A proposal and case study towards a conceptual approach of validating sperm competition in common carp ( Cyprinus carpio L.), with practical implications for hatchery procedures
2008; Wiley; Volume: 24; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01148.x
ISSN1439-0426
AutoresVojtěch Kašpar, Marc Vandeputte, Klaus Kohlmann, Martin Hulák, Marek Rodina, David Gela, Martin Kocour, Otomar Linhart,
Tópico(s)Fish Ecology and Management Studies
ResumoJournal of Applied IchthyologyVolume 24, Issue 4 p. 406-409 A proposal and case study towards a conceptual approach of validating sperm competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), with practical implications for hatchery procedures V. Kaspar, V. Kaspar Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Vandeputte, M. Vandeputte IFREMER, Chemin de Maguelone, Palavas INRA UR544 Unité de Génétique des Poissons, Jouy en Josas, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorK. Kohlmann, K. Kohlmann Department of Inland Fisheries, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Mügelseedamm, Berlin, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorM. Hulak, M. Hulak Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Rodina, M. Rodina Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorD. Gela, D. Gela Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Kocour, M. Kocour Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorO. Linhart, O. Linhart Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this author V. Kaspar, V. Kaspar Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Vandeputte, M. Vandeputte IFREMER, Chemin de Maguelone, Palavas INRA UR544 Unité de Génétique des Poissons, Jouy en Josas, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorK. Kohlmann, K. Kohlmann Department of Inland Fisheries, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Mügelseedamm, Berlin, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorM. Hulak, M. Hulak Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Rodina, M. Rodina Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorD. Gela, D. Gela Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorM. Kocour, M. Kocour Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this authorO. Linhart, O. Linhart Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi, Vodnany, Czech RepublicSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 July 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01148.xCitations: 14 Author’s address: V. Kaspar, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Birkhead, T. R.; Møller, A. P., 1998: Sperm competition, sexual selection and different routes to fitness. In: Sperm competition and sexual selection. T. R. Birkhead, A. P. Møller (Eds). Academic Press, London, pp. 757– 781. ISBN 0-12-100543-7. Birkhead, T. R.; Pizzari, T., 2002: Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 262– 273. Burness, G.; Casselman, S. J.; Schulte-Hostedde, A. I.; Moyes, C. D.; Montgomerie, R., 2004: Sperm swimming speed and energetic vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 65– 70. Busack, C.; Knudsen, C. M., 2007: Using factorial mating designs to increase the effective number of breeders in fish hatcheries. Aquaculture 273, 24– 32. Colbourne, J. K.; Neff, B. D.; Wright, J. M.; Gross, M. R., 1996: DNA fingerprinting of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) using (GT)n microsatellites and its potential for assessment of mating success. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 342– 349. Dupont-Nivet, M.; Vandeputte, M.; Haffray, P.; Chevassus, B., 2006: Effect of different mating designs on inbreeding, genetic variance and response to selection when applying individual selection in fish breeding programs. Aquaculture 252, 161– 170. Eknath, A. E.; Tayamen, M. M.; Palada-de-Vera, M. S.; Danting, J. C.; Reyes, R. A.; Dionisio, E. E.; Capili, J. B.; Bolivar, H. L.; Abella, T. A.; Circa, A. V.; Bentsen, H. B.; Gjerde, B.; Gjedrem, T.; Pullin, R. S. V., 1993: Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environments. Aquaculture 111, 171– 188. Evans, J. P.; Magurran, A. E., 1999: Male mating behavior and sperm production characteristics under varying sperm competition risk in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58, 1001– 1006. Foote, C. J.; Brown, G. S.; Wood, C. C., 1997: Spawning success of males using alternative mating tactics in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1785– 1795. Fuller, R. C., 1998: Sperm competition affects male behaviour and sperm output in the rainbow darter. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265, 2365– 2371. Gage, M. J. G.; MacFarlane, C. P.; Yeates, S., 2004: Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr. Biol. 14, 44– 47. Gharrett, A. J.; Shirley, S. M., 1985: A genetic examination of spawning methodology in a salmon hatchery. Aquaculture 47, 245– 256. Gross, M. R., 1985: Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313, 47– 48. Kaspar, V.; Kohlmann, K.; Vandeputte, M.; Rodina, M.; Gela, D.; Kocour, M.; Alavi, S. M. H.; Hulak, M.; Linhart, O., 2007: Equalization of sperm concentrations in a pool of sperm does not prevent large variance in males contribution in common carp progeny. Aquaculture 272(S1), S204– S209. Kaspar, V.; Hulak, M.; Kohlmann, K.; Vandeputte, M.; Rodina, M.; Gela, D.; Hulak, M.; Linhart, O. In vitro study on sperm competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), Submitted. Kimura, M.; Crow, J. F., 1963: The measurement of effective population numbers. Evolution 17, 279– 288. Kocour, M.; Mauger, S.; Rodina, M.; Gela, D.; Linhart, O.; Flajšhans, M.; Vandeputte, M., 2007: Heritability estimates for processing traits in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) using a molecular pedigree. Aquaculture 270, 43– 50. Leach, B.; Montgomerie, R., 2000: Sperm characteristic associated with different male reproductive tactics in bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 31– 37. Linhart, O.; Rodina, M.; Gela, D.; Kocour, M.; Vandeputte, M., 2005: Spermatozoal competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio): what is the primary determinant of competition success? Reproduction 130, 1– 8. McKay, L. R.; McMillan, I., 1991: Effect of sperm pooling on inbreeding levels, Bull. Aquac. Assoc. Can 3, 16– 18. Mjolnerod, I. B.; Fleming, I. A.; Refseth, U. H.; Hindar, K., 1998: Mate and sperm competition during multiple-male spawnings of Atlantic salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 2292– 2298. Parker, G. A., 1970: Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45, 525– 567. Parker, G. A., 1998: Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm competition and sexual selection. T. R. Birkhead, A. P. Moller (Eds). Academic Press, London, pp. 3– 54. Parker, G. A.; Ball, M. A.; Stockley, P.; Gage, M. J. G., 1996: Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263, 1291– 1297. Reichard, M.; Jurajda, P.; Smith, C., 2004: Male-male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 34– 41. Springbett, A. J.; MacKenzie, K.; Woolliams, J. A.; Bishop, S. C., 2003: The contribution of genetic diversity to the spread of infectious diseases in livestock populations. Genetics 165, 1465– 1474. Stockley, P.; Gage, M.; Parker, G.; Møller, A. P., 1997: Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testes size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149, 933– 954. Stoltz, J. A.; Neff, B. D.; Olden, J. D., 2005: Allometric growth and sperm competition in fishes. J. Fish Biol. 67, 470– 480. Taborsky, M., 1994: Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv. Study Behav. 23, 1– 100. Taborsky, M., 1997: Bourgeous and parasitic tactics: do we need collective, functional terms for alternative reproductive behaviours? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 361– 362. Taborsky, M., 1998: Sperm competition in fish: ‘bourgeois’males and parasitic spawning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 222– 227. Vandeputte, M.; Kocour, M.; Mauger, S.; Dupont-Nivet, M.; De Guerry, D.; Rodina, M.; Gela, D.; Vallod, D.; Chevassus, B.; Linhart, O., 2004: Heritability estimates for growth-related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture 235, 223– 236. Vladic, T. V.; Jarvi, T., 2001: Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268, 2375– 2381. Wedekind, C.; Rudolfsen, G.; Jacob, A.; Urbach, D.; Muller, R., 2007: The genetic consequences of hatchery-induced sperm competition in a salmonid. Biol. Conserv. 137, 180– 188. Withler, R. E., 1988: Genetic consequences of fertilizing chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs with pooled milt. Aquaculture 68, 15– 25. Withler, R. E.; Beacham, T. D., 1994: Genetic consequences of the simultaneous or sequential addition of semen from multiple males during hatchery spawning of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 126, 11– 23. Yeates, S.; Searle, J.; Ward, R. G.; Gage, M. J. G., 2007: A two-second delay confers first-male fertilization precedence within in vitro sperm competition experiments in Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 70, 318– 322. Citing Literature Volume24, Issue4August 2008Pages 406-409 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)