Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Transforming Cardiovascular Health Through Genes and Environment

2013; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 127; Issue: 20 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/cir.0b013e318295b369

ISSN

1524-4539

Autores

Donna K. Arnett,

Tópico(s)

Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Resumo

HomeCirculationVol. 127, No. 20Transforming Cardiovascular Health Through Genes and Environment Free AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBTransforming Cardiovascular Health Through Genes and EnvironmentPresidential Address at the American Heart Association 2012 Scientific Sessions Donna K. Arnett, PhD, MSPH, BSN, FAHA Donna K. ArnettDonna K. Arnett From the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Originally published21 May 2013https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e318295b369Circulation. 2013;127:2066–2070IntroductionGood afternoon, and welcome to Scientific Sessions 2012. It is my privilege and honor to address this esteemed group of researchers, clinicians, colleagues, and friends. I thank you for being here today and for your commitment to science and to the fight against cardiovascular diseases andstroke.I'd like to extend a heartfelt welcome to all of you who are young investigators and early in your careers. I feel a special bond with you today. It was 25 years ago, just down the road in Anaheim, when I presented an oral abstract at Scientific Sessions on my very first independent research study.I am honored to be back here today as the president of the American Heart Association. I also stand before you today as a nurse, a basic scientist, and an epidemiologist. This unique career journey has enriched me with the opportunity to work alongside many of you in many capacities. More importantly, I have been able to care for patients, pursue scientific discovery, and study population health, all with the goal of saving and improving lives.Today, I will discuss a major global threat to human health: hypertension. Almost 1 billion people have high blood pressure, putting 1 of every 7 people on the planet at higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. The World Heart Federation projects that number to grow by >50% by the year 2025.1 As you know, here in the United States, nearly 1 in 3 Americans has hypertension. One in 5 is not aware of this condition. And nearly half of all hypertensives have out-of-control high blood pressure (Figure).2 Ninety percent of Americans are expected to have high blood pressure at some point in their lives. African Americans have one of the highest rates of hypertension in the world and suffer disproportionate rates of hypertensive heart disease and renal failure requiring dialysis.3Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Nearly 1 in 3 Americans has hypertension, and nearly half of those people have out-of-control hypertension.2 Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2010 (September 2012).Today, I'll discuss the urgent need to do everything in our power to change this disturbing picture, both through continued genomic research and drastic environmental change. Hypertension is a global pandemic, and we will need bold solutions to solve it.I became interested in the field of genetics while caring for patients as a clinical research nurse at a VA hospital. I was overseeing randomized clinical trials in hypertension, and I was fascinated by the considerable variability among patients, not only in response to blood pressure–lowering drugs but also in response to hypertension itself.Some patients would have severe left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) at low levels of untreated blood pressure. Others would have no hypertrophy even with very high blood pressure levels. I became keenly interested in the "why" of variable response.I began to explore that question and found that blood pressure variability predicted the degree of increased left ventricular (LV) mass. But the variability was still unexplained. And so it struck me that there must be other factors, possibly genetic, that led to this variation in blood pressure and in target-organ damage.My interest in genetics was further fueled by my observation of patients who passed by my VA office on their way to their dialysis treatments 3 times a week. Nearly all were African Americans, a statistical oddity that made me question whether something unique was causing renal failure in this population. I had directly observed higher blood pressure levels and more LVH in my African American patients, but I wondered: Was a genetic component predisposing them to higher blood pressure and multiple sequelae?Since asking that question 25 years ago, genomics technology and genomics knowledge have exploded. Our ability to approach the genetics of hypertension was limited then. Much of the work involved quantifying the amount of variation in a genetic trait attributable to familial relationships. We knew that hypertension was more common in individuals with a strong family history of hypertension.4And in my research in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) LVH study, LV mass was strongly heritable, particularly in African Americans.5 Data from another study show that up to 70% of the variation in LV mass among African American siblings is explained by familial relationships,6 but which genes were responsible could not be determined by this method.These answers had to wait for the discovery and annotation of millions of genetic variations through the Human Genome Project.7,8 Completed nearly a decade ago, the genome project was an incredible effort: It sought to identify all of the ≈22 000 protein-coding genes in human DNA and to determine the 3 billion chemical base pairs that make up the human DNA sequence. The Human Genome Project provided the tools for identifying genes that contribute to rare forms of extremely high or low blood pressure, among many other diseases. However, the search for the genes contributing to essential hypertension has proven more difficult.As information about the human genome has expanded (and continues to expand), promising new kinds of studies for gene discovery have emerged. One technique used to study genetic variation among individuals, the genome-wide association study (GWAS), was named "breakthrough of the year" in 2007 by Science. GWAS offers the opportunity to search the genome in an agnostic way for any genes that contribute to hypertension.9The GWAS has complemented our traditional approaches for gene discovery by capturing both known and novel genes, including those with only modest effects on blood pressure. The GWAS methods have yielded an unprecedented number of discoveries; significant genetic associations across multiple diseases can be found on every chromosome.Essential hypertension has been thought to result from common genetic variations, called polymorphisms, with moderate effects on blood pressure.10 To identify these genes, a large number of genetic markers are required. Technology evolved such that gene "chips," which actually share some technologies with computer chips, are now available.11 These chips characterize millions of polymorphisms across the genome to enable the identification of a causal genetic variant.The success of GWAS also depends on a large sample size. The most comprehensive blood pressure GWAS study done to date included >200 000 individuals. In this GWAS study, 22 of the 28 significant genes would never have been considered as important for blood pressure.12 This demonstrates the unique power of this kind of study: This agnostic approach allows us to better understand the pathophysiology of hypertension, and that can lead to novel antihypertensive treatments.Our laboratory performed a GWAS for LVH in hypertensive African American families during the second phase of the HyperGEN LVH study. We found a region on chromosome 11 that was associated with LV wall thickness; the most significant polymorphism lies within the promoter of the NCAM1 gene.13NCAM1 is a glycoprotein that mediates adhesive interactions between cells in the nervous system and in muscle.14,15 Animal studies suggest NCAM1 is important for LVH in the context of hypertension.16 While further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which NCAM1 influences hypertrophy, this finding once again highlights the promise in the GWAS approach.While GWAS have focused mostly on common polymorphisms, evidence is accumulating that rare mutations are also important.17,18 Fortunately, it is now feasible to sequence the entire genome or the protein-coding part of the genome, known as the exome, to identify these variants. These new sequencing methods have already identified new genetic mutations underlying a rare hypertension syndrome.19We used the exome-sequencing method in the HyperGEN study to identify genetic variants for LVH, but we combined our exome-sequencing approach with a complementary method using human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes.20 Our sequencing study revealed a large number of genetic variants for LVH—too many to sort through to understand which might be important. So we induced hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes using isoproterenol. We compared the expression of proteins in those cardiomyocytes to "control" cells. From our list of hundreds of genes from the families, we found 44 that are differentially expressed in human cardiomyocytes in our model system.20I am thrilled about the potential of these genomic findings and in our ability to translate these discoveries in humans back into the laboratory to understand the disease mechanisms. I firmly believe that one day a detailed understanding of which variants and genes are involved in essential hypertension, LVH, and even renal failure (and how they are involved) will lead to new and better prevention, diagnosis, and treatment options.But those will be the future lessons of genomics. What are today's lessons, and how can we use them? As an epidemiologist, I am compelled to ask what we can do now about the pandemic of hypertension.One undeniable message in the hypertension genetics literature is that most polymorphisms have very small effects on blood pressure.12,21 But when we're talking about the high prevalence of hypertension, the most important factor may not be the polymorphisms themselves but how they interact with the external environment. And this is what is so important to understand: While our genome has evolved over thousands of years, our environment has evolved quite dramatically over a very small window of "genomic" time.It is the intersection of our genome and this new environment that is critically important to the epidemic of hypertension. We know many of the environmental contributors to hypertension: high dietary sodium intake, physical inactivity, and obesity, to name a few. And so the lesson in today's genetics is this: We must do everything possible to understand and ameliorate the effects of the environment on hypertension.Think about physical activity. Hundreds and hundreds of generations stayed in shape because they had to. Getting away from a saber-tooth tiger or wooly mammoth required humans to stay physically fit. And if you wanted to do anything or go anywhere, you had to walk or run. Then, just a short time ago, in genomic terms anyway, we had cars. Then, again very suddenly, we were flying. As a result, we became less active. We are now people who sit, and we sit a lot, whether we are at home, at work, or at play.Meanwhile, our inactive populations are now eating in a way that was unimaginable even decades ago. Mass food production started in the late 19th century.22,23 Within a half century or so, diets around the world changed dramatically. Processed, packaged, and restaurant foods became increasingly popular. By the 1970s, the family-prepared dinner was largely replaced by larger portions packed with excess sodium, often washed down with sugar-filled drinks.24Think about it this way: Our genome has evolved in a low-sodium, high-activity environment over 8000 generations. Yet the dramatic shifts in dietary sodium and physical inactivity have occurred in just 4 generations.25Everyone in this audience has seen the results of the interaction between our genome and the new environment. I can't possibly discuss all the cardiovascular consequences, so instead I'll focus only on one important determinant of hypertension: sodium consumption. Sodium is so prevalent in processed and restaurant foods that we get >75% of the sodium in our diets this way.26The average American consumes about 3400 mg of sodium every day,27 more than double that recommended by the American Heart Association.28 We know from a meta-analysis of sodium reduction trials that even modest reductions in sodium result in a 5-mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure among patients with hypertension.29 We also know that for every 5-mm Hg reduction in blood pressure, we will have 14% fewer deaths from stroke and 9% fewer deaths from heartdisease.30Still, I'm hopeful about our future. That's partly because of our genomics accomplishments. We are getting more and more information about genes that are important for essential hypertension, and we're going to get even more as human genome research continues. This knowledge can be crucial to our efforts to build a healthier environment and to personalize hypertension treatments.Although we can't change our genome, I passionately believe that we can change our environment. As scientists, healthcare providers, and educators, we have proven we can effect change on a grand scale. Our record shows that we are very good at overcoming major difficulties. And we are at a very promising starting point: We already know a great deal about how our environment contributes to hypertension.Now, we need the will and innovation to put that knowledge to work. That's really all that happened when we accomplished one of the greatest feats in science, landing on the moon in 1969. President Kennedy told Congress, just 8 years earlier, that we would land a man on the moon and return him safely to Earth within a decade. Then scientists carried out that will, discovering and innovating and eventually reaching that goal.In an example from medicine, that's how we eradicated smallpox by 1980.31 We had the will; we developed the vaccine; and, importantly, we found creative ways to deliver the vaccine around the world.In much the same way, we must find the population interventions to prevent hypertension in those who are genetically susceptible and to identify all hypertensive people and get them treated. We need to be sure that the many effective medicines we've already developed, and those we will develop, can be used to benefit those individuals.And we need to continue our search for genetic polymorphisms that can help to personalize medicine for each individual's genome. There's no reason why we can't prevent hypertension for many and effectively control high blood pressure for most of the 1 billion people with hypertension around the world.Here's just one illustration of how we can change this picture in communities everywhere. It's a program in North Carolina called "CheckIt, ChangeIt," which helps people get blood pressure screenings and understand them.32 This is a great example of collaboration because it involves the American Heart Association, as well as partners from business, education, and government.As we look for hypertension solutions, we need to apply that same vigor and excitement that we did with the Human Genome Project and the eradication of smallpox. As you recall, those 2 projects galvanized the world. We need to once again galvanize the world to change.The solution must be many things, and everyone here has the potential to be part of it. Although as scientists, we are all trained to know the "right next question," that is difficult with such a complex population-based problem. So my first challenge to you today is to continue to find that next question … or those next questions.I challenge you to pursue the most innovative solutions to hypertension. There should be no limit to our investigation. Who imagined 25 years ago that we would map 22 000 human genes? Maybe we can find 22 000 environmental prevention strategies. Or maybe it will only take 22.I urge you to pursue this innovation together. We need more collaborative work between basic, clinical, and population scientists. And we must recognize the importance of innovation outside the clinic, lab, or classroom. The solutions will not come entirely from our biomedical world. They will also come from society, business, and government. We must advocate for large-scale change by asking the difficult questions:How do we create a healthier food supply?How do we find innovative ways to mass produce and deliver not only convenient but healthy food?Why can't we make the healthiest food options the most affordable?Today, I also challenge you to do more for your communities. We all invest heavily in our careers to improve human health. But we have an opportunity to do more. We can advocate for public policy; we can share healthy-eating tips with friends and family; and we can help school kids understand nutrition and the importance of staying active. I'd like to close with the story about why I'm here today. It is the story that inspires me every day to fight disease to save lives.This story is about a man named Roberto.* We met in 1981 under the worst of circumstances. I was a critical care unit nurse, and Roberto was a man in his 50s who was in the middle of a massive, evolving myocardial infarction. He was grasping his chest in pain and struggling for every breath.In the middle of it all, Roberto reached up and grabbed my arms with both hands, and our eyes met. Our faces were 6 inches apart. Roberto could barely get the words out, but I'll never forget them. He said, "Don't let me die."The chaos continued for another 10 minutes before Roberto was stabilized. We did not let Roberto die that day. He lived 3 more years, time he relished with his family and friends. But his life was still too short.I'm here today because of Roberto. And for the many people just like Roberto who are saved by you, your colleagues, your teammates, your students, and your mentors.I know each of you has your own "Roberto" story.We have a tremendous opportunity to save many other people. But to do so, we must initiate, we must innovate, and we must collaborate.Thank you for your service to human health. And thank you for your time today.AcknowledgmentI thank Steven A. Claas, MS, for his assistance with this manuscript.* Pseudonym.FootnotesPresented at the 2012 Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, November 3–7, Los Angeles, CA.Correspondence to Donna K. Arnett, PhD, MSPH, BSN, FAHA, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022. E-mail [email protected]References1. Hypertension.World Heart Federation Web site. http://www.world-heart-federation.org/cardiovascular-health/cardiovascular-disease-risk-factors/hypertension/. Accessed March 21, 2013.Google Scholar2. Getting blood pressure under control.Vital Signs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hypertension/. Accessed April 2, 2013.Google Scholar3. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Magid D, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Schreiner PJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association [published correction appears in Circulation. 2013;127:doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad].Circulation. 2013; 127:e6–e245.LinkGoogle Scholar4. Hunt SC, Williams RR, Barlow GK. A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease [published correction appears in J Chronic Dis. 1987;4:369].J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39:809–821.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Arnett DK, Hong Y, Bella JN, Oberman A, Kitzman DW, Hopkins PN, Rao DC, Devereux RB. Sibling correlation of left ventricular mass and geometry in hypertensive African Americans and whites: the HyperGEN study: Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network.Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14:1226–1230.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Swan L, Birnie DH, Padmanabhan S, Inglis G, Connell JM, Hillis WS. The genetic determination of left ventricular mass in healthy adults.Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:577–582.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Lewin R. National Academy looks at human genome project, sees progress.Science. 1987; 235:747–748.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Gregory SG, Barlow KF, McLay KE, Kaul R, Swarbreck D, Dunham A, Scott CE, Howe KL, Woodfine K, Spencer CC, Jones MC, Gillson C, Searle S, Zhou Y, Kokocinski F, McDonald L, Evans R, Phillips K, Atkinson A, Cooper R, Jones C, Hall RE, Andrews TD, Lloyd C, Ainscough R, Almeida JP, Ambrose KD, Anderson F, Andrew RW, Ashwell RI, Aubin K, Babbage AK, Bagguley CL, Bailey J, Beasley H, Bethel G, Bird CP, Bray-Allen S, Brown JY, Brown AJ, Buckley D, Burton J, Bye J, Carder C, Chapman JC, Clark SY, Clarke G, Clee C, Cobley V, Collier RE, Corby N, Coville GJ, Davies J, Deadman R, Dunn M, Earthrowl M, Ellington AG, Errington H, Frankish A, Frankland J, French L, Garner P, Garnett J, Gay L, Ghori MR, Gibson R, Gilby LM, Gillett W, Glithero RJ, Grafham DV, Griffiths C, Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock R, Hammond S, Harrison ES, Hart E, Haugen E, Heath PD, Holmes S, Holt K, Howden PJ, Hunt AR, Hunt SE, Hunter G, Isherwood J, James R, Johnson C, Johnson D, Joy A, Kay M, Kershaw JK, Kibukawa M, Kimberley AM, King A, Knights AJ, Lad H, Laird G, Lawlor S, Leongamornlert DA, Lloyd DM, Loveland J, Lovell J, Lush MJ, Lyne R, Martin S, Mashreghi-Mohammadi M, Matthews L, Matthews NS, McLaren S, Milne S, Mistry S, Moore MJ, Nickerson T, O'Dell CN, Oliver K, Palmeiri A, Palmer SA, Parker A, Patel D, Pearce AV, Peck AI, Pelan S, Phelps K, Phillimore BJ, Plumb R, Rajan J, Raymond C, Rouse G, Saenphimmachak C, Sehra HK, Sheridan E, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Skuce CD, Smith M, Steward C, Subramanian S, Sycamore N, Tracey A, Tromans A, Van Helmond Z, Wall M, Wallis JM, White S, Whitehead SL, Wilkinson JE, Willey DL, Williams H, Wilming L, Wray PW, Wu Z, Coulson A, Vaudin M, Sulston JE, Durbin R, Hubbard T, Wooster R, Dunham I, Carter NP, McVean G, Ross MT, Harrow J, Olson MV, Beck S, Rogers J, Bentley DR, Banerjee R, Bryant SP, Burford DC, Burrill WD, Clegg SM, Dhami P, Dovey O, Faulkner LM, Gribble SM, Langford CF, Pandian RD, Porter KM, Prigmore E. The DNA sequence and biological annotation of human chromosome 1 [published correction appears in Nature. 2006;443:1013].Nature. 2006; 441:315–321.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Pennisi E. Breakthrough of the year: human genetic variation.Science. 2007; 318:1842–1843.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Dudley CR, Giuffra LA, Reeders ST. Identifying genetic determinants in human essential hypertension.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992; 3(suppl):S2–S8.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Fornage M, Doris PA. Use of single nucleotide polymorphisms for gene discovery in hypertension.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000; 2:23–31.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies; Ehret GB, Munroe PB, Rice KM, Bochud M, Johnson AD, Chasman DI, Smith AV, Tobin MD, Verwoert GC, Hwang SJ, Pihur V, Vollenweider P, O'Reilly PF, Amin N, Bragg-Gresham JL, Teumer A, Glazer NL, Launer L, Zhao JH, Aulchenko Y, Heath S, Sõber S, Parsa A, Luan J, Arora P, Dehghan A, Zhang F, Lucas G, Hicks AA, Jackson AU, Peden JF, Tanaka T, Wild SH, Rudan I, Igl W, Milaneschi Y, Parker AN, Fava C, Chambers JC, Fox ER, Kumari M, Go MJ, van der Harst P, Kao WH, Sjogren M, Vinay DG, Alexander M, Tabara Y, Shaw-Hawkins S, Whincup PH, Liu Y, Shi G, Kuusisto J, Tayo B, Seielstad M, Sim X, Nguyen KD, Lehtimaki T, Matullo G, Wu Y, Gaunt TR, Onland-Moret NC, Cooper MN, Platou CG, Org E, Hardy R, Dahgam S, Palmen J, Vitart V, Braund PS, Kuznetsova T, Uiterwaal CS, Adeyemo A, Palmas W, Campbell H, Ludwig B, Tomaszewski M, Tzoulaki I, Palmer ND; CARDIoGRAM Consortium; CKDGen Consortium; KidneyGen Consortium; EchoGen Consortium; CHARGE-HF Consortium; , Aspelund T, Garcia M, Chang YP, O'Connell JR, Steinle NI, Grobbee DE, Arking DE, Kardia SL, Morrison AC, Hernandez D, Najjar S, McArdle WL, Hadley D, Brown MJ, Connell JM, Hingorani AD, Day IN, Lawlor DA, Beilby JP, Lawrence RW, Clarke R, Hopewell JC, Ongen H, Dreisbach AW, Li Y, Young JH, Bis JC, Kahonen M, Viikari J, Adair LS, Lee NR, Chen MH, Olden M, Pattaro C, Bolton JA, Köttgen A, Bergmann S, Mooser V, Chaturvedi N, Frayling TM, Islam M, Jafar TH, Erdmann J, Kulkarni SR, Bornstein SR, Grässler J, Groop L, Voight BF, Kettunen J, Howard P, Taylor A, Guarrera S, Ricceri F, Emilsson V, Plump A, Barroso I, Khaw KT, Weder AB, Hunt SC, Sun YV, Bergman RN, Collins FS, Bonnycastle LL, Scott LJ, Stringham HM, Peltonen L, Perola M, Vartiainen E, Brand SM, Staessen JA, Wang TJ, Burton PR, Soler Artigas MS, Dong Y, Snieder H, Wang X, Zhu H, Lohman KK, Rudock ME, Heckbert SR, Smith NL, Wiggins KL, Doumatey A, Shriner D, Veldre G, Viigimaa M, Kinra S, Prabhakaran D, Tripathy V, Langefeld CD, Rosengren A, Thelle DS, Corsi AM, Singleton A, Forrester T, Hilton G, McKenzie CA, Salako T, Iwai N, Kita Y, Ogihara T, Ohkubo T, Okamura T, Ueshima H, Umemura S, Eyheramendy S, Meitinger T, Wichmann HE, Cho YS, Kim HL, Lee JY, Scott J, Sehmi JS, Zhang W, Hedblad B, Nilsson P, Smith GD, Wong A, Narisu N, Stančáková A, Raffel LJ, Yao J, Kathiresan S, O'Donnell CJ, Schwartz SM, Ikram MA, Longstreth WT, Mosley TH, Seshadri S, Shrine NR, Wain LV, Morken MA, Swift AJ, Laitinen J, Prokopenko I, Zitting P, Cooper JA, Humphries SE, Danesh J, Rasheed A, Goel A, Hamsten A, Watkins H, Bakker SJ, van Gilst WH, Janipalli CS, Mani KR, Yajnik CS, Hofman A, Mattace-Raso FU, Oostra BA, Demirkan A, Isaacs A, Rivadeneira F, Lakatta EG, Orru M, Scuteri A, Ala-Korpela M, Kangas AJ, Lyytikäinen LP, Soininen P, Tukiainen T, Würtz P, Ong RT, Dörr M, Kroemer HK, Völker U, Völzke H, Galan P, Hercberg S, Lathrop M, Zelenika D, Deloukas P, Mangino M, Spector TD, Zhai G, Meschia JF, Nalls MA, Sharma P, Terzic J, Kumar MV, Denniff M, Zukowska-Szczechowska E, Wagenknecht LE, Fowkes FG, Charchar FJ, Schwarz PE, Hayward C, Guo X, Rotimi C, Bots ML, Brand E, Samani NJ, Polasek O, Talmud PJ, Nyberg F, Kuh D, Laan M, Hveem K, Palmer LJ, van der Schouw YT, Casas JP, Mohlke KL, Vineis P, Raitakari O, Ganesh SK, Wong TY, Tai ES, Cooper RS, Laakso M, Rao DC, Harris TB, Morris RW, Dominiczak AF, Kivimaki M, Marmot MG, Miki T, Saleheen D, Chandak GR, Coresh J, Navis G, Salomaa V, Han BG, Zhu X, Kooner JS, Melander O, Ridker PM, Bandinelli S, Gyllensten UB, Wright AF, Wilson JF, Ferrucci L, Farrall M, Tuomilehto J, Pramstaller PP, Elosua R, Soranzo N, Sijbrands EJ, Altshuler D, Loos RJ, Shuldiner AR, Gieger C, Meneton P, Uitterlinden AG, Wareham NJ, Gudnason V, Rotter JI, Rettig R, Uda M, Strachan DP, Witteman JC, Hartikainen AL, Beckmann JS, Boerwinkle E, Vasan RS, Boehnke M, Larson MG, Järvelin MR, Psaty BM, Abecasis GR, Chakravarti A, Elliott P, van Duijn CM, Newton-Cheh C, Levy D, Caulfield MJ, Johnson T. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk.Nature. 2011; 478:103–109.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Arnett DK, Meyers KJ, Devereux RB, Tiwari HK, Gu CC, Vaughan LK, Perry RT, Patki A, Claas SA, Sun YV, Broeckel U, Kardia SL. Genetic variation in NCAM1 contributes to left ventricular wall thickness in hypertensive families.Circ Res. 2011; 108:279–283.LinkGoogle Scholar14. Rutishauser U, Acheson A, Hall AK, Mann DM, Sunshine J. The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) as a regulator of cell-cell interactions.Science. 1988; 240:53–57.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. Gordon L, Wharton J, Moore SE, Walsh FS, Moscoso JG, Penketh R, Wallwork J, Taylor KM, Yacoub MH, Polak JM. Myocardial localization and isoforms of neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) in the developing and transplanted human heart.J Clin Invest. 1990; 86:1293–1300.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Kimura K, Ieda M, Kanazawa H, Yagi T, Tsunoda M, Ninomiya S, Kurosawa H, Yoshimi K, Mochizuki H, Yamazaki K, Ogawa S, Fukuda K. Cardiac sympathetic rejuvenation: a link between nerve function and cardiac hypertrophy.Circ Res. 2007; 100:1755–1764.LinkGoogle Scholar17. Doris PA. The genetics of blood pressure and hypertension: the role of rare variation.Cardiovasc Ther. 2011; 29:37–45.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Nguyen KD, Pihur V, Ganesh SK, Rakha A, Cooper RS, Hunt SC, Freedman BI, Coresh J, Kao WH, Morrison AC, Boerwinkle E, Ehret GB, Chakravarti A. Effects of rare and common blood pressure gene variants on essential hypertension: results from the Family Blood Pressure Program, CLUE, and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities studies.Circ Res. 2013; 112:318–326.LinkGoogle Scholar19. Boyden LM, Choi M, Choate KA, Nelson-Williams CJ, Farhi A, Toka HR, Tikhonova IR, Bjornson R, Mane SM, Colussi G, Lebel M, Gordon RD, Semmekrot BA, Poujol A, Välimäki MJ, De Ferrari ME, Sanjad SA, Gutkin M, Karet FE, Tucci JR, Stockigt JR, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Porter CC, Anand SK, Whiteford ML, Davis ID, Dewar SB, Bettinelli A, Fadrowski JJ, Belsha CW, Hunley TE, Nelson RD, Trachtman H, Cole TR, Pinsk M, Bockenhauer D, Shenoy M, Vaidyanathan P, Foreman JW, Rasoulpour M, Thameem F, Al-Shahrouri HZ, Radhakrishnan J, Gharavi AG, Goilav B, Lifton RP. Mutations in kelch-like 3 and cullin 3 cause hypertension and electrolyte abnormalities.Nature. 2012; 482:98–102.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Zhi D, Irvin MR, Gu CC, Stoddard AJ, Lorier R, Matter

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX