if this new CTX-M-derived enzymes explosion would have been so easily detected if NCCLS recommendations had not moved the breakpoint to 27 mm. Being able to detect it does not prevent its dissemination or allows its control: CTX-M-2 is present in almost 75% of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacteria submitted to our lab, coincident to an epidemiological study in Buenos Aires hospitals through a network of microbiological laboratories (Quinteros et al., unpublished data) being PER-2 (another nonclassical enzyme), the second most prevalent ESBL. Why are these enzymes and not the classical TEM- or SHV-derived enzymes (or any other classical family) are the most prevalent ESBLs in our region, as A. Medeiros has been asking Argentinean microbiologists in each of his visits? There is no formal answer to date.