Should We Regulate ‘Utilization Management?’
1989; Project HOPE; Volume: 8; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1377/hlthaff.8.4.103
ISSN2694-233X
AutoresMarilyn J. Field, Bradford H. Gray,
ResumoCommentary Health AffairsVol. 8, No. 4 Should We Regulate 'Utilization Management?'Marilyn J. Field and Bradford H. Gray AffiliationsNational Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine in Washington, D.C., and the IOM Study on Utilization ManagementYale Program on Nonprofit Organizations and Yale School of MedicinPUBLISHED:Winter 1989No Accesshttps://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.8.4.103AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextView PDFPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions View articleTOPICSUtilization managementRegulationHealth care providersInsurance market regulationPaymentNursesPatient harmCosts and spendingQuality of careMarkets Loading Comments... Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. DetailsExhibitsReferencesRelated Article MetricsCitations: Crossref 12 History Published online 1 January 1989 InformationCopyright © by Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors wish to acknowledge their equal contribution to this Commentary and note that their names are in alphabetical order. Members of the Institute of Medicine Committee on Utilization Management by Third Parties are: Jerome H. Grossman (chairman), Howard L. Bailit, Robert A. Berenson, John M. Burns, Richard H. Egdahl, John M. Eisenberg, Deborah Anne Freund, Paul M. Gertman, Alice G. Gosfield, Michael E. Herbert, Nathan Hershey, Neil Hollander, Karen Ignani, Carol Ann Lockhart, Arnold Milstein, Alan R. Nelson, Robert Patricelli, Cynthia L. Polich, Donald M. Steinwachs, and Bruce S. Wolff.PDF downloadCited byCreating and Managing Systems That Care23 August 2022Financing of Substance Abuse Treatment ServicesSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Care26 September 2016 | AAOHN Journal, Vol. 45, No. 9Ethical and legal implications of managed careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 19, No. 3Practice Evaluation in the Context of Managed Care: Case-Recording Methods for Quality Assurance Reviews18 August 2016 | Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 4, No. 3Managed Care Arrangements: Barriers to Cost Savings Potential5 August 2016 | Medical Care Review, Vol. 51, No. 2Social and Legal Implications of Managed Care in PsychiatryPsychosomatics, Vol. 35, No. 2The impact of private utilization management on psychiatric care: A review of the literatureThe Journal of Mental Health Administration, Vol. 19, No. 2Managed mental health: From cost containment to quality assuranceAdministration and Policy in Mental Health, Vol. 19, No. 5Whodunit? Causal Responsibility of Utilization Review for Physicians' Decisions, Patients' Outcomes1 January 2021 | Law, Medicine and Health Care, Vol. 20, No. 1-2The Effect of Utilization Review on Hospital Use and Expenditures: A Review of the Literature and an Update on Recent Findings18 August 2016 | Medical Care Review, Vol. 47, No. 3Reducing Hospital Use and Expenditures through Utilization Review3 September 2016 | Quality Assurance and Utilization Review, Vol. 5, No. 3
Referência(s)