Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Changes in Vigilance with Group Size under Scramble Competition

2003; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 161; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/368225

1537-5323

Guy Beauchamp, Graeme D. Ruxton,

Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsChanges in Vigilance with Group Size under Scramble CompetitionG. Beauchamp, G. D. Ruxton, and Associate Editor: Allen J. MooreG. Beauchamp*Corresponding author; e‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , G. D. Ruxton Search for more articles by this author , and Associate Editor: Allen J. Moore Search for more articles by this author 1. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montréal, P.O. Box 5000, Saint‐Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 7C6, Canada;2. Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedicine and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United KingdomPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 161, Number 4April 2003 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368225 Views: 454Total views on this site Citations: 51Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived August 28, 2002Accepted October 2, 2002Published online February 28, 2003 Keywordsvigilancescramble competitiongroup sizeforagingpredation© 2003 by The University of Chicago.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:J. Ignacio Ramirez, Lourens Poorter, Patrick A. Jansen, Jan den Ouden, Matthias Siewert, Johan Olofsson Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment, Oecologia 201, no.11 (Nov 2022): 229–240.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8John S. McAlister, Ian M. Hamilton An adaptive dynamic model of a vigilance game among group foragers, Journal of Theoretical Biology 538 (Apr 2022): 111030.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111030Austin Z. T. Allison, Courtney J. Conway Daily foraging activity of an imperiled ground squirrel: effects of hibernation, thermal environment, body condition, and conspecific density, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 76, no.22 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03142-4Désirée Brucks, Barbara Drews, Susanne E. Ulbrich Exploring the social network of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in captivity, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 246 (Jan 2022): 105526.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105526Guy Beauchamp, Zhongqiu Li, Cong Yu, Peter A Bednekoff, Daniel T Blumstein, Amanda Ridley A meta-analysis of the group-size effect on vigilance in mammals, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.55 (Jun 2021): 919–925.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab048Xinxin Wang, Le Yang, Yumeng Zhao, Cong Yu, Zhongqiu Li, Zhi-Yun Jia The group size effect and synchronization of vigilance in the Tibetan wild ass, Current Zoology 67, no.11 (May 2020): 11–16.https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa024Yunchao Luo, Lin Wang, Le Yang, Xinxin Wang, Ming Tan, Zhongqiu Li, Rafael Reyna Inter- and intraspecific vigilance patterns of two sympatric Tibetan ungulates, Journal of Mammalogy 101, no.22 (Dec 2019): 498–506.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz175Guy Beauchamp Predator attack patterns influence vigilance in a virtual experiment, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 74, no.44 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02833-0Lei Han, David Blank, Muyang Wang, Weikang Yang Vigilance behaviour in Siberian ibex (Capra sibirica): Effect of group size, group type, sex and age, Behavioural Processes 170 (Jan 2020): 104021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104021Ruoshuang Liu, Jianbin Shi, Dingzhen Liu, Shikui Dong, Yu Zhang, Yonglin Wu, Dongsheng Guo, Steven Cooke Effect of group size and reproductive status on faecal glucocorticoid concentration and vigilance in a free-ranging population of Przewalski’s gazelle, Conservation Physiology 8, no.11 (Apr 2020).https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa027Guy Beauchamp External body temperature and vigilance to a lesser extent track variation in predation risk in domestic fowls, BMC Zoology 4, no.11 (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-019-0039-8Jorge F.S. Menezes, Burt P. Kotler, Austin K. Dixon Risk pump in Gerbillus pyramidum : quality of poor habitats increases with more conspecifics, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 31, no.22 (Dec 2018): 140–154.https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1521873Ilaria Pecorella, Niccolò Fattorini, Elisabetta Macchi, Francesco Ferretti Sex/age differences in foraging, vigilance and alertness in a social herbivore, acta ethologica 22, no.11 (Sep 2018): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-018-0300-0Niccolò Fattorini, Claudia Brunetti, Carolina Baruzzi, Elisabetta Macchi, Maria Chiara Pagliarella, Noemi Pallari, Sandro Lovari, Francesco Ferretti Being “hangry”: food depletion and its cascading effects on social behaviour, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 21 (Sep 2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly119Hakima Boujja-Miljour, Patrick A. Leighton, Guy Beauchamp Individual vigilance profiles in flocks of House Sparrows ( Passerdomesticus ), Canadian Journal of Zoology 96, no.99 (Sep 2018): 1016–1023.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2017-0301John M. Fryxell, Andrew M. Berdahl Fitness trade-offs of group formation and movement by Thomson's gazelles in the Serengeti ecosystem, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373, no.17461746 (Mar 2018): 20170013.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0013Jussi Lehtonen, Kim Jaatinen Safety in numbers: the dilution effect and other drivers of group life in the face of danger, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70, no.44 (Feb 2016): 449–458.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2075-5Le Yang, Cang jue Zhuom, Zhongqiu Li Group Size Effects on Vigilance of Wintering Black-Necked Cranes ( Grus nigricollis ) in Tibet, China, Waterbirds 39, no.11 (Mar 2016): 108–113.https://doi.org/10.1675/063.039.0114Tomasz Podgórski, Sanne de Jong, Jakub W. Bubnicki, Dries P.J. Kuijper, Marcin Churski, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska Drivers of synchronized vigilance in wild boar groups, Behavioral Ecology 27, no.44 (Feb 2016): 1097–1103.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw016Mu-Yang Wang, Qiang Chen, Hanahati Kuerbanjiang, Feng Xu, David Blank, Wei-Kang Yang Group size and disturbance effects on group vigilance in the Great Bustard Otis tarda in western China, Bird Study 62, no.33 (Jun 2015): 438–442.https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1047736Daniel J. van der Post, Rineke Verbrugge, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk, Long Wang The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback, PLOS ONE 10, no.11 (Jan 2015): e0117027.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027 References, (Jan 2015): 205–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801983-2.00010-3Yan Zhang, Zhenhua Luo, Bingwan Liu The effect of group size on the vigilance of Mongolian gazelle ( Procapra gutturosa ), Folia Zoologica 63, no.22 (Jul 2014): 81–86.https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v63.i2.a5.2014Fenliang Kuang, Fengshan Li, Ning Liu, Fengqin Li Effect of Flock Size and Position in Flock on Vigilance of Black-Necked Cranes ( Grus nigricollis ) in Winter, Waterbirds 37, no.11 (Mar 2014): 94–98.https://doi.org/10.1675/063.037.0112 References, (Jan 2014): 263–302.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407228-2.16001-9Andrea S. Griffin, Françoise Lermite, Marjorie Perea, David Guez To innovate or not: contrasting effects of social groupings on safe and risky foraging in Indian mynahs, Animal Behaviour 86, no.66 (Dec 2013): 1291–1300.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.035Daniel J. van der Post, Harmen de Weerd, Rineke Verbrugge, and Charlotte K. Hemelrijk A Novel Mechanism for a Survival Advantage of Vigilant Individuals in Groups., The American Naturalist 182, no.55 (Jul 2015): 682–688.https://doi.org/10.1086/673298Kristin A. Descovich, Allan T. Lisle, Stephen Johnston, Clive J.C. Phillips The effect of group size on vigilance in a semi-solitary, fossorial marsupial (Lasiorhinus latifrons), Behavioural Processes 100 (Nov 2013): 208–213.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.015Feng Xu, Ma Ming, Weikang Yang, David Blank, Peng Ding, Tong Zhang Vigilance in Black-Necked Cranes: Effects of Predation Vulnerability and Flock Size, The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125, no.11 (Mar 2013): 208–212.https://doi.org/10.1676/12-049.1Feng Xu, Ming Ma, Weikang Yang, David Blank, Peng Ding, Tong Zhang Group size effect on vigilance and daytime activity budgets of the Equus kiang (Equidae, Perissodactyla) in Arjinshan National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China, Folia Zoologica 62, no.11 (Mar 2013): 76–81.https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i1.a11.2013Julie A. Teichroeb, Pascale Sicotte Cost-free vigilance during feeding in folivorous primates? Examining the effect of predation risk, scramble competition, and infanticide threat on vigilance in ursine colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66, no.33 (Nov 2011): 453–466.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1292-1Chunlin Li, Zhigang Jiang, Linlin Li, Zhongqiu Li, Hongxia Fang, Chunwang Li, Guy Beauchamp, Jane M. Waterman Effects of Reproductive Status, Social Rank, Sex and Group Size on Vigilance Patterns in Przewalski's Gazelle, PLoS ONE 7, no.22 (Feb 2012): e32607.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032607Canjun Xia, Wenxuan Xu, Weikang Yang, David Blank, Jianfang Qiao, Wei Liu Seasonal and sexual variation in vigilance behavior of goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in western China, Journal of Ethology 29, no.33 (May 2011): 443–451.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0279-8Xiaoge Ping, Chunwang Li, Zhigang Jiang, Wuhua Liu, Huanbing Zhu Interference competition and group size effect in sika deer (Cervus nippon) at salt licks, acta ethologica 14, no.11 (Feb 2011): 43–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-011-0092-yJianbin Shi, Diqiang Li, Wenfa Xiao Influences of sex, group size, and spatial position on vigilance behavior of Przewalski’s gazelles, Acta Theriologica 56, no.11 (Nov 2010): 73–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-010-0001-1Feng Xu, Ming Ma, Yiqun Wu Group size and sex effects on vigilance: evidence from Asiatic ibex, Capra sibirica in Tianshan Mountains, China, Folia Zoologica 59, no.44 (Dec 2010): 308–312.https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v59.i4.a6.2010Jianbin Shi, Guy Beauchamp, Robin I. M. Dunbar Group-Size Effect on Vigilance and Foraging in a Predator-Free Population of Feral Goats ( Capra hircus ) on the Isle of Rum, NW Scotland, Ethology 116, no.44 (Apr 2010): 329–337.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01749.xGuy Beauchamp How does food density influence vigilance in birds and mammals?, Animal Behaviour 78, no.22 (Aug 2009): 223–231.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.029Z. Li, Z. Jiang, G. Beauchamp Vigilance in Przewalski's gazelle: effects of sex, predation risk and group size, Journal of Zoology 277, no.44 (Mar 2009): 302–308.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00541.xGuillaume Rieucau, Luc-Alain Giraldeau Group size effect caused by food competition in nutmeg mannikins (Lonchura punctulata), Behavioral Ecology 20, no.22 (Nov 2008): 421–425.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn144Fredrik Dalerum, Henrik Lange, Christina Skarpe, Tuulikki Rooke, Berit Inga, Philip W. Bateman Foraging competition, vigilance and group size in two species of gregarious antelope, South African Journal of Wildlife Research 38, no.22 (Oct 2008): 138–145.https://doi.org/10.3957/0379-4369-38.2.138Zhongqiu Li, Zhigang Jiang Group size effect on vigilance: Evidence from Tibetan gazelle in Upper Buha River, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Behavioural Processes 78, no.11 (May 2008): 25–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.011Xinming Lian, Tongzuo Zhang, Yifan Cao, Jianping Su, Simon Thirgood Group size effects on foraging and vigilance in migratory Tibetan antelope, Behavioural Processes 76, no.33 (Nov 2007): 192–197.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.05.001Guy Beauchamp, Graeme D. Ruxton False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance, Animal Behaviour 74, no.55 (Nov 2007): 1199–1206.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.014Andrew J King, Guy Cowlishaw When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making, Biology Letters 3, no.22 (Feb 2007): 137–139.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0017Jihen Boukhriss, Slaheddine Selmi, Arnaud Béchet, Saïd Nouira Vigilance in Greater Flamingos Wintering in Southern Tunisia: Age-Dependent Flock Size Effect, Ethology 113, no.44 (Apr 2007): 377–385.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01335.xT. Amano, K. Ushiyama, G. Fujita, H. Higuchi Costs and benefits of flocking in foraging white‐fronted geese ( Anser albifrons ): effects of resource depletion, Journal of Zoology 269, no.11 (Mar 2006): 111–115.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00076.xF. Javier Pérez-Barbería, Iain J. Gordon Gregariousness increases brain size in ungulates, Oecologia 145, no.11 (Jul 2005): 41–52.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0067-7Christoph Randler Coots Fulica atra reduce their vigilance under increased competition, Behavioural Processes 68, no.22 (Feb 2005): 173–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.12.007Christoph Randler Vigilance during Preening in Coots Fulica atra, Ethology 111, no.22 (Feb 2005): 169–178.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01050.xPeter A. Bednekoff, Steven L. Lima Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, no.15471547 (Jul 2004): 1491–1496.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2739