Differentiation of Sex in Thallus Gametophyte and Sporophyte
1906; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 42; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/328959
ISSN1940-1205
Autores Tópico(s)Lichen and fungal ecology
ResumoNext article FreeDifferentiation of Sex in Thallus Gametophyte and SporophyteAlbert Francis BlakesleeAlbert Francis Blakeslee Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 42, Number 3Sep., 1906 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/328959 Views: 424Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Botanical Gazette (1876-1991), which is continued by International Journal of Plant Sciences (1992-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:John L. Bowman A Brief History of Marchantia from Greece to Genomics, Plant and Cell Physiology 57, no.22 (Mar 2015): 210–229.https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv044Virendra Nath, A. K. Asthana Reproductive Biology of Bryophytes, (Jan 2001): 148–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50133-3_8Paul A. Lemke Speciation Phenomena, (Jan 2001): 219–227.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10189-6_9Karl Esser Fungal Genetics: From Fundamental Research to Biotechnology, (Jan 1997): 3–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60458-4_1David G. Lloyd, C. J. Webb Secondary sex characters in plants, The Botanical Review 43, no.22 (Apr 1977): 177–216.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860717K. Esser 61. Karl Esser: Pilze als Objekte genetischer Forschung 1, Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 80, no.88 (Nov 2013): 453–469.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1967.tb02649.xKarl Esser, Rudolf Kuenen Ontogenese, (Jan 1967): 5–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49210-5_2Karl Esser, Rudolf Kuenen Fortpflanzung, (Jan 1967): 37–128.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49210-5_3Karl Esser, Rudolf Kuenen Morphology, (Jan 1967): 5–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86814-6_2Karl Esser, Rudolf Kuenen Reproduction, (Jan 1967): 40–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86814-6_3Friedrich Oehlkers Entwicklungsgeschichte r�ntgeninduzierter Mutanten vonFunaria hygrometrica L., Zeitschrift f�r Vererbungslehre 96, no.33 (Jan 1965): 234–249.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896824 Max Hartmann Sex Problems in Algae, Fungi and Protozoa: A Critical Account Following the Review of R. A. Lewin, The American Naturalist 89, no.849849 (Oct 2015): 321–346.https://doi.org/10.1086/281897R. P. KORF The Terms Homothallism and Heterothallism, Nature 170, no.43264326 (Sep 1952): 534–535.https://doi.org/10.1038/170534a0F. L. Drayton, J. W. Groves Stromatinia Narcissi, A New, Sexually Dimorphic Discomycete, Mycologia 44, no.11 (Sep 2018): 119–140.https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1952.12024177Lewis Hanford Tiffany The Oedogoniaceae. II, The Botanical Review 12, no.99 (Nov 1946): 530–534.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861803B. O. Dodge Further Remarks on Mycogenetic Terminology, Mycologia 37, no.66 (Sep 2018): 784–791.https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1945.12024030A. Woesler Zur Zwergmännchenfrage bei Leucobryum Glaucum SCHPR. I, Planta 24, no.11 (Aug 1935): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908970Charles E. Allen The genetics of bryophytes, The Botanical Review 1, no.88 (Aug 1935): 269–291.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869756E. N. Bressman INHERITANCE OF SEX IN CERTAIN SEED PLANTS, American Journal of Botany 21, no.66 (Jun 1934): 328–349.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1934.tb04966.xGertraud Haupt Beiträge zur Zytologie der GattungMarchantia (L.), Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 63, no.11 (Dec 1933): 390–419.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849097Gertraud Haupt Beiträge zur Zytologie der GattungMarchantia (L.), Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 62, no.11 (Dec 1932): 367–428.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01948611Maria D. Pastrana SPOROGENESIS AND SEX DETERMINATION IN BEGONIA SCHMIDTIANA, American Journal of Botany 19, no.44 (Apr 1932): 365–384.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1932.tb09655.xMax Hartmann Die Sexualität der Protisten und Thallophyten und ihre Bedeutung für eine allgemeine Sexualitätstheorie, Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 54, no.11 (Dec 1930): 76–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01848932Gerhard Lorbeer Untersuchungen über Reduktionsteilung und Geschlechtsbestimmung bei Lebermoosen, Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 44, no.11 (Dec 1927): 1–109.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01740982Lee Bonar STUDIES ON THE BIOLOGY OF BRACHYSPORIUM TRIFOLII, American Journal of Botany 11, no.33 (Mar 1924): 123–158.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1924.tb05767.x Albert F. Blakeslee , J. Lincoln Cartledge , and Donald S. Welch Sexual Dimorphism in Cunninghamella, Botanical Gazette 72, no.44 (Sep 2015): 185–219.https://doi.org/10.1086/332918Mabel Mary Brown THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GAMETOPHYTE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF SEXUAL CHARACTERS IN FUNARIA HYGROMETRICA (L.) SCHREB., American Journal of Botany 6, no.99 (Nov 1919): 387–400.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1919.tb05551.xDuncan S. Johnson Studies in the development of the Piperaceae I. The suppression and extension of sporogenous tissue in the flower of Piper betel L. var. monoicum C. DC, Journal of Experimental Zoology 9, no.44 (Dec 1910): 715–749.https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400090403
Referência(s)