Zoos and the rights of animals
1999; Wiley; Volume: 18; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/(sici)1098-2361(1999)18
ISSN1098-2361
Autores Tópico(s)Geographies of human-animal interactions
ResumoZoo BiologyVolume 18, Issue 5 p. 433-448 Commentary Zoos and the rights of animals Donald G. Lindburg, Corresponding Author Donald G. Lindburg [email protected] Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, CaliforniaZoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112Search for more papers by this author Donald G. Lindburg, Corresponding Author Donald G. Lindburg [email protected] Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, CaliforniaZoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 January 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:5 3.0.CO;2-UCitations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Bekoff M. 1995. Naturalizing and individualizing animal well-being and animal minds: an ethologist’s naiveté exposed? In: AN Rowan, editor. Wildlife conservation, zoos and animal protection. Philadelphia, PA: Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy. pp 63–115. Google Scholar Bostock S St C. 1993. Zoos and animal rights: the ethics of keeping animals. London, England: Routledge. 227 pp. 10.4324/9780203408810 Google Scholar Broida JP. 1998. Profiles of animal rights advocates. In: M Beckoff, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp 47–48. Google Scholar Callicott JB. 1980. Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environ Ethics 2: 311–324. 10.5840/enviroethics19802424 Google Scholar Callicott JB. 1986. On the intrinsic value of nonhuman species. In: BG Norton, editor. The preservaton of species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp 138–172. Google Scholar Callicott JB. 1989. In defense of the land ethic. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 325 pp. Google Scholar P Cavalieri, editors. 1993. The great ape project. Martin’s Press. New York, NY: St. 312 pp. Google Scholar Ehrenfeld D. 1991. Conservation and the rights of animals. Conserv Biol 5: 1–3. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00375.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Eudey A. 1995. To procure or not to procure. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 146–152. Google Scholar Finson S, Finson L. 1998. Animal rights movement. In: M Beckoff, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp 50–53. Google Scholar Fletcher J. 1966. Situation ethics. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press. 176 pp. Google Scholar Fox M. 1986. Laboratory animal husbandry: ethology, welfare, and experimental variables. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 267 pp. Google Scholar Geist V. 1992. Opening statement, panel discussion on “Wildlife conservation and animal rights: are they compatible?” In: Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. Wheeling, WV: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. pp 10–12. Google Scholar Gibbons Jr EF, Durrant BS, Demarest J. 1995. Conservation of endangered species in captivity: an interdisciplinary approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 810 pp. Google Scholar KE Goodpaster, editors. 1979. Ethics and problems of the 21st century. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. 210 pp. Google Scholar Grandy JW. 1989. Captive breeding in zoos: destructive programs in need of change. Humane Soc News summer: 8–11. Google Scholar Hargrove EC. 1989. Foundations of environmental ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 229 pp. Google Scholar EC Hargrove, editor. 1992. The animal rights/environmental ethics debate. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 273 pp. Google Scholar Herzog HA. 1993. Animal rights and wrongs. Science 262: 1906–1908. 10.1126/science.262.5141.1906 PubMedGoogle Scholar Herzog HA. 1998. Sociology of the animal rights movement. In: M Beckoff, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp 53–54. Web of Science®Google Scholar Hutchins M. 1992. Panel organizer and moderator, “Wildlife conservation and animal rights: are they compatible? A panel discussion. ” In: Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. Wheeling, WV: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. pp 4–22. Google Scholar Hutchins M, Fascione N. 1991. Ethical issues facing modern zoos. In: Proceedings of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, Calgary, Canada, 1991. Philadelphia, PA: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. pp 56–64. Google Scholar Hutchins M, Wemmer C. 1987. Wildlife conservation and animal rights: are they compatible? In: MW Fox, editors. Advances in animal welfare science 1986–1987. Washington, DC: Humane Society of the United States. pp 111–137. 10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_10 Google Scholar Hutchins M, Wemmer C. 1991. In defense of captive breeding. Endangered Species Update 8: 5–6. Google Scholar Hutchins M, Dresser B, Wemmer C. 1995. Ethical considerations in zoo and aquarium research. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 253–276. Google Scholar Jamieson D. 1985. Against zoos. In: P Singer, editor. In defense of animals. New York, NY: Harper and Row. pp 108–117. Web of Science®Google Scholar Jamieson D. 1990. Rights, justice, and duties to provide assistance: a critique of Regan’s theory of rights. Ethics 100: 349–362. 10.1086/293181 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Jamieson D. 1995. Zoos revisited. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 52–66. Google Scholar Jamieson D. 1998. Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. Environ Values 7: 41–57. 10.3197/096327198129341465 Web of Science®Google Scholar Kean H. 1998. Animal rights: political and social change in Britain since 1800. London, England: Reaktion Books. 272 pp. Google Scholar Koontz F. 1995. Wild animal acquisition ethics for zoo biologists. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 127–145. Google Scholar Lacy RC. 1991. Zoos and the surplus problem: an alternate solution. Zoo Biol 10: 293–297. 10.1002/zoo.1430100403 Web of Science®Google Scholar Lacy RC. 1995. Culling surplus animals for population management. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 187–194. Web of Science®Google Scholar Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County almanac. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 226 pp. Google Scholar Lindburg DG. 1995. Preserving individuals versus conserving populations: is there a conflict? In: AN Rowan, editor. Wildlife conservation, zoos and animal protection. Philadelphia, PA: Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy. pp 152–164. Google Scholar Lindburg DG, Lindburg LL. 1995. Success breeds a quandry: to cull or not to cull. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 195–208. Google Scholar Livingston JA. 1994. Rogue primate: an exploration of human domestication. Toronto, Canada: Key Porter. 278 pp. Google Scholar Loftin R. 1995. Captive breeding of endangered species. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 164–180. Google Scholar Maple T, McManamon R, Stevens E. 1995. Defining the good zoo: animal care, maintenance, and welfare. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 219–234. Google Scholar McManamon R. 1993. The humane care of captive wild animals. In: ME Fowler, editor. Zoo and wild animal medicine: current therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. pp 61–63. Google Scholar Morey DF. 1994. The early evolution of the domestic dog. Am Sci 82: 336–347. Web of Science®Google Scholar Morrison AR. 1994. Animal rights and animal politics. Science 263: 1073–1074. 10.1126/science.263.5150.1073 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar BG Norton, editor. 1986. The preservation of species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 305 pp. Google Scholar Norton BG. 1987. Why preserve natural variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 281 pp. Google Scholar Norton BG. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 287 pp. Google Scholar Norton BG. 1995. A broader look at animal stewardship. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 102–121. Google Scholar BG Norton, editors. 1995. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 330 pp. Google Scholar Noske B. 1993. Great apes as anthropological subjects—deconstructing anthropocentrism. In: P Cavalieri, editors. The great ape project. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. pp 258–268. Google Scholar Noske B. 1998. Animals as subjects-of-a-group-life. In: M Beckoff, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp 69–70. Google Scholar Plous S. 1991. An attitude survey of animal rights activists. Psychol Sci 2: 194–196. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Regan T. 1983. The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press. 425 pp. Google Scholar Regan T. 1992. Opening statement, panel discussion on “Wildlife conservation and animal rights: are they compatible?” In: Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. Wheeling, WV: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. pp 5–7. Google Scholar Regan T. 1993. The great ape project. In: P Cavalieri, editors. Martin’s Press. New York, NY: St. pp 194–205. Google Scholar Regan T. 1995. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 38–51. Google Scholar Rolston III H. 1983. Values gone wild. Inquiry 26: 181–207. 10.1080/00201748308601992 Web of Science®Google Scholar Rolston III H. 1986. Philosophy gone wild: essays in environmental ethics. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. 269 pp. Google Scholar Rowan AN. 1992. Opening statement, panel discussion on “Wildlife conservation and animal rights: are they compatible?” In: Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. Wheeling, WV: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. pp 12–15. Google Scholar DJ Shepherdson, editors. 1998. Second nature: environmental enrichment for captive animals. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 350 pp. Google Scholar Singer P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York, NY: Avon Books. 320 pp. Google Scholar P Singer, editors. 1976. Animal rights and human obligations. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 250 pp. Google Scholar Soulé ME, Gilpin M, Conway W, Foose T. 1986. The millennium ark: how long a voyage, how many staterooms, how many passengers? Zoo Biol 5: 101–113. 10.1002/zoo.1430050205 Web of Science®Google Scholar Strand R, Strand P. 1993. The hijacking of the humane movement. Wilsonville, OR: Doral. 174 pp. Google Scholar Toone WD, Wallace MP. 1994. The extinction in the wild and reintroduction of the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus). In: PJS Olney, editors. Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. London, England: Chapman and Hall. pp 411–419. 10.1007/978-94-011-0721-1_23 Google Scholar Varner GE. 1994. The prospects for consensus and convergence in the animal rights debate. Hastings Center Rep 24;1: 24–28.Medline 10.2307/3562383 Web of Science®Google Scholar Varner GE, Monroe MC. 1991. Ethical perspectives on captive breeding: is it for the birds? Endangered Species Update 8: 27–29. Google Scholar Vrijenhoek R. 1995. Natural processes, individuals, and units of conservation. In: BG Norton, editors. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 74–92. Google Scholar Zak S. 1989. Ethics and animals. Atlantic Monthly March: 69–74. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume18, Issue51999Pages 433-448 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)