Tissue Structure and Ventricular Wall Mechanics
2008; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 118; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circulationaha.108.797399
ISSN1524-4539
Autores Tópico(s)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 118, No. 7Tissue Structure and Ventricular Wall Mechanics Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBTissue Structure and Ventricular Wall Mechanics James W. Covell James W. CovellJames W. Covell From the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif. Originally published12 Aug 2008https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.797399Circulation. 2008;118:699–701Considering that the left ventricle is a thick-walled body that maintains its volume while reducing intracavitary volume by two thirds, it should come as no surprise that the ventricular wall thickens during systole and that there is a transmural gradient in wall thickening. Wall thickening on the inner wall may exceed values of 40% measured by a variety of techniques. These values far exceed the 8% diameter increase estimated by simple conservation of volume in an individual myocyte shortening by 15%. Physiologists have long understood that changes in the macrostructure of the wall (cellular rearrangement) must account for the difference between wall thickening and estimates of cell thickening.1 Reorientation of laminae or sheets of muscle cells has been proposed to account for this change in macrostructure.2,3 The dichotomy between wall thickening and estimated change in myocyte diameter has been elegantly framed by Cheng et al4 in this issue of Circulation, which shows nearly identical transmural fiber shortening at 2 ventricular sites, with very different wall thickening in the ovine ventricle. Similar data have been shown for other species.5,6 However, the data presented by Cheng et al4 provide strong evidence that the cellular rearrangements are different at the 2 sites. Cheng et al4 used a method developed by Costa et al5 in which regional histological measurements of muscle fiber and sheet orientations were used to resolve 3-dimensional transmural strain distributions obtained from implanted arrays of radiopaque markers into components. These components were defined by local axes that are parallel to the fibers, transverse to the fibers in the sheet plane, and transverse to the sheets. Wall thickening then can be resolved into components of sheet motion. Costa et al5 and Takayama et al6 reported that the interlaminar shear-strain term (Esn) and the sheet extension term (Ess) were chiefly responsible for the additional wall thickening not explained by myofiber shortening, and that this result was similar at 2 sites within the dog left ventricle. Cheng et al4 have shown that Esn is similar at 2 sites but provide evidence for very different roles for Ess and the sheet-thickening term (Enn) at the 2 sites in the ovine heart. Cheng et al4 found that on the subendocardium, where most wall thickening is generated, the most significant differences between the 2 regions was in sheet thickening (Enn) and shearing within the sheet planes rather than across them (Efs), and a loss of sheet extension (Ess). However, in the dog heart, Ess is a major component of wall thickening at both sites measured. These data, taken with the differences in the role of sheet thickening and sheet extension and compared with studies in the dog, further support the concept proposed by Cheng et al4 that there are large regional and species-specific differences in the mechanism by which fiber shortening is amplified to produce wall thickening. As pointed out by Cheng et al,4 these differences may be important in the response of the ventricular wall to disease. For example, fibrosis that primarily affects connections between myocytes might be expected to preferentially affect deformation within myocardial laminae (Efs, Ess, Enn).Article p 713The structure of the ventricular wall is complex. Myofibers course in the epicardial tangent plane with only a small imbrication angle. Fiber direction changes approximately 100° transmurally, and fiber direction over the whole left ventricle forms a helical wrap.7 The work of LeGrice et al shows that fibers are arranged in branching sheets 4 to 6 cells thick,8 and Spotnitz et al demonstrated that acute changes in this laminar structure occur as diastolic volume is expanded.2 However, directly relating local deformation to the underlying structure is difficult and requires assumptions at several levels. Transmural deformation in these studies has been measured by biplane radiography of markers placed transmurally or tagged magnetic resonance images. The former method determines deformation at several transmural levels in an approximately 25 mm2 area that is assumed to homogeneous in the epicardial tangent plane. Histological measurements usually examine <1 mm2 of tissue. Thus the spatial scale associated with the deformation calculation is an order of magnitude greater than the area of tissue usually sampled histologically, and both the structure and deformation are assumed to be uniform over the area of tissue in which deformation is measured. As pointed out by Cheng et al,4 the histological approach to determining the configuration of myocardial laminae is also important. Gerneke et al have used plastic imbedding of tissue blocks with detailed confocal imaging that allows 3-dimensional reconstruction of the laminar architecture as well as the associated collagen matrix.9 Although it has clear advantages, this approach is currently too labor intensive for studies on the relationship between deformation and structure, and as discussed below, there are no current methods for relating structure to function at this level of resolution. Costa et al5 used an approach termed indirect by Harrington et al10 that reconstructed sheet-angle measurements from 3 sections. This approach has the advantage that it can be used on small hearts and it gives similar results to the direct approach for obtaining predominant angle.5,6,11 However, it has several disadvantages. First, sheets are often hard to detect if the section is parallel to the sheet direction, and perhaps more importantly, one must assume a single predominant sheet angle in each section to reconstruct the sheet angle from the 3 sections. This eliminates the possibility of examining sheet-angle variance. Several years ago, John Criscione devised an approach in which sections perpendicular to the fiber direction were taken from 1-mm-thick transmural blocks.10–12 Harrington et al,10 Cheng et al,4 and Ashikaga et al11 used frozen sections that dry somewhat on the slide, exposing cleavage planes. Zimmerman et al12 used plastic imbedding that produces less distortion. The Figure (left) shows 2 regions of interest of an area approximately 0.5 to 1 mm2 that were obtained from frozen sections of 1-mm-thick blocks of dog myocardium using the Criscione method. Angle measurements were made using the automated method of Karlon et al.13 The Figure (right) shows the distributions of sheet angle determined from 2 to 4 regions of interest in several sections in each 1-mm-thick tissue block. Published sections obtained with this technique, such as the ones in the Figure, appear to demonstrate substantial variance.10,12 Variance is greater near the endocardium, and in this example, there are 2 separate endocardial distributions. To date, investigators have not included the effects that this variance in structure may have on transmural function. Computational models can be used to integrate the contributions of different sheets to the overall tissue stress and deformation. These basic models suggest that the mean sheet angle may be a good approximation to the distribution in areas of 1 sheet population; however, the models predict that the mean or predominant angle is a poor approximation when 2 sheet populations exist. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Left, Frozen sections of myocardium sectioned perpendicular to the fiber direction. Right, Variance in sheet angle (see text).There is accumulating evidence that muscle-fiber direction does not change with cardiac hypertrophy14 or infarction;12,15 thus, it is tempting to speculate as Cheng et al4 did that pathological changes in macrostructure of the ventricular wall may influence sheet motion and, therefore, wall thickening. Fibrosis, myocyte loss, and dilation characterize the end-stage failing heart, and it is likely that changes in the laminar structure or other elements of the wall occur.16 Although small temporal changes in sheet angle were observed in the dilated volume-overload heart by Ashikaga et al,17 Zimmerman et al12 and Helm et al18 showed 10° to 15° changes in the border zone surrounding an infarct and in the dyssynchronous failing heart, respectively. Even small changes in the initial sheet angle may have large effects on wall thickening.3 Significant changes in sheet motion that affect wall thickening can occur without changes in initial angle.19 Moreover, it seems likely that such factors as sheet-angle dispersion, the length and thickness of sheets, as well as factors such as nature and location of collagen that may affect motion between sheets are likely to change with disease.In summary, the study by Cheng et al4 clearly illustrates the importance of the regional structure of the ventricular wall in amplifying fiber shortening to produce wall thickening. Although this approach has the potential to provide insight into the role of pathological changes in tissue structure on regional function of the ventricular wall, advances in techniques to determine the 3-dimensional structure of the wall as well as new approaches to determine their deformation likely will be necessary before these interesting insights can be applied to the understanding of diseases that affect the ventricular wall.The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.The author wishes to thank Ben Coppola, Jeff Omens, and Andrew McCulloch for data on sheet variance, initial modeling approaches to sheet angle variance, and for many stimulating discussions on relating variance in tissue structure to the local mechanics.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to James W. Covell, MD, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0613. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Feneis H. Das gefüge des herzmuskels bei systole und diastole. Morphologisches Jahrbuch. 1943; 89: 371–406.Google Scholar2 Spotnitz HM, Spotnitz WD, Cottrell TS, Spiro D, Sonnenblick EH. Cellular basis for volume related wall thickness changes in the rat left ventricle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1974; 6: 317–331.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 LeGrice IJ, Takayama Y, Covell JW. Transverse shear along myocardial cleavage planes provides a mechanism for normal systolic wall thickening. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 182–193.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Cheng A, Nguyen TC, Malinowski M, Daughters GT, Miller DC, Ingels NB Jr. Heterogeneity of left ventricular wall thickening mechanisms. Circulation. 2008; 118: 713–721.LinkGoogle Scholar5 Costa KD, Takayama Y, McCulloch AD, Covell JW. Laminar fiber architecture and three-dimensional systolic mechanics in canine ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1999; 276: H595–H607.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Takayama Y, Costa KD, Covell JW. Contribution of laminar myofiber architecture to load dependent changes in the mechanics of the left ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H1510–H1520.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH. Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ Res. 1969; 24: 339–347.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Chai LZ, Edgar SG, Gavin JB, Hunter PJ. Laminar structure of the heart: ventricular myocyte arrangement and connective tissue architecture in the dog. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1995; 269: H571–H582.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Gerneke DA, Sands GB, Ganesalingam R, Joshi P, Caldwell BJ, Smaill BH, Legrice IJ. Surface imaging microscopy using an ultramiller for large volume 3D reconstruction of wax- and resin-embedded tissues. Microsc Res Tech. 2007; 70: 886–894.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Harrington KB, Rodriguez F, Cheng A, Langer F, Ashikaga H, Daughters GT, Criscione JC, Ingels NB, Miller DC. Direct measurement of transmural laminar architecture in the anterolateral wall of the ovine left ventricle: new implications for wall thickening mechanics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H1324–H1330.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Ashikaga H, Criscione JC, Omens JH, Covell JW, Ingels NB Jr. Transmural left ventricular mechanics underlying torsional recoil during relaxation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 286: H640–H647.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Zimmerman SD, Criscione J, Covell JW. Remodeling in myocardium adjacent to an infarction in the pig left ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H2697–H2704.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Karlon WJ, Covell JW, McCulloch AD, Hunter JJ, Omens JH. Automated measurement of myofiber disarray in transgenic mice with ventricular expression of ras. Anat Rec. 1998; 252: 620–625.Google Scholar14 Carew TE, Covell JW. Fiber orientation in the hypertrophied canine left ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1979; 236: H487–493.MedlineGoogle Scholar15 Chen J, Song SK, Liu W, McLean M, Allen JS, Tan J, Wickline SA, Yu X. Remodeling of cardiac fiber structure after infarction in rats quantified with diffusion tensor MRI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285: H946–H954.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Ashikaga H, Coppola BA, Yamazaki KG, Villarreal FJ, Omens JH, Covell JW. Changes in regional myocardial volume during the cardiac cycle: implications for transmural blood flow and cardiac structure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (May 30, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart. 00107.2008.Google Scholar17 Ashikaga H, Omens JH, Covell JW. Time-dependent remodeling of transmural architecture underlying abnormal ventricular geometry in chronic volume overload heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H1994–H2002.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Helm PA, Younes L, Beg MF, Ennis DB, Leclercq C, Faris OP, McVeigh E, Kass D, Miller MI, Winslow RL. Evidence of structural remodeling in the dyssynchronous failing heart. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 125–132.LinkGoogle Scholar19 Ashikaga H, Covell JW, Omens JH. Diastolic dysfunction in volume-overload hypertrophy is associated with abnormal shearing of myolaminar planes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H2603–H2610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Gao L, Ma L, Yin X, Luo Y, Yang H and Zhang B (2020) Nano‐ and Microfabrication for Engineering Native‐Like Muscle Tissues, Small Methods, 10.1002/smtd.201900669, 4:3, (1900669), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2020. Li K, Ogden R and Holzapfel G (2017) An exponential constitutive model excluding fibres under compression: Application to extension–inflation of a residually stressed carotid artery, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 10.1177/1081286517712077, 23:8, (1206-1224), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Li K, Ogden R and Holzapfel G (2018) A discrete fibre dispersion method for excluding fibres under compression in the modelling of fibrous tissues, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10.1098/rsif.2017.0766, 15:138, (20170766), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Li K, Ogden R and Holzapfel G (2018) Modeling fibrous biological tissues with a general invariant that excludes compressed fibers, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.005, 110, (38-53), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Holzapfel G and Ogden R (2017) Comparison of two model frameworks for fiber dispersion in the elasticity of soft biological tissues, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.07.005, 66, (193-200), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017. Minatoguchi S, Kawasaki M, Tanaka R, Yoshizane T, Ono K, Saeki M, Nagaya M, Sato H, Nishigaki K, Noda T, Zile M and Minatoguchi S (2017) Evaluation of systolic and diastolic properties of hypertensive heart failure using speckle-tracking echocardiography with high volume rates, Heart and Vessels, 10.1007/s00380-017-0995-2, 32:10, (1202-1213), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017. Schouver E, Moceri P, Doyen D, Tieulie N, Queyrel V, Baudouy D, Cerboni P, Gibelin P, Leroy S, Fuzibet J and Ferrari E (2017) Early detection of cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography, International Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.073, 227, (711-716), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Carruth E, McCulloch A and Omens J (2016) Transmural gradients of myocardial structure and mechanics: Implications for fiber stress and strain in pressure overload, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.11.004, 122:3, (215-226), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016. Gültekin O, Sommer G and Holzapfel G (2016) An orthotropic viscoelastic model for the passive myocardium: continuum basis and numerical treatment, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 10.1080/10255842.2016.1176155, 19:15, (1647-1664), Online publication date: 17-Nov-2016. Washio T, Yoneda K, Okada J, Kariya T, Sugiura S and Hisada T (2015) Ventricular fiber optimization utilizing the branching structure, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 10.1002/cnm.2753, 32:7, (e02753), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Li K, Ogden R and Holzapfel G (2016) Computational method for excluding fibers under compression in modeling soft fibrous solids, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.11.003, 57, (178-193), Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Di Lisi D, Leggio G, Vitale G, Arrotti S, Iacona R, Inciardi R, Nobile D, Bonura F, Novo G, Russo A and Novo S (2016) Chemotherapy cardiotoxicity, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000232, 17:4, (270-275), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Colquitt J and Pignatelli R (2016) Strain Imaging: The Emergence of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography into Clinical Pediatric Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease, 10.1111/chd.12334, 11:2, (199-207), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016. Bokeriya O, Averina I, Potlovskii K, Glushko L, Mironenko M, Donakanyan S, Satyukova A, Mishchenko A and Bokeriya L (2015) Experimental Study of Kinematic Activity of Left Ventricular Myocardium, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 10.1007/s10517-015-3081-8, 159:6, (805-808), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Santoro A, Alvino F, Antonelli G, Cameli M, Bertini M, Molle R and Mondillo S (2014) Left Ventricular Strain Modifications after Maximal Exercise in Athletes: A Speckle Tracking Study, Echocardiography, 10.1111/echo.12791, 32:6, (920-927), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015. Holzapfel G, Niestrawska J, Ogden R, Reinisch A and Schriefl A (2015) Modelling non-symmetric collagen fibre dispersion in arterial walls, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10.1098/rsif.2015.0188, 12:106, (20150188), Online publication date: 1-May-2015. Huang B, Yao H and Huang H (2014) Left Ventricular Remodeling and Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Study, Echocardiography, 10.1111/echo.12515, 31:9, (1085-1094), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Eriksson T, Prassl A, Plank G and Holzapfel G (2013) Modeling the dispersion in electromechanically coupled myocardium, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 10.1002/cnm.2575, 29:11, (1267-1284), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013. Weng L, Liu Y, Zhou J, Guo X, Peng J, Hu X, Fang Q, Zhu W, Li H, Du B and Zhang S (2013) Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Systolic Asynchrony in Patients With Septic Shock and Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Shock, 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31829dcfef, 40:3, (175-181), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Delgado V and Ng C (2012) Assessment of left ventricular systolic function in aortic stenosis and prognostic implications, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 10.1093/ehjci/jes136, 13:10, (805-807), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012. Spethmann S, Dreger H, Schattke S, Riemekasten G, Borges A, Baumann G and Knebel F (2012) Two-dimensional speckle tracking of the left ventricle in patients with systemic sclerosis for an early detection of myocardial involvement, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 10.1093/ehjci/jes047, 13:10, (863-870), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012. Ammar K, Paterick T, Khandheria B, Jan M, Kramer C, Umland M, Tercius A, Baratta L and Tajik A (2012) Myocardial Mechanics: Understanding and Applying Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Clinical Practice, Echocardiography, 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01712.x, 29:7, (861-872), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012. Itoh A, Stephens E, Ennis D, Carlhall C, Bothe W, Nguyen T, Swanson J, Miller D and Ingels N (2012) Contribution of myocardium overlying the anterolateral papillary muscle to left ventricular deformation, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 10.1152/ajpheart.00687.2011, 302:1, (H180-H187), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012. Mor-Avi V, Lang R, Badano L, Belohlavek M, Cardim N, Derumeaux G, Galderisi M, Marwick T, Nagueh S, Sengupta P, Sicari R, Smiseth O, Smulevitz B, Takeuchi M, Thomas J, Vannan M, Voigt J and Zamorano J (2011) Current and Evolving Echocardiographic Techniques for the Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Mechanics: ASE/EAE Consensus Statement on Methodology and Indications Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, European Journal of Echocardiography, 10.1093/ejechocard/jer021, 12:3, (167-205), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011. Mor-Avi V, Lang R, Badano L, Belohlavek M, Cardim N, Derumeaux G, Galderisi M, Marwick T, Nagueh S, Sengupta P, Sicari R, Smiseth O, Smulevitz B, Takeuchi M, Thomas J, Vannan M, Voigt J and Zamorano J (2011) Current and Evolving Echocardiographic Techniques for the Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Mechanics: ASE/EAE Consensus Statement on Methodology and Indications, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015, 24:3, (277-313), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011. Karadag I, Bishop M, Hales P, Schneider J, Kohl P, Gavaghan D and Grau V (2011) Regionally Optimised Mathematical Models of Cardiac Myocyte Orientation in Rat Hearts Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, 10.1007/978-3-642-21028-0_36, (294-301), . Gherghiceanu M, Manole C and Popescu L (2010) TELOCYTES IN ENDOCARDIUM: Electron Microscope Evidence, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01133.x, 14:9, (2330-2334), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F, Nesser H, Khandheria B, Narula J and Sengupta P (2010) Assessment of Myocardial Mechanics Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.015, 23:4, (351-369), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. Washio T, Okada J, Sugiura S and Hisada T (2009) Large-scale integrated model is useful for understanding heart mechanisms and developments of medical therapy 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5335029, , (2347-2350) Sengupta P (2009) Left Ventricular Transmural Mechanics: Tracking Opportunities In-Depth, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.016, 22:9, (1022-1024), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009. August 12, 2008Vol 118, Issue 7 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.797399PMID: 18695201 Originally publishedAugust 12, 2008 KeywordsmyocardiumventriclesEditorialsPDF download Advertisement SubjectsHeart Failure
Referência(s)