Artigo Revisado por pares

Paradigms of Chinese Politics: kicking society back out

2011; Routledge; Volume: 20; Issue: 70 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/10670564.2011.565181

ISSN

1469-9400

Autores

Bruce Gilley,

Tópico(s)

China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

Resumo

Abstract More than three decades of research since reforms were launched has significantly expanded our understanding of China's changing political landscape. In that period, new paradigmatic assumptions have been brought to bear on the study of China to challenge the traditional state-centered approach. Among these have been state–society, society-centered, historical, and globalized models. While such works have enriched our understanding of this dynamic polity, a close reading of them shows that the state-centered paradigm remains the most appropriate one for the study of China's politics. Brief consideration is given to the reasons for this and to how it might change. Notes *Bruce Gilley is an Assistant Professor of Political Science in the Mark O. Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. His research centers on questions of democracy, legitimacy, and global politics. His books include The Right to Rule (2009) and China's Democratic Future (2004). He can be reached by email at: gilleyb@pdx.edu. 1. Vivienne Shue, ‘Theory and irony in the study of contemporary China’, in The Reach of the State: Sketches of the Chinese Body Politic (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988), pp. 11–29, at pp. 2, 4, 13, 29. 2. Shaun Breslin, ‘Do leaders matter? Chinese politics, leadership transition and the 17th Party Congress’, Contemporary Politics 14(2), (2008), pp. 215–231, at p. 215. 3. Richard Baum and Alexei Shevchenko, ‘The “state of the state”’, in Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar, eds, The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 333–360, at p. 333. 4. Harry Harding, ‘The evolution of American scholarship on contemporary China’, in David L. Shambaugh, ed., American Studies of Contemporary China (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1993), pp. 3–40, at p. 30. 5. Lowell Dittmer and William Hurst, ‘Analysis in limbo: contemporary Chinese politics amid the maturation of reform’, Issues and Studies 39(1), (2003), pp. 11–48, at p. 12. 6. Maria Hsia Chang, Falun Gong: The End of Days (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004); David Ownby, Falun Gong and the Future of China (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008); Danny Schechter, Falun Gong's Challenge to China: Spiritual Practice or ‘Evil Cult’? (New York: Akashic Books, 2001). 7. Clemens Stubbe Østergaard, ‘Governance and the political challenge of the Falun Gong’, in Jude Howell, ed., Governance in China (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004), pp. 207–225, at p. 221. 8. Stephen Noakes, ‘Falun Gong ten years on’, Pacific Affairs 83(2), (2010), pp. 349–357, at p. 354. 9. Ronald H. Chilcote, Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search for a Paradigm (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981), p. 21. 10. John Gerring, Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), ch. 5. 11. Maria Heimer and Stig Thøgersen, Doing Fieldwork in China (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006); Allen Carlson, ed., Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and Field Strategies (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011). 12. Chun Lin, The Transformation of Chinese Socialism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006). 13. Chaohua Wang, One China, Many Paths (London and New York: Verso, 2003). 14. Xudong Zhang, Postsocialism and Cultural Politics: China in the Last Decade of the Twentieth Century (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008). 15. Jianjun Zhang, Marketization and Democracy in China (New York, NY: Routledge, 2008). 16. Sujian Guo, Post-Mao China: From Totalitarianism to Authoritarianism? (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000). 17. Kate Xiao Zhou, How the Farmers Changed China: Power of the People (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996). 18. Lynn T. White, Unstately Power (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998). 19. Howard Boorman, ‘The study of contemporary Chinese politics: some remarks on retarded development’, World Politics 12(4), (1960), pp. 585–599; A. M. Halpern, ‘Contemporary China as a problem for political science’, World Politics 15(3), (1963), pp. 361–376; Chalmers Johnson, ‘The role of social science in China scholarship’, World Politics 17(2), (1965), pp. 256–271; Richard Wilson, ‘Chinese studies in crisis’, World Politics 23(2), (1971), pp. 295–317; Edward Friedman and Mark Selden, America's Asia; Dissenting Essays on Asian–American Relations (New York: Vintage Books, 1971). 20. Harry Harding, ‘The study of Chinese politics: toward a third generation of scholarship’, World Politics 36(1), (1984), pp. 284–307; Elizabeth J. Perry, ‘Trends in the study of Chinese politics: state–society relations’, China Quarterly 139(3), (1994), pp. 704–713. 21. Baum and Shevchenko, ‘The “state of the state”’, p. 354. 22. Yongnian Zheng and Joseph Fewsmith, China's Opening Society: The Non-State Sector and Governance (Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2008); Reza Hasmath and Jennifer Hsu, China in an Era of Transition: Understanding Contemporary State and Society Actors (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008); Peter Ho and Richard L. Edmonds, China's Embedded Activism: Opportunities and Constraints of a Social Movement (Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2007). 23. Lily L. Tsai, Accountability without Democracy: Solidarity Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007). 24. Kevin J. O'Brien and Lianjiang Li, Rightful Resistance in Rural China (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006). 25. Anita Chan and Jonathan Unger, ‘China, corporatism, and the East Asian model’, Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, (January 1995); Jonathan Schwartz and Shawn Shieh, State and Society Responses to Social Welfare Needs in China: Serving the People (New York: Routledge, 2009). 26. Jane Duckett, The Entrepreneurial State in China: Real Estate and Commerce Departments in Reform Era Tianjin (London and New York: Routledge, 1998); Gordon White, Riding the Tiger: The Politics of Economic Reform in Post-Mao China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993); Jean Chun Oi, Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999); Jie Chen and Bruce J. Dickson, Allies of the State: China's Private Entrepreneurs and Democratic Change (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009); but see also the book by Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard being reviewed here. 27. Ssu-yu Teng and John King Fairbank, China's Response to the West; a Documentary Survey, 1839–1923 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954). 28. Hosea Ballou Morse, The International Relations of the Chinese Empire (London and New York [etc.]: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1910). 29. David Zweig, Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests and Global Linkages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002), pp. 261, 277. 30. Daniel Bell, China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008). 31. A class-based statement is Hill Gates, China's Motor: A Thousand Years of Petty Capitalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996). 32. Alexander Woodside, Lost Modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea, and the Hazards of World History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006). 33. Roy Bin Wong, China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997). 34. Elizabeth Perry, ‘Studying Chinese politics: farewell to revolution?’, China Journal 57(1), (2007), pp. 1–22, at p. 5. 35. Patricia Thornton, ‘Crisis and governance: Sars and the resilience of the Chinese body politic’, China Journal 61(1), (2009), pp. 23–48, at p. 26. 36. Bell, China's New Confucianism, p. 10. 37. Thornton, ‘Crisis and governance’, p. 24. 38. Jeffrey Haynes, Comparative Politics in a Globalizing World (Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2005), pp. 93–95. 39. Zweig, Internationalizing China, p. 48. 40. Tony Saich, Providing Public Goods in Transitional China (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008). 41. Shue, ‘Theory and irony in the study of contemporary China’, p. 27. 42. Vivienne Shue, ‘State power and social organization in China’, in Joel Migdal, Atul Kohli and Vivienne Shue, eds, State Power and Social Forces (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 65–88, at p. 85. 43. Vivienne Shue, ‘Rule as repertory and the compound essence of authority’, Modern China 34(1), (2008), pp. 141–151, at p. 148. 44. Jude Howell, ‘Reflections on the Chinese state’, Development & Change 37(2), (2006), pp. 273–297. 45. Kevin J. O'Brien, ‘Chinese People's Congresses and legislative embeddedness: understanding early organizational development’, Comparative Political Studies 27(1), (1994). 46. Xiaoguang Kang and Heng Han, ‘Graduated controls: the state–society relationship in contemporary China’, Modern China 34(1), (2008), pp. 36–55. 47. Ho and Edmonds, China's Embedded Activism. 48. Ownby, Falun Gong and the Future of China, pp. 15, 15, 19. 49. David S. G. Goodman, ‘Sixty years of the People's Republic: local perspectives on the evolution of the state in China’, Pacific Review 22(4), (2009), pp. 429–450, at pp. 443, 443, 439, 440. 50. Bruce J. Dickson, Wealth into Power: The Communist Party's Embrace of China's Private Sector (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 107. 51. Minzi Su, China's Rural Development Policy: Exploring the ‘New Socialist Countryside’ (Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, 2009), p. 3. 52. William Hurst, ‘Conceptual tools and the study of Chinese politics: moral economy and corporatism’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, 2002. 53. Edward Friedman, ‘State–society models’, unpublished manuscript, (2008). 54. Wu Zhang, Zhonghua Qiumi Fengyu Lu [The Story of Soccer Fans in China] (Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Ancient Books Press, 2007). 55. Susan Gross Solomon and H. Gordon Skilling, Pluralism in the Soviet Union: Essays in Honour of H. Gordon Skilling (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982). 56. Daniel Roy Kelliher, Peasant Power in China: The Era of Rural Reform, 1979–1989 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992). 57. Lowell Dittmer, ‘Approaches to the study of Chinese politics’, Issues and Studies 32(9), (1996), pp. 1–18, at p. 8. 58. White, Unstately Power, vol. 2, pp. 611–617. 59. Shaoguang Wang, ‘Changing models of China's policy agenda setting’, Modern China 34(1), (2008), pp. 56–87, at pp. 81, 75. 60. Ben Blanchard, ‘China province seeks dams despite environment fears’, Reuters News, (6 March 2008). 61. Andrew Mertha, China's Water Warriors: Citizen Action and Policy Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008), pp. 105, 117. 62. Chinese National Committee on Large Dams, 2008 nian zhongguo yu shijie daba jianshe qingkuang [2008 Report on the Construction of Large Dams in China and the World], available at: www.chincold.org.cn/news/lin200911254534542.pdf (accessed 15 February 2010). 63. Mertha, China's Water Warriors, pp. xv, 152. 64. Kenneth Jowitt, ‘Soviet neo-traditionalism: the political corruption of a Leninist regime’, Soviet Studies 35(2), (1983), pp. 275–297. 65. Shaohua Hu, ‘Confucianism and contemporary Chinese politics’, Politics & Policy 35(1), (2007), pp. 136–153. 66. Joel S. Migdal, State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 49, 22. 67. Mark Frazier, ‘China's domestic policy fragmentation and grand strategy in global politics’, Asia Policy 10, (2010), pp. 87–101 at pp. 89, 97. 68. Linda Jakobson, Dean Knox and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, New Foreign Policy Actors in China (Solna, Sweden: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2010); Hongyi Lai, The Domestic Sources of China's Foreign Policy: Regimes, Leadership, Priorities and Process (New York: Routledge, 2010). 69. Margaret Pearson, ‘China in Geneva: lessons from China's early years in the World Trade Organization’, in Alastair I. Johnston and Robert S. Ross, eds, New Directions in the Study of China's Foreign Policy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 242–275. 70. Joseph Fewsmith and Stanley Rosen, ‘The domestic context of Chinese foreign policy: does “public opinion” matter?’, in David Lampton, ed., The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978–2000 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001). 71. Nicolas Becquelin, Enforcing the Rural–Urban Divide: Use of Custody and Repatriation Detention Triples in 10 Years (New York: Human Rights in China, 2003). 72. Perry, ‘Trends in the study of Chinese politics’, p. 713. 73. Minxin Pei, China's Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006); Susan L. Shirk, China: Fragile Superpower (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007); Xiaoqin Guo, State and Society in China's Democratic Transition: Confucianism, Leninism, and Economic Development (New York: Routledge, 2003). 74. Cheng Chen, The Prospects for Liberal Nationalism in Post-Leninist States (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007). 75. Dickson, Wealth into Power, pp. 253, 251. 76. Pierre F. Landry, Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party's Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008). 77. Lynn White, ‘Chinese political studies: overview of the state of the field’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 14(2), (2009), pp. 229–251, at p. 238. 78. Timothy Cheek, A Critical Introduction to Mao (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010); Gregor Benton, Mao Zedong and the Chinese Revolution (London and New York: Routledge, 2008). 79. Dickson, Wealth into Power, p. 81. 80. James C. Mulvenon, Soldiers of Fortune: The Rise and Fall of the Chinese Military–Business Complex, 1978–1998 (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2001). 81. Yongnian Zheng, The Chinese Communist Party as Organizational Emperor: Culture, Reproduction and Transformation (London and New York: Routledge, 2010). 82. Minxin Pei, From Reform to Revolution: The Demise of Communism in China and the Soviet Union (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994); Victor Nee, David Stark and Mark Selden, Remaking the Economic Institutions of Socialism: China and Eastern Europe (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989); Andrew G. Walder, The Waning of the Communist State: Economic Origins of Political Decline in China and Hungary (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995). 83. Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet, ‘Authorities and the people: an analysis of state–society relations in Vietnam’, in Hy V. Luong, ed., Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a Transforming Society (Singapore and Lanham, MD: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, 2003), pp. 27–53, at p. 23. 84. Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet, ‘Authorities and the people: an analysis of state–society relations in Vietnam’, in Hy V. Luong, ed., Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a Transforming Society (Singapore and Lanham, MD: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, 2003), p. 49. 85. Anita Chan and Hong-zen Wang, ‘The impact of the state on workers’ conditions—comparing Taiwanese factories in China and Vietnam', Pacific Affairs 77(4), (2004), pp. 629–646; Thomas Heberer, Private Entrepreneurs in China and Vietnam: Social and Political Functioning of Strategic Groups (Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2003); Edmund Malesky, Regina M. Abrami and Yu Zheng, ‘Institutions and inequality in single party regimes: a comparative analysis of Vietnam and China’, Comparative Politics (forthcoming); John Gillespie and Pip Nicholson, Asian Socialism & Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform (Canberra, ACT: Australian National University E Press, Asia Pacific Press, 2005). 86. Wong, China Transformed, pp. 210, 199, 201. 87. Walder, The Waning of the Communist State. 88. Wong, China Transformed, p. 201. 89. Chalmers Johnson, ‘What's wrong with Chinese political studies?’, Asian Survey 22(10), (1982), pp. 919–933, at p. 931. 90. Ziyang Zhao, Pu Bao, Renee Chiang, Adi Ignatius and Roderick MacFarquhar, Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Zhao Ziyang (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009), p. 255.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX