Using Mammography for Cancer Control: An Unrealized Potential
1987; Wiley; Volume: 37; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.3322/canjclin.37.1.33
ISSN1542-4863
Autores Tópico(s)Cancer Risks and Factors
ResumoCA: A Cancer Journal for CliniciansVolume 37, Issue 1 p. 33-48 ArticleFree Access Using mammography for cancer control: An unrealized potential Jan Howard M.D., Jan Howard M.D. Program Director for Studies in Social Epidemiology, Health Promotion Sciences Branch, in the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MarylandSearch for more papers by this author Jan Howard M.D., Jan Howard M.D. Program Director for Studies in Social Epidemiology, Health Promotion Sciences Branch, in the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MarylandSearch for more papers by this author First published: January/February 1987 https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.37.1.33Citations: 82AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Silverberg E, Lubera J: Cancer statistics, 1987. CA 37: 2– 19, 1987. 2 Annual cancer statistics review: National Cancer Advisory Board, December 2, 1985. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 86–2789. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986, p IB4. 3 Silverberg E, Lubera J: Cancer statistics, 1986. CA 36: 9– 25, 1986. 4 Silverberg E: Cancer statistics, 1972–1985. CA 22– 34: 1972–1985. 5 Horm J: Probability of dying from breast cancer after diagnosis: Data tables. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986. 6 1985 Annual cancer statistics review: National Cancer Advisory Board, December 2, 1985. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 86–2789. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986, pp IIIB30– 31. 7 SEER program: Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States 1973–1981. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 85–1837. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1984, p 315. 8 Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al: Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan study: A randomized trial with breast cancer screening. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 67: 65– 74, 1985. 9 Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al: Ten-to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. JNCI 69: 349– 355, 1982. 10 Shapiro S: Breast cancer screening, in B Hoogstraten, RW McDivitt (eds): Breast Cancer, Boca Raton, Fla, CRC Press, 1981, pp 53– 69. 11 Shapiro S: Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial, supplement. Cancer 39: 2772– 2782, 1977. 12 Fink R, Shapiro S, Lewison J: The reluctant participant in a breast cancer screening program. Public Health Rep 83: 479– 490, 1968. 13 Fink R, Shapiro S, Roester R: Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. Am J Public Health 62: 328– 336, 1972. 14 Shapiro S, Goldberg JD, Hutchison GB: Lead time in breast cancer detection and implications for periodicity of screening. Am J Epidemiol 100: 357– 366, 1974. 15 Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L: Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography. Methodology and early observations. JAMA 195: 731– 738, 1966. 16 Eddy DM, Baker H, Dodd G, et al: The value of mammography for women under 50: Report of the subcommittee on mammography in women under 50. Prepared for the National Committee on Cancer Detection, American Cancer Society, 1983. 17 Day NE, Tabar L, Fagerberg G: Breast cancer screening. Lancet 2: 94– 95, 1985. 18 Breslow L, Henderson B, Massey F Jr, et al: Report of NCI ad hoc working group on the gross and net benefits of mammography in mass screening for the detection of breast cancer. JNCI 59: 473– 478, 1977. 19 Bailar JC III: Mammography: A contrary view, Ann Intern Med 84: 77– 84, 1976. 20 Baker LH: Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five-year summary report. CA 32: 194– 225, 1982. 21 Baker LH, Chin TDY, Wagner KV: Progress in screening for early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 30: 96– 102, 1985. 22 American Cancer Society, National Task Force on Breast Cancer Control: Mammography 1982: A statement of the American Cancer Society. CA 32: 226– 230, 1982. 23 Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A, et al: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1: 829– 832, 1985. 24 Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JH, Holland R, et al: Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography: First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981. Lancet 1: 1222– 1224, 1984. 25 Collette HJA, Day NE, Rombach JJ, et al: Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet 1: 1224– 1226, 1984. 26 de Waard F, Collette HJ, Rombach JJ, et al: The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Chronic Dis 37: 1– 44, 1984. 27 Breast cancer: We're making progress every day. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 82–2409. Government Printing Office, 1982. 28 Cancer facts for people over 50. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 84–456. Government Printing Office, 1984. 29 Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA 35: 197– 213, 1985. 30 National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Communications, Hamm A: Breast cancer screening. Backgrounder: 1– 7; December 1983. 31 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health: Breast cancer screening, in NIH Consensus Development Conferences, vol 1: Summaries from 1977–78. Bethesda, Md, Office for Medical Applications of Research, 1979, pp 5– 8. 32 American College of Radiology: Guidelines for mammography: Policy statement. Reston, Va, American College of Radiology, September 22, 1982. 33 A basic study of public attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests, vol 1: Major results. New York, Lieberman Research Inc, 1979. 34 National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Communications: Tables from breast cancer survey. Princeton, NJ, Opinion Research Corporation, 1979. 35 Gallup Organization: 1983 survey of public awareness and use of cancer detection tests: Summary of findings. Princeton, NJ, The Gallup Organization Inc, 1984. 36 Reeder S, Berkanovic E, Marcus AC: Breast cancer detection behavior among urban women. Public Health Rep 95: 276– 281, 1980. 37 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: Mammography—A user's guide. NCRP report No. 85. Bethesda, Md, NCRP Publications, 1986. 38 Breast cancer: A measure of progress in public understanding. Technical report. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 81-2291. Princeton, NJ, Opinion Research Corporation, 1980. 39 Lane DS, Fine HL: Compliance with mammography referrals. Implications for breast cancer screening. NY State J Med 83: 173– 176, 1983. 40 Bates B, Mulinare J: Physicians' use and opinions of screening tests in ambulatory practice. JAMA 214: 2173– 2180, 1970. 41 Romm FJ, Fletcher SW, Hulka BS: The periodic health examination: Comparison of recommendations and internists' performance. South Med J 74: 265– 271, 1981. 42 Hulka BS, Romm FJ, Parkerson GR Jr, et al: Peer review in ambulatory care: Use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments, supplement. Med Care 17: i– vi, 1–73, 1979. 43 Cohen DI, Littenberg B, Wetzel C, et al: Improving physician compliance with preventive medicine guidelines. Med Care 20: 1040– 1045, 1982. 44 McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al: Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record: A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 100: 130– 138, 1984. 45 Dietrich AJ, Goldberg H: Preventive content of adult primary care: Do generalists and subspecialists differ? Am J Public Health 74: 223– 227, 1984. 46 Battista RN: Adult cancer prevention in primary care: Patterns of practice in Québec. Am J Public Health 73: 1036– 1039, 1983. 47 Battista RN, Spitzer WO: Adult cancer prevention in primary care: Contrasts among primary care practice settings in Québec. Am J Public Health 73: 1040– 1041, 1983. 48 Cummings KM, Funch DP, Mettlin C, et al: Family physicians' beliefs about breast cancer screening by mammography. J Fam Pract 17: 1029– 1034, 1983. 49 Holleb AI: Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: Five years later, editorial. CA 35: 194– 196, 1985. 50 Beahrs OH, Shapiro S, Smart C: Report of the working group to review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. JNCI 62: 639– 710, 1979. 51 Krohmer JS: Final report: Contract #NO1-CN-45162, reporting period: June 27, 1974-October 31, 1980. Chevy Chase, Md, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Center for Radiological Physics Coordination Program. 52 Malone W: Memorandum regarding radiation exposure from mammography. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986. 53 Hall FM: Screening mammography—potential problems on the horizon. N Engl J Med 314: 53– 55, 1986. 54 Baines C: Breast biopsies—better safe than sorry. The Medical Post: 10, May 29, 1984. 55 Howard J: Compliance with biopsy recommendations in BCDDP: Data tables. Philadelphia, Data Management Center for the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, 1985. 56 Baker LH: Data analysis of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project for project directors and other potential users. Philadelphia, Data Management Center for the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. 57 Utah Professional Review Organization: Benign/malignant ratios for inpatient breast biopsies 1977–78, 1981: Data tables. Salt Lake City, Utah, Utah Professional Review Organization, 1986. 58 Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: Recommendations and rationale. CA 30: 194– 240, 1980. 59 Donegan WL: Diagnosis, in WL Donegan, JS Spratt: Cancer of the Breast. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1979, p 79. 60 Friedman AK, Askovitz SI, Berger SM, et al: A co-operative evaluation of mammography in seven teaching hospitals. Radiology 86: 886– 891, 1966. 61 Thomas LB, Ackerman LV, McDivitt RW, et al: Report of NCI ad hoc pathology working group to review the gross and microscopic findings of breast cancer cases in the HIP study (Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York). JNCI 59: 495– 541, 1977. 62 Fox MS: On the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. JAMA 241: 489– 494, 1979. 63 Smart C: Memorandum regarding cost of mammography in Utah. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986. 64 Engel M: Cancer tests offered free in district. Washington Post: A1– A15, January 31, 1986. 65 American Cancer Society, Illinois Division: Summary of the Illinois Division Coordinated Program on Mammography, Chicago, American Cancer Society, Illinois Division Inc, 1984–1985. 66 Coverage issues appendix, in Medicare Carrier Claims Manual. US Dept of Health and Human Services, 1981, part 3, chap 2, p 50– 21. 67 Eddy DM: Screening for Cancer: Theory, Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall Inc, 1980, p 209. 68 Fox S, Baum JK, Klos DS, et al: Breast cancer screening: The underuse of mammography. Radiology 156: 607– 611, 1985. 69 Maibach E, Gigliotti L, Block G: Report on the Post's cancer prevention survey. Saturday Evening Post: 66– 67, 112, March 1986. 70 Fox S, Tsou CV, Klos DS: An intervention to increase mammography screening by residents in family practice. J Fam Pract 20: 467– 471, 1985. 71 Fox S, Tsou CV, Klos DS: Increasing mammography screening: An application of general principles of CME methodology. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 4: 95– 104, 1985. 72 1980 Census of Population, vol 1: Characteristics of the Population: General Population Characteristics: Illinois, US Dept of Commerce, Government Printing Office, 1981, p 15– 48. 73 National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control: Request for Applications 86-CA-11: Increasing the use of mammography and breast palpation for early detection of breast cancer. Bethesda, Md, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 1986. 74 Drazen EL: What influences acceptance of new medical technology? MM&M 18: 44– 49, 1983. 75 Screening for breast cancer. Lancet 1: 851– 852, 1985. 76 UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group: Trial of early detection of breast cancer: Description of method. Br J Cancer 44: 618– 627, 1981. 77 Howe GR, Sherman GJ, Semenciw RM, et al: Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 124: 399– 403, 1981. 78 Miller AB, Bulbrook RD: Screening, detection, and diagnosis of breast cancer. Lancet 1: 1109– 1111, 1982. 79 Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C: The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin Invest Med 4: 227– 258, 1981. 80 Coleman J, Menzel H, Katz E: Social processes in physicians' adoption of a new drug. J Chronic Dis 9: 1– 19, 1959. 81 Breast screening: New evidence. Lancet 1: 1217– 1218, 1984. 82 Cairns J: The treatment of diseases and the war against cancer. Sci Am 253: 51– 59, 1985. Citing Literature Volume37, Issue1January/February 1987Pages 33-48 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)