Heracleon and the ‘Western’ Textual Tradition
1994; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 40; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1017/s0028688500020531
ISSN1469-8145
Autores Tópico(s)Classical Antiquity Studies
ResumoHeracleon's commentary on the Fourth Gospel has always intrigued Patristic scholars concerned with the history of exegesis. 1 Rarely has it evoked equal interest among textual critics concerned with the history of the NT text. In part this is due to the unfortunate bifurcation of the disciplines, a breach that has begun to mend only in recent years. 2 Perhaps in greater part it is due to the nature of the materials. Heracleon's work is preserved almost exclusively in the citations of Origen, who wrote his own exposition, in some measure, as a rebuttal. Origen never completed his commentary on John; of the thirty-two volumes that he did produce, we have just nine. In these we find scattered quotations drawn from the work of his predecessor, cited primarily in order to be refuted. In all, there are not quite fifty such quotations, ranging from two or three lines of Greek text in the standard edition up to several dozen. 3
Referência(s)