Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Role of DNA in the Activation of the Cry1A Insecticidal Crystal Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis

1998; Elsevier BV; Volume: 273; Issue: 15 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.273.15.9292

ISSN

1083-351X

Autores

François R. Clairmont, R.E. Milne, Van Thong Pham, M Carrière, Harvey Kaplan,

Tópico(s)

Plant Virus Research Studies

Resumo

The Cry1A insecticidal crystal protein (protoxin) from six subspecies of Bacillus thuringiensis as well as the Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, and Cry1Ac proteins cloned in Escherichia coli was found to contain 20-kilobase pair DNA. Only the N-terminal toxic moiety of the protoxin was found to interact with the DNA. Analysis of the crystal gave approximately 3 base pairs of DNA per molecule of protoxin, indicating that only a small region of the N-terminal toxic moiety interacts with the DNA. It is proposed that the DNA-protoxin complex is virus-like in structure with a central DNA core surrounded by protein interacting with the DNA with the peripheral ends of the C-terminal region extending outward. It is shown that this structure accounts for the unusual proteolysis observed in the generation of toxin in which it appears that peptides are removed by obligatory sequential cleavages starting from the C terminus of the protoxin. Activation of the protoxin by spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) gut juice is shown to proceed through intermediates consisting of protein-DNA complexes. Larval trypsin initially converts the 20-kilobase pair DNA-protoxin complex to a 20-kilobase pair DNA-toxin complex, which is subsequently converted to a 100-base pair DNA-toxin complex by a gut nuclease and ultimately to the DNA-free toxin. The Cry1A insecticidal crystal protein (protoxin) from six subspecies of Bacillus thuringiensis as well as the Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, and Cry1Ac proteins cloned in Escherichia coli was found to contain 20-kilobase pair DNA. Only the N-terminal toxic moiety of the protoxin was found to interact with the DNA. Analysis of the crystal gave approximately 3 base pairs of DNA per molecule of protoxin, indicating that only a small region of the N-terminal toxic moiety interacts with the DNA. It is proposed that the DNA-protoxin complex is virus-like in structure with a central DNA core surrounded by protein interacting with the DNA with the peripheral ends of the C-terminal region extending outward. It is shown that this structure accounts for the unusual proteolysis observed in the generation of toxin in which it appears that peptides are removed by obligatory sequential cleavages starting from the C terminus of the protoxin. Activation of the protoxin by spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) gut juice is shown to proceed through intermediates consisting of protein-DNA complexes. Larval trypsin initially converts the 20-kilobase pair DNA-protoxin complex to a 20-kilobase pair DNA-toxin complex, which is subsequently converted to a 100-base pair DNA-toxin complex by a gut nuclease and ultimately to the DNA-free toxin. Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt) 1The abbreviation used are: Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis; bp, base pair(s); CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid; kbp, kilobase pair(s); TAE, Tris-acetic acid-EDTA; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. deposits a proteinaceous crystal during sporulation (1Fast P.G. Burgess H.D. Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Diseases. Academic Press, London1981: 223-248Google Scholar). The major component of crystals toxic to lepidopteran larvae is a 130-kDa protein (protoxin) (2Hofte H. Whitely H.R. Microbiol. Rev. 1989; 53: 225-242Crossref Google Scholar). On ingestion, the protoxin is acted on by a trypsin-like gut protease and converted to a 65-kDa toxin derived from the N-terminal region of the protein (3Tojo A. Aizawa K. Appl. Eviron. Microbiol. 1983; 45: 576-580Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 4Nagamatsu Y. Itai Y. Hatana C. Funatsu G. Hayashi K. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1984; 48: 611-619Crossref Scopus (3) Google Scholar, 5Milne R.E. Kaplan H. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993; 23: 663-673Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). The toxin binds to receptors on the brush border membrane (6Wolfersberger M. Luethy P. Maurer A. Parenti P. Sacchi F.V. Giordana B. Hanozet G.M. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1987; 86A: 301-308Crossref Scopus (550) Google Scholar, 7Hofmann C. Vanderbruggen H. Höfte H. Van Rie J. Jansens S. Van Mellaert H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 7844-7848Crossref PubMed Scopus (351) Google Scholar, 8Masson L. Lu Y. Mazza A. Brousseau R. Adang M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 20309-20325Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar) and is inserted into the membrane, leading to disruption of membrane function with subsequent larval death (9Knowles B.H. Ellar D.J. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1987; 924: 509-518Crossref Scopus (384) Google Scholar, 10Liebig B. Stetson D.L. Dean D.H. J. Insect Physiol. 1995; 41: 17-22Crossref Scopus (21) Google Scholar). An unusual feature is that activation of the protoxin appears to occur by a sequential series of proteolytic cleavages, starting at the C terminus and proceeding toward the N terminus until the protease-stable toxin is generated (11Choma C.T. Surewicz W.K. Carey P.R. Pozsgay M. Raynor T. Kaplan H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1990; 189: 523-527Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar, 12Chestukhina G.G. Kostina L.I. Mikhailova A.L. Tyurin S.A. Klepikova F.S. Stepanov V.M. Arch. Microbiol. 1982; 132: 159-162Crossref Scopus (63) Google Scholar). As there is no known protein structural motif that would give rise to such a proteolytic process, this phenomenon is indicative of either a novel type of protein structure or the presence of an additional structural component that confers this property to the protein. An unexpected finding was that a 20-kbp heterologous DNA fragment is intimately associated with the crystals from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD73 (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The DNA is not susceptible to nuclease attack unless the protoxin is removed or proteolyzed to toxin. The active toxin is not associated with DNA; however, evidence was obtained which indicated that the DNA was involved in the generation of toxin from the crystal protein. At present, the nature of the interaction of the Bt protein with DNA and the role of the DNA in the generation of toxin are unknown. The present investigation was undertaken to determine the role of the DNA in the structure and function of the Bt crystal protein. B. thuringiensis subsp.kurstaki HD73 was grown in half-strength trypticase broth. Harvesting of the cells for crystal purification was performed after 5–7 days based on examination of the cultures under a phase contrast microscope to confirm sporulation and crystal formation in a minimum of 50% of cells. The cells were then lysed in the presence of 1m NaCl and 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C, and the crystals obtained were purified by Renografin gradient as described previously (14Carey P.R. Fast P. Kaplan H. Pozsgay M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986; 872: 169-176Crossref Scopus (20) Google Scholar). Inclusion bodies containing Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, and Cry1Ac protoxins (15Brousseau R. Masson L. Biotechnol. Adv. 1988; 6: 697-724Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar, 16Masson L. Prefontaine G. Peloquin L. Lau P. Brousseau R. Biochem. J. 1989; 269: 507-512Crossref Scopus (97) Google Scholar) cloned in E. coli were obtained from Dr. Luke Masson of the Biotechnology Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec. Aliquots (20 μl) of purified crystal suspension were lyophilized and added to 1.00 ml of 6 n HCl containing 100 nmol of norleucine in a hydrolysis tube and hydrolyzedin vacuo for 24 h at 110 °C. Amino acid analysis was carried out on an Applied BioSystems model 420 amino acid analyzer equipped with an automated phenylisothiocyanate precolumn derivatization system. Phosphate analyses were performed by the modified microprocedure of Bartlett (17Kates M. Burdon R.H. van Knippenberg P.H. Techniques of Lipidology. 2nd Rev. Ed. Elsevier, New York1986: 114-115Google Scholar). A standard phosphate solution was prepared by dissolving 1.097 g of KH2PO4 in 250 ml of deionized-distilled water such that a 1:100 dilution of the stock yielded a concentration of 10 μg/ml phosphate. Aliquots of crystals containing between 0.5 and 10 μg of phosphate (preliminary analyses were used to determine the volume of crystal suspension required) were freeze dried in digestion tubes. Similarly, aliquots (0.1–1.0 ml) of the standard phosphate solution were also freeze dried in digestion tubes. After lyophilization, 0.4 ml of perchloric acid was added to each tube, hydrolyzed for 4 min, and cooled. 4.2 ml of deionized-distilled H2O, 0.2 ml of a 5% ammonium molybdate solution, and 0.2 ml of amidol reagent (0.5 g amidol in 50 ml of 20% sodium bisulfite solution and filtered) were added to each tube. The tubes were covered with aluminum foil and heated in a boiling water bath for 7 min, and the color was allowed to develop for 30 min. Absorbance of the molybdenum blue complex was measured at 830 nm (relative to a water blank) in quartz cuvettes (1.0 cm) using a Philips Pye Unicam PU 8800 UV-visible spectrophotometer. A standard curve was constructed using SigmaPlot 4.0 (with a 95% confidence interval). For routine operations, protoxin and toxin concentrations were estimated from the absorbance at 280 nm (18Bietlot H.P. Carey P.R. Choma C.T. Kaplan H. Lessard T. Pozsgay M. Biochem. J. 1989; 260: 87-91Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar). For quantification of the DNA/protein ratio, protoxin and toxin were quantified by dividing the amount of each amino acid obtained from amino acid analysis by the number of residues predicted from the gene nucleotide sequence of the protoxin or toxin (18Bietlot H.P. Carey P.R. Choma C.T. Kaplan H. Lessard T. Pozsgay M. Biochem. J. 1989; 260: 87-91Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar, 19Adang M.J. Staver M.J. Rocheleau T.A. Leighton J. Barker R.F. Thompson D.V. Gene (Amst .). 1985; 36: 289-300Crossref PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar). The DNA/protein ratio, expressed in base pairs of DNA/molecule of protein, was calculated as the ratio of the concentrations of phosphate and protein from a minimum of two independent assays for each crystal type. The mean error in the determinations was calculated from the standard errors in the phosphate and protein concentrations. Since the DNA is double-stranded, the value obtained for the amount of phosphate was halved to obtain a value expressed as base pairs of DNA/molecule of protein. Purified crystals from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki were solubilized in 100 mm bicarbonate/carbonate buffer in the presence of 10 mm EDTA and adjusted to pH 10.5. The toxin-20-kbp DNA complex was generated by treating the solubilized crystals with 0.05% (w/v) bovine trypsin (Sigma) for 2 h at 37 °C. The digest was centrifuged to remove insoluble material and thoroughly dialyzed against distilled H2O/acetic acid (pH 5). The DNA and protein components were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and SDS-PAGE. SDS-polyacrylamide gels (10%) were prepared from materials supplied by Bio-Rad, and electrophoresis was performed according to standard procedures from the manufacturer using the MiniProtean System (Bio-Rad). Protein detection was achieved by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. DNA was extracted from the DNA-protein complexes using a modified phenol/chloroform procedure as described previously (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Agarose gels (0.9%) were prepared using ultrapure agarose (Life Technologies, Inc.). Gels were prepared in 0.1 m CAPS buffer (pH 10.5) and ethidium bromide-treated for detection of the DNA. Samples were chromatographed using a Bio-Rad HRLC MA7Q (50 × 7.8 mm) anion exchange column. Elution was carried out using a linear gradient of 0 to 1.0m NaCl in 0.1 m CAPS buffer adjusted to pH 10.5. The flow rate was 2.5 ml/min, and the eluate was monitored by UV absorbance at 280 nm. Sixth instar larvae were forced to expectorate by teasing the mouth parts with a capillary. The gut juice collected in this manner was centrifuged at 12,000 × g, and aliquots of the supernatant were stored at − 20 °C as described previously (5Milne R.E. Kaplan H. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993; 23: 663-673Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). Bt crystals were solubilized in 100 mm CAPS buffer (pH 10.5) and incubated at 37 °C with 0.5% (v/v) or 0.1% (v/v) spruce budworm gut juice. At various time intervals, aliquots were drawn and immediately frozen for analysis. Purified crystals containing Cry1A proteins from six different subpecies of Bt were solubilized, and electrophoresis was carried out on ethidium bromide-treated agarose gels (Fig. 1). All these crystals contained a DNA band of approximately 20 kbp. Purified inclusion bodies containing the cloned gene products corresponding to the Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, and Cry1Ac protoxins were isolated from E. coli and examined for the presence of DNA. The protoxins cloned in E. coli also appear to be associated with 20-kbp DNA (Fig. 1). To determine if toxin could be generated in the absence of nuclease activity, the crystal protein was solubilized in the presence of EDTA to inhibit the nuclease activity present in the bovine trypsin preparation used to proteolyze the protoxin to toxin. Fig. 2 shows that the 65-kDa toxin is readily generated in the absence of nuclease activity, while the 20-kbp DNA remains intact. The fate of the DNA and the crystal protein during activation of solubilized crystal protein by spruce budworm gut juice was monitored by agarose gel electrophoresis and SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3). At the earliest time points (30 s and 15 min), most of the crystal protein was converted to toxin, while the 20-kbp DNA remained intact. The DNA is eventually broken down by the nuclease activity in the gut juice but after the protoxin has been converted to toxin. Fig. 4 shows a time course for the same activation process with spruce budworm gut juice on an anion exchange column (Bio-RAD MA7Q, 50 mm × 7.8 mm). The 100-bp DNA-toxin complex reported previously (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) elutes at 0.8m NaCl and is the major product of the processing observed after 30 min. This peak decreases with time and elutes slightly earlier with a corresponding increase in the DNA-free toxin peak, eluting at 0.3 m NaCl. The other peaks eluting near the DNA-free toxin arise from other components of the spruce budworm gut juice.Figure 4Products of activation of the solubilized protoxin by spruce budworm gut juice. Bt crystals were solubilized and treated with 0.5% gut juice. Aliquots were withdrawn at various time intervals and analyzed by anion exchange chromatography (Bio-RAD MA7Q, 50 mm × 7.8 mm). The vertical arrows indicate the toxin eluting at 3.8 min and 0.3 m NaCl (A,B, C, and D) and the 100-bp DNA-toxin complex eluting at 9.2 min and 0.8 m NaCl (A). Elution conditions consisted of a linear gradient 0 to 1 mNaCl in 0.1 m CAPS, pH 10.5, at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min.A, 30 min; B, 2 h; C, 4 h;D, 24 h.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The number of nucleotide base pairs of DNA per molecule of protein was determined for crystals, solubilized protoxin, and toxin-DNA complex (Table I). Quantification of the amount of protoxin or toxin was based on the amino acid composition determined from the gene nucleotide sequence (19Adang M.J. Staver M.J. Rocheleau T.A. Leighton J. Barker R.F. Thompson D.V. Gene (Amst .). 1985; 36: 289-300Crossref PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar). Samples to be analyzed were hydrolyzed in 6 n HCl, and each of the amino acids was quantified by amino acid analysis. The molar amount of protein was estimated by dividing moles of each amino acid by the number of residues of the amino acid in the protoxin. Phosphorus analysis was carried out on a corresponding aliquot of the sample, and the molar number of base pairs was half the molar phosphorus content. The data in Table I indicate there were from 2 to 5 nucleotide base pairs per molecule of protein. The average of all these determinations gives 3.5 ± 1 nucleotide base pairs per molecule of protein.Table IQuantification of base pairs DNA/protein ratioBt sampleDNA/molecule protein1-2001The values are given with the 95% confidence interval determined from the standard error in the estimate of the phosphorus content and the standard error in the estimate of the amount of protein from amino acid analysis.bpB. thuringiensis kurstaki HD73 crystal3.5 ± 0.5B. thuringiensis kurstaki HD73 crystal3.1 ± 0.4B. thuringiensis kenya crystal4.8 ± 1.5B. thuringiensis sotto crystal2.0 ± 0.5Solubilized HD73 protoxin3.2 ± 1.1Solubilized HD73 protoxin4.0 ± 1.4Cloned E. coli Cry1Ac protein2.3 ± 0.2HD73 toxin-20-kpb DNA5.0 ± 1.0 Average:3.5 ± 1.01-a The values are given with the 95% confidence interval determined from the standard error in the estimate of the phosphorus content and the standard error in the estimate of the amount of protein from amino acid analysis. Open table in a new tab The discovery that heterologous 20-kbp DNA was present in the insecticidal crystal of B. thuringiensis subsp.kurstaki HD73 (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) raised the question as to the role of this DNA. The evidence obtained indicated that the DNA was not an artifact of the crystal purification procedure, but was an integral component of the crystal that interacted specifically with the protoxin. The finding in the present study that 20-kbp DNA is present in crystals prepared from five other subpecies of Bt as well as the Cry1A gene products cloned in E. coli supports this conclusion. It was initially proposed (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) that the DNA interacted with the C-terminal region of the protoxin, and that nucleolytic and proteolytic co-processing of the DNA and protoxin gave rise to the sequential proteolysis observed in the generation of toxin. The finding that a 20-kbp-DNA-toxin complex could be generated by trypsin in the absence of nuclease activity indicates that this hypothesis is incorrect and that protoxin interacts with the DNA through its N-terminal toxic moiety. The amount of protein relative to the DNA was quantified to obtain information that would provide clues as to the structure of the DNA-protoxin complex. An initial estimate of the amount of DNA relative to the protein in the solubilized protoxin was made at pH 10.5 using the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (20Monro H.N. Fleck A. Methods of Biochemical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York1966: 113-176Google Scholar) and found to be approximately 10 bp per molecule of protein (21Bietlot, H. P. (1993) Characterization of Insecticidal Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Ph.D. doctoral thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar). A great deal of confidence could not be attached to this estimate because of the many assumptions made in the spectroscopic approach, but it did indicate a large amount of protein relative to the DNA. The quantification procedure adopted in the present investigation was to quantify the protein by amino acid analysis and the DNA by phosphorous analysis. The value of approximately 3 bp per molecule of protoxin obtained by this approach confirms that there is a large amount of protein relative to the DNA (Table I). If this value is correct, then only a very small region of an extended protein molecule must be involved in the interaction. Based on x-ray powder diffraction of Bt crystals, Holmes and Monro (22Holmes K.C. Monro R.E. J. Mol. Biol. 1965; 14: 572-581Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar) concluded that the protoxin was an elongated ellipsoid molecule. A model is proposed (Fig. 5) in which ellipsoid protoxin molecules are interacting with the DNA through the N-terminal toxic moiety while the C-terminal half of the molecule extends away from the central core. The molecules form a protein layer covering the DNA, which accounts for the observed protection of the DNA in the crystal from nuclease attack (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The observation that the DNA isolated from the crystal is extensively digested by EcoRI and BamHI into small DNA fragments (13Bietlot H., P. Schernthaner J.P. Milne R.E. Clairmont F.R. Bhella R.S. Kaplan H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 8240-8245Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) indicates that the DNA is double-stranded. Furthermore, the observation that these DNA fragments can be cloned and fragmentary sequences obtained 2F. R. Clairmont, R. E. Milne, V. T. Pham, M. B. Carrière, and H. Kaplan, unpublished result. provides further evidence that the DNA is double-stranded. Therefore, our results indicate that the protoxin could be interacting with either a minimum of 3 nucleotides or up to 6 nucleotides along the DNA strand. The evidence obtained in the present investigation only shows that it is the N-terminal toxic moiety of the protoxin that interacts with the DNA and the elucidation of the details of this interaction will require further study. The proposed nucleic acid-protein complex is virus-like in structure, and indeed, it has been reported that in tobacco mosaic virus one protein molecule interacts with three nucleotide bases (23Stubbs G. Top. Mol. Struct. Biol. 1989; 10: 87-101Google Scholar). While the nucleic acid in the tobacco mosaic virus is single-stranded RNA, it does show that the proposed model is a plausible explanation of the experimental data. Moreover, the proposed structure accounts for the sequential proteolysis and processing of the DNA. The protoxin molecules are stacked together in such a way that only the C-terminal ends of the molecule are accessible to proteolytic enzymes. Thus, the cleavages must proceed in a sequential manner from the C terminus. Once the C-terminal portion of the protoxin is removed, the DNA becomes susceptible to nuclease attack with the regions not interacting with the protein being processed more rapidly. Fig. 6 is a proposed activation scheme for the conversion of the crystal protein to toxin in the larval gut. Spruce budworm gut juice has been found to contain a single trypsin-like protease (5Milne R.E. Kaplan H. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993; 23: 663-673Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar) and a single type I DNase. 3H. Kaplan and J. P. Schernthaner, manuscript in preparation. On ingestion, the crystal is solubilized by cleavage of the disulfide bridges in the highly alkaline pH environment of the larval gut (25Jacquet F. Hütter R. Lüthy P. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987; 53: 500-504Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 26Nickerson K.W. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980; 12: 1305-1335Crossref Scopus (39) Google Scholar). Cleavage of disulfide bridges has been shown to occur by a base-catalyzed β-elimination reaction with the formation of dehydroalanine and thiocystine residues (27Volkin D.B. Klibanov A.M. Crieghton T.E. Protein Structure and Function: A Practical Approach. IRC Press, Oxford1989: 1-24Google Scholar). Gut juice from the spruce budworm acts rapidly to convert the crystal protein to toxin. However, by dilution of the gut juice it was possible to observe the relative rates of processing of the protein and the DNA (Fig. 3). The results obtained show that the 20-kbp DNA-protoxin is rapidly converted to 20-kbp DNA-toxin complex. Processing of the 20-kbp DNA-toxin complex proceeds rapidly to give a 100-bp DNA-toxin complex that can be observed to accumulate in the early stages of the activation process (Fig. 4). Further action of the larval gut DNase yields the DNA-free toxin. The relatively slow attack of the nuclease on the DNA in the 100-bp DNA toxin complex is indicative of a core structure in which the DNA is strongly associated with the protein. Attempts to reconstitute the DNA-toxin complex from the DNA-free toxin and isolated 20-kbp DNA have been unsuccessful. This may be due to a failure of the reconstitution conditions. However, the endotherms of the protoxin and toxin obtained by differential scanning calorimetry indicate that the toxic moiety has different conformations in the protoxin and in the free toxin (24Choma C.T. Surewicz W.K. Kaplan H. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991; 179: 933-938Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar). The failure to reconstitute the DNA-toxin complex may be due to the fact that the toxic moiety undergoes a conformational change as a result of the processing of the DNA to give DNA-free toxin. In conclusion, the present study provides further evidence that DNA is an integral component of the Bt crystal. The association of the protoxin with the DNA appears to be essential for crystal formation and probably facilitates the sequestering of the protein during sporulation. This association gives rise to a virus-like structure that is responsible for the unusual proteolysis observed during the activation process which involves co-processing of the protein and the DNA to give the active toxin.

Referência(s)