Digoxin in the Management of Cardiovascular Disorders
2004; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 109; Issue: 24 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/01.cir.0000132482.95686.87
ISSN1524-4539
AutoresMihai Gheorghiade, Kirkwood F. Adams, Wilson S. Colucci,
Tópico(s)Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 109, No. 24Digoxin in the Management of Cardiovascular Disorders Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBDigoxin in the Management of Cardiovascular Disorders Mihai Gheorghiade, Kirkwood F. AdamsJr and Wilson S. Colucci Mihai GheorghiadeMihai Gheorghiade From the Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (M.G.); the Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (K.F.A.); and the Division of Cardiology, Boston University, Boston, Mass (W.S.C.). , Kirkwood F. AdamsJrKirkwood F. AdamsJr From the Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (M.G.); the Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (K.F.A.); and the Division of Cardiology, Boston University, Boston, Mass (W.S.C.). and Wilson S. ColucciWilson S. Colucci From the Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (M.G.); the Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (K.F.A.); and the Division of Cardiology, Boston University, Boston, Mass (W.S.C.). Originally published22 Jun 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000132482.95686.87Circulation. 2004;109:2959–2964"After all, in spite of opinion, prejudice or error, time will fix the real value upon this discovery."— Sir William Withering, Birmingham, July 1, 1785Case 1: A 45-year-old man in sinus rhythm, with an ejection fraction of 20%, normal coronaries, and normal renal function is receiving captopril 50 mg 3 times daily, carvedilol 25 mg and furosemide 40 mg twice daily, and spironolactone 25 mg daily. Despite these therapies, he continues to complain of dyspnea with minimal exertion. There are jugular venous distention, rales, and ankle edema. Oral digoxin, 0.125 mg daily, is added. After 3 weeks of maintenance therapy with digoxin, the patient feels better.Case 2: A 70-year asymptomatic woman in sinus rhythm, with coronary artery disease and ejection fraction of 35% is receiving once a day enalapril 10 mg, metoprolol succinate 200 mg, digoxin 0.125 mg, and furosemide 20 mg. There are no signs of heart failure. Six months after digoxin discontinuation she continues to remain asymptomatic.Historical PerspectivesAs far back as the ancient Egyptians, cultures were known to have used medicinal plants containing cardiac glycosides. It was not until 1542 that the German scholar Fuchsius coined the now common term digitalis for the foxglove plant. Since 1785, when Sir William Withering published his textbook1 on the "account of the foxglove," physicians have used digitalis preparations to treat edematous states, irregular heartbeats, and chronic heart failure (HF). According to Withering, digitalis was believed to slow heart rate in patients with irregular pulse and result in diuresis.Mechanism of ActionDigoxin's primary mechanism of action is the ability to inhibit membrane-bound alpha subunits of sodium-potassium ATPase (sodium pump), mainly but not exclusively located in the human myocardium. This inhibition promotes sodium-calcium exchange, which increases the intracellular calcium concentration that is available to the contractile proteins, resulting in an increase in the force of myocardial contraction.2,3 In the human myocardium, there is no evidence of up-regulation of the sodium pump during chronic digoxin therapy.4 The inhibition of the sodium pump may also improve baroreceptor sensitivity in HF and may explain some of the neurohormonal effects of digoxin.5 Digoxin also has important parasympathetic effects, particularly on the atrioventricular node.Hemodynamic EffectsDigitalis administration does not alter cardiac output in normal subjects, although it does cause significant increase in contractility. This lack of effect on cardiac output is likely due to an increase in systemic vascular resistance produced by digitalis that prevents the increase in contractility from translating into increased cardiac output.In patients with reduced systolic function and abnormal central hemodynamics who are in sinus rhythm, digoxin improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure while increasing cardiac output both at rest and during exercise. In HF, however, when hemodynamics are normalized first with diuretics and vasodilators, no further improvement in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or cardiac output is achieved after the acute administration of digoxin.6,7 The improvement in hemodynamics is sustained during chronic therapy.8Neurohormonal EffectsThe beneficial effects of digoxin on HF may be related in part to its modulating effects on neurohormonal abnormalities9: (1) Baroreceptor function: In low-output HF models, there is attenuation of carotid sinus baroreceptor discharge sensitivity. Administration of digoxin produces improvement in baroreceptor function that results in decreased activation of the sympathetic nervous system.5(2) Vagomimetic effect: Digoxin at therapeutic doses increases vagal tone (ie, decreases sinoatrial and atrioventricular conduction).10(3) Sympathoinhibitory effects: Digoxin has a direct sympathoinhibitory effect that does not appear to be related to an increase in the cardiac output produced by the drug. Although dobutamine and digoxin cause a similar increase in cardiac output in HF, only the latter decreases sympathetic nerve discharge.11(4) Circulating neurohormones: Therapeutic doses of digoxin decrease the serum norepinephrine concentrations and plasma renin activity.12(5) Dose related effects on neurohormones: A low dose of digoxin that has no effect on cardiac contractility or hemodynamics decreases cardiac norepinephrine spillover in severe HF.13 Increasing the dose within therapeutic range continues to improve the hemodynamics without further improvement of the neurohormonal profile.14(6) Antifibrotic effects: Patients with HF often have chronically high levels of aldosterone. Aldosterone stimulation of the sodium pump may lead to perivascular fibrosis that experimentally may be prevented by digoxin administration.15Electrophysiological EffectsTherapeutic doses of digoxin have a predominantly parasympathomimetic action on atrial myocardium, slowing conduction, and prolonging atrioventricular node refractory period. There are practically no electrophysiological effects on the Purkinje system. Although digoxin intoxication may produce lethal arrhythmias, therapeutic doses do not appear to increase arrhythmias in the absence of ischemia.16PharmacokineticsSixty to 80 percent of digoxin is absorbed from the tablets and over 90% from the capsules in 1 to 3 hours. This is followed by a 6- to 8-hour tissue distribution phase. In some patients, oral digoxin is partial inactivated by colonic bacteria; as a result, certain antibiotics may increase digoxin absorption. Only 16% of the absorbed digoxin is metabolized, whereas the rest is excreted unchanged in the urine. The half-life of digoxin is 36 to 48 hours in patients with normal renal function and 3.5 to 5 days in anuric patients. Digoxin is not removed by exchange transfusions or peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, or during cardiopulmonary bypass. In patients with normal renal function, an oral daily maintenance dose without a loading dose results in a steady-state blood concentration in approximately 7 days.Clinical EffectsApproximately 1.7 million patients in the United States are currently receiving digoxin for HF and/or atrial fibrillation. It is not clear whether the beneficial effects of digoxin seen in patients with HF and reduced systolic function are related to its hemodynamic effects, neurohormonal effects, or both. The rapidity by which patients deteriorate when digoxin is discontinued suggests, however, that its hemodynamic effects are important.Heart Failure With Systolic DysfunctionWithdrawal Trials Assessing Clinical EffectsIn several studies, digoxin withdrawal in patients with systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm was associated with a decrease in LVEF and exercise tolerance and an increase in heart rate, diastolic pressure, body weight and/or cardiac size on chest x-ray17–20 (Table 1). TABLE 1. Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Digoxin in Patients With Heart FailureTrialStudy DesignDuration, wkNo. PatientsNYHA Functional ClassEF, %SDC, ng/mLConcomitant Therapy, %↑ExTWorsening of HF, %Mortality, %DVDigPDigPCO indicates cross-over; D, diuretics; Dig, digoxin; EF, ejection fraction;↑ ExT, significant increase in exercise time; FS, fractional shortening on echocardiogram; HF, heart failure; NA, not available; NYHA, New York Heart Association; P, placebo; PA, parallel; SDC, serum digoxin concentration; DIMT, Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial; PROVED, the Prospective Randomized study Of Ventricular failure and the Efficacy of Digoxin; RADIANCE, Randomized Assessment of the effect of Digoxin on Inhibitors of the ANgiotensin-Converting Enzyme study; and V, vasodilator.*P<0.05.†Trend.‡Hospitalization for heart failure.§Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.Reprinted with permission from Eichhorn and Gheorghiade,30 with permission from Elsevier.Dobbs et al, 1977CO646NANA1.3600NA034*00Lee et al, 1982CO935II to III291.158824NA2456*00Fleg et al, 1982CO1240II to III23 (FS)1.47717NS101000Taggart et al, 1983CO1222I to IINA0.89636NA101905Captopril-Digoxin, 1988PA24196II to III250.7860No1529*76Guyatt et al, 1988CO728II to III19 (FS)1.379055Yes†035*00German/Austrian Xamoterol, 1988PA12213I to IIINA0.92510No4601Haerer et al, 1988PA328I to III25 (FS)1.800Yes*143600Milrinone Multicenter Trial, 1989PA12111II to III251.210048Yes1547*56Pugh et al, 1989CO844NA27 (FS)1.4759NA725*00Fleg et al, 1991CO410II to III331.410050NS0000Drexler et al, 1992PA104133II to III50NA98Yes†9922.5DIMT, 1993PA26108II to III280.94056Yes*0446PROVED, 1993PA1288II to III271.21000Yes*1939*24RADIANCE, 1993PA12178II to III261.2100100§Yes*725*3.51DIG Trial, 1997PA1486800I to IV290.98295§NA2534‡3535Effects on MortalityThe Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG)21 was a large simple trial that assessed all-cause mortality in patients in sinus rhythm with HF and decreased systolic function while receiving diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Approximately 50% of patients were not taking digoxin before randomization. In this trial, although digoxin had neutral effects on mortality, hospitalizations related to worsening HF were significantly reduced.21 Patients with severe symptoms, cardiomegaly, or very low LVEF on chest x-ray appeared to derive a significant benefit from digoxin, reflected by a decrease in total mortality and total hospitalizations (Table 2). TABLE 2. Subgroup Analyses of Mortality and Hospitalization During the First 2 Years After Randomization in the Digitalis Investigation TrialVariableNo. PatientsRisk of All-Cause Mortality or All-Cause HospitalizationRisk of Heart Failure-Related Mortality or Heart Failure-Related Hospitalization*PlaceboDigoxinRR (95% CI)PlaceboDigoxinRR (95% CI)RR indicates relative risk; CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; and NYHA FC, New York Heart Association Functional Class.*No. of patients with an event during the first 2 years per 1000 randomized patients.†DIG Ancillary Study.Reprinted with permission from Eichhorn and Gheorghiade,30 with permission from Elsevier.All patients (EF ≤0.45)68016045930.94 (0.88 to 1.00)2942170.69 (0.63 to 0.76)NYHA FC I/II45715485410.96 (0.89 to 1.04)2421780.70 (0.62 to 0.80)EF 0.25 to 0.4545435685710.99 (0.91 to 1.07)2441900.74 (0.66 to 0.84)Cardiothoracic ration on chest x-ray ≤0.5544555615690.98 (0.91 to 1.06)2391800.71 (0.63 to 0.81)NYHA FC III/IV22247196960.88 (0.80 to 0.97)4022950.65 (0.57 to 0.75)EF 0.5523466876500.55 (0.77 to 0.94)3982870.65 (0.57 to 0.75)EF≥0.45†9875715851.04 (0.88 to 1.23)1791360.72 (0.53 to 0.99)Diastolic Heart FailureIt is estimated that between 30% and 40% of patients with HF have relatively preserved systolic function or diastolic HF. In the DIG ancillary study,21 which enrolled nearly 1000 patients with diastolic HF, digoxin therapy was associated with a reduction in worsening HF but not mortality.Atrial FibrillationRate ControlBecause it can be taken once daily, is well tolerated, is inexpensive, and allows for measurement of plasma concentration if intoxication is suspected, digoxin remains an important drug for rate control in atrial fibrillation. However, in patients with increased sympathetic activity (eg, during exercise, decompensated HF, or infusion of dopamine or dobutamine), digoxin alone is unlikely to adequately control ventricular response unless large toxic doses are used.22 Although beta-blockers alone or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers alone have been advocated to control rate, usually the doses used had been high and caused significant side effects.23 The most likely combination to effectively control ventricular response in patients with atrial fibrillation and HF due to systolic dysfunction is a combination of digoxin and beta-blockers.24 Diltiazem or verapamil may be used for rate control with digoxin in patients with diastolic HF.Rhythm ControlDigoxin does not appear to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation without HF.25 In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, digoxin may reduce the frequency of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Digoxin should not be used in multifocal atrial tachycardia.Digoxin Dose/ Serum ConcentrationLow dose digoxin, resulting in a serum concentration (SDC) less than 1 ng/mL, has beneficial hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and clinical effects.26,27 Retrospective analysis of the DIG trial suggests that digoxin has a bidirectional effect, with a possible decrease in mortality when SDC is 0.5 to 0.9 ng/mL and an increase in mortality when SDC is above 1 ng/mL.28 Additional data from the DIG trial suggest that in patients with normal renal function who are not receiving medications that tend to increase SDC, a dose of 0.125 mg daily will result in SDC of approximately 0.8 ng/mL.21 Determination of SDC is not routinely necessary because it is predictable based on dose used. Only the post-distribution phase (12 to 24 hours after the dose) is useful to evaluate whether the dose of digoxin is acceptable.29Drug InteractionsDrugs concomitantly used with digoxin may affect its absorption, clearance, volume of distribution, or potentiation of its effects.30 Quinidine, verapamil, and amiodarone, among others, may significantly increase the SDC, and the digoxin dose should be reduced accordingly. Non-potassium sparing diuretics could be a major contributing factor to digoxin toxicity by causing hypokalemia.Digoxin IntoxicationAlthough digoxin intoxication used to be very common and associated with a high mortality, in recent years its prevalence has substantially decreased to less than 1%. Digoxin intoxication can cause arrhythmias and gastrointestinal and/or central nervous system abnormalities. The intoxication is not only dose-dependent but is also related to concurrent medications (non-potassium sparing diuretics) or conditions (renal insufficiency, ischemia, cardiac amyloidosis). A distinction should be made between a digoxin effect (sagging of the ST segments), digoxin excess (second degree atrioventricular block), digoxin intoxication (ventricular arrhythmias), and digoxin overdose (ventricular arrhythmias and severe hyperkalemia). In patients with intoxication and life-threatening arrhythmias or ingestion of a very large dose of digoxin resulting in a very high SDC, purified anti-digoxin FAB fragments from digoxin-specific antisera is usually administered with excellent results.31Special Considerations in the Use of DigoxinWomenMore than 50% of patients with HF are women. Retrospective analysis of the DIG trial suggested that digoxin might increase mortality in women.32 One concern about this conclusion is that SDC was not taken into account in this investigation,33 particularly when detailed analysis by the same authors suggested a relationship between SDC and outcomes in men.28 For now it is prudent to administer low doses of digoxin only in women with HF with very low LVEF and symptoms that occur with minimal exertion or at rest despite standard therapy.ElderlyBecause the elderly have a lower lean body mass and decreased renal function, digoxin should be used with caution. Digoxin is not likely to benefit elderly patients with diastolic HF unless they have atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response.34Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial ischemia in itself may cause inhibition of sodium pump, rendering myocardial tissue more sensitive to the arrhythmogenic effects of digitalis, even at lower SDC.35 Digoxin should be used in very low doses or not used at all in patients with acute coronary syndromes or significant ischemia.Advanced Heart FailureDigoxin may be particularly beneficial in patients with a LVEF less than 25%, symptoms with minimal exertion or at rest, and/or cardiomegaly on chest x-ray.21Acute Heart Failure SyndromeIn patients hospitalized for HF and systolic dysfunction, oral or intravenous administration of digoxin will increase the cardiac output, reduce pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and heart rate, and improve the neurohormonal profile.7 These beneficial hemodynamic effects have not been correlated with symptoms. Rapid intravenous administration of digoxin as a bolus may result in worsening HF through an early predominant vasoconstrictor effect.36Isolated Right-Sided Heart FailureDigoxin increases cardiac output and decreases norepinephrine concentration in patients with right ventricular failure due to cor pulmonale.37 There are no clinical data supporting the use of digoxin for isolated right-sided failure.Digoxin in the Multidrug Approach of Heart FailureDiureticsBecause digoxin affects potassium homeostasis, combination therapy with non-potassium sparing diuretics may induce serious arrhythmias. In these patients, high normal concentration of potassium and magnesium should be maintained. The arrhythmogenic effects of digoxin may be lessened by potassium sparing diuretics.Beta-BlockersAlthough chronic beta-blocker therapy is highly beneficial in HF, during its initiation, hemodynamic deterioration may occur, particularly in patients with very severe HF.38 Because digoxin is known to rapidly improve hemodynamics in HF, theoretically it may prevent this transient deterioration. The effect may be particularly important in hospitalized patients with HF who already have very abnormal hemodynamics. Beta-blocker use may also increase the safety of digoxin therapy, because experimentally they can abolish the digoxin-induced life-threatening arrhythmias in ischemic HF.39Precautions in Using DigoxinDigoxin should not be used in patients with sinoatrial or second/third degree atrioventricular block unless a functioning pacemaker is present. Digoxin should also not be used in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy, and amyloid heart disease. It should be used with caution in patients with impaired renal function, electrolyte disorders, thyroid disorders, and acute coronary syndromes. It is preferable to discontinue digoxin a few days before electrical cardioversion. If cardioversion is performed in patients receiving digoxin, potassium levels should be corrected, and the lowest energy possible should be used.Indications for Digoxin TherapyDigoxin is indicated in patients with HF and impaired systolic function who are in sinus rhythm and continue to have signs and symptoms despite standard therapy that includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers.40 Digoxin may be particularly useful in patients with severe symptoms, LVEF less than 25%, or cardiomegaly on chest x-ray. In patients with diastolic HF, digoxin should be used for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response and/or severe symptoms not responding after optimization of all other therapies. Digoxin is indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation, with or without HF, and a rapid ventricular response. Irrespective of the indication, a low dose of 0.125 mg should be used. Digoxin should be avoided or used with extreme caution in the very elderly or in patients with severe conduction abnormalities, acute coronary syndromes, or renal failure.FootnotesCorrespondence to Mihai Gheorghiade, MD, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter 10-240, 201 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611-2908. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Withering W. An account of the foxglove and some of its medical uses, with practical remarks on dropsy, and other diseases. In Willins FA, Keys TE, eds. Classics of Cardiology. Volume I. New York, NY: Henry Schuman, Dover Publications; 1941:231–252.Google Scholar2 Smith TW, Antman EM, Friedman PL, et al. Digitalis glycosides: mechanisms and manifestations of toxicity: part I. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1984; 26: 495–530.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Smith TW, Antman EM, Friedman PL, et al. Digitalis glycosides: mechanisms and manifestations of toxicity: part II. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1984; 26: 413–458.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Schmidt TA, Allen PD, Colucci WS, et al. No adaptation to digitalization as evaluated by digitalis receptor (Na/K-ATPase) quantification in explanted hearts from donors without heart disease and from digitalized recipients with end-stage heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70: 110–114.Google Scholar5 Wang W, Chen JS, Zucker IH. Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure. Circulation. 1990; 81: 1959–1966.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Gheorghiade M, St. Clair J, St. Clair C, et al. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous digoxin in patients with severe heart failure initially treated with diuretics and vasodilators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 9: 849–857.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Gheorghiade M, Hall V, Lakier J, et al. Comparative hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of intravenous captopril and digoxin and their combinations in patients with severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 134–142.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Arnold SB, Byrd RC, Meister W, et al. Long-term digitalis therapy improves left ventricular function in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303: 1443–1448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Gheorghiade M, Ferguson D. Digoxin: a neurohormonal modulator in heart failure? Circulation. 1991; 84: 2181–2186.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Krum H, Bigger JT, Goldsmith RL, et al. Effect of long-term digoxin therapy on autonomic function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 289–294.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Ferguson DW, Berg WJ, Sanders JS, et al. Sympathoinhibitory responses to digitalis glycosides in heart failure patients: direct evidence from sympathetic neural recordings. Circulation. 1989; 80: 65–77.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 van Veldhuisen DJ, Man in't Veld AJ, Dunselman PHJM, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled study of ibopamine and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: results of the Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial (DIMT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1564–1573.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Newton GE, Tong JH, Schofield AM, et al. Digoxin reduces cardiac sympathetic activity in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28: 155–161.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Gheorghiade M, Hall VB, Jacobsen G, et al. Effects of increasing maintenance dose of digoxin on left ventricular function and neurohormones in patients with chronic heart failure treated with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1801–1807.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Sundaram S, Zampino M, Gheorghiade M. Is there still a place for digoxin in heart failure? In: van Veldhuisen DJ, Pitt B, eds. Focus on Cardiovascular Diseases: Chronic Heart Failure. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benecke NI; 2002:219–254.Google Scholar16 Lown B, Graboys TB, Podrid PJ, et al. Effect of a digitalis drug on ventricular premature beats. N Engl J Med. 1977; 296: 301–306.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Captopril-Digoxin Multicenter Research Group. Comparative effects of therapy with captopril and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. JAMA. 1988; 259: 539–544.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Kostuk W, et al. A comparison of oral milrinone, digoxin, and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 677–683.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Packer M, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, et al. Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1–7.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Uretsky BF, Young JB, Shahidi FE, et al. Randomized study assessing the effect of digoxin withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure: results of the PROVED trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 955–962.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 525–533.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Redfors A. The effect of different digoxin doses on subjective symptoms and physical working capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acta Med Scand. 1971; 190: 307–320.MedlineGoogle Scholar23 Zarowitz BJ, Gheorghiade M. Optimal heart rate control for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: are pharmacologic choices truly changing? Am Heart J. 1992; 123: 1401–1403.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Khand AU, Rankin AC, Martin W, et al. Carvedilol alone or in combination with digoxin for the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1944–1951.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25 Falk RH, Knowlton AA, Bernard SA, et al. Digoxin for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a randomized, double-blinded trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 106: 503–506.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26 Slatton ML, Irani WN, Hall SA, et al. Does digoxin provide additional hemodynamic and autonomic benefit at higher doses in patients with mild to moderate heart failure and normal sinus rhythm? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1206–1213.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Adams KF Jr, Gheorghiade M, Uretsky BF, et al. Clinical benefits of low serum digoxin concentrations in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 946–953.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Wang Y, et al. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2003; 289: 871–878.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Valdes R, Jortani S, Gheorghiade M. Standards of laboratory practice: cardiac drug monitoring. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 1096–1109.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30 Eichhorn EJ, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002; 44: 251–266.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Antman EM, Wenger TL, Butler VP Jr, et al. Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments: final report of a multicenter study. Circulation. 1990; 81: 1744–1752.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32 Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1403–1411.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33 Eichhorn EJ, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin: new perspective on an old drug. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1394–1395.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34 Rich MW, McSherry F, Williford WO et al. Effect of age on mortality, hospitalizations and response to digoxin in patients with heart failure: the DIG study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 806–813.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35 Beller GA, Conroy J, Smith TW. Ischemia-induced alterations in myocardial Na/K-ATPase and cardiac glycoside binding. J Clin Invest. 1976; 57: 341–350.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36 Cohn JN, Tristani FE, Khatri IM. Cardiac and peripheral vascular effects of digitalis in clinical cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 1969; 78: 318–330.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37 Rich S, Seidlitz M, Dodin E, et al. The short-term effects of digoxin in patients with right ventricular dysfunction from pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 1998; 114: 787–792.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38 Hall SA, Cigarroa CG, Marcoux L et al. Time course of improvement in left ventricular function, mass, and geometry in patients with congestive heart failure treated with beta-adrenergic blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1154–1161.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar39 Lynch JJ, Kitzen JM, Hoff PT, et al. Reduction in digitalis-associated post-infarction mortality with nadolol in conscious dogs. Am Heart J. 1988; 115: 67–76.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar40 HFSA Guidelines Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) practice guidelines. HFSA guidelines for management of patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction:pharmacological approaches. J Card Fail. 1999; 5: 357–382.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Gazzaniga G, Menichelli D, Scaglione F, Farcomeni A, Pani A and Pastori D (2023) Effect of digoxin on all-cause and
Referência(s)