Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Probing the Primary Screening Efficiency by Multiple Replicate Testing: A Quantitative Analysis of Hit Confirmation and False Screening Results of a Biochemical Assay

2005; Elsevier BV; Volume: 10; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1177/1087057105279149

ISSN

2472-5560

Autores

Ji-hu Zhang, Xiang Wu, Matthew A. Sills,

Tópico(s)

Gene expression and cancer classification

Resumo

Despite a large body of references on assay development, assay optimization, strategies, and methodologies for high-throughput screening (HTS), there have been few reports on investigations of the efficiency of primary screening in a systematic and quantitative manner for a typical HTS process. Recently, the authors investigated the primary hit comparison and the effect of measurement variability by screening a library of approximately 25,000 random compounds in multiple replicate tests in a nuclear receptor recruitment assay with 2 different assay detection technologies. In this report, we utilized these sets of multiple replicate screening data from a different perspective and conducted a systematic data analysis in order to gain some insights into the hit-finding efficiency of a typical primary screening process. Specifically, hit confirmation, false-positive (declaration) rates, and false-negative rates at different hit cutoff limits were explored and calculated from the 2 different assay formats. Results and analyses provided some quantitative estimation regarding the reliability and efficiency of the primary screening process. For the 2 assay formats tested in this report, the confirmation rate (activity repeated at or above a certain hit limit) was found to be 65% or above. It was also suggested that, at least in this case, applying some hit-selection strategies, it is possible to decrease the number of false-negative or false-positive hits without significantly increasing the efforts in primary screening.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX