Artigo Revisado por pares

The Great Transition: China, Hungary, and Sociology Exit Socialism Into the Market

1996; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 101; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/230787

ISSN

1537-5390

Autores

Anthony Oberschall,

Tópico(s)

Social Policy and Reform Studies

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessSymposium on Market TransitionThe Great Transition: China, Hungary, and Sociology Exit Socialism Into the MarketAnthony OberschallAnthony OberschallPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 101, Number 4Jan., 1996 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/230787 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 31Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1996 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Zhichang Zhu Institutional change and strategic choice: debating the 'stage-model' of strategy in emerging economies, Asia Pacific Business Review 24, no.33 (Oct 2017): 371–388.https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1384130Jing Shen, Wei Xu Institutions and individual strategies: how did job seekers respond to the changing employment environment in urban China?, The Journal of Chinese Sociology 4, no.11 (Aug 2017).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-017-0061-6M. D. R. Evans, Jonathan Kelley Communism, Capitalism, and Images of Class: Effects of Reference Groups, Reality, and Regime in 43 Nations and 110,000 Individuals, 1987-2009, Cross-Cultural Research 51, no.44 (Dec 2016): 315–359.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116677963Lisa A. Keister, E. Paige Borelli Market Transition: An Assessment of the State of the Field, Sociological Perspectives 55, no.22 (May 2012): 267–294.https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.55.2.267Dali Ma A Relational View of Organizational Restructuring: The Case of Transitional China, Management and Organization Review 8, no.11 (Feb 2015): 51–75.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00278.xKuang-Chi Chang A Path to Understanding Guanxi in China's Transitional Economy: Variations on Network Behavior, Sociological Theory 29, no.44 (Dec 2011): 315–339.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01401.xZhenchao Qian, Randy Hodson 'Sent Down' in China: Stratification challenged but not denied, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29, no.22 (Jun 2011): 205–219.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.08.001Lisa A. Keister Organizational research on market transition: A sociological approach, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 26, no.44 (Sep 2008): 719–742.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9113-4Lisa A. Keister, Yanlong Zhang 8 Organizations and Management in China, The Academy of Management Annals 3, no.11 (Jan 2009): 377–420.https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047368Victor Nee, Sonja Opper Bringing market transition theory to the firm, (Mar 2015): 3–34.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-2833(2009)0000019004Pierpaolo Giannoccolo The Brain Drain: A Survey of the Literature, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1374329Lisa A. Keister, Yanlong Zhang 8 Organizations and Management in China, Academy of Management Annals 3, no.11 (Jan 2009): 377–420.https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047368 Andrew Schrank Homeward Bound? Interest, Identity, and Investor Behavior in a Third World Export Platform Schrank, American Journal of Sociology 114, no.11 (Jul 2015): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1086/588742Willem-Jan Verhoeven, Jos Dessens, Wim Jansen Market transition or path dependency?, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26, no.22 (Jun 2008): 141–159.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2008.02.001Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz Privatisation of fixed-rail transit systems: a case study of Malaysia's STAR and PUTRA, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 33, no.77 (Jul 2006): 846–853.https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-030Bruno Grancelli Il passaggio al mercato dopo la caduta di un regime collettivistico: qualche riflessione ulteriore sui meccanismi del mutamento sociale, Quaderni di Sociologia , no.3939 (Dec 2005): 107–126.https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.1018John Marangos * Modelling the privatization process in transition economies, Oxford Development Studies 32, no.44 (Dec 2004): 585–604.https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000293353Yang Cao Behind the rising meritocracy: market, politics, and cultural change in urban China, Social Science Research 33, no.33 (Sep 2004): 435–463.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.09.003Balázs Vedres Testing Narratives of Post-socialism: Transition and Sequence approaches to the Ownership Histories of the Largest Hungarian Corporations, 1991-1999, Review of Sociology 10, no.11 (Jul 2005): 27–46.https://doi.org/10.1556/RevSoc.10.2004.1.2Xiaogang Wu Embracing the Market: Entry into Self-Employment in Transitional China, 1978-1996, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.350140Lisa A. Keister Adapting to Radical Change: Strategy and Environment in Piece-Rate Adoption During China's Transition, Organization Science 13, no.55 (Oct 2002): 459–474.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.459.7811John Marangos A post Keynesian critique of privatization policies in transition economies, Journal of International Development 14, no.55 (Jan 2002): 573–589.https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.909Sonja Opper, Sonia M.L. Wong, Hu Ruyin Party power, market and private power: Chinese Communist Party persistence in China's listed companies, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 19 (Jan 2002): 105–138.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(02)80039-7Lisa A. Keister Corporate labor policies and practices during China's transition: An exploration of implications for social stratification, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 19 (Jan 2002): 171–187.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(02)80041-5John Marangos A Post Keynesian View of Transition to Market Capitalism: Developing a Civilized Society, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, no.22 (Nov 2015): 301–311.https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2000.11490282James M. Raymo, Yu Xie Income of the Urban Elderly in Postreform China: Political Capital, Human Capital, and the State, Social Science Research 29, no.11 (Mar 2000): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1999.0649 Xueguang Zhou Economic Transformation and Income Inequality in Urban China: Evidence from Panel Data, American Journal of Sociology 105, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1135–1174.https://doi.org/10.1086/210401 Yang Cao , and Victor G. Nee Comment: Controversies and Evidence in the Market Transition Debate, American Journal of Sociology 105, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1175–1189.https://doi.org/10.1086/210402 Xueguang Zhou Reply: Beyond the Debate and Toward Substantive Institutional Analysis, American Journal of Sociology 105, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1190–1195.https://doi.org/10.1086/210403Olga O. Suhomlinova Constructive Destruction: Transformation of Russian State-Owned Construction Enterprises During Market Transition, Organization Studies 20, no.33 (May 1999): 451–483.https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699203004 Douglas Guthrie Between Markets and Politics: Organizational Responses to Reform in China Guthrie, American Journal of Sociology 102, no.55 (Jul 2015): 1258–1304.https://doi.org/10.1086/231084

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX