Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Management Control in the Large Corporation: Comment on Zeitlin

1976; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 81; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/226146

1537-5390

Michael P. Allen,

Cooperative Studies and Economics

Previous articleNext article No AccessCommentary and DebateManagement Control in the Large Corporation: Comment on ZeitlinMichael Patrick AllenMichael Patrick Allen Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 81, Number 4Jan., 1976 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/226146 Views: 6Total views on this site Citations: 22Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1976 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Taekjin Shin The Shareholder Value Principle: The Governance and Control of Corporations in the United States, Sociology Compass 7, no.1010 (Oct 2013): 829–840.https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12076Michele Simoni, Rosa Caiazza Interlocks network structure as driving force of coopetition among Italian firms, Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 12, no.33 (Jun 2012): 319–336.https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211234582Rafael Liza Santos, Alexandre di Miceli da Silveira, Lucas Ayres Barros Board Interlocking in Brazil: Directors' Participation in Multiple Companies and Its Effect on Firm Value and Profitability, Latin American Business Review 13, no.11 (Jan 2012): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2012.673419Donald Palmer, Matthew Zafonte Understanding Corporate Participation in Local Relational Networks: Corporate CEO Membership on Large Locally Headquartered Commercial Banks Boards in the 1960s, (Mar 2015): 283–331.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2011)0000033012Rafael Liza Santos, Alexandre Di Miceli da Silveira, Lucas Ayres B. de C. Barros Board Interlocking in Brazil: Directors' Participation in Multiple Companies and its Effect on Firm Value, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1018796Donald Palmer, Michael Maher The managerial revolution revisited: the moderating impact of top managers’ social class position, Strategic Organization 3, no.44 (Aug 2016): 385–430.https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005059717Gavin J. Nicholson, Malcolm Alexander, Geoffrey C. Kiel Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Management & Organization 10, no.11 (Sep 2015): 54–72.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200004612Gavin J. Nicholson, Malcolm Alexander, Geoffrey C. Kiel Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 10, no.11 (Sep 2015): 54–72.https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2004.10.1.54Lisa A. Keister Financial Markets, Money, and Banking, Annual Review of Sociology 28, no.11 (Aug 2002): 39–61.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140836Donald Palmer, Brad M. Barber Challengers, Elites, and Owning Families: A Social Class Theory of Corporate Acquisitions in the 1960s, Administrative Science Quarterly 46, no.11 (Jun 2016): 87–120.https://doi.org/10.2307/2667126Bruce R. Barringer, Jeffrey S. Harrison Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships, Journal of Management 26, no.33 (Jun 2000): 367–403.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600302Rick Eckstein, Kevin Delaney Institutional Investment Patterns in Troubled Corporations: A Sociological analysis, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 52, no.33 (Jul 1993): 291–306.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1993.tb02550.xKevin J. Delaney Control during Corporate Crisis: Asbestos and the Manville Bankruptcy, International Journal of Health Services 21, no.44 (Jan 1995): 697–716.https://doi.org/10.2190/AJUP-457Y-88A3-GLVWLuis R. Gomez-Mejia, David B. Balkin, Theresa M. Welbourne Influence of venture capitalists on high tech management, The Journal of High Technology Management Research 1, no.11 (Mar 1990): 103–118.https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(90)90016-WKevin J. Delaney Control During Corporate Crisis: Asbestos and the Manville Bankruptcy, Critical Sociology 16, no.2-32-3 (Jul 2016): 51–74.https://doi.org/10.1177/089692058901600204Richard Swedberg The Neo-Marxist Contribution, Current Sociology 35, no.11 (Mar 1987): 78–91.https://doi.org/10.1177/001139287035001010Thomas R. Dye Strategic Ownership Positions in U.S. Industry and Banking, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 44, no.11 (Jan 1985): 9–22.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1985.tb01880.xA. I. Kravchenko "The Managerial Revolution": Has Ownership been Separated from Control Over Production?, Russian Social Science Review 24, no.33 (Dec 2010): 35–57.https://doi.org/10.2753/RSS1061-1428240335A. I. Kravchenko "The Managerial Revolution": Has Ownership been Separated from Control Over Production?, Soviet Sociology 21, no.33 (Dec 2014): 21–43.https://doi.org/10.2753/SOR1061-0154210321 References, (Jan 1982): 357–373.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-147150-7.50015-6John Scott, Michael Hughes Capital and Communication in Scottish Business, Sociology 14, no.11 (Jul 2016): 29–47.https://doi.org/10.1177/003803858001400102Michael Patrick Allen Continuity and Change Within the Core Corporate Elite, The Sociological Quarterly 19, no.44 (Dec 2016): 510–521.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1978.tb01195.x