Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

The Autonomy‐Fostering State: “Coordinated Fragmentation” and Domestic Violence Services*

2008; Wiley; Volume: 17; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00315.x

ISSN

1467-9760

Autores

Elizabeth Ben‐Ishai,

Tópico(s)

Foucault, Power, and Ethics

Resumo

Journal of Political PhilosophyVolume 17, Issue 3 p. 307-331 The Autonomy-Fostering State: "Coordinated Fragmentation" and Domestic Violence Services* Elizabeth Ben-Ishai, Elizabeth Ben-Ishai Political Science, Albion CollegeSearch for more papers by this author Elizabeth Ben-Ishai, Elizabeth Ben-Ishai Political Science, Albion CollegeSearch for more papers by this author First published: 05 July 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00315.xCitations: 4Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Anderson, J. and A. Honneth. 2005. Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice. Pp. 127–49 in J. P. Christman and J. Anderson (ed), Autonomy and the challenges of liberalism: new essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Barvosa-Carter, E. 2007. Mestiza Autonomy as Relational Autonomy: Ambivalence & the Social Character of Free Will. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 15, 1–21. Benhabib, S. 1987. The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Feminist Theory. Pp. 77–95 in S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (ed), Feminism as critique: on the politics of gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Benson, P. 2000. Feeling Crazy: Self-Worth and the Social Character of Responsibility. Pp. 72–93 in C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (ed), Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press. Brown, W. 1992. Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies, 18, 7–34. Buel, S. M. 1988. Recent Development: Mandatory Arrest for Domestic Violence. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 11, 213–226. Center, S. Revised 2006. SafeHouse Center Training Manual. SafeHouse, Ann Arbor, MI. Chodorow, N. 1978. The reproduction of mothering: psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. Coker, D. 2001. Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law: A Critical Review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 801, 1–56. Cruikshank, B. 1999. The will to empower: democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Davis, R. C., B. E. Smith, and L. B. Nickles. 1998. The Deterrent Effect of Prosecuting Domestic Violence Misdemeanors. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 434–42. Dutton, D. G., S. D. Hart, L. W. Kennedy, and K. R. Williams. Arrest and the Reduction of Repeat Wife Assault. Pp. 111–124 in E. S. Buzawa and C. G. Buzawa (ed), Domestic violence: the changing criminal justice response. Westport: Auburn. Fraser, N. 1990. Struggle Over Needs: Outline of a Socialist-Feminist Critical Theory of Late-Capitalist Political Culture. Pp. 199–223 in L. Gorden (ed), Women, the state, and welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Friedman, M. 2003. Autonomy, gender, politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Gamache, D. and M. Asmus. 1999. Enhancing Networking Among Service Providers: Elements of Successful Coordination Strategies. Pp. 65–87 in E. Pence and M. Shepard (ed), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Haney, L. 1996. Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance. American Sociological Review, 61, 759–78. Haney, L. 2000. Feminist State Theory: Applications to Jurisprudence, Criminology, and the Welfare State. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 641–66. Hanna, C. 1996. No Right to Choose: Mandated Victim Participation in Domestic Violence Prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109, 1849–910. Hirschel, J. D., I. W. Hutchinson III, and C. W. Dean. 1992. The Failure of Arrest to Deter Spouse Abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 7–33. Iyengar, R. 2007. The Protection Battered Spouses Don't Need. In The New York Times Online. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/opinion/07iyengar.html. Last accessed 27 January 2008. Kittay, E. F. and E. K. Feder. 2002. The subject of care: feminist perspectives on dependency. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. LaVaque-Manty, M. 2001. Food, Functioning and Justice: From Famines to Eating Disorders. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9, 150–67. Mackenzie, C. and N. Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press. Mahoney, M. R. 1991. Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1–94. McDermott, M. J. and J. Garofalo. 2004. When Advocacy for Domestic Violence Victims Backfires: Types and Sources of Victim Disempowerment. Violence Against Women, 10, 1245–66. Miccio, G. K. 2005. A House Divided: Mandatory Arrest, Domestic Violence, and the Conservatization of the Battered Women's Movement. Houston Law Review, 42, 237–323. Nedelsky, J. 1989. Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, 7–36. Nedelsky, J. 1990. Law, Boundaries and the Bounded Self. Representations, 30, 162–89. Noddings, N. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pence, E. and M. McMahon. 1997. A coordinated community response to domestic violence. The National Training Project, Duluth, Minnesota. Piven, F. F. 1990. Ideology and the State: Women, Power, and the Welfare State. Pp. 250–64 in L. Gordon (ed), Women, the state, and welfare. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press. Raz, J. 1986. The morality of freedom. New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press. Shepard, M. and E. Pence. 1999. Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Sherman, L., D. A. Smith, J. D. Schmidt, and D. P. Rogan. 1992. Crime, Punishment, and Stake in Conformity: Legal and Informal Control of Domestic Violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680–90. Stoljar, N. 2000. Autonomy and the Feminist Intuition. Pp. 94–111 in C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (ed), Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press. Thelen, R. 2000. Advocacy in a coordinated community response: overview and highlights of three programs. Clearwater, MN: Gender Violence Institute. Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. Domestic Violence Awareness Handbook. White, J. A. 2000. Democracy, justice, and the welfare state: reconstructing public care. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. Zorza, J. 1994. Must We Stop Arresting Batterers? Analysis and Policy Implications of New Police Domestic Violence Studies. New England Law Review, 28, 929–90. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue3September 2009Pages 307-331 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX