Liver-specific Activities of FGF19 Require Klotho beta
2007; Elsevier BV; Volume: 282; Issue: 37 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m704244200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresBenjamin C. Lin, Man Ping Wang, C. A. Blackmore, Luc Desnoyers,
Tópico(s)Kruppel-like factors research
ResumoHepatocyte function is regulated by members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family of proteins, but little is known about the specific molecular mechanisms of this endocrine pathway. FGF19 regulates bile acid homeostasis and gall bladder filling; FGF19 binds only to FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4), but its liver-specific activity cannot be explained solely by the distribution of this receptor. Although it has been suggested that Klotho beta (KLB) may have a role in mediating FGF19 activity, we have provided for the first time definitive evidence that KLB is required for FGF19 binding to FGFR4, intracellular signaling, and downstream modulation of gene expression. We have shown that FGFR4 is widely distributed in mouse, whereas KLB distribution is more restricted. Liver was the only organ in which both genes were abundantly expressed. We show that in mice, FGF19 injection triggers liver-specific induction of c-Fos and repression of CYP7A1. The tissue-specific activity of FGF19 supports the unique intersection of KLB and FGFR4 distribution in liver. These studies define KLB as a novel FGFR4 coreceptor required for FGF19 liver specific functions. Hepatocyte function is regulated by members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family of proteins, but little is known about the specific molecular mechanisms of this endocrine pathway. FGF19 regulates bile acid homeostasis and gall bladder filling; FGF19 binds only to FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4), but its liver-specific activity cannot be explained solely by the distribution of this receptor. Although it has been suggested that Klotho beta (KLB) may have a role in mediating FGF19 activity, we have provided for the first time definitive evidence that KLB is required for FGF19 binding to FGFR4, intracellular signaling, and downstream modulation of gene expression. We have shown that FGFR4 is widely distributed in mouse, whereas KLB distribution is more restricted. Liver was the only organ in which both genes were abundantly expressed. We show that in mice, FGF19 injection triggers liver-specific induction of c-Fos and repression of CYP7A1. The tissue-specific activity of FGF19 supports the unique intersection of KLB and FGFR4 distribution in liver. These studies define KLB as a novel FGFR4 coreceptor required for FGF19 liver specific functions. Bile acids are amphipathic cholesterol metabolites essential for the absorption of lipophilic nutrients and cholesterol homeostasis (1Russell D.W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003; 72: 137-174Crossref PubMed Scopus (1406) Google Scholar). They are synthesized by the liver and stored in the gall bladder (2Chiang J.Y. J. Hepatol. 2004; 40: 539-551Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (378) Google Scholar). The cycle of gallbladder filling and emptying controls the flow of bile into the intestine for digestion. Because bile acid accumulation can lead to hepatotoxicity and cholestasis, this process is tightly regulated (3Trauner M. Boyer J.L. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2004; 20: 220-230Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar) by a negative feedback mechanism. Bile acids bind to the farnesoid X receptor, a member of the nuclear receptor family of ligand-regulated transcription factors, which is highly expressed in liver and intestine. In the liver, farnesoid X receptor activation represses the transcription of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), 2The abbreviations used are:CYP7A1cholesterol 7α-hydroxylaseFGFfibroblast growth factorFGFRfibroblast growth factor receptorFRSFGFR substrateKLBKlotho betaERKextracellular signal-regulated kinasepERKphosphorylated ERKPBSphosphate-buffered salineRTreverse transcriptionsiRNAsmall interfering RNA , a rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of bile acids (4Jelinek D.F. Andersson S. Slaughter C.A. Russell D.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 8190-8197Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5Li Y.C. Wang D.P. Chiang J.Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 12012-12019Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). In the small intestine, bile acid activation of farnesoid X receptor induces the expression of fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15; mouse orthologue of human FGF19). The secreted FGF15 signals from the intestine to the liver to repress CYP7A1 expression through a FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4)-mediated mechanism (6Inagaki T. Choi M. Moschetta A. Peng L. Cummins C.L. McDonald J.G. Luo G. Jones S.A. Goodwin B. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Repa J.J. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Cell Metab. 2005; 2: 217-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1342) Google Scholar). In addition, the FGF15/FGF19 feedback loop prevents bile excretion into the digestive tract by promoting gallbladder filling (7Choi M. Moschetta A. Bookout A.L. Peng L. Umetani M. Holmstrom S.R. Suino-Powell K. Xu H.E. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: 1253-1255Crossref PubMed Scopus (241) Google Scholar). cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase fibroblast growth factor fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR substrate Klotho beta extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylated ERK phosphate-buffered saline reverse transcription small interfering RNA The role of FGF15/FGF19 in bile acid homeostasis is supported by the increased liver CYP7A1 expression and decreased gallbladder volume that occurs in FGF15-deficient mice (FGF15-/- mice) and in FGFR4-deficient mice (FGFR4-/- mice) (6Inagaki T. Choi M. Moschetta A. Peng L. Cummins C.L. McDonald J.G. Luo G. Jones S.A. Goodwin B. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Repa J.J. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Cell Metab. 2005; 2: 217-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1342) Google Scholar, 7Choi M. Moschetta A. Bookout A.L. Peng L. Umetani M. Holmstrom S.R. Suino-Powell K. Xu H.E. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: 1253-1255Crossref PubMed Scopus (241) Google Scholar). FGF19 is mainly expressed in the gall bladder and the small intestine but is also found in circulation (8Lundasen T. Galman C. Angelin B. Rudling M. J. Intern. Med. 2006; 260: 530-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (324) Google Scholar, 9Xie M.H. Holcomb I. Deuel B. Dowd P. Huang A. Vagts A. Foster J. Liang J. Brush J. Gu Q. Hillan K. Goddard A. Gurney A.L. Cytokine. 1999; 11: 729-735Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar). Transgenic mice, which express FGF19, have reduced fat mass and an increased metabolic rate, and they do not become obese or diabetic on a high fat diet (10Fu L. John L.M. Adams S.H. Yu X.X. Tomlinson E. Renz M. Williams P.M. Soriano R. Corpuz R. Moffat B. Vandlen R. Simmons L. Foster J. Stephan J.P. Tsai S.P. Stewart T.A. Endocrinology. 2004; 145: 2594-2603Crossref PubMed Scopus (439) Google Scholar, 11Tomlinson E. Fu L. John L. Hultgren B. Huang X. Renz M. Stephan J.P. Tsai S.P. Powell-Braxton L. French D. Stewart T.A. Endocrinology. 2002; 143: 1741-1747Crossref PubMed Scopus (287) Google Scholar) These metabolic phenotypes suggested that the biological activity of FGF19 occurs primarily in the liver (12Nicholes K. Guillet S. Tomlinson E. Hillan K. Wright B. Frantz G.D. Pham T.A. Dillard-Telm L. Tsai S.P. Stephan J.P. Stinson J. Stewart T. French D.M. Am. J. Pathol. 2002; 160: 2295-2307Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar). Although FGF19 binds only to FGFR4, the liver-specific activity of FGF19 cannot be explained solely by the distribution of this receptor because of its wide tissue expression. Klotho beta (KLB) encodes a 130-kDa type 1 transmembrane protein with a short (29 amino acids) intracellular domain that has no predicted kinase activity (13Ito S. Kinoshita S. Shiraishi N. Nakagawa S. Sekine S. Fujimori T. Nabeshima Y.I. Mech. Dev. 2000; 98: 115-119Crossref PubMed Scopus (262) Google Scholar). KLB has two extracellular glycosidase domains that lack a characteristic glutamic acid residue essential for enzymatic activity. Klb-deficient mice (Klb-/-) have increased CYP7A1 expression and decreased gallbladder size, indicating that Klb-/- mice can no longer suppress bile acid synthesis (6Inagaki T. Choi M. Moschetta A. Peng L. Cummins C.L. McDonald J.G. Luo G. Jones S.A. Goodwin B. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Repa J.J. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Cell Metab. 2005; 2: 217-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1342) Google Scholar, 14Ito S. Fujimori T. Furuya A. Satoh J. Nabeshima Y. Nabeshima Y. J. Clin. Investig. 2005; 115: 2202-2208Crossref PubMed Scopus (200) Google Scholar). Because FGF15-/- mice develop several similar phenotypes, we proposed that KLB participates in FGF15/FGF19 functions. In this study, we demonstrate that KLB acts as an FGFR4 co-receptor required for FGF19 binding, intracellular signaling, and downstream modulation of gene expression. KLB and FGFR4 are co-expressed in the liver where they mediate the tissue-specific activity of FGF19. DNA Constructs—Total RNA from HepG2 cells was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). The KLB gene was cloned using the SuperScript III One-step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) and the following primers: forward, 5′-CGGGCGCTAGCATGAAGCCAGGCTGTGCGGCAGG-3′; reverse, 5′-CAGTGGATCCTTACTTATCGTCGTCATCCTTGTAATCGCTAACAACTCTCTTGCCTTTCTTTC-3′. The resulting KLB PCR product was digested with NheI and BamHI and ligated into pCMV-Tag4A (Stratagene) to obtain the full-length KLB with a FLAG tag at the C-terminal end (pCMVKLB-FLAG). The secreted KLB extracellular domain (KLBΔTM) was obtained by PCR using pCMVKLB-FLAG as the template and the following primers: forward, 5′-GAA TTC CAC CAT GAA GCC AGG CTG TGC GGC AGG ATC TCC AG-3′; reverse, 5′-GGC GCG CCG ACA AGG AAT AAG CAG ACA GTG CAC TCT G-3′. The resulting PCR product was digested with EcoRI and AscI and ligated into pRK5_c-His (Genentech Inc.). The human FGFR4 cDNA was cloned from total HepG2 cell RNA using the SuperScript III One-step RT-PCR kit and the following primers: forward, 5′-CCGCCGGATATCATGCGGCTGCTGCTGGCCCTGTTGG-3′; reverse, 5′-CCGCCGGAATTCTGTCTGCACCCCAGACCCGAAGGGG-3′. The resulting PCR product was digested with EcoRV and EcoRI and ligated into pIRESpuro3 (Clontech). KLBΔTM-conditioned Medium—HEK 293 cells were transfected with the KLBΔTM or the corresponding empty vector and maintained in serum-free PS25 medium for 72-96 h. The resulting media were filtered, supplemented with HEPES, pH 7.2 (final concentration 40 mm), concentrated, and evaluated for KLBΔTM content by immunoblotting using a KLB-specific antibody (MAB3738 antibody; R&D Systems). Co-precipitation Assay—The control or KLBΔTM-conditioned medium was supplemented with Triton X-100 (Calbiochem) to a final concentration of 0.5% and incubated with or without 0.5 μg/ml FGFR-Fc (R&D Systems), 0.5 μg/ml heparin (Sigma), 1 μg/ml FGF19 (R&D Systems), and 10 μl of protein A-agarose gel (Sigma) at 4 °C for 18 h. The affinity matrix was centrifuged and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/0.5% Triton X-100 and once with PBS. Immunoblot analysis was performed using antibodies against KLB (R&D Systems), FGF19 (clone 1A6; Genentech Inc.), or FGFR4 (clone 8G11; Genentech Inc.) and a horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated antibody against human IgG (Jackson Immunochemical). Cell Culture and Stable Cell Lines—HEK 293, HepG2, and Hep3B cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in an F-12/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium mix (50:50) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mm l-glutamine. HEK 293 cells stably expressing empty vector, hFGFR4, KLB-FLAG, or hFGFR4 and KLB-FLAG were created and grown in selective medium containing 500 μg/ml Geneticin and 2.5 μg/ml puromycin. Co-immunoprecipitation—HEK 293 cells that transiently (24-48 h transfection) or stably expressed empty vector, hFGFR4, KLB-FLAG, or hFGFR4 and KLB-FLAG were lysed with radioimmune precipitation assay lysis buffer (PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and 1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science). Total protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce). Equal amounts of total protein for each sample lysate were incubated in the absence or presence of 0.5 μg/ml heparin along with control- or FGF19-conditioned medium and immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG (Sigma) or anti-FGFR4 (1G7; Genentech, Inc.) agarose affinity matrix at 4 °C for 18 h. Immunoprecipitated proteins were washed twice with PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100 and twice with PBS and then analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies against KLB, FGFR4, and FGF19. FGF Pathway Activation—HEK 293 cells transiently or stably expressing empty vector, hFGFR4, KLB-FLAG, or hFGFR4 and KLB-FLAG were starved of serum for 24 h before they were exposed to 0-500 ng/ml FGF19 (R&D Systems) for 10 min. Hep3B or HepG2 cells were transfected with control or KLB siRNA for 72 h (starved of serum for the final 24 h) before exposure to 0 or 100 ng/ml FGF19 (Genentech, Inc.) for 10 min. In each case, cells were treated with 20 ng/ml FGF1 (FGF acidic, R&D Systems) or 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (Roche Applied Science) as positive controls. Cells were lysed with radioimmune precipitation assay lysis buffer (Upstate Biotechnology) supplemented with Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science) and phosphatase inhibitor mixtures 1 and 2 (Sigma). Equal amounts of protein were analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), phospho-FRS2 (pFRS2), ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology), FRS2 (Upstate Biotechnology), KLB (R&D Systems), or β-actin (Sigma). Quantitation of FGFR substrate 2 (FRS2) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and -2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation was performed as described previously, with modifications (15Holmes W.E. Sliwkowski M.X. Akita R.W. Henzel W.J. Lee J. Park J.W. Yansura D. Abadi N. Raab H. Lewis G.D. Shepard H.M. Kuang W.-J. Wood W.I. Goeddel D.V. Vandlen R.L. Science. 1992; 256: 1205-1210Crossref PubMed Scopus (926) Google Scholar). Briefly, the densitometric analysis of the pFRS2, pERK1/2, total FRS2, and total ERK1/2 protein bands was done using NIH ImageJ software. The normalized relative density values (RDV) were determined as follows: RDV pFRS2 = (DV pFRS2 - DV background)/(DV total FRS2 - DV background). Normalized RDV pFRS2 = [(ΣRDV pFRS2)/n for a given treatment] - [(ΣRDV pFRS2)/n at no treatment] ± S.E. (n = 3). The same method was used to determine the normalized RDV for pERK1/2. Values were plotted as normalized RDV. Semiquantitative RT-PCR—Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Specific primers and fluorogenic probes were used to amplify and quantitate gene expression (see the supplemental data for sequences) (16Winer J. Jung C.K. Shackel I. Williams P.M. Anal. Biochem. 1999; 270: 41-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1226) Google Scholar). The gene-specific signals were normalized to the RPL19 housekeeping gene. All Taq-Man RT-PCR reagents were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). A minimum of a triplicate set of data was analyzed for each condition. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E. siRNA Transfection—KLB and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) siRNA oligos were from Dharmacon (see supplemental data for sequences). The various siRNA duplexes were transfected using the DharmaFECT transfection kit (Dharmacon) following the manufacturer's recommended protocol. In Silico Expression Analysis—For expression analysis, box- and whisker-plots were generated with the normalized gene expression data extracted from the BioExpress™ data base (Gene Logic, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The distribution of KLB and FGFR4 expression was evaluated using the signals associated to the probes 244276_at and 204579_at, respectively. In Vivo Experiments—All animal protocols were approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Female FVB mice at 5 or 6 weeks old were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. The mice were provided standard feed and water ad libitum until 12 h before injection, at which time feed was removed. Mice were given intravenous injections of vehicle (PBS) or 1 mg/kg FGF19. After 30 min, mice from all groups were sacrificed, and tissue samples were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -70 °C. Total RNA from frozen tissue samples was prepared using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen). Groups of 3-5 animals were analyzed for each condition. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E. and were analyzed by the Student's t test. KLB Forms a Complex with FGFR4, FGF19, and Heparin—We first tested the binding of KLB to FGF19 and FGFRs using a co-precipitation assay. FGF19, heparin and different FGFR-Fc fusion proteins were incubated in conditioned medium containing KLBΔTM. The protein interactions were then analyzed by co-precipitation. Strikingly, we found that KLB and FGF19 co-associated only with FGFR4 and were pulled down only with FGFR4-Fc (Fig. 1A). We used the same assay to evaluate the contribution of each component to the complex formation. Control or KLBΔTM containing conditioned medium was incubated in the presence or absence of FGFR4-Fc, FGF19, and/or heparin. In the absence of heparin and FGF19, no interaction was detected between KLB and FGFR4-Fc (Fig. 1B). Heparin was a weak promoter, whereas FGF19 was a strong promoter of the KLB-FGFR4 interaction. The maximal level of stabilization of the KLB-FGFR4-Fc interaction occurred in the presence of both heparin and FGF19. Conversely, FGF19 binding to FGFR4-Fc required the presence of heparin or KLB. The maximal level of FGF19 binding to FGFR4 occurred when both heparin and KLB were included in the reaction. These data demonstrate that KLB is sufficient to support FGF19 binding to FGFR4. They also show that KLB promotes the previously demonstrated heparin-dependent interaction of FGF19 with FGFR4 (9Xie M.H. Holcomb I. Deuel B. Dowd P. Huang A. Vagts A. Foster J. Liang J. Brush J. Gu Q. Hillan K. Goddard A. Gurney A.L. Cytokine. 1999; 11: 729-735Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar). Therefore, each individual component contributes to the stability of the FGF19-FGFR4-KLB-heparin complex. To test whether KLB and FGFR4 also participate in the formation of a complex with FGF19 and heparin at the cell surface, we evaluated the ability of FGFR4 and KLB to immunoprecipitate FGF19 from lysates of transiently or stably transfected cells in the presence or the absence of heparin. No detectable FGF19 was co-precipitated from lysates of cells transfected with only a control or an FGFR4 expression vector (Fig. 1, C and D). KLB pulled down FGF19 from KLB-transfected cell lysate only in the presence of heparin, indicating that KLB expression promotes heparin-dependent FGF19 binding to the endogenous HEK 293 FGFR4. In lysate from KLB- and FGFR4-co-transfected cells, KLB and FGFR4 readily pulled down FGF19. This interaction was further stabilized in the presence of heparin (Fig. 1, C and D). These data show that KLB is required for FGF19 binding to the cell surface FGFR4 and that heparin promotes this interaction. In addition, FGFR4 and KLB readily interacted in a heparin- and ligand-independent manner in co-transfected cells. This result contrasts with the heparin- and ligand-dependent complex formation observed with the secreted chimeric FGFR4 and KLB proteins. This discrepancy indicates a role for the KLB and FGFR4 transmembrane domains in the complex formation. To test the hypothesis that KLB and FGFR4 form a constitutive complex at the cell surface, we evaluated whether KLB co-immunoprecipitated with FGFR4 from HepG2 cell lysates in the absence of FGF19 or heparin. Incubation of HepG2 cell lysates with an antibody against FGFR4-immunoprecipitated FGFR4 and KLB, whereas no protein was immunoprecipitated with the control antibody (Fig. 1E), showing that the endogenous transmembrane KLB and FGFR4 form a constitutive heparin- and ligand-independent complex. KLB Is Required for FGF19 Signaling—To test whether KLB contributes to the activation of the FGF19 signaling pathway, we evaluated the effects of FGF19 on FRS2 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in KLB- and/or FGFR4-transfected HEK 293 cells as well as in controls. FGF19 did not promote FRS2 or ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cells transfected with an empty expression vector (Fig. 2 and supplemental Fig. S2). HEK 293 cells transfected with KLB or FGFR4 showed only a weak, dose-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation but no detectable FRS2 phosphorylation following exposure to FGF19. The co-transfection of FGFR4 with KLB promoted FGF19 signaling in HEK 293 cells, indicated by the robust, dose-dependent increase of both FRS2 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. One possible explanation for this effect is that local, high concentrations of FGF19 and FGFR4 allow for weak signaling in the absence of KLB. However, because FGF19 has an endocrine function and its average circulating concentration is 193 ± 36 pg/ml (a range of 49 to 590 pg/ml), this explanation is unlikely (8Lundasen T. Galman C. Angelin B. Rudling M. J. Intern. Med. 2006; 260: 530-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (324) Google Scholar). Therefore the robust induction of FGF19 signaling by KLB is likely to occur at physiological concentrations of FGF19. KLB Is Required for FGF19 Downstream Modulation of Gene Expression—Because KLB is required for FGF19 signaling, we evaluated the effect of FGF19 on KLB expression in various cell lines. We detected high KLB expression in liver cell lines (HepG2 and Hep3B) but only traces in kidney (HEK 293) or colon cell lines (Fig. 3A, SW620 and Colo205). Upon exposure to FGF19, KLB expression in HepG2 and Hep3B cells was gradually repressed to 50-60% the level of unexposed cells after 6 h, and it remained at this level for at least 24 h. Exposure to FGF19 did not affect KLB expression levels in the other cell lines. The repression of KLB expression by FGF19 might be a regulatory negative feedback mechanism in liver cells. Because a plethora of physiological and pathological stimuli induce the genes of the Fos and Jun family in a wide variety of cell types, we tested whether FGF19 modulates c-Fos, JunB, and c-Jun expression in various cell lines (17Ashida R. Tominaga K. Sasaki E. Watanabe T. Fujiwara Y. Oshitani N. Higuchi K. Mitsuyama S. Iwao H. Arakawa T. Inflammopharmacology. 2005; 13: 113-125Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar, 18Hess J. Angel P. Schorpp-Kistner M. J. Cell Sci. 2004; 117: 5965-5973Crossref PubMed Scopus (960) Google Scholar, 19Shaulian E. Karin M. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002; 4: E131-E136Crossref PubMed Scopus (2224) Google Scholar). FGF19 up-regulated c-Fos and JunB expression, as well as c-Jun expression to a lesser extent, in KLB-expressing cells (Fig, 3, B-D, HepG2 and Hep3B). The induction of c-Fos, JunB, and c-Jun expression occurred within 30 min of exposure to FGF19, and in most cases, expression returned to basal levels after 6 h. JunB expression remained elevated for at least 24 h in Hep3B cells (Fig. 3C). To test whether KLB promotes FGF19 signaling and c-Fos induction in Hep3B and HepG2 cells, we inhibited KLB expression using specific siRNAs. KLB siRNA transfection significantly reduced KLB mRNA and protein expression in Hep3B (Fig. 3, E and G) and HepG2 cells (supplemental Fig. S1). The individual transfection of four different KLB siRNAs significantly attenuated FGF19-mediated FRS2 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3F). In addition, transfection of Hep3B cells with KLB siRNA inhibited FGF19-mediated c-Fos induction by 62-80% compared with the control cells (Fig. 3G). Similarly, transfection of HepG2 cells with KLB siRNA reduced the levels of FGF19-dependent FRS2 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation as well as c-Fos induction as compared with the control cells (supplemental Fig. S1). These results indicate that KLB expression is required for FGF19-dependent pathway activation and c-Fos induction. To further assess the participation of KLB in FGF19-mediated c-Fos induction, we transfected HEK 293 cells with empty, KLB, or FGFR4 vector or a combination of KLB and FGFR4 expression vectors and exposed the cells to FGF19. Only cells transfected with both KLB and FGFR4 expression vectors induced c-Fos in response to FGF19 (Fig. 3H). These data indicate that KLB is required for FGF19 pathway activation and modulation of gene regulation. KLB and FGFR4 Distribution Dictate FGF19 Tissue-specific Activity—We evaluated KLB and FGFR4 expression in a variety of human tissues by analyzing the BioExpress data base (Gene Logic, Inc.). In decreasing order of signal intensity, KLB was expressed in adipose, liver, pancreas, and breast tissues (Fig. 4A). In decreasing order of signal intensity, FGFR4 was expressed in liver, lung, gall bladder, small intestine, pancreas, colon, lymphoid, ovary, and breast tissues (Fig. 4B). These data show that KLB expression is restricted to only a few tissues, whereas FGFR4 expression is more widely distributed. A high level of co-expression of KLB and FGFR4 was observed only in liver and pancreas. Because the expression of KLB and FGFR4 are required for FGF19 activity, these findings suggest that liver and pancreas are the major organs in which they are active. Marginal levels of KLB and FGFR4 expression were also observed in breast tissues. KLB was highly expressed in adipose tissues, but the absence of FGFR4 precludes the function of FGF19 in this tissue. To test the hypothesis that FGF19 acts only on tissues that express both FGFR4 and KLB, we first surveyed Klb and FGFR4 distribution in various mouse organs using semiquantitative RT-PCR. The relative mRNA levels represent the relative -fold expression compared with brain (organ with the lowest expression surveyed). Klb was predominantly expressed in liver (Fig. 4C). Lower levels of Klb expression were also found in adipose and colon tissues. Additional organs tested showed marginal expression of Klb. FGFR4 was highly expressed in liver, lung, adrenals, kidney, and colon (Fig. 4D). Lower levels of FGFR4 expression were also observed in intestine, ovaries, muscle, and pancreas. The overall Klb and FGFR4 distribution in mouse tissues was similar to that of human tissues. However, contrary to the findings in human tissues, no consistent Klb or FGFR4 expression could be detected in mouse pancreas. In addition, a low level of Klb expression was detected in mouse colon, whereas no expression was found in the corresponding human tissues. These differences might be attributable to species- and/or strain-specific tissue distribution. These data indicate that liver is the only mouse organ in which Klb and FGFR4 are highly co-expressed. To determine the FGF19-specific site of action, we compared the levels of c-Fos expression in organs of mice injected with FGF19 with those of mice injected with PBS (controls). We chose to monitor the c-Fos response to FGF19 because c-Fos expression is ubiquitous and its induction is sensitive to FGF19 stimulation. C-Fos expression was 1300-fold higher in the livers of mice injected with FGF19 compared with the livers of mice injected with PBS (Fig. 4E). The FGF19-dependent c-Fos induction was at least 150-fold lower in all other organs tested. The activity of FGF19 in liver was confirmed by a 98% inhibition of CYP7A1 expression (Fig. 4F). These data demonstrate that FGF19 acts specifically in liver, the only mouse organ that expresses high levels of both Klb and FGFR4. In this study we have provided evidence that FGF19 requires KLB for binding to FGFR4, intracellular signaling, and down-stream gene modulation. However, the reason for such a requirement is still unclear. Compared with the paracrine FGF family members, FGF19 has a low heparin-binding affinity that allows it to act in an endocrine fashion without being tethered to the pericellular proteoglycan of the secreting cells (6Inagaki T. Choi M. Moschetta A. Peng L. Cummins C.L. McDonald J.G. Luo G. Jones S.A. Goodwin B. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Repa J.J. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Cell Metab. 2005; 2: 217-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1342) Google Scholar, 7Choi M. Moschetta A. Bookout A.L. Peng L. Umetani M. Holmstrom S.R. Suino-Powell K. Xu H.E. Richardson J.A. Gerard R.D. Mangelsdorf D.J. Kliewer S.A. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: 1253-1255Crossref PubMed Scopus (241) Google Scholar, 8Lundasen T. Galman C. Angelin B. Rudling M. J. Intern. Med. 2006; 260: 530-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (324) Google Scholar, 20Harmer N.J. Pellegrini L. Chirgadze D. Fernandez-Recio J. Blundell T.L. Biochemistry. 2004; 43: 629-640Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). The topology of the FGF19 heparin-binding site prevents FGF19 from forming hydrogen bonds with heparin when FGF19 is bound to its receptor (21Goetz R. Beenken A. Ibrahimi O.A. Kalinina J. Olsen S.K. Eliseenkova A.V. Xu C. Neubert T.A. Zhang F. Linhardt R.J. Yu X. White K.E. Inagaki T. Kliewer S.A. Yamamoto M. Kurosu H. Ogawa Y. Kuro O.M. Lanske B. Razzaque M.S. Mohammadi M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007; 27: 3417-3428Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar). Therefore KLB may act as an FGFR4 co-receptor that stabilizes the weak FGF19-FGFR4-heparin interaction. In addition, we have shown that FGFR4 and KLB readily interacted in a heparin- and ligand-independent manner at the cell surface (Fig. 1, C-E). This result contrasts with the heparin- and ligand-dependent complex formation observed with the secreted chimeric FGFR4 and KLB proteins (Fig. 1, A and B). This discrepancy may indicate a role for the KLB and FGFR4 transmembrane domains in the complex formation. The KLB and FGFR4 transmembrane domains could directly interact with each other or promote the interaction of the proteins by tethering them to the cell surface. The KLB-FGFR4 cell surface complex might alter the heparin- and ligand-induced receptor dimerization that was described previously for paracrine FGFs (22Plotnikov A.N. Schlessinger J. Hubbard S.R. Mohammadi M. Cell. 1999; 98: 641-650Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (506) Google Scholar, 23Schlessinger J. Plotnikov A.N. Ibrahimi O.A. Eliseenkova A.V. Yeh B.K. Yayon A. Linhardt R.J. Mohammadi M. Mol. Cell. 2000; 6: 743-750Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (964) Google Scholar). We found high expression of KLB in adipose tissue (Fig. 4C). However, the absence of FGFR4 expression (Fig. 4D) precludes FGF19 activity in this tissue. Therefore, it is possible that KLB promotes the activity of other endocrine FGF family members with different FGFR binding specificity in adipose tissues. Notably, KLB was recently shown to be required for FGF21 adipose-specific activity (24Ogawa Y. Kurosu H. Yamamoto M. Nandi A. Rosenblatt K.P. Goetz R. Eliseenkova A.V. Mohammadi M. Kuro-o M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007; 104: 7432-7437Crossref PubMed Scopus (483) Google Scholar). Because of its low heparin-binding affinity, FGF21 might require KLB to signal through FGFR1 and FGFR2 (21Goetz R. Beenken A. Ibrahimi O.A. Kalinina J. Olsen S.K. Eliseenkova A.V. Xu C. Neubert T.A. Zhang F. Linhardt R.J. Yu X. White K.E. Inagaki T. Kliewer S.A. Yamamoto M. Kurosu H. Ogawa Y. Kuro O.M. Lanske B. Razzaque M.S. Mohammadi M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007; 27: 3417-3428Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar, 25Kharitonenkov A. Shiyanova T.L. Koester A. Ford A.M. Micanovic R. Galbreath E.J. Sandusky G.E. Hammond L.J. Moyers J.S. Owens R.A. Gromada J. Brozinick J.T. Hawkins E.D. Wroblewski V.J. Li D.S. Mehrbod F. Jaskunas S.R. Shanafelt A.B. J. Clin. Investig. 2005; 115: 1627-1635Crossref PubMed Scopus (1632) Google Scholar). Together, these data demonstrate that FGF19 requires KLB for binding to FGFR4, intracellular signaling, and downstream gene modulation. Most importantly, the requirement for KLB restricts the endocrine activity of FGF19 to tissues that express both FGFR4 and KLB. The liver-specific activity of FGF19 is supported by this molecular mechanism. We are grateful to Pete Haverty for assistance with the preparation of figures. Download .pdf (.08 MB) Help with pdf files
Referência(s)