"Into Hostile Political Camps": The Reorganization of International Science in World War I
1971; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 62; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/350707
ISSN1545-6994
Autores Tópico(s)Polar Research and Ecology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No Access"Into Hostile Political Camps": The Reorganization of International Science in World War IDaniel J. KevlesDaniel J. KevlesPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 62, Number 1Spring, 1971 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/350707 Views: 39Total views on this site Citations: 33Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1971 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Florian Schmaltz, Frank W. Stahnisch, Sascha Topp On the history of neuroscience research in the Max Planck Society, 1948–2002—German, European, and transatlantic perspectives: Introduction, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 14 (Mar 2023): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2023.2179779Kenji Ito Transnational scientific advising: occupied Japan, the United States National Academy of Sciences and the establishment of the Science Council of Japan, The British Journal for the History of Science 30 (Feb 2023): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087423000031Fernando Clara O saber nos labirintos do poder: a Europa e a (inter)nacionalização da ciência na primeira metade do século XX, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 29, no.22 (Jun 2022): 441–460.https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702022000200008Charles A. Kollmer International Culture Collections and the Value of Microbial Life: Johanna Westerdijk’s Fungi and Ernst Georg Pringsheim’s Algae, Journal of the History of Biology 55, no.11 (Mar 2022): 59–87.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09669-6Danielle Fauque, Robert Fox A Hundred Years Ago: The Birth of the IAU as a Model for Other Scientific Unions (1919), (Jul 2022): 81–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98625-4_3Florian Laguens Crossing Forbidden Borders After WWI, (Jul 2022): 141–157.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98625-4_4TOMÁS IRISH THE “MORAL BASIS” OF RECONSTRUCTION? HUMANITARIANISM, INTELLECTUAL RELIEF AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS, 1918–1925, Modern Intellectual History 17, no.33 (Mar 2019): 769–800.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244319000064Sjang L. ten Hagen The Local versus the Global in the history of relativity: The case of Belgium, Science in Context 33, no.33 (Jun 2021): 227–250.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889721000028Alessandro Iaria, Carlo Schwarz, Fabian Waldinger Frontier Knowledge and Scientific Production: Evidence from the Collapse of International Science*, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133, no.22 (Jan 2018): 927–991.https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx046Roy MacLeod The Mobilisation of Minds and the Crisis in International Science: The Krieg der Geister and the Manifesto of the 93, Journal of War & Culture Studies 11, no.11 (Mar 2017): 58–78.https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2016.1264753Dániel Margócsy A long history of breakdowns: A historiographical review, Social Studies of Science 47, no.33 (Jun 2017): 307–325.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706559Astrid Elbers Joining Forces with the Belgians, (Nov 2016): 117–167.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49079-3_4Fernando Clara ‘The “invisible” export of thought’: German Science and Southern Europe, 1933–45, (Jan 2016): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551528_1Tomás Irish Internationalism after the War, 1918–25, (Jan 2015): 171–192.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409461_9Peter Burke THE REPUBLIC OF LETTERS AS A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, Media History 18, no.3-43-4 (Aug 2012): 395–407.https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2012.721956Jeroen van Dongen Mistaken Identity and Mirror Images: Albert and Carl Einstein, Leiden and Berlin, Relativity and Revolution, Physics in Perspective 14, no.22 (May 2012): 126–177.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-012-0084-ySofie Onghena The Survival of 19th-Century Scientific Optimism: The Public Discourse on Science in Belgium in the Aftermath of the Great War (ca. 1919-1930), Centaurus 53, no.44 (Oct 2011): 280–305.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2011.00239.xAndré Felipe Cândido da Silva, A trajetória de Henrique da Rocha Lima e as relações teuto-brasileiras (1901-1956), História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 17, no.22 (Jun 2010): 495–509.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702010000200013Gregory A. Good Sydney Chapman: Dynamo behind the International Geophysical Year, (Jan 2010): 177–203.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230114654_11Heiner Fangerau From Mephistopheles to Isaiah, Social Studies of Science 39, no.22 (Apr 2009): 229–256.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708101045Geert J. Somsen A History of Universalism: Conceptions of the Internationality of Science from the Enlightenment to the Cold War, Minerva 46, no.33 (Sep 2008).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9105-z Alexis De Greiff The Politics of Noncooperation: The Boycott of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics Alexis De Greiff, Osiris 21, no.11 (Jul 2015): 86–109.https://doi.org/10.1086/507137 John Krige Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism, and Scientific Intelligence John Krige, Osiris 21, no.11 (Jul 2015): 161–181.https://doi.org/10.1086/507140 Matthew Stanley “An Expedition to Heal the Wounds of War” The 1919 Eclipse and Eddington as Quaker Adventurer Stanley, Isis 94, no.11 (Jul 2015): 57–89.https://doi.org/10.1086/376099David H. DeVorkin Quantum Physics and the Stars (V): Physicists at Mount Wilson Prior to 1922, Journal for the History of Astronomy 31, no.44 (Nov 2000): 301–321.https://doi.org/10.1177/002182860003100402Helen E. Longino Interpretation Versus Explanation in the Critique of Science, Science in Context 10, no.11 (Sep 2008): 113–128.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700002568Lutz Danneberg, Jörg Schönert Zur Transnationalität und Internationalisierung von Wissenschaft, (Jan 1996): 7–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03631-5_2D. E. H. Edgerton British Scientific Intellectuals and the Relations of Science, Technology and War, (Jan 1996): 1–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0671-9_1E. Robert Paul International Astronomy, (Jan 1993): 57–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1940-5_5E. Robert Paul The life and works of J. C. Kapteyn, Space Science Reviews 64, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1993): V–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819658E. Crawford Internationalism in science as a casualty of the First World War: relations between German and Allied scientists as reflected in nominations for the Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry, Social Science Information 27, no.22 (Jun 1988): 163–201.https://doi.org/10.1177/053901888027002001Paul Weindling The Rockefeller Foundation and German Biomedical Sciences, 1920–40: from Educational Philanthropy to International Science Policy, (Jan 1988): 119–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09514-8_6Helge Kragh Anatomy of a Priority Conflict: The Case of Element 72, Centaurus 23, no.44 (Jun 1980): 275–301.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1980.tb00235.x
Referência(s)