In Search of the Proteins That Cause Myocardial Stunning
1999; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 85; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/01.res.85.5.470
ISSN1524-4571
AutoresD. Brian Foster, Jennifer E. Van Eyk,
Tópico(s)Signaling Pathways in Disease
ResumoHomeCirculation ResearchVol. 85, No. 5In Search of the Proteins That Cause Myocardial Stunning Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyRedditDiggEmail Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBIn Search of the Proteins That Cause Myocardial Stunning D. B. Foster and J. E. Van Eyk D. B. FosterD. B. Foster From the Departments of Physiology (J.E.V.E.) and Biochemistry (D.B.F., J.E.V.E.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. and J. E. Van EykJ. E. Van Eyk From the Departments of Physiology (J.E.V.E.) and Biochemistry (D.B.F., J.E.V.E.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Originally published3 Sep 1999https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.85.5.470Circulation Research. 1999;85:470–472Cardiac diseases are characterized by a host of changes to the cellular processes that affect contractility of the heart. One emerging experimental approach to the study of cardiac disease, including the ischemia/reperfusion injury known as stunning, is to identify proteins that have been specifically altered or modified in the diseased state. Minimally, the identification of modified proteins will provide new diagnostic markers of myocyte injury. However, for a subset of proteins, disease-induced modification will substantively affect molecular function and contribute directly to cardiac dysfunction. Identification of these causative proteins will ultimately prove beneficial to the design of new pharmacological, genetic, or peptidomimetic therapies.The complement and status of proteins within a myocyte (its protein profile) may be altered, through gene-mediated processes, which include isoform switching and the capacity to vary levels of protein expression, or through posttranslational modification, which includes phosphorylation and proteolysis among other processes. Protein function can also be perturbed under conditions of altered cellular homeostasis, which range from oxidative stress to cellular acidosis. In chronic disease, such as heart failure, the complexity of ongoing adaptive changes to cardiac function is mirrored at the molecular level. As a result, many, possibly hundreds of, proteins are subject to altered expression and/or posttranslational modification. In the acute phase of disease, however, dysfunction often precedes gene-mediated adaptive response, which suggests that the mechanism that underlies acute cardiac injury is attributable to a select few posttranslational events. This could well be the case for myocardial stunning, the subject of the article by Thomas et al1 in this issue of Circulation Research.Stunning and Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Continuum of ChangeStunning is a clinical syndrome, a phenomenon in which patients experience reversible contractile dysfunction of the heart following a transient episode of ischemia and subsequent reestablishment of blood flow. It is considered an acute injury, although its severity varies with the length of the ischemic episode. As such, instances of stunning may appear morphologically and functionally similar, yet need not arise necessarily from the same molecular mechanisms. In fact, it is unclear precisely which molecular events are responsible for the onset of stunning and which signaling events, if different, serve to exacerbate the dysfunction. Ischemia/reperfusion injury may result from at least two sets of protein modification pathways. The first is due to the ischemic insult, which Bolli and Marbán 2 suggest acts as a "primer" for the subsequent changes caused by the second insult, the onset of reperfusion. It is noteworthy that ischemia/reperfusion injury does not cause a general breakdown of cellular processes. Rather, it is characterized by the modification of specific myofilament proteins in a number of animal models. Such modifications include the proteolysis and cross-linking of troponin I (TnI)345 and troponin T (TnT),56 alteration of α-actinin,47 as well as proteolysis of myosin light chain-1 (MLC1),4 desmin,7 and spectrin.7 Furthermore, other cytoplasmic proteins, such as α/b-crystallin,89 OSC protein4 (both of which migrate between MLC1 and MLC2), and GAPDH,8 can become associated with the myofilament during ischemia. However, of these protein modifications, far fewer occur within the reversible stage of ischemia/reperfusion injury known as stunning.Cross-linking of TnI to the other members of the troponin complex and proteolysis of TnI are the first documented changes in the isolated rat heart model of stunning. Given that TnI is key to the control of muscle contraction and relaxation (for reviews, see References 10 and 111011 ), it has been proposed that its modification may be responsible for stunning. The current hypothesis (see reviews in References 2 and 12212 ) holds that TnI is selectively modified through the action of a protease and a cross-linking enzyme that are activated by the increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ during the early stages of reperfusion. Calpain and transglutaminase are candidates for the role of proteolysis and cross-linking, respectively. Interestingly, work by Thomas et al1 argues that there is no significant increase in TnI modification, as assessed by immunoblot, in two different in vivo swine models of stunning.1Although ischemia is requisite for stunning, the role of reperfusion is likely to prove equally important to our understanding of altered cardiac contractility. There is evidence that the protein profile of the myocardium continues to change for considerable time after initial reperfusion. For example, Canty's group shows that the level of hsp70 mRNA is upregulated over 60 minutes of reperfusion, although levels of TnI mRNA remain unchanged over the same period.1 These results imply an intriguing role for HSP-70 in the later stages of stunning but do not preclude the involvement of TnI, particularly in the early phase of stunning, which is characterized by posttranslational events. For example, TnI is phosphorylated in both canine and rabbit models after as little as 15 minutes of ischemia.1314 Subsequent reperfusion further increases phosphorylation in the in vivo canine model.15 In another study, increased TnI phosphorylation persists for several days after coronary artery occlusion.16 The length of the ischemic and reperfusion periods is particularly important, since it has yet to be established whether there is any overlap between events triggered by ischemia and those due to reperfusion. For instance, TnI undergoes similar extents of proteolysis whether rat hearts have been subjected to 60-minute ischemia alone or 15-minute ischemia followed by 45-minute reperfusion.4 Detailed time-course studies of both ischemia and reperfusion are therefore key to our understanding, given the dynamic nature of the protein modifications.Whereas the stunned myocardium, by definition, is devoid of necrosis or apoptosis, recent studies indicate that the processes that lead to apoptosis,1718 and presumably necrosis, may be already underway. The viability of a myocyte may therefore result from a battle between competing life and death signals. The protein profile of a cell would then reflect whether the cell would commit, on further injury, to an apoptotic or necrotic pathway. Clearly, it will be important to determine which circumstances lead to each cell fate. A detailed model of stunning therefore must address the issue of the temporal and spatial sequence of conflicting signals within the myocardium. Differences between experimental stunning protocols, animal models, and analytical techniques further complicate efforts to obtain such a model.Experimental Strategies for the Identification of Modified ProteinsIt is becoming clear that stunning can have many faces, in no small part owing to differences between animal models. One of the points at issue is whether proteolysis of TnI is a hallmark of stunning. Work by Canty's group shows that TnI is degraded in two porcine models of stunning under control conditions, but that there is little or no change in the quantity of TnI degradation during ischemia/reperfusion.1 However, other work with swine has demonstrated that troponin isolated from stunned hearts can confer altered function when reconstituted with skeletal muscle, clearly implying that at least one of the troponin subunits has been modified.19 In other species, TnI is modified specifically. In an in vivo canine model of stunning, there is little proteolysis of TnI under control conditions, although TnI forms a high molecular weight covalent complex following ischemia.20 Studies using a rat Langendorff reperfusion model show that after 15-minute ischemia and 45-minute reperfusion, TnI was degraded to TnI1–193, and that the cleavage product represented 24% of total TnI. Covalent complex formation accounted for an additional 17% of total TnI.5The simplest interpretation of these differences is that the animal models differ with respect to levels and/or activity of protease and transglutaminase. The data also suggest that different mechanisms of stunning may be at play in each animal model. To discriminate among these possibilities, it is imperative that we evaluate the technical aspects of these studies critically. At issue, in addition to the identity of the modified protein(s), is exactly how much protein must be modified to affect cardiac function? Studies of other cardiac diseases may provide clues. Tardiff et al21 showed that expression of mutant TnT, to levels 9) and its degradation products, because proteolytic fragments of TnI have different isoelectric points and therefore transfer with varying efficiency. Furthermore, linearity of signal from secondary antibody, length of exposure, and method of quantification all have an impact on the interpretation of data. SDS-PAGE followed by either Coomassie Blue or silver staining has also been used to quantify myofilament changes, although the practice is perilous. Many proteins and their fragments comigrate on a gel, making unambiguous identification and quantification of a particular protein difficult. One study, for example, has shown that the proteolytic product TnI1–193 comigrates with MLC1.4An alternative approach to the issue of protein modification is to use a broad-scope screening method to observe as many proteins as possible. In this approach, currently termed "proteomics," 2-dimensional electrophoresis is used to resolve proteins (and their modified products), which can then be characterized by mass spectrometry.222324 The identity of promising candidate proteins can then be confirmed by sequence analysis, and the nature of the protein change must then be determined. One of the advantages of this approach is that it is generally free of bias, although certain proteins do confound 2-dimensional electrophoresis (due to issues of solubility, high pI, and cellular abundance). Furthermore, just as the field of genomics has driven the development of new techniques in molecular biology, the study of the proteome will spur advances in protein separation and characterization technologies. Finally, the proteomic approach will prove powerful for the documentation of the subtle and complex changes that occur along the continuum of cardiac injury.Proteomic and traditional immunoblotting approaches will continue to yield more information about the nature and degree of posttranslational modifications that comprise cardiac stunning. In time, the combination of experimental strategies will resolve how many mechanisms of stunning are at play and whether they diverge between species. To identify the proteins that cause stunning, research will undoubtedly begin to focus on the functional consequences of protein modifications at both the physiological and biochemical levels. Studies of transgenic mice should help resolve the issue of which specific protein modifications cause contractile dysfunction. These studies will also address the extent of modification required to cause this phenotype. How closely will the phenotypes of the transgenic mice match that of clinical stunning? Interestingly, studies of novel transgenic mice expressing low levels of TnI1–193 display systolic and diastolic dysfunction in addition to reduced maximum Ca2+-activated force, recapitulating stunning in the clinical setting.25 Biochemical analysis will continue to delineate the precise protein-protein interactions or functions that lead directly to contractile dysfunction. Finally, the ultimate test will be to determine which protein modifications occur in humans and to assess whether the modifications correlate with the development of ischemic heart disease.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.FootnotesCorrespondence to Dr J.E. Van Eyk, Departments of Physiology and Biochemistry, Room 429 Botterell Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Thomas SA, Fallavollita JA, Lee T-C, Feng J, Canty JM Jr. Absence of troponin I degradation or altered sarcoplasmic reticulum uptake protein expression after reversible ischemia in swine. Circ Res.1999; 85:446–456.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Bolli R, Marbán E. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial stunning. Physiol Rev.1999; 79:609–634.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Gao WD, Atar D, Liu Y, Perez NG, Murphy AM, Marbán E. Role of troponin I proteolysis in the pathogenesis of stunned myocardium. Circ Res.1997; 80:393–399.LinkGoogle Scholar4 Van Eyk JE, Powers F, Law W, Larue C, Hodges RS, Solaro RJ. Breakdown and release of myofilament proteins during ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion in rat hearts: identification of degradation products and effects on the pCa-force relation. Circ Res.1998; 82:261–271.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 McDonough JL, Arrell DK, Van Eyk JE. Troponin I degradation and covalent complex formation accompanies myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circ Res.1999; 84:9–20.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Gorza L, Menabo R, Vitadello M, Bergamini CM, Di Lisa F. Cardiomyocyte troponin T immunoreactivity is modified by cross-linking resulting from intracellular calcium overload. Circulation.1996; 93:1896–1904.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Matsumura Y, Saeki E, Inoue M, Hori M, Kamada T, Kusuoka H. Inhomogeneous disappearance of myofilament-related cytoskeletal proteins in stunned myocardium of guinea pig. Circ Res.1996; 79:447–454.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Barbato R, Menabo R, Dainese P, Carafoli E, Schiaffino S, Di Lisa F. Binding of cytosolic proteins to myofibrils in ischemic rat hearts. Circ Res.1996; 78:821–828.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Golenhofen N, Htun P, Ness W, Koob R, Schaper W, Drenckhahn D. Binding of the stress protein α B-crystallin to cardiac myofibrils correlates with the degree of myocardial damage during ischemia/reperfusion in vivo. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1999; 31:569–580.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Solaro RJ, Van Eyk JE. Altered interactions among thin filament proteins modulate cardiac function. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1996; 28:217–230.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Solaro RJ, Rarick HM. Troponin and tropomyosin: proteins that switch on and tune in the activity of cardiac myofilaments. Circ Res.1998; 83:471–480.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Lamers JMJ. Preconditioning and limitation of stunning: one step closer to the protected protein(s). Cardiovasc Res.1999; 42:571–575.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Matejovicova M, Kaplan P, Mubagwa K, Raeymaekers L, Pongo E, Flameng W. Phosphorylation by protein kinases A and C of myofibrillar proteins in rabbit stunned and non-stunned myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1997; 29:3189–3202.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Andres J, Moczarska A, Stepkowski D, Kaakol I. Contractile proteins in globally "stunned" rabbit myocardium. Basic Res Cardiol.1991; 86:219–226.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Colantonio DA, Van Eyk JE, Przyklenk K. Progressive phosphorylation of intact troponin I in stunned peri-infarct canine myocardium. Circulation. Abstract. In press.Google Scholar16 Li P, Hoffmana PA, Li B, Malhotra A, Cheng W, Sonnenblick EH, Meggs LG, Anversa P. Myocardial infarction alters myofilament calcium sensitivity and mechanical behavior of myocytes. Am J Physiol.1997; 272:H360–H370.MedlineGoogle Scholar17 Gottlieb RA, Engler RL. Apoptosis in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. Ann N Y Acad Sci.1999; 874:412–426.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Schaper J, Lorenz-Meyer S, Suzuki K. The role of apoptosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. Herz.1999; 24:219–224.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 McDonald KS, Moss RL, Miller WP. Incorporation of the troponin regulatory complex of post-ischemic stunned porcine myocardium reduces myofilament calcium sensitivity in rabbit psoas skeletal muscle fibers. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1998; 30:285–296.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Van Eyk JE, Colantonio DA, Przyklenk K. Preconditioning does not protect against myofilament protein damage. Circulation. 1998(suppl I);98:I-487. Abstract 2561.Google Scholar21 Tardiff JC, Factor SM, Tompkins BD, Hewett TE, Palmer BM, Moore RL, Schwartz S, Robbins J, Leinwand LA. A truncated cardiac troponin T molecule in transgenic mice suggests multiple cellular mechanisms for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest.1998; 101:2800–2811.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Heinke MY, Wheeler CH, Chang D, Einstein R, Drake-Holland A, Dunn MJ, dos Remedios CG. Protein changes observed in pacing-induced heart failure using two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis.1998; 19:2021–2030.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Corbett JM, Why HF, Wheeler CH, Richardson PJ, Archard LC, Yocoub MH, Dunn MJ. Cardiac protein abnormalities in dilated cardiomyopathy detected by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis.1998; 19:2031–2042.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Arnott D, O'Connell KL, King KL, Stult JT. An integrated approach to proteome analysis: identification of proteins associated with cardiac hypertrophy. Anal Biochem.1998; 258:1–18.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25 Murphy AM, Georgakopoulos D, Kogler H, Kass DA, Van Eyk JE, Marbán E. Transgenic expression of a truncated mutant of cardiac troponin I recapitulates myocardial stunning. Circulation. Abstract. In press.Google Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails September 3, 1999Vol 85, Issue 5Article InformationMetrics Download: 74 © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.85.5.470 Originally publishedSeptember 3, 1999 Keywordsdegradationischemia/reperfusionstunningtroponin Iprotein modificationPDF download
Referência(s)