Artigo Revisado por pares

Comparison of temporary occlusion and aspiration system versus the conventional method during coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction

2004; Elsevier BV; Volume: 94; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.063

ISSN

1879-1913

Autores

Takanori Kusuyama, Toru Kataoka, Hidetaka Iida, Eiji Uchida, Hitoe Matsuura, Hidemasa Tanaka, Hiroshi Sato, Shinichi Shimodozono, Heidi N. Bonneau, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Minoru Yoshiyama, Junichi Yoshikawa,

Tópico(s)

Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Resumo

This study evaluated the effects of the temporary occlusion and aspiration device GuardWire on percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. This device brought about a significant reduction in the no-reflow phenomenon and improvement in ST resolution compared with conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. This study evaluated the effects of the temporary occlusion and aspiration device GuardWire on percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. This device brought about a significant reduction in the no-reflow phenomenon and improvement in ST resolution compared with conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.

Referência(s)