Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Patient preferences in knee prostheses

2004; British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery; Volume: 86-B; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14991

2044-5377

James W. Pritchett,

Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

A total of 344 patients underwent bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) using a different prosthesis on each side. Four knee prostheses were used: anterior and posterior cruciate-retaining (ACL-PCL), posterior cruciate-retaining (PCL), medial or lateral pivot (MLP), and posterior cruciate-substituting (PS). All patients had good or excellent results. The range of movement, relief from pain, alignment, and stability did not vary among any of the prostheses. Forty-one of 46 patients (89%) preferred the ACL-PCL to the PS knee and 27 of 35 patients (77%) the MLP knee to the PS knee. Of the patients with an ACL-PCL knee on one side and a MLP on the other, an equal number preferred each type. The MLP knee was preferred to the PCL by 34 (79%) patients. PS and PCL knees were preferred equally. Patients with bilateral TKRs preferred retention of both their cruciate ligaments or substitution with a medial or lateral pivot prosthesis.