Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Moderate versus Mediocre: The Reliability of Spine MR Data Interpretations

2008; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 250; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1148/radiol.2493081458

1527-1315

Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. Deyo,

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

HomeRadiologyVol. 250, No. 1 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialsModerate versus Mediocre: The Reliability of Spine MR Data InterpretationsJeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. DeyoJeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. DeyoAuthor Affiliations1From the Departments of Radiology, Neurological Surgery, and Health Services, and the Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 (J.G.J.); and Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (R.A.D.). Received August 15, 2008; final version accepted August 28.Address correspondence to J.G.J. (e-mail: [email protected]).Jeffrey G. JarvikRichard A. DeyoPublished Online:Jan 1 2009https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2493081458MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References1 Carrino JA, Lurie JD, Tosteson ANA, et al. Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology 249;3:161–170. Google Scholar2 Fardon DF, Milette PC; and Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 2001;26:E93–E113. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Mulconrey DS, Knight RQ, Bramble JD, Paknikar S, Harty PA. Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of diagnostic lumbar MRI and nuclear imaging. Spine J 2006;6:177–184. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Jones A, Clarke A, Freeman BJ, Lam KS, Grevitt MP. The Modic classification: inter- and intraobserver error in clinical practice. Spine 2005;30:1867–1869. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Peterson CK, Gatterman B, Carter JC, Humphreys BK, Weibel A. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in identifying and classifying degenerative marrow (Modic) changes on lumbar spine magnetic resonance scans. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:85–90. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Smith BM, Hurwitz EL, Solsberg D, et al. Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain and anular disruption. Spine 1998;23:2074–2080. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine. IV. The development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:843–848. Google Scholar9 McCombe PF, Fairbank JC, Cockersole BC, Pynsent PB. 1989 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 1989;14:908–918. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Poiraudeau S, Foltz V, Drape JL, et al. Value of the bell test and the hyperextension test for diagnosis in sciatica associated with disc herniation: comparison with Lasègue's sign and the crossed Lasègue's sign. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:460–466. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Fedorak C, Ashworth N, Marshall J, Paull H. Reliability of the visual assessment of cervical and lumbar lordosis: how good are we? Spine 2003;28:1857–1859. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience). Breast 2006;15:44–51. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Snoey ER, Housset B, Guyon P, ElHaddad S, Valty J, Hericord P. Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. J Accid Emerg Med 1994;11:149–153. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Holm I, Friis A, Storheim K, Brox JI. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study. Spine 2003;28:828–833. Medline, Google Scholar15 Medicare Part B Imaging Services. Rapid spending growth and shift to physician offices indicate need for CMS to consider additional management practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008. Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: 2009 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByShort tau inversion recovery MRI of Modic changes: a reliability studyPer MartinKristoffersen, NilsVetti, KjerstiStorheim, Lars ChristianBråten, Mads PederRolfsen, JörgAssmus, AnsgarEspeland2020 | Acta Radiologica Open, Vol. 9, No. 1Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three ratersKlausDoktor, Tue SecherJensen, Henrik WulffChristensen, UlrichFredberg, MortenKindt, EleanorBoyle, JanHartvigsen2020 | Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, Vol. 28, No. 1DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY METHODS OF DEGENERATIVE CHANGES IN LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS IN YOUNG PEOPLEIlhar Halyb ohlyMammadov2020 | International Medical Journal, No. 3Metastatic Versus Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on MRI: A Blinded, Multicenter, and Multispecialty Observer Agreement EvaluationEstanislaoArana, Francisco M.Kovacs, AnaRoyuela, BeatrizAsenjo, FatimaNagib, SandraPérez-Aguilera, MaríaDejoz, AlbertoCabrera-Zubizarreta, YolandaGarcía-Hidalgo, AnaEstremera, __2020 | Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Vol. 18, No. 3Interobserver and intraobserver variability in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients with suspected disc herniationSomayehHajiahmadi, AzinShayganfar, MahsaAskari, ShadiEbrahimian2020 | Heliyon, Vol. 6, No. 11Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI?LindaBerg, HanneThoresen, GescheNeckelmann, HåvardFurunes, ChristianHellum, AnsgarEspeland2019 | European Radiology, Vol. 29, No. 9Adjacent Disc Degeneration After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement or Nonoperative TreatmentHåvardFurunes, ChristianHellum, AnsgarEspeland, Jens IvarBrox, Milada CvancarovaSmåstuen, LindaBerg, KjerstiStorheim2018Dec15 | Spine, Vol. 43, No. 24Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided DiagnosisSamuel G.Armato, Nicholas A.Petrick, Rachael N.Affenit, Erik R.Barns, Jacob D.Furst, AlexanderRasin, Daniela S.Raicu2017 | , Vol. 10134Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?Woo YoungKang, Joong MoAhn, Joon WooLee, EugeneLee, Yun JungBae, JiwoonSeo, JunghoonKim, Heung SikKang2017 | Acta Radiologica, Vol. 58, No. 2Diagnostic Accuracy of Lumbosacral Spine Magnetic Resonance Image Reading by Chiropractors, Chiropractic Radiologists, and Medical RadiologistsAnnemariede Zoete, RaymondOstelo, Dirk L.Knol, Paul R.Algra, Jan T.Wilmink, Maurits W.van Tulder2015 | Spine, Vol. 40, No. 11MRI Characterization of Vascular Spinal TumorsKenneth S.Bode, Kristen E.Radcliff, Alexander R.Vaccaro2015 | Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Vol. 28, No. 10Disc cell therapies: critical issuesMartaTibiletti, NevenkaKregar Velikonja, Jill P. G.Urban, Jeremy C. T.Fairbank2014 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 23, No. S3Reliability of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings and their correlation with clinical outcome in patients with sciaticaAbdelilahel Barzouhi, Carmen L.A.M.Vleggeert-Lankamp, Geert J.Lycklama à Nijeholt, Bas F.Van der Kallen, Wilbert B.van den Hout, Bart W.Koes, Wilco C.Peul2014 | The Spine Journal, Vol. 14, No. 11Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesisLindaBerg, ChristianHellum, ØivindGjertsen, GescheNeckelmann, Lars GunnarJohnsen, KjerstiStorheim, Jens IvarBrox, Geir EgilEide, AnsgarEspeland2013 | Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 42, No. 11Are two readers more reliable than one? A study of upper neck ligament scoring on magnetic resonance imagesAnsgarEspeland, NilsVetti, JosteinKråkenes2013 | BMC Medical Imaging, Vol. 13, No. 1Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation in Patients with Sciatica Who Are Potential Candidates for Lumbar Disc SurgeryAbdelilahel Barzouhi, Carmen L. A. M.Vleggeert-Lankamp, Geert J.Lycklama à Nijeholt, Bas F.Van der Kallen, Wilbert B.van den Hout, Annemieke J. H.Verwoerd, Bart W.Koes, Wilco C.Peul, FriedemannPaul2013 | PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 7Agreeing (or Not) on How to Describe Spinal Stenosis: Expanding a Narrow MindsetJanna L. Friedly, , and Jeffrey G. Jarvik, 1 July 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 264, No. 1Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesisLindaBerg, GescheNeckelmann, ØivindGjertsen, ChristianHellum, Lars G.Johnsen, Geir E.Eide, AnsgarEspeland2012 | Neuroradiology, Vol. 54, No. 7Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis—comparing two different image evaluation methodsLindaBerg, ØivindGjertsen, ChristianHellum, GescheNeckelmann, Lars G.Johnsen, Geir E.Eide, AnsgarEspeland2012 | Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 41, No. 12Consensus Versus Disagreement in Imaging Research: a Case Study Using the LIDC DatabaseDmitriyZinovev, YujieDuo, Daniela S.Raicu, JacobFurst, Samuel G.Armato2012 | Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 25, No. 3Nomenclatura estandarizada de la patología discalM.Sánchez Pérez, A.Gil Sierra, A.Sánchez Martín, P.Gallego Gómez, D.Pereira Boo2012 | Radiología, Vol. 54, No. 6Standardized terminology for disc diseaseM.Sánchez Pérez, A.Gil Sierra, A.Sánchez Martín, P.Gallego Gómez, D.Pereira Boo2012 | Radiología (English Edition), Vol. 54, No. 6Overenthusiastic Interpretations of a Nonetheless Promising StudyFrancisco M.Kovacs, VíctorAbraira, JuanGérvas, EstanislaoArana, Wilco C.Peul, Mark L.Schoene, Terry P.Corbin2012 | Transplantation, Vol. 93, No. 3Vertebral Endplate Changes Are Not Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain among Southern European Subjects: A Case Control StudyF.M.Kovacs, E.Arana, A.Royuela, A.Estremera, G.Amengual, B.Asenjo, H.Sarasíbar, I.Galarraga, A.Alonso, C.Casillas, A.Muriel, C.Martínez, V.Abraira2012 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 33, No. 8Uncertainties in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal StenosisGustav Andreisek, , Juerg Hodler, , and Johann Steurer, 1 December 2011 | Radiology, Vol. 261, No. 3Modic changes and associated features in Southern European chronic low back pain patientsEstanislaoArana, Francisco M.Kovacs, AnaRoyuela, AnaEstremera, BeatrizAsenjo, HelenaSarasíbar, GuillermoAmengual, IsabelGalarraga, AnaAlonso, CarlosCasillas, AlfonsoMuriel, JuliaMontoya, CristinaOrdóñez, CarmenMartínez, JavierZamora, CarlosCampillo, VíctorAbraira2011 | The Spine Journal, Vol. 11, No. 5Surgeons Agree to Disagree on Surgical Options for Degenerative Conditions of the Cervical and Lumbar SpineJoon YLee, Justin BHohl, Catherine JFedorka, ClintDevin, Darrel SBrodke, Charles L JrBranch, Alexander R.Vaccaro2011 | Spine, Vol. 36, No. 3Influence of Nomenclature in the Interpretation of Lumbar Disk Contour on MR Imaging: A Comparison of the Agreement Using the Combined Task Force and the Nordic NomenclaturesE.Arana, F.M.Kovacs, A.Royuela, A.Estremera, H.Sarasíbar, G.Amengual, I.Galarraga, C.Martínez, A.Muriel, V.Abraira, J.Zamora, C.Campillo2011 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 32, No. 6Consensus Interpretation in Imaging Research: Is There a Better Way?1Alexander A. Bankier, , Deborah Levine, , Elkan F. Halpern, , and Herbert Y. Kressel, 1 October 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 257, No. 1Lumbar Spine: Agreement in the Interpretation of 1.5-T MR Images by Using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group Classification Form1Estanislao Arana, , Ana Royuela, , Francisco M. Kovacs, , Ana Estremera, , Helena Sarasíbar, , Guillermo Amengual, , Isabel Galarraga, , Carmen Martínez, , Alfonso Muriel, , Víctor Abraira, , María Teresa Gil del Real, , Javier Zamora, , and Carlos Campillo, 8 February 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 254, No. 3Babel 2.01Jeffrey S. Ross, 8 February 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 254, No. 3Recommended Articles Additional Findings in Differential Diagnosis of Facet Joint DisordersRadioGraphics2021Volume: 41Issue: 3pp. E94Multitask Deep Learning Tools Are Needed for Clinical Practice—Especially for Low Back PainRadiology2022Volume: 305Issue: 1pp. 167-168Changes in Primary Care Health Care Utilization after Inclusion of Epidemiologic Data in Lumbar Spine MR Imaging Reports for Uncomplicated Low Back PainRadiology2018Volume: 287Issue: 2pp. 563-569Improved Productivity Using Deep Learning–assisted Reporting for Lumbar Spine MRIRadiology2022Volume: 305Issue: 1pp. 160-166Differential Diagnosis of Facet Joint DisordersRadioGraphics2021Volume: 41Issue: 2pp. 543-558See More RSNA Education Exhibits Lumbar Spine Surgery Techniques And Postoperative Imaging: What The Radiologist Should KnowDigital Posters2020Use of MDP SPECT/CT to Characterize Low Back Pain and Predict Response to TherapyDigital Posters2020Evaluating The Perioperative Spine: Beyond Degenerative Disc Disease And Hardware ComplicationsDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Paget's disease of the spine RSNA Case Collection2020Lumbar Discal CystRSNA Case Collection2020Pyogenic spondylodiscitis RSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 250, No. 1 Supplemental MaterialMetrics Altmetric Score PDF download